Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Education
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion (DEI)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Neurology Future Forecasting Series
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Topics A-Z
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit New Manuscript
    • Submit Revised Manuscript
    • Author Center

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Education
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion (DEI)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Neurology Future Forecasting Series
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Topics A-Z
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit New Manuscript
    • Submit Revised Manuscript
    • Author Center
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Neurology Video Journal Club
  • Residents & Fellows

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Neurology
Home
The most widely read and highly cited peer-reviewed neurology journal
  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
Site Logo
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Neurology Video Journal Club
  • Residents & Fellows

Share

December 01, 1998; 51 (6) Articles

Wallerian degeneration of the pyramidal tract does not affect stroke rehabilitation outcome

I. Miyai, T. Suzuki, K. Kii, J. Kang, K. Kubota
First published December 1, 1998, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.51.6.1613
I. Miyai
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
T. Suzuki
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. Kii
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Kang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. Kubota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Full PDF
Citation
Wallerian degeneration of the pyramidal tract does not affect stroke rehabilitation outcome
I. Miyai, T. Suzuki, K. Kii, J. Kang, K. Kubota
Neurology Dec 1998, 51 (6) 1613-1616; DOI: 10.1212/WNL.51.6.1613

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions

Make Comment

See Comments

Downloads
53

Share

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Loading

Abstract

Objective: To test whether Wallerian degeneration (WD) of the pyramidal tract as signaled by MRI affects rehabilitation outcome in patients with subcortical infarction (internal capsule or corona radiata).

Background: Recent radiologic evidence suggests that WD occurs no earlier than 3 months after a subcortical infarction.

Methods: A total of 77 consecutive patients with pure motor hemiparesis due to an initial subcortical infarction were assessed on admission and discharge with the Functional Independence Measure (FIM) for disability and Stroke Impairment Assessment Set (SIAS, full = 25) for impairment. WD was defined by a high-intensity area detected along the pyramidal tract below the level of lesion on T2-weighted MR image (WD+).

Results: Age, sex, side of stroke, Mini-Mental State Examination score, and volume of lesion were comparable for each group. Length of stay (LOS) was significantly longer (p < 0.05) in WD+ (130 days) than in WD- (105 days). There was no difference in the change of FIM (WD+, 99 to 111; WD-, 95 to 107) or SIAS measures (WD+, 12 to 16; WD-, 13 to 16) made on admission and discharge, nor was there any effect of the timing of the rehabilitation experience (≤90 days or >90 days after stroke).

Conclusions: After stroke, apparent WD of the pyramidal tract may slow functional recovery but does not limit final rehabilitation outcome of pure motor hemiparesis. Study of the mechanisms of compensation for this delayed pyramidal tract degeneration will enhance the scientific basis for rehabilitation.

Recent studies1-6 suggest that Wallerian degeneration (WD) of the pyramidal tract detected by MRI may be related to poor functional outcome in stroke. Although these studies have produced a new perspective on clinical neurorehabilitation, they have presented only single-time point analysis and have focused on impairment or disability instead of functional outcome. In this report we sought to specify the onset of WD, the relation of the rehabilitation experience to the stroke event, and the effect on functional outcome. We also focused the evaluation on patients with isolated subcortical infarcts and pure motor hemiplegia because sensory and visual deficit also affect functional outcome.7

Methods. A total of 77 consecutive patients with pure motor hemiparesis after ischemic infarcts in either the posterior limb of the internal capsule or the corona radiata were evaluated prospectively. MRI (1.0-T superconductive; Shimadzu, Kyoto, Japan. MAGNEX Epios 10; 8.5-mm slice thickness) included T2-weighted (repetition time [TR], 3,630 msec; echo time [TE], 110 msec) axial spin-echo images and T1-weighted (TR, 500 msec; TE, 15 msec) axial spin-echo images. Positive delineation of WD occurred when a high-intensity area was detected along the pyramidal tract in three consecutive slices below the level of lesion either in the corona radiata or the internal capsule in the T2-weighted image (figure). Because WD had been demonstrated by this class of MRI criteria to occur at least 3 months after an acute stroke,8,9 all patients had an MRI evaluation at least 3 months after the acute event.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure. A patient with MRI evidence of Wallerian degeneration of the pyramidal tract. Note the high-intensity area along the pyramidal tract below the level of lesion in the right corona radiata. See text for details.

