This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Background and Objectives The best management of patients with mild stroke and large vessel occlusion (LVO) remains unclear. This study aimed to identify perfusion imaging predictors of poor functional outcome in such patients.
Methods This cohort study retrospectively selected patients enrolled in the International Stroke Perfusion Imaging Registry between August 2011 and April 2022. The registry enrolled patients with acute ischemic stroke and with baseline CT perfusion scanned within 24 hours of stroke onset. This study identified patients with mild symptoms, defined by an NIH Stroke Scale score of ≤5. Patients with LVO of anterior circulation were selected. This study further selected patients who received medical management and excluded patients who received endovascular treatment. The primary outcome was poor functional outcome defined as a modified Rankin Scale of 3–6 at 3 months. Perfusion lesion was defined by delay time > 3 seconds on CTP. Regression analyses were used to identify clinical and imaging variables that predicted poor functional outcome.
Results A total of 139 patients with mild stroke were included, of whom 27 (19%) had poor functional outcome. Patients with poor outcome, compared with those with good outcome, had much larger perfusion lesion volume (median 80 mL vs 41 mL, p < 0.001). Perfusion lesion was a significant predictor of poor outcome in either univariable regression (crude OR = 1.02, 95% CI = [1.01–1.03]) or multivariable regression model (adjusted OR = 1.01, 95% CI = [1.01–1.02]), adjusting for occlusion site, good collaterals, baseline stroke severity, age, IV thrombolysis (IVT), and onset to scan time. A perfusion lesion of 65 mL was the optimal cutpoint to identify poor functional outcome (sensitivity = 59%, specificity = 77%). Patients with perfusion lesion ≥65 mL, compared with patients with perfusion lesion <65 mL, showed a much higher rate of poor functional outcome (38% vs 11%, p < 0.001). Of the 139 patients in this study, 95 received IVT. Patients treated with or without IVT did not influence their outcomes (crude OR = 0.74, 95% CI = [0.31–1.78]).
Discussion A perfusion lesion of ≥65 mL predicted poor functional outcome in mild stroke patients with LVO.
Glossary
- ASPECTS=
- Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score;
- CBF=
- cerebral blood flow;
- CTP=
- CT perfusion;
- DT=
- delay time;
- EVT=
- endovascular thrombectomy;
- INSPIRE=
- International Stroke Perfusion Imaging Registry;
- IVT=
- IV thrombolysis;
- LVO=
- large vessel occlusion;
- NCCT=
- noncontrast CT;
- NIHSS=
- NIH Stroke Scale;
- PH=
- parenchymal hemorrhage;
- sICH=
- symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org/N for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
↵* These authors contributed equally to this work as first authors.
↵† These authors contributed equally to this work as senior authors.
Submitted and externally peer reviewed. The handling editor was José Merino, MD, MPhil, FAAN.
CME Course: NPub.org/cmelist
- Received February 20, 2022.
- Accepted in final form September 15, 2022.
- © 2022 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
More Online
Use of Whole-Genome Sequencing for Mitochondrial Disease Diagnosis
Dr. Robert Pitceathly and Dr. William Macken