Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Education
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion (DEI)
    • Neurology: Clinical Practice Accelerator
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Neurology Future Forecasting Series
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Topics A-Z
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit New Manuscript
    • Submit Revised Manuscript
    • Author Center

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Education
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion (DEI)
    • Neurology: Clinical Practice Accelerator
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Neurology Future Forecasting Series
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Topics A-Z
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit New Manuscript
    • Submit Revised Manuscript
    • Author Center
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Neurology Video Journal Club
  • Residents & Fellows

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Neurology
Home
The most widely read and highly cited peer-reviewed neurology journal
  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
Site Logo
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Neurology Video Journal Club
  • Residents & Fellows

Share

November 01, 1998; 51 (5) Articles

Dextromethorphan decreases the excitability of the human motor cortex

Ulf Ziemann, Robert Chen, Leonardo G. Cohen, Mark Hallett
First published November 1, 1998, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.51.5.1320
Ulf Ziemann
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert Chen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Leonardo G. Cohen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Mark Hallett
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Full PDF
Citation
Dextromethorphan decreases the excitability of the human motor cortex
Ulf Ziemann, Robert Chen, Leonardo G. Cohen, Mark Hallett
Neurology Nov 1998, 51 (5) 1320-1324; DOI: 10.1212/WNL.51.5.1320

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions

Make Comment

See Comments

Downloads
255

Share

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Loading

Abstract

Objective: To assess the acute effects of dextromethorphan (DM) on human motor cortical excitability.

Background: DM, a noncompetitive N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonist, has recently attracted clinical interest for its potential as a neuroprotective agent in various models of excitotoxicity. We were interested in learning whether this drug can modulate the excitability of the motor cortex in healthy subjects.

Methods: The effects of DM on the excitability of the normal human motor cortex were studied in eight healthy volunteers by means of focal transcranial magnetic stimulation before and 1.5, 4, 6.5, and 24 hours after a single oral dose of 150 mg DM. Motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded from the relaxed abductor digiti minimi muscle. Measures of motor cortical excitability were motor threshold, MEP recruitment, duration of the cortical silent period, and intracortical inhibition and facilitation. In addition, the authors explored spinal and neuromuscular excitability by means of F waves, duration of the peripheral silent period, and maximum M wave.

Results: Intracortical inhibition increased temporarily, intracortical facilitation decreased, and the cortical silent period lengthened slightly. Motor threshold, MEP recruitment, and spinal and peripheral motor excitability were not affected significantly.

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that DM can exert a significant suppression of the excitatory drive in the normal human cortex, which may be relevant for its potential therapeutic use in excitotoxicity-related neurologic disease. Furthermore, the noninvasive technique described may prove useful in preclinical studies to assess the effects on motor cortical excitability induced by new modulators of glutamatergic transmission currently under development.

The activation of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors has been implicated in several forms of neocortical synaptic plasticity such as long-term potentiation and long-term depression,1-4 but also in excitotoxicity-mediated neuronal death in various neurodegenerative diseases5 or under ischemic conditions.6 Blockade of NMDA receptors was effective in preventing deafferentation-induced plasticity of sensory maps in the somatosensory cortex of nonhuman primates.7,8 Dextromethorphan (DM), a noncompetitive blocker of the NMDA receptor, showed neuroprotective properties in ischemia-induced neuronal damage in rats.9 However, DM appeared ineffective in therapeutic trials in human neurodegenerative disease such as PD10 or ALS.11 In the current study we employed transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in healthy volunteers before and after a single oral dose of DM to learn whether this NMDA receptor antagonist is capable of reducing the activity of excitatory circuits in the normal human motor cortex.

Methods. Subjects. Eight healthy volunteers (mean age, 31.8 ± 11.3 years; range, 18 to 54 years; three women and five men) participated in the study. All gave written informed consent. Experiments were approved by the institutional review board.

Measures of motor excitability. Details of the experimental protocol have been described elsewhere.12 In short, motor evoked potentials (MEPs) were recorded with surface electromyography (EMG) from the left abductor digiti minimi (ADM) muscle. The amplified and bandpass-filtered (0.1 to 2 kHz) EMG raw signal was digitized (analog/digital rate, 5 kHz) and fed into a laboratory computer (486 DX, IBM PC/AT, American Megatrends, Inc., Norcross, GA). TMS was delivered through a focal figure-of-eight shaped coil (each loop measured 70 mm in diameter) connected to two magnetic stimulators via a BiStim module (Magstim, Whitland, Dyfed, UK), and placed flat on the skull over the right motor cortex at the site optimal for left ADM activation. The induced current in the brain beneath the junction of the coil flowed from posterior to anterior, approximately perpendicular to the assumed line of the central sulcus.

