Psychiatric disorders in C9orf72 kindreds
Study of 1,414 family members
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments
This article has a correction. Please see:

Abstract
Objective The aim of this study was to determine in a systematic manner if the C9orf72 phenotype might extend beyond frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) to include psychiatric disease.
Methods A validated semistructured family history interview was conducted in a large cohort of patients with FTD and ALS (n = 89), with and without the C9orf72 expansion (n = 29 and n = 60, respectively), encompassing 1,414 first- and second-degree relatives. Statistical analyses used both the hazard ratio (HR) and the relative risk ratio to determine the risk profiles within families.
Results A significant HR of 4.9 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.9–13.9, p = 0.003) confirmed a higher probability of developing schizophrenia for relatives of C9orf72 carriers compared with noncarriers. In addition, 8 relatives of C9orf72 carriers experienced an episode of late-onset psychosis unrelated to schizophrenia, in comparison to one noncarrier (HR = 17.9, 95% CI: 2.2–143.2, p = 0.007). The probability of suicide was also significantly higher for family members of C9orf72 carriers (HR = 2.7, 95% CI: 1.2–6.2, p = 0.02). An HR of 2.7 (95% CI: 1.1–6.9, p = 0.03) indicated a higher probability of autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in family members of C9orf72 carriers, and this risk extended to FTD. Furthermore, there was a positive association between psychosis in probands and mental health disorders, including ASD in their family members (p = 0.04).
Conclusion Overall, the results from this study suggest that a psychiatric phenotype exists within C9orf72 kindreds. Further studies should attempt to delineate the risk of psychiatric disorders in C9orf72 kindreds to aid in clinical decision making, particularly regarding genetic counseling, through collaborations between neurology and psychiatry.
Glossary
- ASD=
- autism spectrum disorder;
- ALS=
- amyotrophic lateral sclerosis;
- CI=
- confidence interval;
- FTD=
- frontotemporal dementia;
- HR=
- harard ratio;
- RR=
- risk ratio;
- MAPT=
- microtubule-associated protein tau;
- FIGS=
- Family Interview for Genetic Studies;
- NIMH=
- National Institute of Mental Health
Patients carrying the C9orf72 expansion frequently present with psychosis, raising the possibility of a link between frontotemporal dementia (FTD), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), and psychiatric disorders.1,–,3 Similarly, the clinical similarities between bvFTD and autism spectrum disorder (ASD) are striking, with both conditions resulting in alterations in social interaction, obsessive-compulsive traits, mental inflexibility, and stereotypy of speech.4
In further support of a link between psychiatric disease and the FTD-ALS spectrum, a previous report, undertaken before the C9orf72 discovery, found that schizophrenia and FTD may coexist within families.5 An Irish population-based study that included 17 C9orf72 ALS patients and their relatives identified an increased risk of schizophrenia and suicide within C9orf72-positive families compared with normal control families.6 Since then, ASD has been reported to occur frequently in family members of patients with ALS.7
With this in mind, this study will prospectively examine the spectrum of mental health disorders, including ASD, across FTD and ALS kindreds, and will directly compare C9orf72-positive with C9orf72-negative kindreds, using a standardized interview tool designed specifically for the exploration of psychiatric disorders in genetic cohorts. The aims of this study are as follows: (1) to determine whether psychiatric disorders occur more frequently in C9orf72-positive than C9orf72-negative kindreds, (2) to determine whether psychiatric disorders aggregate within these kindreds, (3) to consider whether the inclusion of psychiatric diagnosis is warranted when considering familial FTD and ALS and, finally, (4) to establish the rate of psychiatric disease within FTD vs ALS families.
Methods
Participants
Patients were assessed at the ForeFront FTD and ALS research clinics between September 2013 and September 2015. Patients were recruited sequentially and included in the study if they satisfied criteria for bvFTD according to the international consensus criteria for bvFTD8 or ALS according to the El Escorial criteria.9 Both carriers and noncarriers were recruited in the same manner. All patients including those with ALS underwent cognitive and behavioral assessments. Patients with FTD and concurrent ALS (FTD-ALS) were also included in the study.
