Abstract
One hundred eleven patients with supratentorial cerebrovascular disease were studied by computerized axial tomography (CT scanning). With one exception, every patient who had a normal scan 48 hours after the onset of symptoms was ultimately diagnosed as having had transient ischemie attack, although in nearly one-third, the clinical diagnosis at the time of the scan was infarction. A normal CT scan, therefore, augurs a good outcome in supratentorial cerebrovascular disease. Ninety-eight percent of the patients with infarction had abnormal scans, with areas of decreased density in a vascular distribution. Pitfalls in the diagnosis of infarction were (1) initially normal CT scans that changed to abnormal after 48 hours, and (2) mass effect of infarction leading to misdiagnosis of brain tumor. Serial studies eliminated both pitfalls. Intracerebral hemorrhages had a distinctive high density appearance. In 43 percent of patients whose scans showed hemorrhage, the clinical diagnosis was thrombosis. Many did not have symptoms, signs, or outcome of cerebral hemorrhage, and the diagnosis would not have been suspect were it not for the CT scan.
- © 1976 by the American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.