Clinical Reasoning: A 23-Year-Old Man With Progressive Asymmetric Weakness and Numbness
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

Abstract
We report a case of a 23-year-old man who presented with progressive asymmetric weakness and numbness in his distal extremities over 4 months, with initial symptoms starting days after a coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) vaccine booster. Initial neurologic examination was notable for distal weakness of both upper and lower extremities that was more pronounced on the left, complete areflexia, and decreased distal sensation to pinprick and vibration without loss of proprioception. Nerve conduction studies demonstrated a generalized, non–length-dependent, sensorimotor, demyelinating polyneuropathy, with conduction block seen in multiple compound muscle action potentials. Sensory nerve action potentials were normal in absolute terms but had asymmetric amplitudes.
Based on the patient's nerve conduction studies, he was diagnosed with a specific immune-mediated neuromuscular disorder. He was started on intravenous immunoglobulin, but within days of the first infusions experienced a rare and potentially life-threatening complication. He received appropriate treatment and was started on alternative immunotherapy, after which his symptoms improved.
Our case exemplifies the features of a specific subtype of a more common immune-mediated neuromuscular diagnosis with unique elements of history, examination, and nerve conduction studies that required interpretation in the clinical context. We also discuss a rare side effect of a commonly used immunotherapy and its risk factors and comment on the likelihood that this diagnosis may be related to a preceding COVID-19 vaccine booster.
Section 1
A 23-year-old man presented with numbness, tingling, and weakness in his extremities progressing over 4 months. He initially noticed left thumb numbness and tingling that spread throughout his hand, followed a month later by sensory changes in both legs and left leg weakness. Previously a lacrosse player, he lost the ability to run. He denied neck or lower back pain. He denied any preceding illness but had received the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) Moderna vaccine booster 3 days before symptom onset.
His initial neurologic examination was notable for distal weakness of both upper and lower extremities, more pronounced on the left. Shoulder abduction, elbow extension and flexion, and wrist extension and flexion strength were graded 5/5 bilaterally using the Medical Research Council scale; finger abduction (interosseous) and thumb abduction (abductor pollicis brevis) were 4/5 bilaterally; hip flexion and knee extension and flexion were 5/5 bilaterally; ankle dorsiflexion was 4/5 bilaterally; ankle plantar flexion was 5/5 bilaterally; toe extension was 1/5 on the left and 4/5 on the right; and toe flexion was 5/5 bilaterally. Sensation to pinprick was decreased distally in both upper and lower extremities with 8 seconds timed vibration sensation at bilateral great toes while proprioception was intact. The Romberg sign was absent. Reflexes were absent throughout. He could march on his toes but not on his heels.
Questions for Consideration:
Where along the neuromuscular axis could this process localize?
What is the best next diagnostic step?
Section 2
The combination of motor weakness, sensory abnormalities, and areflexia suggests a disorder of the lower motor neurons, which may localize to the nerve roots, plexuses, or peripheral nerves. Simultaneous upper and lower extremity involvement suggests a diffuse process and narrows the localization to the peripheral nerves with a non–length-dependent pattern suggestive of an inflammatory polyneuropathy. The next best diagnostic step is to obtain nerve conduction studies (NCSs), which may help differentiate between a demyelinating and axonal neuropathy and elucidate further patterns such as uniformity or symmetry. These were performed and are summarized in the Table.
Nerve Conduction Studies
Section 3
NCSs showed normal sensory nerve action potentials in absolute terms, but amplitudes were asymmetric in 2 nerves (sural: right 11.6uV and left 21.5uV; median: right 18.4uV and left 41.0uV). Compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) had slowed conduction velocities in multiple nerves, several with associated conduction block. The peroneal-extensor digitorum brevis CMAP had particularly slowed conduction velocities with conduction block (Figure). The left median and tibial F-wave latencies were prolonged. The needle electromyography portion of the electrodiagnostic study was normal.
.
Although the NCS abnormalities were much more striking in motor nerves, the asymmetric SNAPs along with the patient's sensory symptoms and deficits on examination suggest sensorimotor involvement. Taken together, NCSs demonstrated a generalized, non–length-dependent, sensorimotor, demyelinating polyneuropathy.
Questions for Consideration:
What is the differential diagnosis for a demyelinating polyneuropathy?
What are the best next steps in evaluation?