Standard protocol approvals, registrations, and patient consents
Ethical approval for this study was obtained from the Ethics Committees of South Eastern Sydney and Illawarra Area Health Service and the University of New South Wales. Participants, or their person responsible, provided informed written consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.
Genetic assessment
DNA was extracted from whole blood collected for genetic screening after obtaining informed consent and using protocols approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of the South Eastern Sydney and Illawarra Area Health Service. Genetic screening protocols and results for a proportion of the cohort were previously published.10 Briefly, to identify C9orf72 repeat expansions, repeat primed PCR was performed based on the protocol of Renton et al.11 and other common genetic mutations including the progranulin (GRN) gene and the microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT) gene were assessed using Sanger sequencing. A patient's DNA sample was deemed C9orf72 expansion positive if it contained an allele with >30 repeats.
Family history assessment
A family history of psychiatric disorders was assessed by means of the Family Interview for Genetic Studies (FIGS), a semistructured family history interview guide developed by principal investigators in the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Schizophrenia and Bipolar Disorder Genetics Initiatives and NIMH extramural program staff and designed to systematically collect psychiatric diagnostic data about relatives from the pedigree being studied (nimhgenetics.org/interviews/figs). A family history of ASD was determined in the same way.
A family history of neurodegenerative disease was obtained, and the Goldman score was calculated.12 A score of 3.5 and 4 is indicative of sporadic disease, whereas scores of 3, 2, and 1 represent familial disease.
Family history interview
In the first instance, a family pedigree was drawn, which included all first- and second-degree relatives of the proband. Then, 13 general screening questions, designed to probe mood and perceptual disturbance, were asked. Each individual relative was then discussed, and psychiatric diagnoses were recorded, including depression, anxiety, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, psychosis, and suicide. A family history of ASD, FTD and ALS were also included. Diagnosis of each of the psychiatric disorders, including ASD, as well as a diagnosis of FTD and ALS, was included only if it was made by an appropriately trained clinician. When the diagnosis was unclear, but suspicion was raised based on the general screening questions, a symptom checklist was completed and the proband was encouraged to contact family members to confirm the diagnosis. Additional information was gathered including the current age or age at death, age at disease onset, and sex.
The interview was conducted by a clinician competent in the assessment of patients with FTD and ALS and trained in administration of the FIGS. The interviewer was blinded to the genetic status of patients. The family history interview was conducted with the patient together with a spouse, parent, or child. In cases in which the patient was deemed to have cognitive issues by means of neuropsychological testing, the primary interviewee was a close family member. In all instances, probands and their relatives were advised to discuss their family history with other family members before and after the initial interview. In instances where there was uncertainty regarding any member of the kindred, participants were asked to contact the relative being discussed or their next of kin if they had died or were incapacitated. In cases in which inadequate information was available or further information became available, a follow-up interview was conducted at the next clinic visit or via telephone or email if a visit was not possible. Only when complete data were available for all first-degree relatives was the pedigree included in the study. If complete information was also available for second-degree relatives, this was also included in the study.
Statistical analysis
Probands and their relatives were stratified according to the C9orf72 expansion status and diagnosis (FTD or ALS) to determine the relationship between psychiatric disease including ASD and neurodegeneration in genetic FTD and ALS.
Data were analyzed using SPSS 22.0 statistical package. Kolmogorov-Smirnov tests were performed to determine whether variables were normally distributed. Parametric variables were compared across groups via independent t tests and analysis of variance. Nonparametric data were analyzed using Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests, and χ2 tests were used to compare categorical data.
The risk of psychiatric or neurodegenerative diagnoses in family members was assessed in two ways. First, the risk of the proband having at least 1 family member with a diagnosis of interest was determined by the relative risk ratio (RR), χ2 statistic, and p values. The RR is the recommended statistic for cohort family aggregation studies and takes into account the possibility that some families will have large numbers of affected individuals, whereas others will not. Second, the probability of a psychiatric or neurodegenerative diagnosis occurring in individual family members was assessed by means of a Cox regression analysis model. The hazard ratios (HRs) obtained by this method take into account that some relatives may not have reached the age of disease risk. The time variable applied was current age or age at death for those who had not developed the disease of interest (censored), whereas the age at disease onset was applied as the time variable for those who developed the disease of interest (uncensored).
