Dose‐effect relationship of dexamethasone on Karnofsky performance in metastatic brain tumors
A randomized study of doses of 4, 8, and 16 mg per day
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine whether lower doses of dexamethasone for treatment of brain tumor edema are as effective as the conventional dose of 16 mg/d. We consecutively executed two double-blind randomized trials in patients with CT-proven brain metastasis and Karnofsky scores of 80 or less. In the first series, we compared 8 mg dexamethasone per day versus 16 mg/d; in the second series, 4 mg/d versus 16 mg/d. Standardized evaluation of quality of life and side effects took place at days 0, 7, 28, and 56. We randomized a total of 96 patients and evaluated eighty-nine. The Karnofsky score improved in the 8-mg group, which had improvement of 8.0 ± 10.1 (mean ± SD) points at day 7 versus 7.3 ± 14.2 points in the 16-mg group. In the second series, the 4-mg group had improvement of 6.7 ± 11.3 points at day 7 and 7.1 ± 18.2 points at day 28 versus 9.1 ± 12.4 and 5.6 ± 18.5 points in the 16-mg group. Toxic effects occurred more frequently in the 16-mg group (p < 0.03). We conclude that administration of 4 mg dexamethasone per day for treatment of brain tumor edema results in the same degree of improvement as does administration of 16 mg/d after 1 week of treatment in patients who have no signs of impending herniation. Toxic effects are dose-dependent and, during a 4-week period, occurred more frequently in patients using 16 mg/d. Following radiotherapy to the brain or other antitumor therapy, tapering of dexamethasone from 4 mg/d should preferably be temporized over about 4 weeks.
- © 1994 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.
Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Related Articles
- No related articles found.