Resting motor threshold (RMT) was determined to the nearest 1% of maximal stimulator output and was defined as the minimum stimulus intensity that produced MEPs ≥50 µV in at least 5 of 10 trials. Active motor threshold (AMT) was determined in the moderately active ADM (approximately 10% of the maximum voluntary contraction, monitored by an auditory feedback of the EMG signal) and was defined as the minimum intensity that produced an MEP ≥100 µV in an average of five consecutive trials. It is currently thought that the motor threshold reflects primarily the excitability of neuronal membranes because voltage-gated sodium or calcium channel blockers increase motor threshold.12-14

Peak-to-peak MEP amplitudes were measured in the resting ADM at stimulus intensities of 100, 110, 130, and 150% RMT (MEP recruitment curve). Conditional averages (10 trials per stimulus intensity) of MEP amplitudes were calculated and related to the size of the maximum M wave (Mmax). The slope of the MEP recruitment curve is related to the number of corticospinal neurons that can be activated at a given stimulus intensity, mainly indirectly through corticocortical connections.15

Intracortical inhibition (ICI) and intracortical facilitation (ICF) were obtained in the resting ADM according to a previously described paired TMS protocol16,17 using a sub-threshold (90% AMT) conditioning stimulus followed by a suprathreshold test stimulus (adjusted to produce control MEPs of approximately 1 mV in peak-to-peak amplitude) at 12 different interstimulus intervals (ISIs) from 1 to 30 msec. Four blocks of 40 trials were run. Each consisted of 10 control trials (test stimulus alone) and 30 paired stimulation trials (three ISIs per block) in a random order. For each ISI, the amplitude ratio of the mean conditioned MEP to the control MEP was calculated.16,17 ICI and ICF were defined as the averages of the MEP ratios obtained at inhibitory ISIs of 1 to 5 msec, and facilitatory ISIs of 7 to 20 msec respectively. Several lines of evidence have accumulated that imply that ICI and ICF reflect primarily the excitability of separate inhibitory and excitatory interneuronal circuits within the motor cortex, which in turn regulate the activity of motor cortical output cells.16-19

The cortical silent period (CSP) was measured in 10 trials each at stimulus intensities of 125, 150, and 200% AMT in the moderately active ADM. CSP duration was defined in the rectified single trials from the time of the magnetic stimulus to the first reoccurrence of voluntary EMG activity. For each stimulus intensity the average was calculated. Many authors (for review see Hallett20) suggested that the CSP duration is related to long-lasting inhibitory mechanisms at the level of the motor cortex. However, other mechanisms such as the accessibility of voluntary motor drive to the primary motor cortex may also play a role (e.g., see Classen et al.21 and Ziemann et al.22).

Supramaximal electrical stimulation (0.2-msec square-wave constant current pulses) of the ulnar nerve at the wrist was used to assess spinal and peripheral motor excitability. While the ADM was active, the duration of the peripheral silent period (PSP; measured from the time of the electrical stimulus to the first recurrence of voluntary EMG activity), the peak-to-peak amplitudes of F waves, and Mmax were determined (average, 10 trials). All parameters of motor excitability were measured before and 1.5, 4, 6.5, and 24 hours after a single oral dose of 150 mg DM was administered in five 30-mg capsules. Adverse side effects were generally slight (lightheadedness in five subjects, sedation in four subjects, and nausea in three subjects) and did not interfere with the subjects' ability to comply fully with the requirements of the experimental protocol.

Statistical procedures. The different measures of motor excitability were analyzed separately. The effect of DM was evaluated in an analysis of variance model of repeated measures, with time as the intrasubject effect. Conditional on significance of the F value, the measures obtained at the four delays after drug intake were compared individually with the baseline data in post hoc two-tailed paired Student's t-tests. In general, significance was accepted at p < 0.05. However, for the paired t-tests the level of significance was adjusted by dividing it by the number of comparisons (0.05 ÷ 4 = 0.0125) to approximate the conservativeness of post hoc statistics corrected for multiple comparisons, which are not appropriate in repeated-measure statistics.