Finally, a survival analysis using a Cox regression model was applied to determine whether survival rates differed between family members with psychiatric disorders of C9orf72 expansion carriers and expansion noncarriers.
Data availability
All data are published within the article with the exception of the data available from Dryad (tables e-1 and e-2, doi.org/10.5061/dryad.1nd7372), a public repository.
Results
Participants, diagnosis, and genetic status
A family history interview was undertaken in 112 consecutive cases. A complete family pedigree was available for 89 patients (figure 1). Twenty-three cases were excluded for the following reasons: probands were no longer in contact with their family either because of migration in 12 or family conflict in 3; in 5 cases, the proband had severe cognitive impairment, and a close family member was not available to provide sufficient information; or the presence of other genetic mutations (2 SOD-1 ALS cases and 1 MAPT bvFTD case). Three of the excluded families were C9orf72 carriers.
The flowchart demonstrates the number of participants including probands, their primary diagnosis and gene status, and relatives. ALS = amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; FTD = frontotemporal dementia.
Of the 46 FTD cases, 2 developed ALS, both of whom carried the C9orf72 expansion, and of the 43 ALS patients, 9 satisfied criteria for ALS and having either behavioral or cognitive changes, with 2 of these patients carrying the C9orf72 expansion.13
Demographics
Complete data were available for 1,414 first- and second-degree relatives of 89 patients (table 1). No significant group differences were present between relatives of C9orf72 expansion carriers and noncarriers in terms of current age/age at death, sex, and alive/dead status (all p > 0.2). Relatives of patients with FTD and ALS did not differ in terms of current age/age at death, sex, and alive/dead status (all p > 0.1).
Demographic data for probands and relatives according to C9orf72 status and diagnosis
Family history of ASD
Family members of C9orf72 carriers had a significantly greater risk of ASD compared with family members of noncarriers (HR = 2.7, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1–6.9, p = 0.03). In terms of the risk of a proband having at least 1 family member with ASD, 43% of C9orf72 probands had a family history of ASD compared with 10% of noncarriers, representing an RR of 4.3 (95% CI: 1.8–10.3, p < 0.0001; figure 2). The mean age at diagnosis was 6.1 (1.9) years in C9orf72 expansion–positive kindreds and 5.9 (2.1) in C9orf72 expansion–negative kindreds. Survival was not significantly different between C9orf72 expansion–positive and C9orf72 expansion–negative kindreds (data available from Dryad table e-1, doi.org/10.5061/dryad; p = 0.9).
(A) Percentage of cases with at least 1 family member diagnosed with ASD for C9orf72 carriers and noncarriers and patients with FTD and ALS. (B) Relative risk, and 95% CIs, for a family history of ASD (in at least 1 family member) in C9orf72 carrying probands compared with noncarriers. (C) Risk for probands with FTD vs ALS. ASD = autism spectrum disorder; ALS = amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; CI = confidence interval; FTD = frontotemporal dementia.
The risk was also greater if the proband presented with FTD rather than ALS: 32% of patients with FTD had at least 1 family member with ASD compared with 9% of all ALS probands, representing a statistically significant difference and an RR of 3.4 (95% CI: 1.2–9.5, p = 0.009). To explore this potential link further, when the FTD and ALS cohorts were analyzed without the C9orf72 carriers (i.e., sporadic cases only), there were no significant differences between FTD and ALS (95% CI: 0.3–10.6, p = 0.7), thereby suggesting that this finding was driven by the C9orf72 carriers in the FTD cohort.
