Pathologic heterogeneity in clinically diagnosed corticobasal degeneration
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

Abstract
Background: Early reports suggested that corticobasal degeneration (CBD) is a distinct clinicopathologic entity. Because patients have had a fairly consistent constellation of clinical and laboratory findings, many have proposed that the pathologic diagnosis can be surmised with confidence during life.
Objective: To analyze the pathologic findings in a large series of cases with clinically diagnosed CBD.
Methods: Using the medical research linkage system of the Mayo Clinic for the period January 1990 to December 1997, we identified cases diagnosed during life with CBD who subsequently underwent autopsy. All patients had progressive asymmetric rigidity and apraxia (except one with rigidity but no apraxia) with other findings, suggesting additional cortical and basal ganglionic dysfunction. All cases underwent standardized neuropathologic examination with the distribution and severity of the pathologic changes determined for each case and the pathologic diagnoses based on currently accepted criteria.
Results: Thirteen cases were identified. The pathologic diagnoses were CBD in seven, AD in two, and one each for progressive supranuclear palsy, Pick’s disease, nonspecific degenerative changes, and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease. Two cases had negligible basal ganglia and nigral degeneration despite previously having obvious extrapyramidal signs. However, all patients had focal or asymmetric cortical atrophy with coexisting neuronal loss and gliosis with or without status spongiosis, which was maximal in the parietal and frontal cortical regions.
Conclusions: The constellation of clinical features considered characteristic of CBD is associated with heterogeneous pathologies. Furthermore, this syndrome can occur in the absence of basal ganglia and nigral degeneration. The one invariable pathologic abnormality in patients with this syndrome, however, is asymmetric parietofrontal cortical degeneration. At present, accurate diagnosis of CBD requires tissue examination.
Rebeiz et al.1 described three patients with a very distinctive clinical phenotype consisting of progressive asymmetric rigidity and apraxia plus other cortical and subcortical features. The postmortem features were also distinctive with degeneration of the cerebral cortex, substantia nigra, and, in two cases, dentate nucleus of the cerebellum, as well as swollen and achromatic neurons. The authors originally named this disorder “corticodentatonigral degeneration with neuronal achromasia.” Subsequent case series have described similar clinical and pathologic findings but with the recognition that dentate pathology is infrequent, whereas basal ganglia and cortical pathology is the rule.2-12 Hence, this clinicopathologic disorder is now described with the labels “corticobasal ganglionic degeneration” or “corticobasal degeneration (CBD).”
The neuropathologic hallmarks of CBD include focal/asymmetric neocortical atrophy, which predominantly involves the frontoparietal region in most cases, and ballooned achromatic neurons. Basal ganglia and nigral degeneration are often but not always present. The achromatic neurons are intensely neurofilament protein-positive (NFP+).13 Immunostains for tau protein have also shown two features: conglomerations of tau-positive (tau+) astrocytes known as “astrocytic plaques” and tau+ coiled inclusions in oligodendrocytes.14 Although similar tau+ glial pathology and NFP+ ballooned neurons can be seen in Pick’s disease and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), the presence of these findings in the absence of numerous Pick bodies and numerous globose neurofibrillary tangles is considered diagnostic of CBD pathologically.15
Although pathologic heterogeneity was suspected as early as 1992,16 some authors argued that the constellation of clinical findings is so specific for CBD that the characteristic pathology can be accurately predicted from the antemortem examination.17,18 Except for the report of Lang et al. in 1994,19 there were minimal data to suggest that CBD was not a distinct clinicopathologic entity. At the Movement Disorders Symposium on Cortical-Basal Ganglionic Degeneration and Other Asymmetric Cortical Degeneration Syndromes in 1995, we and others demonstrated significant heterogeneity in clinically and pathologically diagnosed CBD cases, and these and subsequent cases have been published.20-22 Despite these findings, some investigators still suggest that CBD has a characteristic clinical profile in life.23,24
We have continued to follow well over 100 patients whose clinical picture has been suggestive of underlying CBD. Of these, 11 have now come to postmortem examination, and we include two additional cases that have been neuropathologically studied at our institution. This large series of prospectively followed patients allows us to assess the accuracy of the clinical diagnosis for this disorder.
