Kallmann’s syndrome
Mirror movements associated with bilateral corticospinal tract hypertrophy
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

Abstract
Objective: To investigate the etiology of mirror movements in patients with X-linked Kallmann’s syndrome (xKS) through statistical analysis of pooled white matter data from structural MR images.
Background: Mirror movements occur in 85% of xKS patients. Previous electrophysiologic studies have suggested an abnormal ipsilateral corticospinal tract projection in xKS patients exhibiting mirror movements. However, an alternative hypothesis has proposed a functional lack of transcallosal inhibitory fibers.
Methods: T1-weighted brain scans were normalized into stereotaxic space with segregation of gray and white matter to allow comparison of pooled white matter data on a voxel-by-voxel basis using SPM-96 software. Nine xKS patients were compared with two age-matched groups of nonmirroring individuals: nine patients with autosomal Kallmann’s syndrome (aKS) and nine age-matched normal (healthy) men.
Results: Hypertrophy of the corpus callosum was found in both Kallmann’s syndrome groups: the anterior and midsection in xKS, and the genu and posterior section in aKS. Bilateral hypertrophy of the corticospinal tract was found only in the group of xKS patients exhibiting mirror movements. SPM analysis was validated by an independent region of interest analysis of corpus callosum size.
Conclusion: Although morphometry on its own cannot determine the cause of mirror movements, the specific finding of a hypertrophied corticospinal tract in xKS is consistent with electrophysiologic evidence suggesting that mirror movements in xKS result from abnormal development of the ipsilateral corticospinal tract fibers.
Kallmann’s syndrome is defined by the association of anosmia with idiopathic hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (IHH), caused by a deficiency of hypothalamic gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH). The X-linked form of Kallmann’s syndrome (xKS) is further characterized by an 85% prevalence of mirror movements and a 33% prevalence of unilateral renal agenesis.1-4 Mirror movements are involuntary, nonsuppressible movements of the contralateral upper limb, which occur during unilaterally intended voluntary movement. They are maximal in distal hand and finger muscles. In these muscle groups, spinomuscular axons are innervated by direct monosynaptic corticospinal tract projections, rather than via spinal interneurons.5 Mirror movements are not exhibited by Kallmann’s syndrome patients whose disease is not X linked.1,2,4
Mirror movements are not solely observed in xKS. They can occur as an isolated phenomenon, which in some cases may be autosomally inherited,6,7 and also in association with Klippel–Feil syndrome, an autosomal condition comprising low-set hairline and cervical fusion disorder.8 In these conditions, there is a suggestion that mirror movements may be mediated by an abnormal corticospinal tract projection. That both xKS and Klippel–Feil syndrome should be associated with mirror movements and unilateral renal agenesis9 is an intriguing but unexplained observation. Mirror movements are also seen in hemiplegic cerebral palsy,10 and occasionally with poststroke hemiplegia, in which mirroring of the unaffected hand represents a poor prognostic sign, but mirroring of the paretic hand is associated with better prognosis.11
xKS results from abnormal prenatal development of the nervous system. Fascicles of the olfactory nerve complex fail to establish central synaptic connections, resulting in dysplastic olfactory bulbs and extracranial migration arrest of GnRH-synthesizing neurons.12 This forms the pathophysiologic basis for the anosmia and IHH. KAL at Xp22.313,14 encodes anosmin-1, an extracellular matrix protein15-17 that is presumed to have an important role in axonal growth or guidance during human development. It is likely that a similar developmental defect of the motor system may be responsible for mirror movements. Most xKS pedigrees harbor KAL mutations or deletions. However, a number of well-phenotyped xKS families (including patients exhibiting mirror movements and unilateral renal agenesis) have a normal KAL coding sequence. In these patients, there is presumed to be a mutation or deletion of some (as yet unrecognized) KAL regulatory sequence or promoter region.2,18