Section 4
The differential diagnosis for subacute or chronic sensory and motor demyelinating neuropathy includes chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP) and its variants, paraproteinemic neuropathy, inherited polyneuropathies, and neuropathy secondary to medication exposures. This is a short list compared with that for axonal neuropathies, which includes numerous metabolic, toxic, infectious, and other etiologies.1 Regarding the possibility of CIDP, the patient's NCS met diagnostic criteria for multifocal CIDP in the 2021 revised European Academy of Neurology/Peripheral Nerve Society guidelines.2 Specifically, motor conduction criteria for demyelination was seen in at least 2 nerves and in more than one limb (in this case, right ulnar and peroneal CMAP motor conduction blocks among other criteria), and sensory conduction abnormalities were seen in at least 2 nerves (in this case, left median and right sural SNAPs). The initial approach to a demyelinating neuropathy is to complete a detailed clinical history encompassing toxic exposures, family history, and a thorough review of systems. This is followed by laboratory studies corresponding to the differential diagnosis.1
In this case, the patient did not have toxic exposures, a contributory family history, or systemic symptoms suggestive of a plasma cell dyscrasia. He had unremarkable serum electrophoresis, immunofixation, free light chains, anti-MAG antibodies, and vascular endothelial growth factor. Given the noncontributory history and normal serum studies, CIDP or a CIDP variant was strongly considered. To further evaluate for this possibility, cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) studies were obtained and revealed a borderline protein of 45 mg/dL (normal 15–45 mg/dL) with no pleocytosis.
Question for Consideration:
Based on specific elements of history, examination, and NCS findings, which CIDP variant is most likely?
Section 5
CIDP subtypes include typical CIDP as characterized classically by symmetric and proximal and distal weakness, acute CIDP, sensory CIDP, chronic immune sensory polyradiculopathy, motor CIDP, multifocal acquired demyelinating sensory and motor neuropathy (MADSAM), and distal acquired demyelinating and symmetric neuropathy.3 Our patient's neuropathy was best characterized as sensorimotor, asymmetric, and subacute. These elements were most consistent with a diagnosis of MADSAM. It should be noted that if NCSs were interpreted without the context of the patient's history and examination, the predominant motor involvement may suggest multifocal motor neuropathy, a disorder distinct from CIDP characterized by asymmetric, purely motor nerve dysfunction.3
The patient was started on 2 g/kg of intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIg) administered over 2 days. Three days after the initial dose, he noticed dark-colored urine and fatigue. Laboratory studies 5 days after IVIg were notable for hemoglobin 12.3 g/dL, below his baseline of 15 g/dL. Three days later, repeat hemoglobin was 10.6 g/dL. Aspartate transaminase and alanine transaminase were found to be elevated at 54 and 107 U/L, respectively.
Questions for Consideration:
Which adverse effect of IVIg is the patient most likely experiencing?
What are the next best steps to confirm this suspicion?
How can this adverse effect be managed?
Section 6
Dark-colored urine along with downtrending hemoglobin after IVIg administration suggests hemolytic anemia, a rare complication. In this case, additional studies supported this diagnosis, including an elevated reticulocyte index (2.2%), elevated indirect bilirubin (0.8 mg/dL), and low haptoglobin (<8 mg/dL). Lactate dehydrogenase was normal, and urinalysis was unremarkable, but these negative studies did not exclude the diagnosis. The direct antiglobulin test (DAT) was negative. The blood type was AB-negative, Rh-negative. With the trough in hemoglobin, the patient received high-dose steroids, and the long-term treatment was switched to subcutaneous immunoglobulin. He did not experience further adverse effects and had gradual improvement in motor strength and sensory symptoms.
