The tau gene A0 allele and progressive supranuclear palsy
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

Abstract
Background: Recent studies have shown an association between a polymorphic tandem repeat allele, located in intron 9, of the tau gene and progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP).
Objective: To investigate this tau polymorphism in individuals with a clinical diagnosis of sporadic or familial PSP as well as in cases confirmed by pathology.
Methods: We analyzed the frequency of tau intronic polymorphism, the presence of linkage in two families with multiple cases of PSP, the splicing of exon 10, and direct sequence of the tau gene.
Results: We found that patients with a clinical diagnosis of sporadic or familial PSP and individuals with PSP confirmed by neuropathology have greater prevalence of the A0 allele and A0/A0 genotype than controls. This finding, however, was also true for asymptomatic relatives of individuals with PSP. Linkage analysis in familial PSP excluded the location of the gene in the region 17q21. Furthermore, no significant differences were found in the level of expression of exon 10 in PSP, A0/A0 brain with respect to Alzheimer A3/A3 brain. We found no mutations in the tau gene in individuals with familial PSP.
Conclusions: A mutation in the tau gene was not the primary cause of familial PSP. The role of tau and the tau A0 allele in white PSP patients remains unknown, although it may represent a genetic risk factor for several neurodegenerative disorders.
Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) is the most common degenerative akinetic rigid syndrome after PD. PSP is characterized by supranuclear vertical gaze palsy, postural instability, rigidity, akinesia, progressive oculomotor disturbance, and dementia.1 Although the cause of this disease is not known, the study of familial clusters with multiple cases of PSP suggests, at least in some cases, that PSP can be transmitted by mendelian inheritance.2-5
The major cytoskeletal abnormality in PSP patients is the formation of neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs), located mainly in subcortical nuclei of the brain and the brainstem. PSP patients do not have amyloid deposits or neuritic plaques.6-8 The NFTs and other abnormal filaments found in many neurodegenerative diseases are mainly composed by hyperphosphorylated tau species. Tau proteins are microtubule-associated proteins that belong to a family of developmentally regulated isoforms generated by alternative splicing of the tau gene and phosphorylation.9 The tau pathology varies considerably in both quantity and characteristics among the different disorders.10 The primary human tau transcript has 16 exons.11 In CNS neurons, exons 2, 3, and 10 are alternatively spliced and because exon 3 is always expressed together with exon 2, alternative splicing allows the expression of six different tau isoforms.9
A dinucleotide repeat polymorphism in the tau intron located between exons 9 and 10 was identified and used to evaluate the genetic association of tau with several neurodegenerative diseases (tauopathies) characterized by tau pathology.12 The prevalence of the tau genotype A0/A0 and the tau A0 allele was greater in PSP patients than it was in controls or in AD patients in the white population.12-14 This is an interesting association because exon 10 encodes the second repeat of the tubulin-binding domain, and a higher proportion of tau isoforms expressing that exon was observed in PSP patients compared with a control population.10 However, Conrad et al.15 examined this polymorphism in a Japanese population and found that this dinucleotide repeat was relatively nonpolymorphic.
Here we present multiple genetic analysis as a step to defining the significance of the association between PSP and this intronic polymorphism in the tau gene. We have included in the study sporadic and familial PSP patients, and we analyzed brain samples of pathologically confirmed PSP cases. We analyzed the presence of linkage between the gene that produces familial PSP and the region 17q21-22, where the tau gene maps. Sequence analysis, in pathologically confirmed patients, has also been included. Because the sequences indicating the different dinucleotide polymorphism alleles A0, A1, A2, or A3 are located between exons 9 and 10, we have also performed analysis to test the expression of the alternatively spliced tau exon 10 from PSP A0/A0 brains. In addition, the tau polymorphism has been analyzed in our patients with PD to confirm the association with the tau genetic marker previously reported by Lazzarini et al.16
Methods.
Individuals.
The clinical diagnosis of PSP (years since disease onset: 2 to 8) was made according to the recommended international criteria.17 A total of 28 asymptomatic PSP family members were included in the study (age 65 ± 7.23 years, range 55 to 80; n = 28). The clinical diagnosis of PD patients (age 59.77 ± 11.63 years, range 44 to 81, n = 18; mean follow-up after disease onset = 4.5 years) was performed according to criteria of the United Kingdom Parkinson’s Disease Society Brain Tissue Bank.18 The pathologic diagnosis of PSP brains was made in accordance with the recent international recommendations.7,8 Control DNA was obtained from healthy individuals (age 52.1 ± 9.98 years, range 39 to 75; n = 79) with no evidence of neurologic diseases in their families who were studied at the Department of Genetics, “Fundación Jiménez Díaz,” Madrid. All individuals in this study were white.