Methods.
Case ascertainment.
Among patients seen in our clinic whom we diagnosed with CBD and followed, 11 have died and have been neuropathologically examined. Detailed clinical information was obtained on another two patients, both diagnosed with CBD during life and followed longitudinally, who only underwent pathologic examination at the Mayo Clinic. All patients had progressive asymmetric rigidity and apraxia (except one with asymmetric rigidity only) and additional findings suggesting cortical (e.g., one or more of the following: alien limb phenomenon, apraxia of speech, cortical sensory loss, constructional dyspraxia, hemisensory neglect, myoclonus, mirror movements) and basal ganglionic (e.g., one or more of the following: bradykinesia, dystonia, tremor, postural instability) dysfunction. The majority of these patients were examined by at least one of the authors, and neurologic examinations and laboratory investigations were performed serially in some. One patient evaluated at the Mayo Clinic and Washington University in St. Louis, Missouri, underwent autopsy at Washington University, and the histologic material was subsequently reviewed at this institution.
Clinical assessments.
All patients were diagnosed with CBD by a neurologist during life and subsequently underwent brain autopsy. For purposes of analysis, all available clinical records were reviewed by one author (B.F.B.) who was blinded to the pathologic findings. The demographic and clinical data as well as pathologic diagnoses were abstracted and tabulated. For each patient, a particular clinical sign was considered present if that finding was specifically stated as present in the clinical record. A sign was considered an initial finding if it was recorded as present during the first 2 years of symptoms. Likewise, a finding was considered absent if that finding was specifically described as absent in the record. Those features that were not specifically noted as present or absent in the record were considered absent.
Neuropathologic assessments.
Brains were fixed in 10% neutral formalin and examined for cortical atrophy. As per the protocol of the Consortium to Establish a Registry for Alzheimer’s Disease,25 sections were obtained from superior/medial frontal gyrus, superior/medial temporal gyrus, inferior parietal lobule, cingulate gyrus, parahippocampal gyrus/entorhinal cortex, thalamus, caudate, putamen, pallidum, midbrain, pons, and medulla in every case; cortical sections were usually taken from the more affected hemisphere. Additional sections were obtained in areas of severe cortical atrophy. Sections were then stained with hematoxylin-eosin (H-E), modified Bielschowsky’s silver, Luxol fast blue/periodic acid-Schiff, and thioflavine S. Using the peroxidase-antiperoxidase or the avidin-biotin complex method, representative sections were immunostained using antisera directed toward ubiquitin (DAKO Z478, Carpinteria, CA), phosphorylated neurofilament, and tau polyclonal antibodies (Accurate Chemical #AXL-147).
Pathologic diagnoses were made using accepted neuropathologic criteria for degenerative and prion disorders.25 Autopsy material was examined by one or both Mayo Clinic neuropathologists (J.E.P. and D.W.D.).
For topographic analysis, the degree of degenerative changes was assessed by examining all H-E slides and categorizing neuronal loss and gliosis as follows: 0 = none or negligible, 1+ = mild, 2+ = moderate, 3+ = severe. The 3+ categorization was reserved for those sections showing status spongiosis as well as severe neuronal loss and gliosis. The topography and severity of these degenerative changes were then analyzed.
Results.
The demographic information, clinical features, and pathologic diagnoses of the 13 patients are summarized in table 1. The mean age at onset was 64 years (range 49 to 72), and mean duration of illness was 6 years (range 3 to 12). Twelve patients had the core findings of progressive asymmetric limb rigidity and apraxia; the remaining patient had asymmetric rigidity without apraxia. Other cortical and extrapyramidal signs were present in every patient. None of the patients who were administered levodopa experienced any significant improvement. Dysarthria, oculomotor dysfunction, frontal release signs, and pyramidal tract findings were frequent accompanying features. Thus, every patient had the constellation of clinical findings most suggestive of CBD.