That autosomal forms of Kallmann’s syndrome exist (recessive, dominant, and variable penetrance) can be inferred by pedigree analysis and from the existence of affected women.1,2,4,19,20 The pathophysiology and genetic locus/loci underlying autosomal Kallmann’s syndrome (aKS) are unknown at present. In some autosomal families there is a striking coexistence of individuals with Kallmann’s syndrome, isolated anosmia, and even normosmic IHH.1,2,4,20 However, because Kallmann’s syndrome patients are almost invariably infertile, the vast majority of cases are sporadic, of which only 8 to 11% represent de novo X-linked disease.4,20 Although no aKS gene has yet been identified, autosomal disease can be inferred in any sporadic Kallmann’s syndrome patient who harbors no KAL mutation or deletion nor exhibits phenotypic markers of X-linked disease such as ichthyosis (suggesting a continuous gene syndrome at Xp22.3), mirror movements, or renal agenesis.1,2,4
There have been two main hypotheses concerning the cause of mirror movements. The first hypothesis is that mirror movements result from an abnormal development of the ipsilateral corticospinal tract,21 as was suggested for Klippel–Feil syndrome.8 Mayston et al.22 performed a series of electrophysiologic studies on 13 xKS patients, including the nine patients presented in this article. They demonstrated that stimulation of the digital nerves of the index finger of one hand caused modulation of the ongoing electromyogram (EMG) in the opposite hand and that there was a short-duration peak centered around time zero in cross-correlograms constructed from EMG recordings from cocontracting left and right first dorsal interosseus muscles. Focal transcranial magnetic stimulation of a single motor cortex elicited bilateral motor evoked potentials (MEPs) of similar latency in distal upper limb muscles. These and other data were interpreted as indicating the existence of an abnormally developed, fast-conducting ipsilateral corticospinal tract projection in the patients.
An alternative hypothesis is that mirror movements result from a lack of transcallosal inhibition.23-25 Although normal individuals do have a small proportion of ipsilaterally projecting corticospinal tract fibers,26,27 they do not exhibit mirror movements. This could be explained by supposing that there is a failure to inhibit the motor cortex contralateral to the hand in which the involuntary movement occurs. For example, an abnormality of the corpus callosum could result in a failure of transcallosal inhibition. Krams et al.28 used PET to compare xKS and control individuals during an externally paced finger opposition task. They demonstrated a small but significant degree of activation in the motor cortex contralateral to the mirroring hand. These data were consistent with the transcallosal hypothesis. However, similar degrees of motor cortex activation were seen with both active and passive finger movement, presumably because of afferent input to the motor cortex from the somatosensory cortex.29 The data were thus also compatible with the corticospinal hypothesis, with motor cortex activation contralateral to the mirroring hand secondary to sensory feedback from that hand.
Anatomic data from postmortem studies of xKS patients are lacking. We have therefore tried to distinguish between these two hypotheses by means of an in vivo study, applying a recently described voxel-based method for morphometric analysis.30 This involved statistical comparison of white matter density in structural MR images. First we compared the brains of xKS patients (all exhibiting mirror movements) with those of normal control subjects. Then we compared those of aKS patients (and no mirror movements) with normal control subjects. Lastly we compared directly the brains of xKS and aKS patients. If the first hypothesis was correct we might expect to see abnormalities in the corpus callosum in xKS patients; however, if the second hypothesis was correct we might expect to see abnormalities in the corticospinal tracts.
Methods.
Subjects.
Nine xKS male patients exhibiting mirror movements were studied (mean age, 27 years; range, 19 to 48 years). All nine men had previously been examined electrophysiologically by Mayston et al.,22 corresponding to subjects K4a, K4 through 6, and K8 through 12 in that study. The diagnosis of X-linked disease was confirmed by pedigree analysis (n = 7) and/or by demonstrating a mutation or deletion at the KAL locus (n = 7). For comparison, 18 healthy men (mean age, 29 years; range, 19 to 42 years) and nine male aKS patients (mean age, 28; range, 21 to 49 years) were also studied. Autosomal disease was inferred from the absence of KAL coding exon deletions2,31 and of xKS-specific phenotypic markers. All subjects were right handed as tested by the Edinburgh Handedness Questionnaire.32 Subjects gave written informed consent to participate in the project, which was approved by the local hospital ethics committee.
MRI data acquisition.
