Mutations of the noncoding region of the connexin32 gene in X-linked dominant Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

Abstract
We studied two families with X-linked dominant Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy. The clinical findings included onset around age 14 years, with moderate weakness of feet extensors and palmar and dorsal interossei, areflexia, distal hypesthesia, and slow progressivity. Motor nerve conduction velocities showed slowing (20 to 30 m/sec) and EMGs were normal. Genetic linkage analysis revealed positive lod scores with the markers of the Xq13.1 region in family 2, but was noninformative in family 1. There were no point mutations in the connexin32 gene coding region. Instead, family 1 revealed a T-to-G transversion at position -528 relative to the ATG start codon, whereas family 2 showed a C-to-T transition at position -458. The first mutation is located in the nerve-specific connexin32 promoter just upstream of the transcription start site, the second is located in the 5 prime untranslated region of the mRNA.
NEUROLOGY 1996;47: 541-544
X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth (CMTX) neuropathy may be inherited as dominant or recessive. The dominant form of CMTX1 makes up 90% of all CMTX, whereas the recessive CMTX2 and CMTX3 [1] forms occur with a combined frequency of only 10%. The CMTX1 gene has been mapped to the proximal long arm of the X chromosome at Xq13.1 by genetic linkage studies. [2-9] There are recent reports of families with mutations in the coding region of the connexin32 gene (CX32) that cosegregrate with the CMTX1 phenotype. [10-12]
Five of the families diagnosed with CMTX1 by us on the basis of linkage analysis [11] did not show point mutations of the CX32 gene coding region. We suggested that their phenotypes might be due to mutations in the CX32 promoter, splice sites, or untranslated regions (UTRs). The present study of two CMTX1 families is the first report of mutations in the noncoding region of the CX32 gene. The mutations occur near the nerve-specific promoter P2 of the CX32 gene.
Methods.
DNA isolation.
Genomic DNA was isolated from leukocytes by the method of Kunkel et al. [13]
PCR amplification.
The CX32 gene promoter P2 region was polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-amplified with primers CX32-P7 and CX32-P16 in a reaction containing 250 ng of genomic DNA and 50 pmoles of each primer in a volume of 50 micro Liter. An initial denaturation for 5 minutes at 95 degrees C was followed by 35 cycles of 45 seconds at 95 degrees C, 45 seconds at 58 degrees C, and 45 seconds at 72 degrees C, with a final extension for 5 minutes at 72 degrees C. The PCR products were separated on 1.2% agarose gels (SeaKem GTG, FMC BioProducts, Rockland, ME) overnight at 1.5 volts/cm. The fragments of 753-bp size were cut out and extracted from the agarose by centrifugation for 5 minutes at room temperature in a 0.45-mu SPIN-X tube (Costar, Cambridge, MA). The DNA products were then extracted with phenol/chloroform and precipitated with ethanol.
Genetic linkage analysis.
Genetic linkage analysis was calculated using the MLINK program of the LINKAGE package (version 5.1), [14] as previously described. [7]
DNA sequence analysis.
Sequencing was performed with primer CX32-P11 (IIc) (Neuhaus et al., Bioscience Reports, in press) using the SequiTherm cycle sequencing kit of Epicentre Technologies (Madison, WI) according to the manufacturer's specifications. All primers were designed based on the sequence of the human CX32 promoter 2 region (Neuhaus et al., Bioscience Reports, in press), using the computer program Primer (version 0.5) written by S.E. Lincoln, M.J. Daly, and E.S. Lander (Whitehead Institute, Cambridge, MA).
Oligonucleotide primers.
All primers were synthesized on the 394A model DNA/RNA synthesizer from Applied Biosystems (Foster City, CA). Following are the primer sequences: CX32-P7 (antisense, +8 to -12), 5 prime-CAGTTCATCCTGCCTCATTC-3 prime; CX32-P11 (IIc) (-590 to -570), 5 prime-GGAAGTCAGGGCGTTTGATCT-3 prime; CX32-P16 (-745 to -725), 5 prime-GCCTGTGTTTTATCTCCCTCC-3 prime. Primer positions are listed relative to the ATG start codon.
Mutation detection by restriction digestion.
After detection of the mutation by sequence analysis of DNA from normal and affected males, the remaining members of family 2 were tested by PCR amplification of the promoter P2 region followed by digestion of the fragment with the restriction enzyme HhaI (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA).
Results.
Clinical data.
The pedigrees of the two families studied by us are shown in Figure 1. Family 1 has a small size with four affected members and only two still alive. Family 2 has 10 affected members with 9 still alive. The proband of family 1 was aged 48 years, and the proband of family 2 was aged 31 years. In the clinical diagnosis we distinguish three CMT phenotypes: (1) a mild CMT phenotype showing relatively good muscle strength, which is compatible with normal gait and ability to climb stairs; (2) a moderate CMT phenotype that is characterized by weakness of the tibialis anterior and peroneals, requiring ankle foot orthoses (braces), and weakness of palmar and dorsal interossei; and (3) a severe CMT phenotype that shows some proximal limb weakness in addition to distal weakness. The patients with this phenotype require canes or wheelchairs, and some of them have triple arthrodesis of the feet.
