This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Background and Objectives Chronic poststroke language impairment is typically worse in older individuals or those with large stroke lesions. However, there is unexplained variance that likely depends on intact tissue beyond the lesion. Brain age is an emerging concept, which is partially independent from chronologic age. Advanced brain age is associated with cognitive decline in healthy older adults; therefore, we aimed to investigate the relationship with stroke aphasia. We hypothesized that advanced brain age is a significant factor associated with chronic poststroke language impairments, above and beyond chronologic age, and lesion characteristics.
Methods This cohort study retrospectively evaluated participants from the Predicting Outcomes of Language Rehabilitation in Aphasia clinical trial (NCT03416738), recruited through local advertisement in South Carolina (US). Primary inclusion criteria were left hemisphere stroke and chronic aphasia (≥12 months after stroke). Participants completed baseline behavioral testing including the Western Aphasia Battery–Revised (WAB-R), Philadelphia Naming Test (PNT), Pyramids and Palm Trees Test (PPTT), and Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale Matrices subtest, before completing 6 weeks of language therapy. The PNT was repeated 1 month after therapy. We leveraged modern neuroimaging techniques to estimate brain age and computed a proportional difference between chronologic age and estimated brain age. Multiple linear regression models were used to evaluate the relationship between proportional brain age difference (PBAD) and behavior.
Results Participants (N = 93, 58 males and 35 females, average age = 61 years) had estimated brain ages ranging from 14 years younger to 23 years older than chronologic age. Advanced brain age predicted performance on semantic tasks (PPTT) and language tasks (WAB-R). For participants with advanced brain aging (n = 47), treatment gains (improvement on the PNT) were independently predicted by PBAD (T = −2.0474, p = 0.0468, 9% of variance explained).
Discussion Through the application of modern neuroimaging techniques, advanced brain aging was associated with aphasia severity and performance on semantic tasks. Notably, therapy outcome scores were also associated with PBAD, albeit only among participants with advanced brain aging. These findings corroborate the importance of brain age as a determinant of poststroke recovery and underscore the importance of personalized health factors in determining recovery trajectories, which should be considered during the planning or implementation of therapeutic interventions.
Glossary
- TE=
- echo time;
- TI=
- inversion time;
- PBAD=
- proportional brain age difference;
- PNT=
- Philadelphia Naming Test;
- PPTT=
- Pyramids and Palm Trees Test;
- POLAR=
- Predicting Outcomes of Language Rehabilitation in Aphasia;
- TR=
- repetition time;
- WAB-AQ=
- Western Aphasia Battery–Aphasia Quotient;
- WAB-R=
- Western Aphasia Battery–Revised;
- WAIS=
- Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
Submitted and externally peer reviewed. The handling editor was Editor-in-Chief José Merino, MD, MPhil, FAAN.
- Received May 16, 2022.
- Accepted in final form October 31, 2022.
- © 2022 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