Results. A single oral dose of 150 mg DM resulted in a temporary increase in ICI and a decrease in ICF (see figure, table). These effects peaked at 1.5 hours after drug intake but were no longer statistically significant after 4 hours. Furthermore, DM produced an overall lengthening effect on CSP200, which was only a nonsignificant trend at 1.5 and 4 hours in the post hoc pairwise comparisons (see the table). All other measures of motor excitability (RMT, AMT, MEP recruitment, CSP125, CSP150, PSP, F wave, and Mmax) were not affected by DM (see the table).

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure. Intracortical inhibition (A) and intracortical facilitation (B) are pooled across inhibitory interstimulus intervals of 1 to 5 msec and facilitatory intervals of 7 to 20 msec respectively, and are expressed as the ratio of conditioned motor evoked potential (MEP) versus control MEP amplitudes (ordinates). Data are plotted against the delay (abscissa) after intake of a single oral dose of 150 mg dextromethorphan. The individual data of the eight subjects are shown by gray lines and different symbols. Mean data and standard errors are denoted by the heavy black lines and error bars. Asterisks at 1.5 hours after drug intake indicate a significant drug-induced deepening of intracortical inhibition and a suppression of intracortical facilitation. *p < 0.05. **p < 0.005.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint

Table Effects of dextromethorphan on the measures of motor excitability

Discussion. The principal new finding of the current study was that a single oral dose of an NMDA receptor antagonist induced a temporary deepening of ICI and a suppression of ICF in the normal human brain. ICI and ICF reflect the excitability of respectively inhibitory and excitatory interneuronal circuits at the level of the motor cortex.16,17 Both measures are regulated in part by γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)12,23,24-the major inhibitory neurotransmitter in the mammalian cerebral cortex. The current findings demonstrate that DM is also capable of increasing inhibition and decreasing excitation in the motor cortex as defined by these TMS measures. Very likely, these effects are produced by a noncompetitive NMDA receptor blockade that is thought to be the responsible mechanism for the neuroprotective and anticonvulsant properties of this drug (for review see Netzer et al.25). At high concentrations, DM is also a blocker of voltage-dependent Ca2+ and Na+ channels,25 but it is unlikely that these modes of action were relevant to the current results, because classic ion channel-blocking antiepileptic drugs like carbamazepine and phenytoin have no effect on ICI or ICF.12,14 Furthermore, DM had no effect on motor threshold, which is elevated by ion channel blockers.12-14

The duration of the CSP is thought to reflect the activity of inhibitory mechanisms in the motor cortex,20 but its physiology is not completely understood and its relation to GABA is less clear than for ICI or ICF.12,26,27 The current findings indicate that a suppression of the excitatory motor cortical drive through a blockade of NMDA receptors can lead to a slight lengthening of the CSP.

DM is metabolized rapidly and extensively to dextrorphan, which has a high affinity for the phencyclidine binding site of the NMDA receptor, and has potent neuroprotective and anticonvulsant properties similar to DM.28 Both DM and dextrorphan have short plasma peak times of 1.2 to 2.2 hours in extensive metabolizers.29 Therefore, the peaking of DM effects on motor excitability at 1.5 hours in the current experiments is compatible with the pharmacokinetics of this compound. Whether DM, dextrorphan, or both were responsible for the observed results is uncertain.

To our knowledge, the effects of the major excitatory neurotransmitter in the CNS glutamate on motor excitability have not been studied with TMS, except in one other study using riluzole rather than DM.30 This is surprising because glutamate is considered of crucial importance in the regulation of cortical excitability, in excitotoxicity-mediated neurodegeneration, and in various forms of neuroplasticity. Previous TMS studies (for review see Ziemann et al.31) showed that the excitability of the motor cortex is increased in various forms of epilepsy and in some neurodegenerative diseases such as ALS.32,33 The latter studies related their findings to the hypothesis that glutamatergic excitotoxicity plays an important role in the pathogenesis of this disease. The current TMS experiments support this view by showing that a single oral dose of the NMDA receptor antagonist DM can shift the balance toward less excitation and more inhibition even in the normal human brain.

Acknowledgment

The authors thank J. Dambrosia for help with the statistical analysis.

Footnotes

  • Supported by grant Zi 542/1-1 from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (U.Z.).