All patients were transferred to Bobath Memorial Hospital after conservative therapy at acute hospitals. None had complications severe enough to discontinue rehabilitation. All patients participated in a neurodevelopmental technique (NDT)10 rehabilitation program that included two 45-minute sessions of physical therapy, two 45-minute sessions of occupational therapy, and one 45-minute session of speech therapy as needed, 5 days a week. The NDT approach views segmental and suprasegmental spinal cord movement patterns as abnormal movements that should always be inhibited and never used to elicit movement.10,11

On admission and discharge, disability was measured utilizing the Functional Independence Measure12 (FIM), and neurologic impairment was evaluated utilizing motor subscore of Stroke Impairment Assessment Set13 (SIAS). We also analyzed subscores for activities of daily living (ADL), mobility, and cognition subscores of FIM.14 Motor subscores of SIAS (0 to 25) consist of two tests for upper extremity (0 to 10) and three tests for lower extremity (0 to 15).13

To estimate the severity of injury, each lesion on MRI was transposed to the standardized horizontal brain templates,15 and volume of lesion was calculated using the National Institutes of Health (NIH, Baltimore, MD) Image Version 1.60. Statistical analysis for outcome measures was performed using Wilcoxon's ranked sum test and analysis of variance (ANOVA). Demographic data were analyzed using unpaired t-tests and chi-square tests.

Results. There were 51 patients with WD (WD+) and 26 patients without WD (WD-). Age, sex, duration after the onset of stroke, side of infarction, Mini-Mental State Examination score, and volume of infarction were comparable for each group (table 1). However, length of stay (LOS) in the rehabilitation environment was significantly longer (p < 0.05) in WD+ (130 days) than in WD- (105 days; see table 1). There were no significant differences between the groups in the mean admission total, ADL, mobility, and cognition scores of FIM, and gains in these scores at the time of discharge (table 2). Improvement in total FIM score was due mainly to changes of ADL and mobility subscores in both WD+ and WD-. Similarly, there were no significant differences in the mean SIAS scores for upper and lower extremities or gains of these scores at the time of discharge (table 3).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint

Table 1 Demographic features of patients with pure motor hemiparesis due to subcortical infarction

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint

Table 2 Changes of FIM scores in patients with pure motor hemiparesis due to subcortical infarction

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint

Table 3 Changes of SIAS scores in patients with pure motor hemiparesis due to subcortical infarction

Because there was a significant difference of LOS between WD+ and WD-, we tested whether time that elapsed between stroke and the commencement of the rehabilitation experience affects LOS. Patients were divided into two groups-one referred to rehabilitation ≤90 days after stroke and the other referred to rehabilitation >90 days after stroke-because the literature demonstrate that WD appears to occur at least 3 months after an acute stroke8,9 by the MRI criteria we used. A total of 31 patients were referred ≤90 days after stroke (mean, 57 ± 4 days; WD+, n = 19; WD-, n = 12), and 46 patients were referred >90 days after stroke (mean, 186 ± 21 days; WD+, n = 32; WD-, n = 14). Chi-square analysis demonstrated that incidence of WD was not significantly different between groups. An analysis for LOS was performed using two-factor ANOVA with WD as the intersubject factor, and days after stroke set to ≤90 or >90 days from stroke to rehabilitation as the intrasubject factor. There was a significant main effect for WD (F[1,73] = 7.139, p < 0.01). However, there was no effect for the timing of the rehabilitation experience, nor was there any interaction between WD and the rehabilitation starting point. The results suggest that WD+ patients had a longer LOS in the rehabilitation setting, which was independent of timing of that experience. Finally, an ANOVA of the admission/discharge FIM and SIAS scores and their subscores demonstrated no effects for either set of scores, nor any significant interaction between the factors. These results suggest that the presence of WD and the timing of the rehabilitation with respect to the stroke had no effect on the ultimate functional outcome.