Figure 1. (A) The pedigree of family 1 showing no male-to-male transmission, consistent with X-linked inheritance. (B) Pedigree of family 2. Arrows indicate the proband.
Based on these definitions, patients in both families were diagnosed with moderate CMTX1. The onset of the disease was between the ages of 12 and 14 years, with pes cavus, hammer toes, moderate to severe weakness of feet extensors (tibialis anterior) and evertors (peroneals), weakness of palmar and dorsal interossei, absence of deep tendon reflexes, distal hypesthesia (proprioceptive, pallesthetic, tactile), positive Romberg's sign, slow progressivity. Male patients were more severely affected than female patients. The probands of both families wore ankle foot orthoses. Motor nerve conduction velocities showed slowing (20 to 30 m/sec) in both male and female patients, and their EMGs were normal.
Molecular genetic studies.
The results of genetic linkage analysis of family 1 were inconclusive because of the small family size. Analysis of family 2 revealed positive lod scores with maximal values of 1.50 with markers of the Xq13.1 region. Neither family showed any point mutations in the coding region of the CX32 gene. To look for possible promoter or splice site mutations, or both, the nervespecific promoter P2 region Figure 2 (Neuhaus et al., Bioscience Reports, in press) of the CX32 gene was analyzed by PCR amplification of DNA from male patients. Direct sequence analysis of the PCR products revealed that patients of family 1 had a T-to-G transversion at position -528 in relation to the translation start codon, and patients of family 2 had a C-to-T transition at position -458. The latter mutation destroys the HhaI restriction endonuclease site, which was used to analyze a large number of members of this family. Both mutations occurred in male and female (heterozygous) patients and were not present in the nonaffected members of the families. In addition, over 100 unrelated control individuals, both males and females, lacked the two mutations, making it unlikely that the mutations represent polymorphisms without phenotype.
Figure 2. (a) The human connexin32 gene with its two tissue-specific promoters. Alternative splicing of mRNA is indicated by thin lines. (b) Sequence of the promoter P2 region of the human connexin32 gene. The locations of the two mutations found in families 1 and 2 are shown in boxes above the normal sequence. The transcription start site (Neuhaus et al., Bioscience Reports, in press) and normal donor splice site are indicated.
Discussion.
Dominantly inherited diseases are usually caused by structural protein defects. Genes that encode for a protein subunit of a membrane, receptor, or organelle structure will be responsible for dominant diseases as distinct from the recessive disorders, which are caused by enzyme protein defects. [15] CMTX1 is associated with mutations in the gene encoding CX32, a member of the family of proteins forming intercellular channels. The CX32 mutations identified in CMTX1 patients are dominant and are considered to produce the clinical phenotype by single amino acid substitutions (missense mutations), a codon deletion, or frame shifts resulting in truncated proteins (nonsense mutations). [10-12] Nonsense mutations are very convincing regarding causality for the disease because of a complete loss of function of the protein.
Female patients (manifesting carriers) have milder phenotypes than male patients with CMTX1, and the suggested explanation is that they are heterozygotes for the mutant gene and therefore mosaics for CX32 mutation.
New studies have shown that CMTX1 mutants selectively act as dominant inhibitors of intercellular communications because they are devoid of channel activity. These results demonstrate a functional loss and are consistent with null mutations of CX32 in patients with CMTX1 neuropathy. [16]
The rat CX32 gene consists of three exons that are transcribed from two alternative promoters and spliced alternatively in different tissues. Exon Ia forms most of the 5 prime-UTR of mRNA present in liver and pancreas, whereas exon Ib forms most of the 5 prime-UTR of mRNA present in nervous tissue. Exon II is shared by both mRNA species and contains the remainder of the 5 prime-UTR, the entire coding region and the 3 prime-UTR. [17] The structure of the human CX32 gene is analogous. Promoter P1 is used exclusively in liver and pancreas, whereas promoter P2 is functional in nervous tissue (Neuhaus et al., Bioscience Reports, in press). The regulation of expression of the CX32 gene is similar to that of the peripheral myelin protein 22 gene in neural and non-neural tissue that also involves the use of two alternative promoters producing mRNAs with distinct 5 prime-UTRs. [18] This suggests that the translation machinery in nervous tissue requires specific 5 prime-UTRs for the efficient translation of mRNA.