Amplification and identification of tau polymorphism.
Genomic DNA from patients and controls was obtained either from whole-blood lysate or brain samples using standard techniques. Allelotyping was performed by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using the oligonucleotides described by Conrad et al.12 PCR was performed in a 10-μL reaction mixture containing 100 ng of genomic DNA as template, 10 mM Tris-HCl pH 8.0, 50 mM KCl, 1.5 mM MgCl2, 0.2 μM each primer, 200 μM dNTPs, 1 unit of Taq DNA polymerase (Boehringer Ingelheim, Germany), and 0.07 μL of [α-32P]dCTP (10 mCi/μL; Amersham, Arlington Heights, IL). Reactions were performed in a 96-well microtiter plate, and the amplification conditions comprised 30 cycles at 94 °C for 1 minute, annealing at 55 °C for 1 minute, and extension at 72 °C for 1 minute. The final products, after denaturation at 95 °C for 5 minutes, were subjected to 6% polyacrylamide/8 M urea gel electrophoresis. Extension products were detected by autoradiography using Kodak XAR-5 radiographic film.
Chromosome 17 linkage analysis.
Genomic search of chromosome 17 was performed in two PSP white families, a large one from Spain previously described by de Yébenes et al.5 and a small unreported one from the United States (see pedigrees, figure 1). The following short tandem repeat polymorphisms, distributed throughout the chromosome at a mean distance of 15.59 cM, were examined: D17S849, D17S796, D17S1303, D17S122, D17S1288, D17S579, D17S806, D17S809, D17S1290, D17S795, D17S801, D17S836, D17S784, and D17S928. The sense primers were end labeled using adenosine triphosphate polynucleotide kinase with [α-32P]dCTP. A total of 200 ng of endogenous DNA were used for PCR (30 cycles, denaturation at 94 °C for 1 minute; annealing at 60 °C for 1 minute and extension at 60 °C for 1 minute) in a final volume of a 10-μL mixture containing the sense and antisense primers, 0.5 units of Taq DNA polymerase, and 1.0 mM MgCl2. After amplification, the different alleles were identified in autoradiographs after electrophoresis in 6% polyacrylamide gel.
Figure 1. Family trees of two families with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). The clinical and pathologic features of some members were previously reported.5
Data analysis.
Linkage analysis was performed with the Mlink program of the LINKAGE package, version 5.2.19 Multipoint analysis was performed with VITESSE version 1.0.20 Analysis of the frequencies of polymorphisms of the tau gene in PSP, other diseases, and controls was performed by the chi-square test. Differences were considered significant when p < 0.05.
Sequence analysis.
Sequencing of the coding exons of the tau gene was performed on both strands from genomic DNA amplified using the primers and conditions described previously.21 This only included exons expressed in the brain (1 to 5, 7, and 9 to 13). Briefly, purified PCR products were sequenced using the rhodamine dye terminator kit from Perkin-Elmer (Foster City, CA). The reactions were resolved using an automated DNA sequencer (ABI377, Perkin-Elmer), and the sequences were analyzed using PolyPhred (Nickerson, US).
Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).
The expression of exon 10 from the tau gene was studied according to Montejo et al.22 Total RNA was prepared from different sections of two normal brains (controls), three AD brains, and four PSP brains using the reagent RNAzol (Tel-Test, Inc., US) and following the supplier’s protocol. Reverse transcription was performed using the first cDNA synthesis kit (Pharmacia, Piscataway, NJ) on 5 μg of brain RNA with oligo(dT) primer. PCR was performed with the oligonucleotides A15 (5′-GCGAATTCAATGCCAGACCTG-3′) and A16 (5′-GCGGATCCCAAACCCTGCTTGG-3′). The amplification conditions comprised 30 cycles at 94 °C for 30 seconds, annealing at 55 °C for 30 seconds, and extension at 72 °C for 1 minute. PCR products were analyzed on agarose gel.
Results.
Prevalence of the A0 allele of the tau gene in individuals with PSP.