Family history of psychiatric disorders
Psychotic disorders
Overall, psychotic disorders were significantly more common in family members of C9orf72 probands than in noncarriers (p < 0.0001; table 2). In terms of risk to individual family members, a significant HR of 4.9 (95% CI: 1.7–13.9, p = 0.003) was found, confirming a higher probability of developing schizophrenia for relatives of C9orf72 carriers compared with noncarriers. When considering all family members of C9orf72 carriers, 2.4% were diagnosed with schizophrenia, in comparison to 0.5% for relatives of noncarriers. Viewed from another perspective, almost a third (31%) of C9orf72 carriers had at least 1 family member with schizophrenia compared with 5% of noncarriers, RR = 6.2 (95% CI: 1.8–21.2, p < 0.0001; figure 3). The mean age at onset of schizophrenia in C9orf72 kindreds was 22.3 (4.6) years and was not significantly different from the age at onset in non-C9orf72 kindreds (27.4 [8.4] years, p = 0.4; data available from Dryad [table e-1, doi.org/10.5061/dryad.1nd7372]). Similarly, survival did not differ between the genetic groups (data available from Dryad table e-1, doi.org/10.5061/dryad.1nd7372). In 3 of the C9orf72 kindreds, schizophrenia was linked to completed suicide in 2 and attempted suicide in 1. In another 6 cases, the patient remained under long-term follow-up with a psychiatrist or was institutionalized.
HRs determining risk to relatives of developing psychiatric disorders
Relative risk, and 95% CIs, for a family history of psychiatric disorders (in at least 1 family member) in C9orf72 carrying probands compared with probands without the C9orf72 expansion. ALS = amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; CI = confidence interval; FTD = frontotemporal dementia.
Family members of C9orf72 carriers had a higher probability of experiencing a significant episode of psychosis, unrelated to schizophrenia, representing an HR of 17.9 (95% CI: 2.2–143.2, p = 0.007; table 2). In contrast to schizophrenia, the average age of family members at the onset of psychosis was 50.3 (8.7) years. Figure 3 illustrates the RR (16.6, 95% CI: 2.2–126.2, p < 0.0001) for C9orf72 carrying probands compared with noncarriers for having at least 1 family member who experienced an episode of psychosis that required treatment.
No significant differences were identified between FTD and ALS probands for a family history of schizophrenia or psychosis (both p > 0.3). Similarly, the risk to relatives for developing these conditions was similar for family members of both patients with FTD and ALS (table 2). Finally, we conducted an analysis to compare the risk of psychiatric disorders in family members between FTD and ALS probands with the C9orf72 expansion (data available from Dryad, table e-2, doi.org/10.5061/dryad.1nd7372). No significant differences were identified, in keeping with the hypothesis that an increased risk of psychotic disorders is driven by genetic findings and not clinical diagnosis.
Mood disorders and suicide
In terms of the risk to individual family member, a significant HR of 1.9 (95% CI: 1.1–3.2, p = 0.01) confirmed a higher probability of developing mood disorders for relatives of C9orf72 carriers compared with noncarriers (table 2). Almost 60% of C9orf72 carriers and a third of noncarriers had at least 1 family member with a mood disorder (RR = 1.8, 95% CI: 1.1–3, p = 0.03; figure 3). The mean age at onset of the mood disorder was similar for both carriers (28.2 [11.9] years) and noncarriers (31.3 years [11.5] years, p = 0.7), and survival did not differ between the groups (HR = 0.9, 95% CI: 0.3–2.6, p = 0.8; data available from Dryad [table e-1, doi.org/10.5061/dryad.1nd7372]).
The probability of suicide was significantly higher for family members of C9orf72 kindreds than non-C9orf72 kindreds (HR = 2.7, 95% CI: 1.2–6.2, p = 0.02). The average age of relatives at the time of suicide was similar in C9orf72 (38 [17.6] years) and non-C9orf72 (43.6 [12.7] years) kindreds (data available from Dryad, table e-1, doi.org/10.5061/dryad.1nd7372). As illustrated in figure 3, 35% of C9orf72 carriers had a family member who had committed suicide compared with 12% of noncarriers (RR = 3, p = 0.01). In contrast, the risk of bipolar disorder did not differ between C9orf72 carriers and noncarriers (p = 0.9).