Discussion
MADSAM is a CIDP variant characterized by gradually progressive and asymmetric weakness and numbness. Electrodiagnostic studies demonstrate a demyelinating sensorimotor polyneuropathy with multifocal nerve involvement. Approximately three-fourths of patients have albuminocytologic dissociation on CSF studies. Similar to other CIDP variants, it may be treated with immunotherapy including IVIg, plasmapheresis, and corticosteroids.3 Although some studies describe the course of MADSAM as less debilitating, symptoms may be less responsive to first-line immunotherapy compared with typical CIDP.4
Hemolytic anemia is a rare complication of IVIg, with an estimated prevalence of 1.6%.5 The mechanism is believed to be a reaction caused by isohemagglutinins (anti-A/B antibodies) incompatible with the patient's blood group passively transferred during IVIg transfusion.6 This complication is most common in non-O blood group patients, hypothetically due to their inability to neutralize the isohemagglutinins, and with cumulative doses of 2 g/kg or more in IVIg-naïve patients.7 Our patient had both risk factors, but his DAT was notably negative, a finding in 12.5% of cases of hemolytic anemia with an unclear mechanism.8 Of note, no studies have investigated whether the risk of hemolytic anemia depends on the number of days over which doses are administered. The national IVIg shortage9 has necessitated that clinicians occasionally use shorter courses of IVIg at higher daily doses to reduce waste from rounding; further study is needed to determine whether this increases the rates of adverse effects. IVIg-mediated hemolysis can be self-limiting, only requiring observation. However, in severe cases, patients may require intravenous fluids and transfusions. IVIg infusion should be stopped, and the batch of IVIg may be quarantined.9
Our patient received the COVID-19 Moderna vaccine booster 3 days before symptom onset, raising the possibility of an adverse vaccine reaction. A recent Neurology article discussing Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) and the COVID-19 vaccine clinical trial10 argued that the temporal association between vaccination and symptom onset does not imply causality, given the very large number of individuals who received COVID-19 vaccinations in the first months of their availability. It is also possible that a vaccination unmasks an underlying, previously asymptomatic autoimmune disorder rather than causes it.11 Similarly, one should be cautious in attributing new diagnoses of CIDP to COVID-19 vaccinations, the subject of several case reports12,13 and Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System entries.14 Although available data are limited, observational studies suggest a higher risk of an inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy after SARS-CoV-2 infection compared with vaccination, in consensus with previous studies demonstrating the same for GBS and influenza.15 As such, neurologists should continue to advocate for their patients to be fully vaccinated for COVID-19 and other infections.
Author Contributions
Emma H. Kaplan: drafted and revised the manuscript for content, analyzed and interpreted the data. Kaveh Torabian: drafted and revised the manuscript for content, analyzed and interpreted the data. Camille V. Edwards: revised the manuscript for content. Michelle C. Kaku: revised the manuscript for content. Pria Anand: revised the manuscript for content. K. H. Vincent Lau: revised the manuscript for content, had a major role in acquisition of the data, analyzed and interpreted the data.
Study Funding
The authors report no targeted funding.
Disclosure
The authors report no relevant disclosures. Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures.
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
Submitted and externally peer reviewed. The handling editor was Resident and Fellow Deputy Editor Ariel Lyons-Warren, MD, PhD.
↵* These authors are contributed equally to this work as first authors.
- Received July 1, 2022.
- Accepted in final form November 17, 2022.
- © 2022 American Academy of Neurology
References
- 1.↵
- Siao P,
- Kaku M
- 2.↵
- Van den Bergh PYK,
- Doorn PA,
- Hadden RDM, et al.
- 3.↵
- Gwathmey K
- 4.↵
- Kuwabara S,
- Isose S,
- Mori M, et al.
- 5.↵
- Daw Z,
- Padmore R,
- Neurath D, et al.
- 6.↵
- Flegel WA
- 7.↵
- Berard R,
- Whittemore B,
- Scuccimarri R
- 8.↵
- Pendergrast J,
- Armali C,
- Callum J, et al.
- 9.↵FDA. Information about immune globulin (human) product shortage. U.S. Food and drug administration. Accessed June 1, 2022. fda.gov/vaccines-blood-biologics/safety-availability-biologics/information-about-immune-globulin-human-product-shortage.
- 10.↵
- Márquez Loza AM,
- Holroyd KB,
- Johnson SA,
- Pilgrim DM,
- Amato AA
- 11.↵
- 12.↵
- Singh S,
- Sanna F,
- Adhikari R,
- Akella R,
- Gangu K
- 13.↵
- de Souza A,
- Oo WM,
- Giri P
- 14.↵Services USDoHaH. VAERS vaccine adverse event reporting system. Accessed August 25, 2022. vaers.hhs.gov/.
- 15.↵
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
- Reader Response: Clinical Reasoning: A 23-Year-Old Man With Progressive Asymmetric Weakness and Numbness
- Eric L. Bressler, MD, FACR, Neuroradiologist, Retired
Submitted April 06, 2023
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Hastening the Diagnosis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Dr. Brian Callaghan and Dr. Kellen Quigg
► Watch
Related Articles
- No related articles found.