Discussion. Several studies1-6 suggest that WD of the pyramidal tract detected by MRI is related to poor functional outcome in stroke. Most studies, however, employed only one-point evaluation of either disability or impairment. Sawlani et al.6 reported that WD was related to a poor Barthel index score at 1 and 4 months in 18 stroke patients.

We investigated the relation between WD and rehabilitation outcome, including both impairment and disability, in a prospective study. We studied patients with motor deficit without sensory and visual deficits to analyze the pure motor aspect of functional recovery due to damage of the subcortical motor pathway.

It is not known whether patients without MRI evidence of WD actually have WD in vivo. Increased signal intensity on T2-weighted images as seen in patients with WD might be due in part to increased water content secondary to glial proliferation.8 Incidence of WD of the pyramidal tract on MRI by capsular infarction has been reported to be as high as 78.6%.9 The incidence of WD in our study was comparable (51 of 77, 66%), and suggests the incidence of WD may change with larger lesions. It is likely that patients with WD+ have more damage in the pyramidal tract than do patients with WD-. Nevertheless, WD+ had comparable rehabilitation outcome compared with WD- both in terms of disability and impairment in pure motor hemiparesis. Patients with WD of the pyramidal tract had a longer LOS and therefore a longer rehabilitation effort than those without WD, independent of the start of rehabilitation after stroke. These data suggest that more damage of the pyramidal tract might cause a delay in functional improvement, as reported previously.5,6 However, pathways other than the residual pyramidal tract ipsilateral to the lesions might substitute the damage.

Recovery from hemiplegia due to subcortical lesions disrupting the pyramidal tract might occur by ipsilateral and contralateral substituting pathways that bypass the site of lesions. Fries et al.16 demonstrated almost complete recovery of finger movements in patients with MRI evidence of WD. Transcortical electric response of the affected cerebral hemisphere produced bilateral motor response, suggesting polysynaptic corticoreticulospinal connection bypassing the lesions. They consider the reorganization of parallel-acting multiple motor areas (i.e., primary motor cortex, premotor cortex, and supplementary motor area) ipsilateral to the lesion side as the central mechanism in motor recovery.17 Conversely, there have been several reports that suggest reorganization of the cerebral hemisphere contralateral to the lesion is associated with the mechanism of functional recovery. Jones et al.18 demonstrated impairment of ipsilateral sensorimotor function due to unilateral cerebral infarction. Furthermore, Fisher19 reported two patients with pure motor hemiplegia who developed another pure motor stroke on the opposite side, causing exacerbation of preexisting hemiplegia as well as new hemiplegia. However, ipsilaterally evoked motor responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation in the nonaffected hemisphere after stroke were not correlated to clinical improvement of hemiparesis.20-22 Recent PET studies23-26 revealed that recovery of motor function is associated with complex changes of regional cerebral blood flow (rCBF), including both the damaged and the undamaged hemisphere, and that the pattern of rCBF varies between patients. Findings of functional MRI studies are in good agreement with these results of PET studies.27,28

Although the pathways that substitute for damage to the subcortical motor tract were not determined in our study, it is likely that WD of the pyramidal tract does not affect final rehabilitation outcome and that residual pyramidal tract contributes little to functional recovery, especially in chronic stroke.

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Dr. Bruce T. Volpe for reviewing the manuscript and Ms. Naomi Hoshina for assistance with data collection.

Footnotes

  • Supported by funds for comprehensive research on aging and health from Ministry of Health and Welfare, Japan.

    Presented at the fifth annual meeting of the American Society of Neurorehabilitation; Minneapolis, MN; April 1998.