The mutation in family 1 is located in the nervespecific promoter P2 of the CX32 gene 16 base pairs upstream of the TATA box. This mutation may directly affect the rate of initiation of transcription. In contrast, the mutation in family 2 is located in a region that codes for the 5 prime-UTR of the mRNA found in nervous tissue. The mutation creates a potential donor splice site, showing only a one-base deviation from the consensus sequence, and thus might cause incorrect splicing of the CX32 transcript. This would produce an mRNA with a shortened 5 prime-UTR. Alternatively, the GTG codon, which is created by this mutation, represents a potential translation initiation site that may be used as a translation start codon and thereby compete with the initiation from the correct AUG located downstream from it. There is a similar mutation in some patients with beta-thalassemia in which the mutation created a new ATG site that led to the initiation of a very short peptide chain. [19] Furthermore, Davidson et al. described a mutation of the AUG initiation codon of the human HPRT gene creating a GUG codon that functioned as a translation start codon. [20] Similarly, the CMTX1 mutation in family 2 would lead to the initiation of a polypeptide chain of only 12 amino acids because of a stop codon located only 37 bases downstream of the newly created GTG initiation codon. The precise effects of these mutations will have to be studied in transfection experiments or in transgenic mice.
The present study is the first report of mutations in the CX32 gene that are not located in the coding region. The location of these mutations near the nerve-specific promoter of the gene would not affect the expression of the gene in liver or pancreas where a different promoter is used (Neuhaus et al., Bioscience Reports, in press). The association of these mutations with the CMT phenotype does not by itself prove that they cause the disease. However, taken together with the CX32 coding region mutations that were found associated with the CMT phenotype, they make a strong argument that the CX32 protein is essential for nerve function and that mutations in its gene cause CMT neuropathy.
- Copyright 1996 by Advanstar Communications Inc.
REFERENCES
- 1.↵
McKusick VA. Mendelian inheritance in man. 10th edition. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1994.
- 2.↵
Gal A, Mucke J, Theile H, Wieacker PF, Ropers HH, Wienker TF. X-linked dominant Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: suggestion of linkage with a cloned DNA sequence from the proximal Xq. Hum Genet 1985;70:38-42.
- 3.
Beckett J, Holden NE, Simpson BN, White BN, MacLeod PM. Localization of X-linked dominant Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease to Xq13.1. J Neurogenet 1986;3:225-231.
- 4.
Fischbeck KH, Ar-Rushdi N, Pericak-Vance M, Rozear M, Roses AD, Fryns JP. X-linked neuropathy: gene localization with DNA probes. Ann Neurol 1986;20:527-532.
- 5.
Goonewardena P, Welinhinda J, Anvret M, et al. A linkage study of the locus for X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Clin Genet 1988;33:435-440.
- 6.
- 7.↵
- 8.
Haites N, Fairweather N, Clark C, Kelly KF, Simpson S, Johnston AW. Linkage in a family with X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Clin Genet 1989;35:399-403.
- 9.
Mostacciuolo ML, Miller E, Fardin P, et al. X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: a linkage study in a large family using 12 probes of the pericentromeric region. Hum Genet 1991;87:23-27.
- 10.↵
Bergoffen J, Sherer SS, Wang S, et al. Connexin mutations in X-linked Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. Science 1993;262:2039-2042.
- 11.↵
Ionasescu V, Searby Ch, Ionasescu R. Point mutations of the connexin 32 (GJB1) gene in X-linked dominant Charcot-Marie-Tooth neuropathy. Hum Mol Genet 1994;2:355-358.
- 12.
- 13.↵
Kunkel LM, Tantravahi U, Eisenhard M, Latt SA. Regional localization on the human X of DNA segments cloned from flow sorted chromosomes. Nucleic Acids Res 1982;10:1557-1578.
- 14.↵
Lathrop GM, Lalouel JM, Julier C, Ott J. Strategies for multilocus linkage analysis in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1984;81:3443-3446.
- 15.↵
Rosenberg RN. Neurogenetics, principles and practice. New York: Raven Press, 1986.
- 16.↵
- 17.↵
Neuhaus IM, Dahl G, Werner R. Use of alternate promoters for tissue-specific expression of the gene coding for connexin 32. Gene 1995;158:257-262.
- 18.↵
Suter U, Jackson Snipes G, Schoener-Scott R, et al. Regulation of tissue-specific expression of alternative peripheral myelin protein-22 (PMP22) gene transcripts by two promoters. J Biol Chem 1994;269:25795-25808.
- 19.↵
Cai SP, Eng B, Francombe WH, et al. Two novel beta-thalassaemia mutations in the 5 prime and 3 prime noncoding regions of the beta-globin gene. Blood 1992;79:1342-1346.
- 20.↵
Davidson BL, Golovoy N, Roessler BJ. A 13 base pair deletion in exon 1 of HPRT Illinois forms a functional GUG initiation codon. Hum Genet 1994;93:300-304.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Hemiplegic Migraine Associated With PRRT2 Variations A Clinical and Genetic Study
Dr. Robert Shapiro and Dr. Amynah Pradhan
Related Articles
- No related articles found.