Demographic features, clinical signs, and pathologic diagnoses in 13 patients with clinically diagnosed corticobasal degeneration (CBD)
Despite all cases having the same clinical diagnosis of CBD, other neuropathologic conditions were identified at postmortem examination in 6 of the 13 cases. The characteristic pathologic findings of CBD were found in 7, whereas the findings were those of AD in 2 and PSP, Pick’s disease, nonspecific degenerative changes, and Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease in the remaining cases.
Tissue was available for immunohistochemistry in 12 cases. All CBD cases had NFP+ ballooned neurons, tau+ astrocytic plaques, and tau+ coiled bodies in oligodendroglia. The PSP and Pick’s disease cases had rare NFP+ achromatic neurons and sparse tau+ glial pathology, which were not of sufficient severity or topography to warrant the diagnosis of CBD.15 One CBD case (Case 7) had marked tau+ pathology in neurons and glia and scattered NFP+ swollen neurons in the frontoparietal region, as well as sparse globose neurofibrillary tangles and Pick body-like inclusions in the dentate fascia of the hippocampus, and this pathology was therefore considered most consistent with CBD. The H-E and anti-ubiquitin sections of several brainstem and cortical regions did not reveal any Lewy bodies in any case.
The topographic distribution and severity of histologic degenerative changes are shown in table 2. In every case but two, the severity of degenerative changes (i.e., neuronal loss and gliosis with or without status spongiosis) was maximal in the parietal cortex, with the cortical asymmetry corresponding to the severity of limb findings (e.g., left > right cortical degeneration corresponding to right > left apraxia, rigidity, etc.). The frontal cortex was equally or slightly less severely involved than the parietal cortex all cases. In two cases, the anterior cingulate cortex was maximally involved. More variable changes were noted in the occipital and temporal cortices. Degeneration of the substantia nigra was present to some degree in 11 cases but negligible in 2. Basal ganglia degeneration was absent in five cases. This lack of basal ganglia and nigral degeneration is noteworthy because all patients had had extrapyramidal signs.
Topographic distribution and severity of degenerative changes in 13 patients with clinically diagnosed corticobasal degeneration
Discussion.
This series adds to the growing literature that shows several neurodegenerative disorders and prion disease can underlie the constellation of clinical findings thought to be specific for CBD. These disorders include AD (Patients 8 and 9 in this series and other reported cases20,26-28), Pick’s disease (Patient 11 in this series and other reported cases19,20,29), PSP (Patient 10 in this series and other reported cases20,30), nonspecific degenerative changes (Patient 12 in this series and the reported case of Brown et al.31), Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (Patient 13 in this series and the reported case of Cannard et al.32), as well as CBD (Patients 1 to 7 in this series and other reported cases2-12).
The seemingly high clinical misdiagnosis rate in this study is not surprising. Previous experience with clinicopathologic correlations in neurodegenerative disorders has tended to show the following: The initial reports on a unique and rare disorder suggest there is a strong correlation between a certain constellation of clinical findings and that particular disorder, but as additional cases with the same clinical appearance undergo autopsy, an appreciation of the pathologic heterogeneity evolves. Heterogeneity becomes especially apparent when a large number of patients carrying the same clinical diagnosis are followed prospectively until death. The misdiagnosis rate of 10 to 35% has been noted in studies performed in this manner in patients with clinically diagnosed PD33 and AD (see review by Klatka et al.34). If future studies indicate that CBD, Pick’s disease, and PSP represent phenotypes within the spectrum of a similar pathophysiologic process (see below), the misdiagnosis rate may become comparable with that of PD and AD.