    Received April 3, 1998. Accepted in final form July 13, 1998.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Kirkwood A, Dudek SD, Gold JT, Aizenman CD, Bear MF. Common forms of synaptic plasticity in hippocampus and neocortex. Science 1993;260:1518-1521.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.
    Bear MF, Malenka RC. Synaptic plasticity: LTP and LTD. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1994;4:389-399.
    OpenUrl
  3. 3.
    Hess G, Donoghue JP. Long-term potentiation of horizontal connections provides a mechanism to reorganize cortical motor maps. J Neurophysiol 1994;71:2543-2547.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.
    Hess G, Aizenman CD, Donoghue JP. Conditions for the induction of long-term potentiation in layer II/III horizontal connections of the rat motor cortex. J Neurophysiol 1996;75:1765-1778.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Rothstein JD. Excitotoxic mechanisms in the pathogenesis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Adv Neurol 1995;68:7-20.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    McCulloch J. Glutamate receptor antagonists in cerebral ischaemia. J Neural Transm Suppl 1994;43:71-79.
    OpenUrl
  7. 7.↵
    Kano M, Iino K, Kano M. Functional reorganization of adult cat somatosensory cortex is dependent on NMDA receptors. Neuroreport 1991;2:77-80.
    OpenUrl
  8. 8.
    Garraghty PE, Muja N. NMDA receptors and plasticity in adult primate somatosensory cortex. J Comp Neurol 1996;367:319-326.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    Block F, Schwarz M. Dextromethorphan reduces functional deficits and neuronal damage after global ischemia in rats. Brain Res 1996;741:153-159.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    Montastruc JL, Rascol O, Senard JM. Glutamate antagonists and Parkinson's disease: a review of clinical data. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 1997;21:477-480.
    OpenUrl
  11. 11.↵
    Gredal O, Werdelin L, Bak S, et al. A clinical trial of dextromethorphan in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand 1997;96:8-13.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    Ziemann U, Lonnecker S, Steinhoff BJ, Paulus W. Effects of antiepileptic drugs on motor cortex excitability in humans: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Ann Neurol 1996;40:367-378.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.
    Mavroudakis N, Caroyer JM, Brunko E, Zegers de Beyl D. Effects of diphenylhydantoin on motor potentials evoked with magnetic stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1994;93:428-433.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.
    Chen R, Samii A, Canos M, Wassermann EM, Hallett M. Effects of phenytoin on cortical excitability in humans. Neurology 1997;49:881-883.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    Ridding MC, Rothwell JC. Stimulus/response curves as a method of measuring motor cortical excitability in man. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1997;105:340-344.
    OpenUrl
  16. 16.↵
    Kujirai T, Caramina MD, Rothwell JC, et al. Corticocortical inhibition in human motor cortex. J Physiol (Lond) 1993;471:501-519.
    OpenUrl
  17. 17.
    Ziemann U, Rothwell JC, Ridding MC. Interaction between intracortical inhibition and facilitation in human motor cortex. J Physiol (Lond) 1996;496:873-881.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.
    Nakamura H, Kitagawa H, Kawaguchi Y, Tsuji H. Intracortical facilitation and inhibition after transcranial magnetic stimulation in conscious humans. J Physiol (Lond) 1997;498:817-823.
    OpenUrl
  19. 19.
    Di Lazzaro V, Restuccia D, Oliviero A, et al. Magnetic transcranial stimulation at intensities below active motor threshold activates intracortical inhibitory circuits. Exp Brain Res 1998;119:265-268.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    Hallett M. Transcranial magnetic stimulation. Negative effects. Adv Neurol 1995;67:107-113.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    Classen J, Schnitzler A, Binkofski F, et al. The motor syndrome associated with exaggerated inhibition within the primary motor cortex of patients with hemiparetic stroke. Brain 1997;120:605-619.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.↵
    Ziemann U, Paulus W, Rothenberger A. Decreased motor inhibition in Tourette's disorder: evidence from transcranial magnetic stimulation. Am J Psychiatry 1997;154:1277-1284.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. 23.
    Ziemann U, Lonnecker S, Paulus W. Inhibition of human motor cortex by ethanol. A transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Brain 1995;118:1437-1446.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. 24.
    Ziemann U, Lonnecker S, Steinhoff BJ, Paulus W. The effect of lorazepam on the motor cortical excitability in man. Exp Brain Res 1996;109:127-135.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    Netzer R, Pflimlin P, Trube G. Dextromethorphan blocks N-methyl-D-aspartate-induced currents and voltage-operated inward currents in cultured cortical neurons. Eur J Pharmacol 1993;238:209-216.
    OpenUrl
  26. 26.
    Inghilleri M, Berardelli A, Marchetti P, Manfredi M. Effects of diazepam, baclofen and thiopental on the silent period evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation in humans. Exp Brain Res 1996;109:467-472.
    OpenUrl
  27. 27.
    Mavroudakis N, Caroyer JM, Brunko E, Zegers de Beyl D. Effects of vigabatrin on motor potentials with magnetic stimulation. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1997;105:124-127.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    Goldberg MP, Pham PC, Choi DW. Dextrorphan and dextromethorphan attenuate hypoxic injury in neuronal culture. Neurosci Lett 1987;80:11-15.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    Silvasti M, Karttunen P, Tukiainen H, Kokkonen P, Hanninen U, Nykanen S. Pharmacokinetics of dextromethorphan and dextrorphan: a single dose comparison of three preparations in human volunteers. Int J Clin Pharmacol Ther Toxicol 1987;25:493-497.
    OpenUrl
  30. 30.↵
    Liepert J, Schwenkreis P, Tegenthoff M, Malin J-P. The glutamate antagonist riluzole suppresses intracortical facilitation. J Neural Transm 1997;104:1207-1214.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.↵
    Ziemann U, Steinhoff BJ, Tergau F, Paulus W. Transcranial magnetic stimulation: its current role in epilepsy research. Epilepsy Res 1998;30:11-30.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. 32.↵
    Ziemann U, Winter M, Reimers CD, Reimers K, Tergau F, Paulus W. Impaired motor cortex inhibition in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Evidence from paired transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurology 1997;49:1292-1298.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  33. 33.
    Yokota T, Yoshino A, Inaba A, Saito Y. Double cortical stimulation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1996;61:596-600.
    OpenUrl