Mood disorders were present equally in FTD and ALS kindreds. Almost half of the patients with FTD and a third of patients with ALS had a family member with a significant mood disorder (p = 0.2). In total, 23% of patients with FTD and 16% of patients with ALS had a family history of suicide (p = 0.5). Within the C9orf72 carrier cohort, there was no significant difference for risk of mood disorders between FTD and ALS proband kindreds (HR = 0.6, 95% CI: 0.3–1.4, p = 0.2; data available from Dryad, table e-2, doi.org/10.5061/dryad.1nd7372).
Any mental health disorder
When all major mental health disorders were considered together, 14% of the relatives of C9orf72 carriers were diagnosed with a mental health disorder compared with 7% of noncarriers. This represented an HR of 2.3 (95% CI: 1.6–3.2, p < 0.001). To put this in another way, 76% of C9orf72 probands had at least 1 family member with a mental health disorder in comparison to 42% of non-C9orf72 probands (RR = 1.8, 95% CI: 1.3–2.6, p = 0.002). In contrast, no significant differences were found for mental health disorders between probands and their relatives for FTD and ALS or between FTD and ALS C9orf72 cohorts (table 2, data available from Dryad [table e-2, doi.org/10.5061/dryad.1nd7372]).
Family history of neurodegenerative disease
HRs of 7.6 (95% CI: 3.6–16.2, p < 0.0001) and 6.9 (95% CI: 3.7–12.9, p < 0.0001) indicated that relatives of C9orf72 carriers were significantly more likely to develop FTD and ALS, respectively. As illustrated in figure 4, there was a significant difference of family history for both FTD and ALS between C9orf72 carriers and noncarriers (both p < 0.0001). Sixty percent of C9orf72 probands had at least one family member with FTD, compared to 5% of noncarriers, while 63% of C9orf72 probands had a family history of ALS compared to 11% of noncarriers.
(A) Percentage of cases with at least 1 family member diagnosed with FTD or ALS for C9orf72 carriers and noncarriers and patients with FTD and ALS. (B) Relative risk, and 95% CIs, that C9orf72 carrying probands will have at least 1 family member with FTD and ALS compared with noncarriers. (C) Risk for probands with FTD vs ALS. ALS = amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; CI = confidence interval; FTD = frontotemporal dementia.
An HR of 3.8 (95% CI: 1.7–8.4, p = 0.001) suggested that relatives of patients with FTD had a higher risk of developing FTD than relatives of patients with ALS. Both groups were at a similar risk of developing ALS (HR = 0.8, 95% CI: 0.5–1.4, p = 0.4).
Comorbidity within FTD, ALS, and C9orf72 kindreds
Within the C9orf72 kindreds, probands who developed psychosis early in their FTD or ALS illness were significantly more likely to have a positive family history of a psychotic disorder (67%; p = 0.03) compared with those without psychotic symptoms. Furthermore, psychotic probands were significantly more likely to have a family history of a mental health disorder of any kind including ASD (p = 0.04).
When the Goldman score was applied to probands carrying the C9orf72 expansion, 20% (n = 6) had a Goldman score of ≥3.5, indicating the absence of any family history of neurodegenerative disease (FTD or ALS). All these cases, however, had a significant family history of a major psychiatric disorder. In 1 case, the proband's father had a psychotic episode in his late 50s, which may have marked the onset of FTD; however, he died shortly after from a stroke. In another case, a prominent history of severe depression was present in first- and second-degree relatives, with 1 family member committing suicide; ASD was also present in this kindred. Another proband had relatives with mood disorders and suicide. ASD was present in a grandchild of another proband. In the final two apparently sporadic kindreds, a history of schizophrenia was present in one, with ASD and psychotic depression present in another. Two family trees are shown in figure 5, demonstrating the variety of neurologic and psychiatric diagnoses within families.
Two C9orf72 family pedigrees (A,B) over 3 generations showing the array of neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders present. Blue = ALS, red = FTD, yellow = suicide, pink = depression, purple = depression/anxiety, green = schizophrenia, and orange = ASD. ALS = amyotrophic lateral sclerosis; ASD = autism spectrum disorder; FTD = frontotemporal dementia.
