Abstract
Objective To assess whether the thalamic pain syndrome of Dejerine-Roussy is produced preferentially by right diencephalic lesions and to elucidate its clinical features.
Background Several experimental paradigms suggest that the right hemisphere is specialized for monitoring somatic states, including mediating pain. However, clinical studies of pain laterality have been inconclusive, possibly due to pathophysiologic diversity among analyzed patients. We collected reports of central pain laterality in a single, well-demarcated disorder, the Dejerine-Roussy syndrome.
Design/Methods Reports from English, French, and German literature were identified through Medline search and bibliography-guided retrieval. Inclusion criteria were (1) thalamic lesion documented by CT, MRI, or postmortem examination and (2) contralateral pain. Exclusion criteria were (1) tumoral/nonvascular etiology (to optimize anatomic localization), (2) symptoms consisting solely of evoked dysesthesia without spontaneous pain, or (3) sidedness of lesion not clearly indicated. Cases were analyzed for laterality as well as secondary anatomic and clinical variables.
Results Literature search identified 274 cases. After exclusions, 180 remained. A total of 114 had a right-sided thalamic lesion, 66 left-sided (p < 0.001). Laterality predominance was greater among men than women. The frequency of other components of the Dejerine-Roussy syndrome—sensory impairment, hemiparesis, ataxia, and choreoathetosis—did not significantly differ between right and left groups. Pain onset was within the first week poststroke in 36%. Frequency of spontaneous pain was 14% after any thalamic stroke and 24% after geniculothalamic artery territory stroke.
Conclusion Right-sided lesions predominate among reported cases of the thalamic pain syndrome. This preferential involvement of the nondominant thalamus in pain processing is supportive evidence of a nondominant hemisphere specialization in monitoring somatic states.
- © 1997 by the American Academy of Neurology
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Use of Whole-Genome Sequencing for Mitochondrial Disease Diagnosis
Dr. Robert Pitceathly and Dr. William Macken