Letters: Rapid online correspondence

No comments have been published for this article.
Comment

REQUIREMENTS

You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.

Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.

If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.

Submission specifications:

  • Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
  • Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
  • Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
  • Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
  • Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.

More guidelines and information on Disputes & Debates

Compose Comment

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
NOTE: The first author must also be the corresponding author of the comment.
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Publishing Agreement
NOTE: All authors, besides the first/corresponding author, must complete a separate Publishing Agreement Form and provide via email to the editorial office before comments can be posted.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

You May Also be Interested in

Back to top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Acknowledgment
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Advertisement

Cutaneous α-Synuclein Signatures in Patients With Multiple System Atrophy and Parkinson Disease

Dr. Rizwan S. Akhtar and Dr. Sarah Brooker

► Watch

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.

Alert Me

  • Alert me when eletters are published

Recommended articles

  • Articles
    Functional reorganization of sensorimotor cortex in early Parkinson disease
    M. Kojovic, M. Bologna, P. Kassavetis et al.
    Neurology, April 18, 2012
  • Articles
    Dopaminergic drugs restore facilitatory premotor-motor interactions in Parkinson disease
    P. Mir, K. Matsunaga, F. Gilio et al.
    Neurology, June 13, 2005
  • Articles
    Impaired presynaptic inhibition in the motor cortex in Parkinson disease
    J. Chu, A. Wagle-Shukla, C. Gunraj et al.
    Neurology, March 02, 2009
  • Articles
    Altered cortical excitability in obsessive–compulsive disorder
    B.D. Greenberg, U. Ziemann, G. Corá-Locatelli et al.
    Neurology, January 11, 2000
Neurology: 100 (22)

Articles

  • Ahead of Print
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Popular Articles
  • Translations

About

  • About the Journals
  • Ethics Policies
  • Editors & Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise

Submit

  • Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Information for Reviewers
  • AAN Guidelines
  • Permissions

Subscribers

  • Subscribe
  • Activate a Subscription
  • Sign up for eAlerts
  • RSS Feed
Site Logo
  • Visit neurology Template on Facebook
  • Follow neurology Template on Twitter
  • Visit Neurology on YouTube
  • Neurology
  • Neurology: Clinical Practice
  • Neurology: Education
  • Neurology: Genetics
  • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • AAN.com
  • AANnews
  • Continuum
  • Brain & Life
  • Neurology Today

Wolters Kluwer Logo

Neurology | Print ISSN:0028-3878
Online ISSN:1526-632X

© 2023 American Academy of Neurology

  • Privacy Policy
  • Feedback
  • Advertise