Discussion
The present study has identified an increased rate of ASD, FTD, ALS, and other major psychiatric disorders in kindreds with the C9orf72 expansion compared with non-C9orf72 kindreds, with evidence that these conditions coaggregate within susceptible kindreds. We report that ASD occurs frequently in family members of patients with FTD and the C9orf72 expansion. The explanation for this association is as yet unknown. The effect of environmental stress should be considered, and ideally, future work should be extended to include genotyping of family members. We propose that familial psychiatric disorders should be considered when determining whether a proband is likely to carry the C9orf72 expansion.
The relationship between ASD and FTD, particularly in the presence of the C9orf72 expansion, warrants further investigation. As yet, no studies have directly compared these conditions, which may be partly related to the markedly different ages at onset. The triad of behavioral change in ASD is similar to that experienced by patients with FTD and includes impaired social interactions, impaired communication, and restricted and repetitive interests and activities.14 Theory of mind deficits are present in FTD, ALS with cognitive involvement, and ASD and may account for some of the abnormal behaviors in each condition.15,16 It is plausible that the proportion of patients with a family history of ASD is underestimated, as none of the relatives identified with ASD were older than 15 years at the time of this study. Some of the older relatives may also have the syndrome, but it has simply not been formally recognized.
The discovery of psychotic symptoms in approximately 40% of C9orf72 carriers highlighted the potential link between FTD, ALS, and psychiatric disorders.2,3 Furthermore, negative symptoms of schizophrenia and core behavioral features of FTD, ALS, and C9orf72 overlap, including poor personal hygiene, loss of volition, and reduced empathy. Although the cognitive difficulties experienced by patients with FTD and ALS are relatively homogenous and progressive (e.g., socioemotional, executive, and memory deficits), those in schizophrenia are variable, may be static, and are probably influenced by antipsychotic medications.17 Nonetheless, a similar pattern of cognitive dysfunction exists in patients with schizophrenia and FTD in that each group shows deficits in probabilistic learning, theory of mind, and sarcasm detection.18,–,20 Theory of mind deficits in bvFTD occur early in the disease process and cause patients to lose insight, empathy, and their ability to sympathize.15,21 Similarly, within schizophrenia, these deficits are pervasive and are associated with poor social functioning and outcome.22 Moreover, a wealth of evidence exists for memory and executive deficits in schizophrenia.23
We were careful to include cases diagnosed as schizophrenia by a psychiatrist and not cases that the relatives reported to be “odd” or “mad.” We are therefore confident of the diagnosis in all cases labeled as schizophrenia. Of note is the fact that the age at onset of schizophrenia was very similar in C9orf72 and non-C9orf72 kindreds and fell within the typical age range of schizophrenia and that survival rates did not differ between C9orf72 and non-C9orf72 kindreds.24 The majority of these cases remained in psychiatric care for many years with no suggestion of atypical features, all of which suggests that typical schizophrenia is more common in C9orf72 kindreds. It remains possible that the schizophrenia cases in C9orf72 kindreds are in some way atypical and would show neuropathologic and neuroimaging changes of the type seen in patients with the C9orf72 expansion manifesting as bvFTD. Further studies with detailed brain imaging are clearly required. Attempts have been made to determine whether patients with schizophrenia harbor the C9orf72 expansion, which has been found in some but not in many. These studies, however, have not specifically considered C9orf72 families. It is possible that results may have been diluted by a heterogeneous cohort of patients with schizophrenia or, as in one study, in a population in which C9orf72 expansions are rare.25,–,28 Nonetheless, the evidence does not exist for the C9orf72 expansion as a cause of schizophrenia. Another possibility is that other genetic or epigenetic factors related to the C9orf72 expansion are responsible. As yet, these questions remain unanswered.