Three-dimensional volume acquisition MR images of nine xKS patients and nine normal control subjects were obtained with a 1.0-T Picker HPQ Vista system (Cleveland, OH) using a radiofrequency spoiled volume acquisition, relatively T1-weighted to give good gray/white contrast and anatomic resolution (repetition time [TR], 21 msec; echo time [TE], 6 msec; flip angle, 35 degrees; field of view [FOV], 25 cm; 192 × 256 × 140 slices at a resolution of 1 × 1 × 1.3 mm). MR images of nine aKS patients and nine additional normal control subjects were obtained with a 2-T Siemens VISION system (Munich/Erlangen, Germany), acquiring T1-weighted images (TR, 9.5 msec; TE, 4 msec; flip angle, 12 degrees; FOV, 25 cm; 192 × 256 × 256 slices at a resolution of 1 × 1 × 1.5 mm).
Image processing and spatial normalization.
Image analysis was performed on a SUN SPARC 20 workstation (SUN Microsystems, Europe Inc., Surrey, UK) using ANALYZE33 software (version 5; Mayo Foundation, Rochester, MN) for region of interest and image editing purposes, and SPM-9634,35 software (Wellcome Dept. of Clinical Neurology, London, UK) for spatial normalization into stereotaxic space, gray/white matter segregation, smoothing, and statistical comparisons. SPM-96 uses MATLAB (version 4; Mathworks Inc., Sherborn, MA).
The MR images were interpolated to yield a 1-mm3 voxel size. They were then normalized into stereotaxic space, as defined by Talairach and Tournoux,36 using the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) template.37,38 The normalization was performed using the automated procedure of SPM-96 (custom affine transformations only, without nonlinear algorithms). The voxel size was set to 1 × 1 × 1 mm. The normalized images were then segregated into gray matter, white matter, and CSF spaces using the automated procedure as implemented in SPM-96. A smoothing filter of 12 mm was applied to account for interindividual variability in structural anatomy. The smoothed, segmented images can be thought of as images of gray or white matter density.
Statistical analysis.
The processed images were analyzed using the General Linear Model as implemented in SPM-96. The following categoric comparisons of pooled white matter images were carried out: 1) xKS versus normal men, 2) aKS versus normal men, and 3) xKS versus aKS patients. After specifying the appropriate design matrix, the subject effects were estimated at each and every voxel. The resulting set of voxel values for each contrast constitutes a statistical parametric map (SPM) of the t-statistic. The SPM(t) was transformed to the unit normal distribution SPM(z) and thresholded at 2.33 or p < 0.01 uncorrected. The significant foci in the SPM(z) were then characterized in terms of spatial extent and peak height (z-scores). The Talairach coordinates36 are given in millimeters for the maximally significant voxel in each area, where x defines the lateral displacement from the midline (left = negative), y defines the anteroposterior displacement relative to the anterior commissure (posterior = negative), and z defines the vertical position relative to the anteroposterior commissural line (down = negative).
Region-of-interest analysis.
To validate SPM-96 as a method for morphometry we carried out an independent region-of-interest analysis of the corpus callosum surface in the midline. This analysis was performed on the original nonnormalized MR images. Using the semiautomatic region-of-interest function in ANALYZE, we measured the midsagittal surface of the corpus callosum in each individual and related it to the total brain surface area in the parasagittal plane, including midbrain and pons, at the most medial point of the head of the caudate nucleus. The measurements were taken blind; that is, without knowing to which group any individual belonged. Assuming a normal distribution, we performed an independent t-test using SPSS for Windows (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) on a personal computer. This compared the logarithms of the nine ratios of corpus callosum versus brain surface in xKS patients with the logarithms of the equivalent ratios in the normal men.
Results.
Statistical analysis (SPM).
Table 1 lists the regions with increased white matter density as determined by SPM(z) when comparing pooled white matter data for each of the three group comparisons.
xKS (with mirror movements) versus normal men.