There were also overlapping pathologic findings in the PSP and Pick’s disease cases and in one CBD case. These findings are consistent with other reports in which pathologic alterations characteristic of CBD and other presumably distinct disorders coexist.15,22,35
Although Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease has been reported to mimic CBD, and we have evaluated three similar cases of Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease presenting with “rapidly progressive CBD” (unpublished data, 1996), the rapid progression with duration of symptoms less than 2 years has suggested prion disease. Patient 13, our patient with prion disease pathology, is noteworthy because he had classic progressive CBD features over a 4-year period.
The findings from a recent study suggest that CBD is markedly underdiagnosed.23 The findings in this analysis suggest that CBD is overdiagnosed. This discrepancy likely reflects several factors, one being the manner in which clinical diagnoses were made because diagnoses were determined in our series based on prospective clinical evaluations as opposed to ratings of clinical vignettes in the study of Litvan et al.23 Although these authors suggest that the diagnosis may have improved if the neurologists had examined the patients, the clinical features that are listed as the best predictors of underlying CBD in their report were also present in most of our non-CBD patients. Myoclonus was identified as one of the better clinical predictors,23 but despite two or more examinations in each of our autopsy-proven CBD cases, myoclonus was never noted in any. Therefore, despite the rigorous attempts to improve diagnostic accuracy of CBD by several groups of experienced clinicians, the diagnosis cannot be made with accuracy in life at the present time.
Despite variable pathologic diagnoses in this series, the one consistent histopathologic finding was asymmetric parietal and frontal cortical degeneration. Many of the clinical findings in this syndrome are therefore explained by this topography of cortical damage. Cortical sensory loss and apraxia occur with parietal lesions and occasionally with frontal lesions.36 Frontal or parietal lesions, or both, can also be associated with the alien limb phenomenon37 and mirror movements.38 Other less common findings such as pyramidal tract signs, oculomotor impairment, gait apraxia, apraxia of speech, aphasia, alexia, and agraphia can result from frontoparietal with or without temporal cortical dysfunction.
The specific neuroanatomic substrates underlying the motor findings are less clear. In our experience, some patients have clinical findings suggesting pyramidal tract pathology (e.g., asymmetric hyperreflexia, Hoffmans’s or Babinski’s signs, flexion or extension contractures, spasticity with velocity-dependent increases in muscle tone, etc.); extrapyramidal findings (e.g., rigidity, dystonia, tremor) are also a consistent feature. Dysfunction of neurons in the motor cortex and their afferent/efferent projections are the likely substrates for pyramidal tract findings; marked degeneration in the motor cortex has been reported in CBD39 and PSP.40 A recent study employing electrical stimulation in patients undergoing evaluation for surgical treatment of intractable epilepsy demonstrated that a significant proportion of motor responses were elicited from postcentral gyrus stimulation, and conversely, many sensory responses were elicited from precentral gyrus stimulation.41 Hence, damage to motor neurons residing in the parietal region could explain the motor findings in some who have primarily parietal lobe degeneration.
Rigidity, dystonia, and tremor have been presumed to reflect basal ganglia or nigral degeneration, or both.17 The lack of marked and sustained improvement in extrapyramidal signs after levodopa administration is an almost universal finding in cases clinically diagnosed with CBD,42 which presumably reflects postsynaptic nigrostriatal dysfunction rather than substantia nigra degeneration.17 However, basal ganglia or nigral degeneration, or both, have been absent on rare occasions in previous reports; in fact, the basal ganglia were spared in the index cases of Rebeiz et al.1 The clinicopathologic correlations in two of our cases are especially noteworthy; extrapyramidal findings were striking (in Case 12) or moderate (in Case 13) despite negligible degeneration of the basal ganglia and substantia nigra. Therefore, detectable degeneration of these subcortical gray and pigmented structures is not necessary to produce rigidity, dystonia, and tremor.