    Received June 5, 1998. Accepted in final form August 8, 1998.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Sonoda S, Tsubahara A, Saito M, Chino N. Extent of pyramidal tract Wallerian degeneration in the brain stem on MRI and degree of motor impairment after supratentorial stroke. Disabil Rehabil 1992;14:89-92.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  2. 2.
    Waragai M, Iwabuchi S. Wallerian degeneration of the cortico-descending tract in the cerebral peduncle following a supratentorial cerebrovascular lesion detected by MRI. The relationship between Wallerian degeneration at the center of the cerebral peduncle and functional recovery of paresis. Rinsho Shinkeigaku 1993;33:1146-1153. In Japanese.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.
    Fukui K, Iguchi I, Kito A, Watanabe Y, Gugita K. Extent of pontine pyramidal tract Wallerian degeneration and outcome after supratentorial hemorrhagic stroke. Stroke 1994;25:1207-1210.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  4. 4.
    Orita T, Tsurutani T, Izumihara A, Kajiwara K. Early, evolving Wallerian degeneration of the pyramidal tract in cerebrovascular diseases: MR study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1994;18:943-946.
    OpenUrl
  5. 5.↵
    Miyai I, Kajiura I, Suzuki T, Kang J, Nozaki S. Mechanism of functional recovery of hemiplegia in cerebral infarction. Wallerian degeneration and basal ganglia damage affect functional prognosis. Neurol Med (Tokyo) 1995;42:155-162. In Japanese.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    Sawlani V, Gupta RK, Singh MK, Kohli A. MRI demonstration of Wallerian degeneration in various intracranial lesions and its clinical implications. J Neurol Sci 1997;146:103-108.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Reding MJ, Potes E. Rehabilitation outcome following initial unilateral hemispheric stroke life table analysis approach. Stroke 1988;19:1354-1358.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Kuhn MJ, Mikulis DJ, Ayoub DM, Kosofsky BE, Davis KR, Taveras JM. Wallerian degeneration after cerebral infarction: evaluation with sequential MR imaging. Radiology 1989;172:179-182.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    Pujol J, Martí-Vilalta JL, Junqué C, Vendrell P, Fernández J, Capdevila A. Wallerian degeneration of the pyramidal tract in capsular infarction studied by magnetic resonance imaging. Stroke 1990;21:404-409.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    Bobath B. Adult hemiplegia: evaluation and treatment. 2nd ed. Revised. London: William Heinemann Medical Books, 1978.
  11. 11.
    Miyai I, Reding MJ. Stroke recovery and rehabilitation. In: Ginsberg MD, Bogousslavsky J, eds. Cerebrovascular disease. Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. Malden, MA: Blackwell Science, 1998:2043-2056.
  12. 12.↵
    Keith RA, Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Sherwin FS. The Functional Independence Measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. In: Eisenberg MG, Grzesiak RC, eds. Advances in clinical rehabilitation. Vol. 2. New York: Springer, 1987:6-18.
  13. 13.↵
    Chino N, Sonoda S, Domen K, Saitoh E, Kimura A. Stroke Impairment Assessment Set (SIAS). A new evaluation instrument for stroke patients. Jpn J Rehabil Med 1994;31:119-125.
    OpenUrl
  14. 14.↵
    Miyai I, Blau AD, Reding MJ, Volpe BT. Patients with stroke confined to basal ganglia have diminished response to rehabilitation efforts. Neurology 1997;48:95-101.
    OpenUrl
  15. 15.↵
    Matsui T, Hirano A. An atlas of the human brain for computerized tomography. Tokyo: Igaku-shoin, 1978.
  16. 16.↵
    Fries W, Danek A, Witt TN. Motor responses after transcranial electrical stimulation of cerebral hemispheres with a degenerated pyramidal tract. Ann Neurol 1991;29:646-650.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    Fries W, Danek A, Scheidtmann K, Hamburger C. Motor recovery following capsular stroke. Role of descending pathways from multiple motor areas. Brain 1993;116:369-382.
    OpenUrl
  18. 18.↵
    Jones RD, Donaldson IM, Parkin PJ. Impairment and recovery of ipsilateral sensory-motor function following unilateral cerebral infarction. Brain 1989;112:113-132.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  19. 19.↵
    Fisher CM. Concerning the mechanism of recovery in stroke hemiplegia. Can J Neurol Sci 1992;19:57-63.
    OpenUrl
  20. 20.↵
    Palmer E, Ashby P, Hajek VE. Ipsilateral fast corticospinal pathways do not account for recovery in stroke. Ann Neurol 1992;32:519-525.
    OpenUrl
  21. 21.
    Turton A, Wroe S, Trepte N, Fraser C, Lemon RN. Contralateral and ipsilateral EMG responses to transcranial magnetic stimulation during recovery of arm and hand function after stroke. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1996;101:316-328.
    OpenUrl
  22. 22.
    Netz J, Lammers T, Hüberg V. Reorganization of motor output in the non-affected hemisphere after stroke. Brain 1997;20:1579-1586.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    Chollet F, DiPiero V, Wise RJS, Brooks DJ, Dolan RJ, Frackowiak RSJ. The functional anatomy of motor recovery after stroke in humans: a study with positron emission tomography. Ann Neurol 1991;29:63-71.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.
    Weiller C, Chollet F, Friston KJ, Wise RJS, Frackowiak RSJ. Functional reorganization of the brain in recovery from striatocapsular infarction in man. Ann Neurol 1992;31:463-472.
    OpenUrl
  25. 25.
    Weiller C, Ramsay SC, Wise RJS, Friston KJ, Frackowiak RSJ. Individual patterns of functional reorganization in the human cerebral cortex after capsular infarction. Ann Neurol 1993;33:181-189.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  26. 26.
    Weiller C, Chollet F, Frackowiak RSJ. Physiologic aspects of functional recovery from stroke. In: Ginsberg MD, Bogousslavsky J, eds. Cerebrovascular disease. Pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. Malden, MA: Blackwell Science, 1998:2057-2067.
  27. 27.↵
    Cramer SC, Nelles G, Benson RR, et al. A functional MRI study of subjects recovered from hemiparetic stroke. Stroke 1997;28:2518-2527.
    OpenUrl
  28. 28.
    Cao Y, D'Olhaberriague L, Vikingstad EM, Levine SR, Welch KMA. Pilot study of functional MRI to assess cerebral activation of motor function after poststroke hemiparesis. Stroke 1998;29:112-122.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text