The most extensive increases in white matter density in the xKS group were found in the middle and anterior part of the corpus callosum (figure, D). In the y-plane the differences within the corpus callosum extended from y = −21 to y = +33. Anteriorly, the bilateral regions of increased white matter density followed the rostral outline of the head of the caudate nuclei, extending into the anterior limbs of the internal capsule (figure, C). The widest extent of white matter density increase in the x-plane was from x = −24 to x = +24 (see figure, C). The widest extent in the z-plane was from z = −1 in the rostrum to z = +33 in the midbody of the corpus callosum (see figure, D). ⇓
z-Scores and coordinates in Talairach space35 for regions with significant differences (p < 0.01) when comparing pooled white matter
Figure. (a–h) The left column (a–d) demonstrates the comparison of pooled white matter data for X-linked Kallmann’s syndrome (xKS) patients (with mirror movements) versus normal men. The right column (e–h) demonstrates the comparison of pooled white matter data for autosomal Kallmann’s syndrome (aKS) patients (without mirror movements) versus normal men. Regions of increased white matter density (p < 0.01) are superimposed in yellow on the Montreal Neurological Institute reference brain.37,38 (a, b) xKS: Increased white matter density in relation to the course of the corticospinal tract. Coronal section (a) at y = −24 and transverse section (b) at z = −18. (c, d) xKS: Increased white matter density in the mid and anterior sections of the corpus callosum and its radiation. Transverse section (c) at z = +11 and midsagittal section at x = 0. (e, f) aKS: Increased white matter density in the splenium of the corpus callosum but no increase in relation to the course of the corticospinal tracts. Coronal section (e) at y = −24 and transverse section (f) at z = −18. (g) aKS: Increased white matter density in the callosal radiation. Transverse section at z = +11. (h) aKS: Increased white matter density in the splenium of the corpus callosum. Midsagittal section at x = 0.
Bilateral increased white matter density was found in the posterior limbs of the internal capsule, trailing down laterally through the midbrain (figure, A and B). The extent in the z-plane was from z = +8 to z = −22. Peak changes identified by SPM(z) were located in the corticospinal tract as outlined in the stereotaxic atlas of Talairach and Tournoux,36 and onto posterior areas immediately adjacent to it.
There was one additional extensive area of increased white matter density in the posterior aspect of the left occipital lobe, localizing to the optic radiation as outlined by Talairach and Tournoux.36 In the y-plane the area extended from y = −44 to y = −90, in the z-plane the area extended from z = +13 to z = −8, and in the x-plane the area extended from x = −10 to x = −30.
aKS (without mirror movements) versus normal men.
The most extensive difference in white matter density was found in the splenium of the corpus callosum (figure, H), extending into the right inferior parietal lobe (figure, E), with the most lateral peak at x = +42, y = −42, z = +38 (z = 4.15). Bilateral differences in the anterior radiation of the corpus callosum extended from the lateral aspects of the genu into the anterior limbs of the internal capsule, covering white matter up to the anterior aspect of the insula (figure, G). The most lateral peaks were at x = −36, y = +24, z = +9 (z = 3.63) and x = +39, y = +25, z = +7 (z = 4.73) respectively. There were no observed differences in the posterior limb of the internal capsule or that part of the midbrain corresponding to the expected course of the corticospinal tract (see figure, E and F).
xKS (with mirror movements) versus aKS (without mirror movements).
There was no significant difference in the corpus callosum between these two groups either at p < 0.01 or p < 0.1. There were, however, bilateral peaks in the left posterior limb of the internal capsule, the left anterior midbrain, and the right midbrain at the level of the red nucleus.
Region-of-interest analysis.
The ratio of the midsagittal area of the corpus callosum versus the total brain surface area was 20% greater in the xKS group than in the group of normal men (table 2). A t-test performed on the logarithm of this ratio for xKS and normal men demonstrated that this difference was significant at p < 0.0006 (CI, 1.11 to 1.30). A t-test on the differences of the absolute values for the midsagittal callosal area was significant at p < 0.03.
Region-of-interest data for the midsagittal area of the corpus callosum and the parasagittal brain surface area in age-matched xKS and normal men
Discussion.