The distribution of the four polymorphic alleles in the tau gene was studied in patients with familial PSP, their asymptomatic relatives, PSP asymptomatic family members, patients with sporadic PSP, and controls free of neurologic disorders. Table 1 shows an over-representation of the tau genotype A0/A0 and the A0 allele in both familial and sporadic PSP patients compared with controls (p = 0.001, odds ratio 17.03, chi-square test). The high frequency of the A0 allele and the A0/A0 homozygous individuals was, however, not restricted to PSP patients but also occurred in their asymptomatic PSP relatives (p = 0.008, chi-square test), suggesting that this genotype may not be specific for familial PSP. Consistent with these results, the prevalence of the A0/A0 genotype is also greater in individuals with the pathologic diagnosis of PSP than it is in those with the pathologic diagnosis of AD, other neurologic disorders, or absence of neurologic disease, as shown in table 1.
Distribution of genotypes of tau gene polymorphisms
In patients with PD the association between the A0/A0 genotype and the A0 allele with the disease was not significant (p = 0.09, odds ratio 2.86; and p = 0.23, odds ratio 1.86, respectively, chi-square test). There was, however, a trend that does not allow us to disregard the importance of the A0 allele in PD.
Linkage analysis of multiple markers in the region of the tau gene and other areas of chromosome 17.
We tested for linkage in our PSP families with 14 polymorphic markers located throughout chromosome 17. The lod scores of two-point linkage analysis are shown in table 2. Negative lod scores are found for markers D17S1288 and D17S579 located in the vicinity of the cytogenetic region 17q21, where the tau gene is located, as well as in most areas of chromosome 17, with the exception of the distal telomere, where a positive but low lod score was found. We also analyzed our results by multipoint linkage study, as shown in figure 2. This analysis excluded linkage to this area.
Two-point linkage analysis of multiple markers throughout chromosome 17 in two families with progressive supranuclear palsy
Figure 2. Multipoint lod score analysis of familial progressive supranuclear palsy with polymorphic markers of chromosome 17.
In addition, we analyzed linkage of tau intronic polymorphism with PSP in two families. When the data of these two families were pooled, linkage was excluded for both autosomal dominant and autosomal recessive models of inheritance. If the families were analyzed individually, linkage was excluded in family 2 with the model of dominant inheritance, but we obtained a noninformative lod score of −1.44 with the model of recessive inheritance. In the case of family 1, linkage was excluded under the model of recessive inheritance, and it was noninformative due to its small size (lod score 0.1) under the model of dominant inheritance.
Sequence of the tau gene in pathologically confirmed PSP cases.
We performed sequence analysis of two A0/A0 homozygous PSP patients belonging to the large family (family 2) and two A0/A0 sporadic patients. All were confirmed by pathologic diagnosis. Sequencing of the coding exons of the tau gene failed to detect any change that could account for the appearance of the disease.
Expression of tau mRNA containing exon 10 in PSP brain.
To study whether the disease affects neuronal groups that only express a particular tau isoform, we analyzed, at the cDNA level, the expression pattern of the alternatively spliced exon 10 in each case. We performed the molecular analysis by RT-PCR from the brains of PSP or AD patients and from controls. Our results indicate similar levels of expression in samples from different brain regions from a PSP patient, although a slightly higher proportion of four-repeat cDNA tau isoform was found in the cortex (figure 3A). Because the increase in messenger RNA containing exon 10 would increase the proportion of tau containing four microtubule-binding repeats, we also quantified, by densitometry, the proportion of tau cDNA expressing exon 10 for the samples indicated in figure 3, B and C. The quantified expression of four-repeat tau isoform, represented as a percentage of the total tau (three- plus four-repeat isoforms) in two samples from two brains with different disorders was the following: AD, 20 ± 4 and 31 ± 7; PSP, 23 ± 6 and 28 ± 8; control, 21 ± 3 and 24 ± 5 (see figure 3B). These data do not suggest dramatic differences among the tested samples. However, there is a slight increase in the proportion of four-repeat tau in one AD and in one PSP brain. Although these analyses are only from two samples, it suggests that there is not a clear increase of four-repeat tau in PSP. Nevertheless, to test whether the different polymorphisms modify the expression of exon 10, samples from two regions of an AD patient (A3/A3) and from a PSP patient (A0/A0) were compared by RT-PCR and quantified (see figure 3C). The expression of four-repeat tau isoform from PSP cortex was 33 ± 7 and from basal ganglia was 30 ± 5, whereas the expression in patients with AD were 21 ± 4 from cortex and 20 ± 3 from basal ganglia. These differences were too small to have pathologic significance.
