Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Education
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion (DEI)
    • Neurology: Clinical Practice Accelerator
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Neurology Future Forecasting Series
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Topics A-Z
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit New Manuscript
    • Submit Revised Manuscript
    • Author Center

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Education
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion (DEI)
    • Neurology: Clinical Practice Accelerator
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Neurology Future Forecasting Series
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Topics A-Z
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit New Manuscript
    • Submit Revised Manuscript
    • Author Center
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Neurology Video Journal Club
  • Residents & Fellows

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Neurology
Home
The most widely read and highly cited peer-reviewed neurology journal
  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
Site Logo
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Neurology Video Journal Club
  • Residents & Fellows

Share

November 01, 1998; 51 (5) Brief Communications

Physiologic MRI of a tumefactive multiple sclerosis lesion

Thomas Ernst, Linda Chang, Irwin Walot, Kenneth Huff
First published November 1, 1998, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.51.5.1486
Thomas Ernst
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Linda Chang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Irwin Walot
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Kenneth Huff
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Full PDF
Citation
Physiologic MRI of a tumefactive multiple sclerosis lesion
Thomas Ernst, Linda Chang, Irwin Walot, Kenneth Huff
Neurology Nov 1998, 51 (5) 1486-1488; DOI: 10.1212/WNL.51.5.1486

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions

Make Comment

See Comments

Downloads
211

Share

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Loading

Abstract

Structural and physiologic MRI were performed after subacute onset of left hemiparesis in a patient with MS. MRI showed a large ring-enhancing lesion with surrounding edema and mass effect; differential diagnosis included a neoplasm or a large MS plaque. Physiologic MRI showed reduced blood flow and magnetization transfer, as well as increased diffusion, in the large lesion. Because these findings suggested a tumefactive MS plaque rather than a neoplasm, the patient received steroid treatment for acute MS exacerbation. Three months later the patient improved clinically and on MRI.

White matter lesions caused by MS have variable appearance but rarely exceed 2 cm in diameter.1,2 On MRI, acute MS plaques often show enhancement with gadolinium and may be associated with surrounding edema.3 However, when patients present with a solitary, large enhancing lesion with marked surrounding edema (>3 cm), possible diagnoses also include glioma or other neoplasms.1 Because MRI may not differentiate these diseases, diagnosis of these tumefactive lesions often involves a brain biopsy.

Some of these diagnostic problems might be resolved by advanced physiologic MRI techniques. For example, magnetization transfer (MT) MRI improves the sensitivity of MRI for detecting MS lesions and may delineate the extent of demyelination.4 Other physiologic MRI techniques that might be useful for the evaluation of MS lesions are diffusion MRI,5 which evaluates tissue integrity, and perfusion MRI, which measures regional cerebral perfusion. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H MRS) also has been applied to the evaluation of MS lesions6; this technique allows for noninvasive measurement of certain biochemical changes associated with the lesions. We report the application of these physiologic MRI techniques in a young woman with MS who had a large contrast-enhancing lesion with marked surrounding edema. In this unusual case, physiologic MRI helped to exclude a neoplastic process.

Case report. A 20-year-old woman with a diagnosis of MS presented with a 1-week history of progressive weakness and coordination problems in her left hand, gait difficulty, and mildly slurred speech. She had been maintained on interferon beta-1b, 0.25 mg every other day, for the treatment of her MS. On examination her height was 62 inches, her weight was 147 pounds, and her vital signs were normal. Her cognitive function was intact, but she had difficulty writing with her left-dominant hand due to the left hemiparesis. Cranial nerves were intact except for nystagmus associated with leftward and upward gaze; she also had jerky pursuit movements bilaterally. Motor examination showed mild weakness primarily in the left upper extremity, involving the distal more than the proximal regions. Her sensory examination showed decreased light touch distal to her left elbow, but intact pinprick sensation, and decreased proprioception and vibratory sensation in her left fingers. She had mild truncal ataxia and dysmetria in the left upper extremity. She also had hyperactive deep tendon reflexes and the presence of Babinski sign bilaterally. Her gait was wide based and mildly ataxic. She scored 3.5 on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS).7

Figure 1 shows the results of the initial MR studies, performed on a 1.5-T GE scanner. The fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images showed several small periventricular white matter lesions consistent with MS. However, one large lesion in the right frontoparietal white matter had unusual radiographic features for MS, such as large size (2.8 × 1.6 cm) with mass effect, marked surrounding edema (4.5 × 6.5 cm), and ring enhancement after gadolinium injection (see figure 1, A and B). These MRI findings raised the possibilities of a neoplastic process versus a tumefactive MS lesion.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 1. Initial structural and physiologic MRIs and magnetic resonance spectroscopy obtained 1 month after onset of clinical symptoms. (A) Fluid-attenuated inversion recovery image, (B) postgadolinium T1-weighted image, (C) magnetization transfer ratio map, (D) regional cerebral blood flow map, and (E) apparent diffusion coefficient map of an axial slice through the center of the large enhancing lesion in the right frontoparietal region. Localized 1H spectra were obtained from a voxel (3.7 cc) in the lesion (bottom right, lower spectrum) and in the contralateral normal-appearing white matter (upper spectrum). Spectra are scaled (repeat time/echo time = 3,000/30 msec). See text for details. MI = myoinositol; CHO = choline; CR = creatine; NA = N-acetyl; LAC/LIP = lactate and lipids.