There were three main findings. First, there was an increase in size of the corpus callosum in both xKS and aKS patients. This was demonstrated by statistical comparison of white matter in Kallmann’s syndrome patients versus normal men, and the finding was confirmed by an independent region-of-interest analysis carried out on the nonnormalized brains. Second, there were two symmetrically placed tracts of increased white matter density, running from the posterior limb of the internal capsule laterally through the midbrain down toward the pons. Third, the only significant difference between the xKS patients (with mirror movements) and the aKS patients (without mirror movements) lay in the existence of white matter tracts in the internal capsule and midbrain.
The methodology of the current study cannot determine whether observed increases in white matter density result from an increased number of fibers, increased fiber diameter, or increased fiber myelination. However, the number of callosal axons in newborn rhesus monkeys does exceed the number present in adults by at least 3.5 times.39 There is a similar reduction in the number of corticospinal tract axons during the first 8 months of postnatal life.40 Thus, it is possible that increases in white matter density observed in this study are the result of a defective postnatal axon pruning process within both the corpus callosum and the corticospinal tract.
Mirror movements and the corpus callosum.
Dennis et al.23-25 proposed a lack of callosally mediated interhemispheric inhibition to explain mirror movements. They hypothesized that, under normal circumstances, there is an underlying propensity for both motor cortices to become active even when voluntary movements are intended with one hand, but that the motor cortex contralateral to the side of intended movement exerts a tonic inhibitory activity on the other motor cortex. Indeed, there is functional evidence for the existence of transcallosal inhibition.41-43 Interhemispheric connections of the primary motor cortices pass through the corpus callosum.44,45 The rostral half of the body of the corpus callosum contains predominantly interhemispheric fibers to the motor cortex and supplementary motor cortex, whereas the dorsal and ventral sectors of the caudal part of the genu contain fibers to the lateral premotor regions.
In the current study, the middle and anterior parts of corpus callosum were significantly larger in the xKS patients than in the normal control subjects. However, an increase in callosal size was also observed when comparing the aKS patients with the normal control subjects, albeit in more posterior regions. Direct comparison between xKS and aKS patients revealed no significant differences in callosal size between the two groups. It follows that increased callosal size does not segregate consistently with the presence or absence of mirror movements in Kallmann’s syndrome.
Mirror movements and the corticospinal tracts.
The alternative hypothesis is that mirror movements in xKS patients result from an abnormal complement of corticospinal tract fibers that project ipsilaterally.21 Muller et al.46 studied the maturation of ipsilateral corticospinal tract projections in normal children age 3 through 11 years using focal transcranial magnetic brain stimulation. They elicited ipsilateral MEPs in two-thirds of the children examined. These occurred more often in proximal than in distal arm muscles and not in children older than 10 years. The latency of the MEPs was approximately 12 to 14 msec longer than the usual contralateral response, indicating a slow conduction velocity. Muller et al.46 hypothesized that the disappearance of ipsilateral MEPs in older children was related to the development of tonic transcallosal inhibition as the corpus callosum became fully myelinated. However, the physiologic ipsilateral corticospinal projections they identified are clearly not analogous to the fast-conducting corticospinal pathways, innervating predominantly distal forearm muscles, demonstrated in xKS patients by Mayston et al.22
The current study has demonstrated two symmetric tracts of increased white matter density, extending from the lower limb of the internal capsule and laterally through the midbrain toward the pons. Looking at these tracts as coregistered onto the MNI template (see figure, A and B), they might appear to lie just posterior to the conventional anatomic course of the corticospinal tract in humans. However, careful examination of the peak white matter differences in the xKS group shows that more than 50% correspond to the course of the corticospinal tract as delineated by Talairach and Tournoux.36 Moreover, these peaks lie largely within the confidence limits for the course of the corticospinal tract shown in the autopsy study of 30 human brainstem specimens by Afshar et al.47 It should also be noted that this application of SPM-96 to morphometric analysis18 depends on the normalization and smoothing of data derived from a group of nine individuals. Thus the confidence limits for precise anatomic localization are not clear. Finally, it is possible that an abnormal development of corticospinal tract fibers occurs in xKS at the borders of the normal course of the corticospinal tract. Taking all these factors into account, the data point to bilateral hypertrophy of the corticospinal tract in patients with xKS exhibiting mirror movements.