In contrast to family members with a diagnosis of schizophrenia, those with “psychosis” in the absence of a schizophrenia diagnosis were much older with a mean age of 50 years at the onset. It is possible that these individuals had a late-onset psychiatric illness or they may have experienced psychotic symptoms as the prodrome to bvFTD. Psychosis in relatives was associated with psychotic symptoms in the proband, and it suggests that a psychosis phenotype exists within C9orf72 FTD-ALS. Moreover, a positive association was found between psychotic probands and mental health disorders in their families, leading us to suggest that proneness to mental health disorders occurs in a subset of C9orf72 families.
The association between C9orf72 repeat expansions and mood disorders is less strong and difficult to disentangle in families with significant comorbidities. However, the results from this study suggest that mood disorders are also more common in C9orf72 kindreds than in non-C9orf72 kindreds. In fact, many patients with bvFTD experience depressive symptoms before the onset of their illness.29 The existing literature is mixed, however, as to whether depression and anxiety are risk factors for dementia or merely appear in the prodromal phase.30,–,32 A previous population-based study also found a link between suicide and C9orf72 ALS,6 which we have extended to include FTD. This association may reflect the consequences of poor mental health, which, in some cases, leads to suicide and highlights the central issue of appropriate genetic counseling and access to support services for family members of gene carriers.
This study has limitations. Although we have identified a higher rate of psychiatric disorders in kindreds of C9orf72 carriers compared with noncarriers, this is, however, not a population-based study, and we cannot compare the rates of psychiatric disorders with those found in the population. This raises the possibility that nongenetic FTD and ALS are protective against primary psychiatric disorders, whereas genetic FTD and ALS are not. This seems unlikely, particularly in view of recent reports of an increased prevalence of psychiatric disorders in patients with ALS years before the diagnosis of ALS and reports of depression occurring in the prodrome to FTD.29,33 Nevertheless, we can draw conclusions in terms of comparison between C9orf72 expansion carriers and noncarriers, and specifically, this removes the potential environmental confounder of stress related to living with a family member with FTD or ALS. It was not possible, however, to address the issue of stress associated with being a member of a family with a strong history of hereditary neurodegenerative disease. Moreover, this study has focused on the C9orf72 expansion, given its high prevalence in this cohort; however, as yet, it is not clear whether other genetic mutations would also show an association with psychiatric disorders. If other genetic mutations were considered in future studies, this could serve as a control for the stress of living in a FTD/ALS genetic family and may confirm whether these stresses influence the development of psychiatric disease. Furthermore, controversy surrounds the C9orf72 expansion, as researchers debate the exact number of repeats that represent a pathogenic mutation, with some advocating a higher cutoff of up to 50. Other nongenetic factors may also be relevant, including socioeconomic status and environment, and should be considered for future studies. Recall bias is another confounder that should also be considered, as it is likely that family members in genetic families will be more aware of and more likely to research their family history in detail. Referral bias could also have influenced the results of this study. The research center has a reputation for an interest in familial FTD and ALS, which is reflected in the high proportion of C9orf72 carriers in the studied cohort. Ideally, we would have obtained genetic data on each family member within these cohorts; however, this was not feasible, given the large sample, and would have likely led to bias, as it is very unlikely that each member would have consented or been amenable to testing.
This study suggests that a link may exist between the FTD-ALS spectrum and psychiatric disorders, findings which potentially have important clinical implications, particularly in terms of genetic counseling. At a scientific level, these results indicate that close collaboration between neurology and psychiatry should be encouraged to better understand the shared features of these neurodegenerative and psychiatric disorders and determine whether they share other neurobiological or genetic features. Furthermore, given the overlap between these conditions, cross-disciplinary treatments could be considered in the future. Future work needs to determine an explanation for the findings of this study and, subsequently, the exact risk to family members of gene carriers. Ultimately, future work will need to establish whether the C9orf72 expansion has a role in increasing proneness to mental health disorders.
Author contributions
E.M. Devenney: conception and design of the study, analysis and interpretation of data, and drafting and revising the manuscript. R.M. Ahmed: acquisition and analysis of data and drafting and revising the manuscript. G. Halliday and O. Piguet: drafting and revising the manuscript. M.C. Kiernan and J.R. Hodges: conception and design of the study, interpretation of data, and drafting and revising the manuscript.