1H MRS of the mass lesion showed slightly elevated choline (CHO, +10%), decreased N-acetyl compounds (NA, -39%), decreased creatine (CR, -52%), decreased myoinositol (MI, -38%), and excess lactate and lipids (LAC/LIP) compared with the contralateral normal-appearing brain region. The MT ratio (MTR; see figure 1C) was markedly decreased in the enhancing lesion (MTR = 0.22) and moderately decreased in the surrounding edema (MTR = 0.30) compared with normal-appearing white matter (MTR = 0.45).

Regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF) was calculated from the signal changes of a dynamic gradient-echo planar imaging (EPI) scan (echo time [TE]/repeat time [TR] = 30/2,500, 39 time points) during a bolus injection of gadolinium contrast agent. The rCBF was decreased (-43%) in the central part of the enhancing lesion as well as in the surrounding edema (see figure 1D). With diffusion MRI, using spin-echo EPI (TE/TR = 109/5,000; b values 0 and 400 sec/mm2), the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was increased in the enhancing lesion (+36%) and the surrounding edema (+67%; see figure 1E).

Because the physiologic MRI findings and the clinical history were suggestive of an acute MS plaque rather than a neoplasm, needle biopsy was deferred and a course of IV methylprednisolone was recommended instead. The patient initially declined the steroid treatment and waited for the exacerbation to subside. However, her left-arm weakness further progressed 1 week later, and she was hospitalized for a 3-day course of IV methylprednisolone (1 g/d). She showed moderate improvement in her symptoms and could return to school. Her left upper-extremity weakness and sensory deficits gradually normalized over the next 3 months; however, her EDSS score remained at 3.5 because she developed new-onset, right lower-extremity weakness.

On the repeat MRI, obtained 3 months after the initial scan, the patient showed several new, small enhancing MS lesions in the left periventricular and right parietal regions (figure 2B). However, the large initial lesion was substantially smaller and did not enhance with gadolinium. The mass effect with surrounding edema also had resolved at the time of the repeat scan. On the repeat 1H MRS, the previously tumefactive MS lesion showed further elevated CHO (+60%), persistently decreased NA (-23%), excess LAC/LIP, and normalized CR (-3%). The previously decreased MI became elevated (+36%) (see figure 2). The MTR in the right frontal white matter normalized compared with the initial value. However, some areas, such as the center of the original large lesion, still showed markedly reduced MTR (see figure 2C, green areas). Finally, the rCBF and ADC values at the original lesion site also normalized in the repeat scan (see figure 2, D and E).

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 2. Structural and physiologic MRIs and magnetic resonance spectroscopy obtained 3 months after the initial MR studies. The resolving mass lesion is demonstrated in the (A) fluid-attenuated inversion recovery image, (B) postgadolinium T1-weighted image, (C) magnetization transfer ratio map, (D) regional cerebral blood flow map, and (E) apparent diffusion coefficient map of an axial slice through the center of the previously enhancing lesion in the right frontal lobe. Localized 1H spectra were obtained from a voxel (4.0 cc) in the region of the previously enhancing lesion (bottom right, lower spectrum) and the contralateral normal-appearing white matter (upper spectrum; repeat time/echo time = 3,000/30 msec). See text for details. MI = myoinositol; CHO = choline; CR = creatine; NA = N-acetyl; LAC/LIP = lactate and lipids.

Discussion. The large ring-enhancing lesion in our patient represented a diagnostic dilemma between an acute tumefactive MS plaque and a neoplasm. Because conventional MRI cannot differentiate between these two pathologies, such lesions often require brain biopsies for diagnosis and treatment planning. Our data suggest that the differential diagnosis of tumefactive MS lesions from neoplasms may be improved by physiologic MRI, especially perfusion MRI; active areas of neoplasms typically have vascular proliferation and should show increased rCBF.8 In contrast, the rCBF in the enhancing lesion of our patient was reduced, suggesting decreased vasculature; therefore, perfusion MRI was consistent with a tumefactive MS lesion rather than a neoplastic process.

The reduced MTR in the enhancing lesion was consistent with a demyelinating MS lesion.4 However, because the MTR of neoplastic lesions is generally also decreased,9 the MTR might not differentiate the two lesion types. The MRS findings of decreased NA and CR most likely reflected axonal loss, whereas the elevated CHO and lipids probably resulted from demyelination and cell membrane injury, and the subsequently elevated MI represented increased glial content. Although these MRS profiles are characteristic of MS lesions,4,6 gliomas may show similar biochemical changes.10

We present a patient with a history of relapsing-remitting MS who had new-onset symptoms due to a large tumefactive MS lesion. Conventional MRI couldn't determine whether the large enhancing lesion with mass effect was due to a neoplasm or an acute tumefactive MS lesion. Because physiologic MRI, especially perfusion MRI, did not support the presence of a neoplasm, the patient was treated for a presumptive MS exacerbation, and a needle biopsy, with its associated morbidity, was avoided.