There are reports of similar extrapyramidal findings despite relatively normal basal ganglia and substantia nigra in patients diagnosed pathologically with AD26,43,44 and Pick’s disease.19,29 Limb akinesia, cataleptic posture, levitation, and rigidity with and without coexisting apraxia have also been reported in association with parietal cortex lesions.45 Therefore, extrapyramidal symptomatology might reflect dysfunction of the somatosensory, motor, and/or premotor cortices and their afferent/efferent projections.
All our patients but one had a distinct syndrome with progressive asymmetric rigidity and apraxia dominating the clinical picture, with the exception having asymmetric rigidity only. This constellation of findings, which represents the core features of the “CBD syndrome,” reflects the topography of parietofrontal degeneration, and a spectrum of disorders can manifest clinically in this fashion. The CBD syndrome can therefore be viewed in the context of other focal/asymmetric cortical degeneration syndromes in which a similar spectrum of disorders can manifest clinically as a frontal lobe dementia syndrome or a progressive aphasia syndrome.16 It is interesting to note that the preponderance of disorders that can present in a focal/asymmetric fashion have tau+ pathology. Furthermore, although features suggesting cortical and extrapyramidal system dysfunction are characteristic of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB),46 DLB has not been identified in any patient with CBD syndrome findings to our knowledge. Because none of the patients in this series ever experienced complex visual hallucinations—a feature considered suggestive of DLB in the clinical setting of dementia and parkinsonism—the absence of visual hallucinations may be a key clinical feature that differentiates disorders with prominent tau pathology from those within the spectrum of disorders with Lewy bodies.
Recent analyses indicate that many cases with familial frontotemporal dementia with parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17 have prominent tau+ pathology and various combinations of achromatic neurons typical of CBD, Pick bodies characteristic of Pick’s disease, or globose neurofibrillary tangles typical of PSP.47 Whether CBD, Pick’s disease, and PSP represent distinctly different pathophysiologic processes or a spectrum of the same pathophysiologic process is a matter of debate.48,49 The rapidly evolving molecular research findings in these disorders increasingly indicate more similarities than differences. The accurate differentiation of CBD from other neurodegenerative disorders will therefore likely require analysis of biological material rather than rely on any clinical classification system.
Addendum.
Since this paper was accepted for publication, an additional four patients with clinically diagnosed CBD have died, and detailed neuropathologic examinations have been completed. The histopathologic diagnoses were CBD in two, nonspecific degenerative changes in one, and a combination Alzheimer’s and Pick’s disease changes in the other. The topographic distribution of degenerative changes in these cases was the same as that described in this article.
Acknowledgments
Supported by grant AG08031 from the National Institutes of Health.
Acknowledgment
The authors thank Drs. Leonard Berg and Daniel McKeel from Washington University in St. Louis, MO, for sharing the pathologic materials on one patient, and the nursing and secretarial staff of the Mayo Alzheimer’s Disease Center for their assistance in evaluating patients. They also extend their appreciation to the patients and their families for their willingness to participate in neurodegenerative disease research.
Footnotes
Presented in part at the Movement Disorders Symposium on Cortical-Basal Ganglionic Degeneration and Other Asymmetric Cortical Degeneration Syndromes at the annual meeting of the American Neurological Association, Washington, DC, October 1995; the meeting of the International Congress of Neuropathology, Perth, Australia, September 1997; and the meeting of the World Congress of Neurology, Buenos Aires, Argentina, September 1997.
- Received November 23, 1998.
- Accepted in final form March 27, 1999.
References
- ↵
- ↵
- LeWitt P, Friedman J, Nutt J, Korczyn A, Brogna C, Truong D. Progressive rigidity with apraxia the variety of clinical and pathologic features. Neurology 1989;39 (suppl 1):140. Abstract.
- Watts R, Mirra S, Young R, Burger P, Villier J, Heyman A. Cortico-basal ganglionic degeneration (CBGD) with neuronal achromasia clinical-pathological study of two cases. Neurology 1989;39 (suppl 1):140. Abstract.