Letters: Rapid online correspondence

No comments have been published for this article.
Comment

REQUIREMENTS

If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org

Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.

If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.

Submission specifications:

  • Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
  • Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
  • Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
  • Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
  • Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.

More guidelines and information on Disputes & Debates

Compose Comment

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
NOTE: The first author must also be the corresponding author of the comment.
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Publishing Agreement
NOTE: All authors, besides the first/corresponding author, must complete a separate Publishing Agreement Form and provide via email to the editorial office before comments can be posted.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

You May Also be Interested in

Back to top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Acknowledgment
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Advertisement

SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Safety in Guillain-Barré Syndrome, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy, and Multifocal Motor Neuropathy

Dr. Jeffrey Allen and Dr. Nicholas Purcell

► Watch

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.

Alert Me

  • Alert me when eletters are published

Recommended articles

  • Articles
    Proximal paresis of the upper extremity in patients with stroke
    Megumi Hatakenaka, Ichiro Miyai, Saburo Sakoda et al.
    Neurology, July 23, 2007
  • Article
    Patients with Stroke Confined to Basal Ganglia Have Diminished Response to Rehabilitation Efforts
    Ichiro Miyai, Alan D. Blau, Michael Reding et al.
    Neurology, January 01, 1997
  • Article
    Intracerebral hemorrhage location and outcome among INTERACT2 participants
    Candice Delcourt, Shoichiro Sato, Shihong Zhang et al.
    Neurology, February 24, 2017
  • Article
    Selective atrophy of the connected deepest cortical layers following small subcortical infarct
    Eyal Lotan, Ido Tavor, Daniel Barazany et al.
    Neurology, January 11, 2019
Neurology: 100 (13)

Articles

  • Ahead of Print
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Popular Articles
  • Translations

About

  • About the Journals
  • Ethics Policies
  • Editors & Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise

Submit

  • Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Information for Reviewers
  • AAN Guidelines
  • Permissions

Subscribers

  • Subscribe
  • Activate a Subscription
  • Sign up for eAlerts
  • RSS Feed
Site Logo
  • Visit neurology Template on Facebook
  • Follow neurology Template on Twitter
  • Visit Neurology on YouTube
  • Neurology
  • Neurology: Clinical Practice
  • Neurology: Education
  • Neurology: Genetics
  • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • AAN.com
  • AANnews
  • Continuum
  • Brain & Life
  • Neurology Today

Wolters Kluwer Logo

Neurology | Print ISSN:0028-3878
Online ISSN:1526-632X

© 2023 American Academy of Neurology

  • Privacy Policy
  • Feedback
  • Advertise