Comparison of MS clinical phenotypes using conventional and magnetization transfer MRI
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective: To identify differences in pathology between the principal clinical phenotypes of MS using conventional and magnetization transfer (MT) MRI.
Methods: T1-weighted and T2-weighted images as well as MT scans were obtained from 20 controls, 21 patients presenting with clinically isolated syndromes suggestive of MS, and 93 MS patients with relapsing-remitting, secondary progressive, benign, or primary progressive course. Metrics considered: hypointense T1 and T2 lesion volumes, average lesion MT ratio, average brain MT ratio, peak height and position from MT histograms.
Results: MS patients had lower MT metrics than controls. Patients with clinically isolated syndromes had MT measures similar to controls, whereas primary progressive MS patients had lower histogram peak height with normal peak position. Relapsing-remitting MS patients had lower MT measures, higher T2 lesion load and ratio of hypointense T1 to T2 lesion volumes than patients with clinically isolated syndromes, and lower MT ratio and peak height than benign MS patients. Benign MS patients were similar to controls and patients with clinically isolated syndromes. Secondary progressive MS patients had the lowest MT measures and highest lesion loads.
Conclusions: Pathology in patients with clinically isolated syndromes is confined to modest tissue damage in the lesions seen on T2-weighted scans. Severe damage is important for the later development of disability. However, microscopic damage in normal-appearing white matter may be a major contributor to disability in primary progressive MS.
- Received July 20, 1998.
- Accepted October 17, 1998.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
For assistance, please contact:
AAN Members (800) 879-1960 or (612) 928-6000 (International)
Non-AAN Member subscribers (800) 638-3030 or (301) 223-2300 option 3, select 1 (international)
Sign Up
Information on how to subscribe to Neurology and Neurology: Clinical Practice can be found here
Purchase
Individual access to articles is available through the Add to Cart option on the article page. Access for 1 day (from the computer you are currently using) is US$ 39.00. Pay-per-view content is for the use of the payee only, and content may not be further distributed by print or electronic means. The payee may view, download, and/or print the article for his/her personal, scholarly, research, and educational use. Distributing copies (electronic or otherwise) of the article is not allowed.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Hastening the Diagnosis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Dr. Brian Callaghan and Dr. Kellen Quigg
► Watch
Related Articles
- No related articles found.
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Articles
A magnetization transfer histogram study of normal-appearing brain tissue in MSC. Tortorella, B. Viti, M. Bozzali et al.Neurology, January 11, 2000 -
Articles
Pathologic damage in MS assessed by diffusion-weighted and magnetization transfer MRIM. Cercignani, G. Iannucci, M.A. Rocca et al.Neurology, March 14, 2000 -
Articles
MRI and magnetization transfer imaging changes in the brain and cervical cord of patients with Devic’s neuromyelitis opticaM. Filippi, M.A. Rocca, L. Moiola et al.Neurology, November 01, 1999 -
Articles
A conventional and magnetization transfer MRI study of the cervical cord in patients with MSM. Filippi, M. Bozzali, M.A. Horsfield et al.Neurology, January 11, 2000