Study funding
This work was supported by funding to Forefront, a collaborative research group dedicated to the study of frontotemporal dementia and motor neuron disease, from the National Health and Medical research Council of Australia program grant (#1037746) and the Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence in Cognition and its Disorders Memory Node (#CE110001021). E.M. Devenney is supported by a MNDRIA postdoctoral fellowship and the Motor Neurone Disease Association UK. G. Halliday is supported by an NHMRC Senior Principal Research Fellowship (#1079679). O. Piguet is supported by an NHMRC Senior Research Fellowship (APP1103258). R.M. Ahmed is supported by an NHMRC postdoctoral fellowship.
Disclosure
The authors report no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures.
Publication history
Received by Neurology November 16, 2017. Accepted in final form July 13, 2018.
Acknowledgment
The authors are grateful to the research participants involved with the ForeFront research studies. Previous genetic screening of the cohort was performed in the laboratory of A/Prof. John Kwok (in association with Dr. Carol Dobson-Stone) and in the ForeFront biomarker research laboratory (Glenda Halliday, Olivier Piguet, Lauren Bartley, Yue Huang, Mia MacMillan, and Sahar Lateef). They are grateful to Heidi Cartright for help with designing the figures.
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
- Received November 16, 2017.
- Accepted in final form July 13, 2018.
- © 2018 American Academy of Neurology
References
- 1.↵
- Solje E,
- Aaltokallio H,
- Koivumaa-Honkanen H, et al
- 2.↵
- Devenney E,
- Hornberger M,
- Irish M, et al
- 3.↵
- 4.↵
- 5.↵
- Schoder D,
- Hannequin D,
- Martinaud O, et al
- 6.↵
- 7.↵
- O'brien M,
- Burke T,
- Heverin M, et al
- 8.↵
- 9.↵
- 10.↵
- Dobson-Stone C,
- Hallupp M,
- Bartley L, et al
- 11.↵
- 12.↵
- Goldman JS,
- Farmer JM,
- Wood EM, et al
- 13.↵
- 14.↵American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013.
- 15.↵
- 16.↵
- 17.↵
- 18.↵
- 19.↵
- 20.↵
- Dalton MA,
- Weickert TW,
- Hodges JR,
- Piguet O,
- Hornberger M
- 21.↵
- 22.↵
- 23.↵
- 24.↵
- 25.↵
- Huey ED,
- Nagy PL,
- Rodriguez-Murillo L, et al
- 26.↵
- Galimberti D,
- Reif A,
- Dell'Osso B, et al
- 27.↵
- Yoshino Y,
- Mori Y,
- Ochi S, et al
- 28.↵
- Solje E,
- Miettunen J,
- Marttila R, et al
- 29.↵
- Gregory CA,
- Hodges JR
- 30.↵
- 31.↵
- da Silva J,
- Gonçalves-Pereira M,
- Xavier M,
- Mukaetova-Ladinska EB
- 32.↵
- Gallacher J,
- Bayer A,
- Fish M, et al
- 33.↵
- Turner MR,
- Goldacre R,
- Talbot K,
- Goldacre MJ
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Hastening the Diagnosis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Dr. Brian Callaghan and Dr. Kellen Quigg
► Watch
Topics Discussed
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Article
Multiparametric MRI study of ALS stratified for the C9orf72 genotypePeter Bede, Arun L.W. Bokde, Susan Byrne et al.Neurology, June 14, 2013 -
Article
Comparative analysis of C9orf72 and sporadic disease in an ALS clinic populationMfon E. Umoh, Christina Fournier, Yingjie Li et al.Neurology, August 03, 2016 -
Articles
C9ORF72 repeat expansion in clinical and neuropathologic frontotemporal dementia cohortsCarol Dobson-Stone, Marianne Hallupp, Lauren Bartley et al.Neurology, August 08, 2012 -
Articles
Hexanucleotide repeat expansions in C9ORF72 in the spectrum of motor neuron diseasesWouter van Rheenen, Marka van Blitterswijk, Mark H.B. Huisman et al.Neurology, July 25, 2012