Footnotes

  • Supported in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health (Scientist Development Award for Clinicians DA 00280 of L.C.).

    Received March 25, 1998. Accepted in final form June 27, 1998.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Dagher A, Smirniotopoulos J. Tumefactive demyelinating lesions. Neuroradiology 1996;38:560-565.
    OpenUrl
  2. 2.
    Paty D, Moore G. Magnetic resonance imaging changes as living pathology in multiple sclerosis. In: Paty D, Ebers GC, eds. Multiple sclerosis. Contemporary neurology, vol 50. Philadelphia: FA Davis, 1997:328-369.
  3. 3.↵
    Miller DH, Rudge P, Johnson G, et al. Serial gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in multiple sclerosis. Brain 1988;111:927-939.
    OpenUrl
  4. 4.↵
    Hiehle JF, Lenkinski RE, Grossman RI, et al. Correlation of spectroscopy and magnetization transfer imaging in the evaluation of demyelinating lesions and normal appearing white matter in multiple sclerosis. Magn Reson Med 1994;32:285-293.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    Larsson HB, Thomsen C, Frederiksen J, Stubgaard M, Henriksen O. In vivo magnetic resonance diffusion measurement in the brain of patients with multiple sclerosis. Magn Reson Imaging 1992;10:7-12.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Wolinsky J, Narayanna P, Fenstermacher M. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 1990;40:1764-1769.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. 7.↵
    Kurtzke J. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale. Neurology 1983;33:1444-1452.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Aronen H, Gazit I, Louis D, et al. Cerebral blood volume maps of gliomas: comparison with tumor grade and histologic findings. Radiology 1994;191:41-51.
    OpenUrl
  9. 9.↵
    Grossman R, Gomori J, Ramer K, Lexa F, Schnall M. Magnetization transfer: theory and clinical applications in neuroradiology. Radiographics 1994;14:279-290.
    OpenUrl
  10. 10.↵
    Preul MC, Caramanos Z, Collins DL, et al. Accurate, noninvasive diagnosis of human brain tumors by using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Nat Med 1996;2:323-325.
    OpenUrlPubMed

Letters: Rapid online correspondence

No comments have been published for this article.
Comment

REQUIREMENTS

You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.

Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.

If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.

Submission specifications:

  • Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
  • Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
  • Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
  • Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
  • Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.

More guidelines and information on Disputes & Debates

Compose Comment

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
NOTE: The first author must also be the corresponding author of the comment.
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Publishing Agreement
NOTE: All authors, besides the first/corresponding author, must complete a separate Publishing Agreement Form and provide via email to the editorial office before comments can be posted.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

You May Also be Interested in

Back to top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Advertisement

Safety and Efficacy of Tenecteplase and Alteplase in Patients With Tandem Lesion Stroke: A Post Hoc Analysis of the EXTEND-IA TNK Trials

Dr. Nicole Sur and Dr. Mausaminben Hathidara

► Watch

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.

Alert Me

  • Alert me when eletters are published

Recommended articles

  • Articles
    MRI features of pediatric multiple sclerosis
    B. Banwell, M. Shroff, J. M. Ness et al.
    Neurology, April 16, 2007
  • Resident and Fellow Section
    Pearls & Oy-sters: CNS lymphoma in a patient with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis treated with interferon
    Sharon Chiang, Navin K. Kesari, Anthony Bradshaw et al.
    Neurology, October 23, 2017
  • Article
    Spatiotemporal evolution of venous narrowing in acute MS lesions
    Philipp Eisele, Kristina Szabo, Anne Ebert et al.
    Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation, January 18, 2018
  • Clinical and Ethical Challenges
    Restricted diffusion preceding gadolinium enhancement in large or tumefactive demyelinating lesions
    Megan Hyland, Robert A. Bermel, Jeffrey A. Cohen et al.
    Neurology: Clinical Practice, February 18, 2013
Neurology: 100 (22)

Articles

  • Ahead of Print
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Popular Articles
  • Translations

About

  • About the Journals
  • Ethics Policies
  • Editors & Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise

Submit

  • Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Information for Reviewers
  • AAN Guidelines
  • Permissions

Subscribers

  • Subscribe
  • Activate a Subscription
  • Sign up for eAlerts
  • RSS Feed
Site Logo
  • Visit neurology Template on Facebook
  • Follow neurology Template on Twitter
  • Visit Neurology on YouTube
  • Neurology
  • Neurology: Clinical Practice
  • Neurology: Education
  • Neurology: Genetics
  • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • AAN.com
  • AANnews
  • Continuum
  • Brain & Life
  • Neurology Today

Wolters Kluwer Logo

Neurology | Print ISSN:0028-3878
Online ISSN:1526-632X

© 2023 American Academy of Neurology

  • Privacy Policy
  • Feedback
  • Advertise