Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Specialty Sites
    • COVID-19
    • Practice Current
    • Practice Buzz
    • Without Borders
    • Equity, Diversity and Inclusion
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
  • Collections
    • Topics A-Z
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Infographics
    • Patient Pages
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Center

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Specialty Sites
    • COVID-19
    • Practice Current
    • Practice Buzz
    • Without Borders
    • Equity, Diversity and Inclusion
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
  • Collections
    • Topics A-Z
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Infographics
    • Patient Pages
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Center
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Residents & Fellows

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Neurology
Home
The most widely read and highly cited peer-reviewed neurology journal
  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
Site Logo
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Residents & Fellows

Share

October 01, 1996; 47 (4) VIEWS AND REVIEWS

Ethical use of placebos and provocative testing in diagnosing nonepileptic seizures

Orrin Devinsky, Robert Fisher
First published October 1, 1996, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.47.4.866
Orrin Devinsky
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert Fisher
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Full PDF
Citation
Ethical use of placebos and provocative testing in diagnosing nonepileptic seizures
Orrin Devinsky, Robert Fisher
Neurology Oct 1996, 47 (4) 866-870; DOI: 10.1212/WNL.47.4.866

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions

Make Comment

See Comments

Downloads
75

Share

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Loading

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

One important reason for therapeutic failure of epilepsy treatment is misdiagnosis of epilepsy. Several imitators of epilepsy [1] can confound even experienced clinicians. Among these imitators, nonepileptic (psychogenic) seizures (NES) can be particularly difficult to diagnose. Induction of NES by hypnosis or suggestion has been used since 1955. [2] This diagnostic maneuver, although useful, raises ethical issues pertaining to employment of placebos, informed consent, and the effect of deception on the patient-doctor relationship. In this review, we examine provocative testing for seizures in light of these issues.

Placebo use in medicine.

Neurologists use placebos during provocative testing to diagnose suspected conversion symptoms. Recent reviews address ethical issues of placebo use in controlled studies. [3] Here, we review a brief history of the placebo and consider ethical issues related to placebo use in provocative testing.

The therapeutic benefits of placebos have been recognized, directly or indirectly, since the dawn of civilization. Given the severe limitations of pharmacologic and surgical therapies until the current century, administration of a placebo was among the most effective therapeutic strategies. Robert Burton (1628) [4] recognized that "a silly chirurgeon, doth more strange cures than a rational physician ... because the patient puts his confidence in him." Mesmer's use of animal magnetism during the late 18th century, although disproved as fraudulent, became the forerunner of hypnotism and helped shape the future of dynamic psychiatry. [5] Thomas Jefferson (1807) viewed placebos as a "pious fraud," but noted that "One of the most successful physicians ... used more of bread pills, drops of colored water, and powders of hickory ashes, than of all other medicines put together." [6] In the late 19th century, Charcot used hypnosis and suggestion to explore various neuropsychiatric disorders, including conversion. In pioneering studies, he hypnotized patients to produce and relieve hysterical paralysis, mutism, and amnesia. Unfortunately, some of …

View Full Text

AAN Members

We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.

Google Safari Microsoft Edge Firefox

Click here to login

AAN Non-Member Subscribers

Click here to login

Purchase access

For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)

Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here 

Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page.  Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00.  Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means.  The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use.  Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.

Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence

No comments have been published for this article.
Comment

NOTE: All authors' disclosures must be entered and current in our database before comments can be posted. Enter and update disclosures at http://submit.neurology.org. Exception: replies to comments concerning an article you originally authored do not require updated disclosures.

  • Stay timely. Submit only on articles published within the last 8 weeks.
  • Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
  • 200 words maximum.
  • 5 references maximum. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
  • 5 authors maximum. Exception: replies can include all original authors of the article.
  • Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.

More guidelines and information on Disputes & Debates

Compose Comment

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
NOTE: The first author must also be the corresponding author of the comment.
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Publishing Agreement
NOTE: All authors, besides the first/corresponding author, must complete a separate Disputes & Debates Submission Form and provide via email to the editorial office before comments can be posted.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

You May Also be Interested in

Back to top
  • Article
    • Placebo use in medicine.
    • Effects of placebo therapy.
    • Ethical issues in using placebos for therapy.
    • The use of provocation test suggestion to elicit conversion symptoms or malingering.
    • Spell induction.
    • Conclusion.
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Advertisement

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.

Alert Me

  • Alert me when eletters are published
Neurology: 96 (9)

Articles

  • Ahead of Print
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Popular Articles
  • Translations

About

  • About the Journals
  • Ethics Policies
  • Editors & Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise

Submit

  • Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Information for Reviewers
  • AAN Guidelines
  • Permissions

Subscribers

  • Subscribe
  • Activate a Subscription
  • Sign up for eAlerts
  • RSS Feed
Site Logo
  • Visit neurology Template on Facebook
  • Follow neurology Template on Twitter
  • Visit Neurology on YouTube
  • Neurology
  • Neurology: Clinical Practice
  • Neurology: Genetics
  • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • AAN.com
  • AANnews
  • Continuum
  • Brain & Life
  • Neurology Today

Wolters Kluwer Logo

Neurology | Print ISSN:0028-3878
Online ISSN:1526-632X

© 2021 American Academy of Neurology

  • Privacy Policy
  • Feedback
  • Advertise