Differences in structure do not necessarily entrain differences in function, and vice versa, such that a physiologic alteration in transcallosal inhibition might not necessarily be reflected in a change in size of the corpus callosum. Therefore, this study cannot exclude entirely a callosal contribution to the etiology of mirror movements. Nevertheless, the data constitute strong anatomic evidence to support the physiologic data of Mayston et al.,22 suggesting that mirror movements in xKS are due to abnormal, fast-conducting ipsilateral corticospinal pathways. It is thus likely that anosmin-1, the protein encoded by KAL, plays a role in the development of the corticospinal tracts—specifically by inhibiting the establishment of fast-conducting ipsilateral pathways directly innervating those anterior horn cells that supply distal forearm muscles. This theory is consistent with the identification of KAL messenger RNA in embryonic human spinal cord tissue at 45 days postfertilization by reverse-transcriptase PCR.48
Acknowledgments
Supported by the Wellcome Trust.
- Received July 22, 1998.
- Accepted in final form November 7, 1998.
References
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵Quinton R, Kirk JMW, Matfin G, et al. Phenotypic aspects of isolated GnRH deficiency in males. Proceedings of the Annual Congress of the Endocrine Society. Endocrine Soc Abstr 1998; volume: P2–46. Abstract.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵Mayston MJ, Harrison LM, Stephens JA. Neurophysiological study of mirror movements in adults and children. Ann Neurol 1999 (in press).
- ↵
- ↵Duncan PA. Embryologic pathogenesis of renal agenesis associated with cervical vertebral anomalies (Klippel–Feil phenotype). Birth Defects 1977;13:91–101.
- ↵
- ↵Nelles G, Cramer SC, Schaechter JD, Kaplan JD, Finklestein SP. Quantitative assessment of mirror movements after stroke. Stroke 1998;29:1182–1187.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- Soussi–Yanicostas N, Hardelin J-P, Del Mar Aroyo–Jimenez M, et al. Initial characterization of anosmin-1, a putative extracellular matrix protein synthesized by definite neuronal cell populations in the central nervous system. J Cell Sci 1996;109:1749–1757.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- Nass R. Mirror movement asymmetries in congenital hemiparesis : the inhibition hypothesis revisited. Neurology 1985;35:1059–1062.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵Yakovlev PI, Rakic P. Patterns of decussation of bulbar pyramids and distribution of pyramidal tracts on two sides of the spinal cord. Trans Am Neurol Assoc 1966;91:366–367.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵Duke VM, de Zoysa PA, Quinton R, Bouloux P-MG. Mutation analysis in patients with Kallmann’s syndrome. Proceedings of the International Congress of Endocrinology 1996; volume: P1–337. Abstract.
- ↵
- ↵Robb RA, Hanson DP. A software system for interactive and quantitative visualisation of multidimensional biomedical images. Aust Phys Eng Sci Med 1991;14:9–30.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵Talairach J, Tournoux P. Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. Stuttgart:Thieme, 1988.
- ↵
- ↵Evans AC, Collins L, Mills SR, Brown ED, Kelly RL, Peters TM. 3D statistical neuroanatomical models from 305 MRI volumes. Proceedings of the IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference 1993; volume:1813–1817.
- ↵LaMantia AS, Rakic P. Axon overproduction and elimination in the corpus callosum of the developing rhesus monkey. J Neurosci 1990;10:2156–2175.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵Pandya DN, Seltzer B. The topography of commissural fibers. In: Lepore F, Ptito M, Jasper H, eds. Two hemispheres—one brain: functions of the corpus callosum. New York:Alan R. Liss, 1986:47–73.
- ↵
- ↵Afshar F, Watkins ES, Yap JC. Stereotaxic atlas of the human brainstem and cerebellar nuclei. New York:Raven Press, 1978.
- ↵
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Hemiplegic Migraine Associated With PRRT2 Variations A Clinical and Genetic Study
Dr. Robert Shapiro and Dr. Amynah Pradhan
Related Articles
- No related articles found.