- Riley D, Lang A, Lewis A, et al. Cortical-basal ganglionic degeneration. Neurology 1990;40:1203–1212.
- Rosenfield D, Bogatka C, Viswanath N, Lang A, Jankovic J. Speech apraxia in cortico-basal ganglionic degeneration. Ann Neurol 1991;30:296–297.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵Lang A, Riley D, Bergeron C. Cortical-basal ganglionic degeneration. In: Calne D, ed. Neurodegenerative diseases. Philadelphia:WB Saunders, 1994:877–894.
- ↵Watts R, Mirra S, Richardson E. Corticobasal ganglionic degeneration. In: Marsden C, Fahn S, eds. Movement disorders 3. Oxford:Butterworth-Heinemann, 1994:282–299.
- ↵Lang A, Bergeron C, Pollanen M, Ashby P. Parietal Pick’s disease mimicking cortical-basal ganglionic degeneration. Neurology 1994;44:1436–1440.
- ↵Movement Disorders Symposium on Cortical-Basal Ganglionic Degeneration and Other Asymmetric Cortical Degeneration Syndromes. Mov Disord 1996;11:346–357.
- ↵Schneider JA, Watts RL, Gearing M, Brewer RP, Mirra SS. Corticobasal degeneration neuropathologic and clinical heterogeneity. Neurology 1997;48:959–969.
- ↵Litvan I, Agid Y, Goetz C, et al. Accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of corticobasal degeneration a clinicopathologic study. Neurology 1997;48:119–125.
- ↵Wenning G, Litvan I, Jankovic J, et al. Natural history and survival of 14 patients with corticobasal degeneration confirmed at postmortem examination. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998;64:184–189.
- ↵Mirra S, Gearing M, Heyman A. CERAD guide to the neuropathological assessment of Alzheimer’s disease and other dementias. CERAD, 1994.
- ↵Ball J, Lantos P, Jackson M, Marsden C, Scadding J, Rossor M. Alien hand sign in association with Alzheimer’s histopathology. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1993;56:1020–1023.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵Brown J, Lantos P, Rossor M. Familial dementia lacking specific pathological features presenting with clinical features of corticobasal degeneration. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998;65:600–603.
- ↵Cannard K, Galvez-Jimenez N, Watts R. Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease presenting and evolving as rapidly progressive corticobasal degeneration. Neurology 1998;50 (suppl 4):A95. Abstract.
- ↵Hughes A, Daniel S, Kilford L, Lees A. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease a clinico-pathological study of 100 cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1992;55:181–184.
- ↵Klatka L, Schiffer R, Powers J, Kazee A. Incorrect diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease a clinicopathologic study. Arch Neurol 1997;53:35–42.
- ↵
- ↵Heilman K, Gonzales-Rothi L. Apraxia. In: Heilman K, Valenstein E, eds. Clinical neuropsychology. New York:Oxford University Press, 1985:131–150.
- ↵Doody R, Jankovic J. The alien hand and related signs. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1992;55:806–810.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵Nii Y, Uematsu S, Lesser R, Gordon B. Does the central sulcus divide motor and sensory functions? Cortical mapping of human hand areas as revealed by electrical stimulation through subdural grid electrodes. Neurology 1996;46:360–367.
- ↵
- ↵Pogacar S, Williams R. Alzheimer’s disease presenting as slowly progressive aphasia. Rhode Island Med J 1984;67:181–185.
- ↵Jagust W, Davies P, Tiller-Borcich J, Reed B. Focal Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 1990;40:14–19.
- ↵Goldhammer L. The apraxic and parietal hand and their definite localizing value tonic, motor, and visuokinetic phenomena in parietal lobe syndromes. Neurology 1989;39 (suppl 1):225. Abstract.
- ↵McKeith IG, Galasko D, Kosaka K, et al. Consensus guidelines for the clinical and pathologic diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB) report of the Consortium on DLB international workshop. Neurology 1996;47:1113–1124.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Related Articles
- No related articles found.