Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
    • Education
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, Anti-racism, & Social Justice (IDEAS)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Topics A-Z
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Center

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
    • Education
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, Anti-racism, & Social Justice (IDEAS)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Topics A-Z
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Center
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Residents & Fellows

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Neurology
Home
The most widely read and highly cited peer-reviewed neurology journal
  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
Site Logo
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Residents & Fellows

Share

December 01, 1998; 51 (6) Brief Communications

Enhanced spasticity in primary progressive MS patients treated with interferon beta-1b

P. Bramanti, E. Sessa, C. Rifici, G. D'Aleo, D. Floridia, P. Di Bella, F. Lublin
First published December 1, 1998, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.51.6.1720
P. Bramanti
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E. Sessa
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. Rifici
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. D'Aleo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. Floridia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. Di Bella
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
F. Lublin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Full PDF
Citation
Enhanced spasticity in primary progressive MS patients treated with interferon beta-1b
P. Bramanti, E. Sessa, C. Rifici, G. D'Aleo, D. Floridia, P. Di Bella, F. Lublin
Neurology Dec 1998, 51 (6) 1720-1723; DOI: 10.1212/WNL.51.6.1720

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions

Make Comment

See Comments

Downloads
52

Share

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Loading

Abstract

Spasticity is a disabling symptom of MS that is enhanced during interferon beta-1b (IFNβ-1b) treatment. Nineteen patients with primary progressive MS were treated with IFNβ-1b; an additional 19 patients did not receive this treatment. Thirteen of the 19 patients treated with IFNβ-1b had increased spasticity requiring increased antispasticity drug administration. This observation suggests that further studies are needed before interferons can be so widely used in primary progressive MS patients.

Interferon beta-1b (IFNβ-1b) is the first approved therapy proven in large multicenter trials to alter the natural course of MS. These trials defined the efficacy and toxicity of interferon treatment in relapsing-remitting MS patients, but further studies are needed to define the usefulness of interferons in other forms of MS. Anecdotal reports of increased spasticity in some MS patients on interferon treatment were given at a recent consensus conference,1 and the observation prompted us to examine spasticity in 19 consecutive primary progressive MS patients who were beginning interferon therapy.

Patients and methods. We collected data from the first 19 consecutive primary progressive MS patients whom we observed and who had obtained IFNβ-1b for compassionate use. For this evaluation they signed an informed consent form that included the information that IFNβ-1b has been tested successfully only in relapsing-remitting MS and that there are no clinical data on the use of this drug in primary progressive MS. The patients (aged 26 to 62 years) had an average duration of disease of 10.84 years, with an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score ranging from 2.5 to 7.5.

Patients were treated with IFNβ-1b (8 mIU SC every other day) over a period of 1 year and monitored by clinical examination before treatment and every 2 months after initiation of treatment. Evaluations included the EDSS score,2 the Ashworth Scale (figure), and a six-point scale for spastic reflexes (1 = reflexia, 2 = hyporeflexia, 3 = normoreflexia, 4 = hyperreflexia, 5 = unsustained clonus, 6 = sustained clonus). Increase in muscle tone and reflexes by one point was considered sufficient to establish an increase in spasticity (table). Changes in spasticity and in the EDSS score were used as an end point. Brain and spinal MRIs were performed at baseline and after 6 and 12 months, and laboratory testing (hemogram and liver function, glucose, and thyroid function tests) was performed monthly.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure. Ashworth Scale. ▪ = Primary progressive MS patients treated with interferon beta-1b (IFNβ-1b); ▴ = primary progressive MS patients not treated with IFNβ-1b; ★ = relapsing-remitting MS patients treated with IFNβ-1b.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint

Table Characteristics of primary progressive MS patients treated (boldface) and not treated with IFNβ-1b

Only two patients were on medications for spasticity before interferon therapy. They received intrathecal baclofen. They were allowed to modify their doses after the increase in spasticity. Only seven patients required initiation of oral baclofen. All patients followed IFN therapy for 6 months, after which seven discontinued. Concomitant fever was not measured; however, antipyretic medication was used to suppress fever caused by interferon in all patients after the first appearance of temperature elevation.

The comparison group consisted of 19 patients with primary progressive MS followed in the same way but without IFNβ-1b treatment. A statistical comparison of the two groups showed that they did not differ significantly in age (40 ± 11 versus 42 ± 4.7 years). Using the data to calculate the t-test, we obtained the following values: duration of therapy, t = 0.996; Ashworth Scale, t = 1.997; reflex scale, t = 0.589; and EDSS, t = 1.339. All values confirm that these two groups are perfectly homogeneous. Following the same criteria, a group of 10 patients with clinically defined relapsing-remitting MS3,4 were also treated with IFNβ-1b (EDSS score 1.5 to 3.5) to complete the study.

Results. Some of the 19 patients with primary progressive MS treated with IFNβ-1b manifested a significant change in clinical spasticity after an average time of 2 months (see table) that was also documented in the spasticity and reflex scales (see figure). A detailed examination of the data related to nontreated patients showed that of a total of 19 patients, 17 (89%) maintained constant values, whereas only 2 (11%) had an increase in the two value scales (Ashworth and reflex scales). In the treated patients, however, 13 (68%) had an increase in values, whereas only 6 (32%) were constant. According to the Ashworth Scale, 10 of 13 patients (77%) had an increase of one point, whereas the remaining 3 patients (23%) had a twofold increase. On the reflex scale, however, 6 of 13 patients (46%) had an increase of one point, whereas the remaining 7 patients (54%) had a twofold increase. As a result, the EDSS score increased in all these patients. However, the brain and spinal MRIs performed at 6 and 12 months showed no evidence of new demyelinating lesions, which could explain the worsening of the EDSS score.

Patient 12 serves as a typical example for the clinical situation; 3 months after starting IFNβ-1b he had a relevant increase in spasticity (from 3 to 4 on the Ashworth Scale, and from 4 to 6 on the reflex scale), and a spastic bladder paresis also appeared. This patient, who had an intrathecal infusion system5 implanted 2 years earlier for spasticity, increased the daily dose of infused baclofen by 15 µg/d after 3 months on IFNβ-1b. He then returned to a pretreatment baclofen dosage 2 months after cessation of IFNβ-1b therapy.

All patients continued therapy for 6 months, whereas seven primary progressive patients decided to discontinue IFNβ-1b treatment within 6 months after initiation of therapy (see table). One patient, to control spasticity, was taking 35 µg/d of intrathecal baclofen before IFNβ-1b treatment. During IFNβ-1b treatment baclofen was increased to 55 µg/d but was decreased to 35 µg/d after therapy suspension. Among 13 patients with an increase in spasticity during IFNβ-1b treatment, 7 required initiation of oral baclofen (dosages from 20 to 60 mg daily). In these subjects spasticity was observed even if the fever vanished. We did not note any relation between the changes in spasticity and antipyretic treatment.

A similar increase in spasticity was not observed in the 10 patients with relapsing-remitting MS treated under the same conditions. In the 19 patients with primary progressive MS not treated with IFNβ-1b, an increase in spasticity appeared in only 2 (11%) during the study period.

Discussion. We observed a frequent and clinically relevant increase in spasticity in patients with primary progressive MS that could not be correlated with any new pathology on MRI. This phenomenon usually appeared approximately 2 months after initiation of therapy and, in some patients, caused an increased need for baclofen. Symptoms of spasticity improved several months after interruption of treatment. This time lag differs from other clinical effects of beta-interferons. Thus this is probably a reversible functional side effect of interferon whose mechanism is not entirely understood. It is probably linked to a direct effect on the motor neurons or to a release of spasticity from previous central control. The symptom lasted throughout the entire treatment period and probably did not result from body temperature elevation (as part of a flu-like syndrome) because it vanished after the first month in most subjects. Further studies are needed to better understand the mechanism of this side effect. The design for further clinical trials on primary progressive MS should consider the possibility of this phenomenon because increased reversible spasticity could mask positive clinical effects on the EDSS score or other effects of IFNβ-1b on, for example, fatigue, mood, or cognition (B.G.W. Arnason, personal communication, 1996).

The smaller percentage of the 19 patients with primary progressive MS who experienced an increase in spasticity but were not being treated with IFNβ-1b minimizes the possibility that this increase was due to disease progression and new small lesions that could not be discerned on spinal MRI. Ongoing controlled clinical studies on interferons in primary progressive MS should help to clarify the issue of a causal relation. Both groups present a normal probability distribution because more than 95% of the subjects can be retained homogeneous among themselves (median ± 2 SD).

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Dr. Maurizio Petix for statistical analysis and Ms. Antonina Donato editing the manuscript.

Footnotes

  • Received January 22, 1998. Accepted in final form August 14, 1998.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Lublin FD, Whitaker JN, Eidelman BH, Miller AE, Arnason BGW, Burks JS. Management of patients receiving interferon beta-1b for multiple sclerosis: report of a consensus conference. Neurology 1996;46:12-18.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS). Neurology 1983;33:1444-1452.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    Poser CM, Paty DW, Scheinberg L, et al. New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis. Ann Neurol 1983;13:227-231.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.
    Lublin FD, Reingold SC for the National Multiple Sclerosis Society (USA) Advisory Committee on Clinical Trials of New Agents in Multiple Sclerosis. Defining the clinical course of multiple sclerosis: results of an international survey. Neurology 1996;46:907-911.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Saltuary L, Kronenberg M, Marosi MJ, et al. Indication, efficiency and complications of intrathecal pump supported baclofen treatment in spinal spasticity. Acta Neurologica 1992;14:187-194.
    OpenUrlPubMed

Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence

No comments have been published for this article.
Comment

REQUIREMENTS

If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org

Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.

If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.

Submission specifications:

  • Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
  • Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
  • Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
  • Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
  • Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.

More guidelines and information on Disputes & Debates

Compose Comment

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
NOTE: The first author must also be the corresponding author of the comment.
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Publishing Agreement
NOTE: All authors, besides the first/corresponding author, must complete a separate Publishing Agreement Form and provide via email to the editorial office before comments can be posted.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

You May Also be Interested in

Back to top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Acknowledgment
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Advertisement

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.

Alert Me

  • Alert me when eletters are published
Neurology: 99 (1)

Articles

  • Ahead of Print
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Popular Articles
  • Translations

About

  • About the Journals
  • Ethics Policies
  • Editors & Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise

Submit

  • Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Information for Reviewers
  • AAN Guidelines
  • Permissions

Subscribers

  • Subscribe
  • Activate a Subscription
  • Sign up for eAlerts
  • RSS Feed
Site Logo
  • Visit neurology Template on Facebook
  • Follow neurology Template on Twitter
  • Visit Neurology on YouTube
  • Neurology
  • Neurology: Clinical Practice
  • Neurology: Genetics
  • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Neurology: Education
  • AAN.com
  • AANnews
  • Continuum
  • Brain & Life
  • Neurology Today

Wolters Kluwer Logo

Neurology | Print ISSN:0028-3878
Online ISSN:1526-632X

© 2022 American Academy of Neurology

  • Privacy Policy
  • Feedback
  • Advertise