Figure 3. (A) Expression of tau isoforms in different regions of the brain from a patient with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). Reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction was performed to characterize the tau RNA transcripts from cortex (a), globus pallidus (b), and caudate nucleus (c). The electrophoretic mobility of the cDNA expressing exon 10 (4 tubulin-binding motifs) (4R) or not expressing exon 10 (3 tubulin-binding motifs) (3R) are indicated as electrophoretic mobility markers. (B) Expression of tau isoforms in two isoforms in two samples from controls (c, c′) and AD (a, a′) and PSP (p, p′) patients from the temporal gyrus. (C) Expression of tau isoforms from the same AD patient in panel B (A3/A3) from cortex (a) and basal ganglia (a′) and from the same PSP patient (A0/A0) from cortex (p) and basal ganglia (p′). 3R and 4R are as in panel A, and M indicates electrophoretic mobility markers.
Thus, the above results indicate that there is not a clear correlation between the presence of alleles A0 and A3 and the expression of tau with three- or four-repeat isoforms, as determined by analyzing their cDNAs, although a slight increase in four-repeat tau cDNA was observed in the A0 compared with the A3 allele.
Discussion.
Different late-onset neurodegenerative disorders, including PSP, show neuronal inclusions composed of filamentous cytoskeletal proteins termed “neurofibrillary tangles.” Recent biochemical and molecular studies have identified the microtubule-binding protein tau as the predominant component of these inclusions. PSP tangles show unique characteristics when compared with other diseases.10 The universal presence of NFTs in brains of patients with PSP suggests that there is a relation between the tau gene and this disease. Our data confirm the association previously reported12-14 between PSP and the genotype A0/A0 and the A0 allele of the tau gene in white patients with this disease. Although the NINDS-SPSP clinical criteria have a specificity and positive predictive value of 100%, the clinical diagnosis of PSP in clinical practice is occasionally erroneous in up to one of three cases.17,23 We confirmed, therefore, the high prevalence of the A0 allele in individuals with pathologic diagnosis. However, the high prevalence of the A0 allele was also present in asymptomatic members of families with multiple cases of this disease, suggesting this allele is not linked to PSP in families with this disease.
The frequency of genotype A0/A0 for the tau gene is approximately 53.4 to 57.4% in North Americans12,13 and approximately 37.5% in the Spanish population (data included in this study and reference 14). The prevalence of PSP is aged-related but as low as 77.91 cases per 100,000 even at ages 80 to 99 as shown by the only available population-based epidemiologic study.24 The relative risk of an A0/A0 homozygous white individual older than 80 with PSP is, therefore, 1 in 750, whereas in the general population, regardless of tau genotype, it is 1 in 1,250, yielding an odds ratio of 1.66. Recently, it was reported that the frequency of the genotype A0/A0 in the Japanese population is almost 100%.15 Although other genetic or environmental factors may play a modulator role in the prevalence of PSP, there is no evidence of an increased prevalence of this disease in Japan due to the high proportion of the A0 allele.
However, two-point linkage analysis performed throughout chromosome 17 suggests that linkage between the tau gene and PSP is unlikely in the families that we have investigated. The only interesting areas of chromosome 17 with positive lod scores were located at the distal telomere, far away from the region 17q21 where the tau gene is located. Multipoint linkage analysis excluded linkage in the area of the tau gene.
Recent reports suggested the presence of linkage disequilibrium for the genotype A0/A0 in sporadic cases of PSP using a model of autosomal recessive inheritance and gene frequencies but not when the pattern of inheritance was considered autosomal dominant with variable penetrance.13 The majority of the families with multiple cases of PSP previously reported in the literature or examined by ourselves are compatible with a pattern of autosomal dominant inheritance with reduced penetrance.2-5,25-30 We found multiple cases of PSP in two or more generations in six of nine families from Europe and North America. No evidence of consanguinity was found in these families. Summing up other families previously reported, nine with pathologic confirmation in at least one patient, multiple cases of PSP restricted to only one generation, and therefore suggestive of recessive inheritance, were present in two families. Fifteen families had multiple cases in different generations—12 families in two generations and 3 families in three generations. Consanguinity was only recognized in one family from Japan.31 These data suggest that the pattern of inheritance of PSP is compatible with autosomal dominant, with reduced penetrance in these families and the majority of those previously described.
In addition, the recent identification of mutations in the tau gene that influence the alternative splicing of exon 10 in a similar neurodegenerative condition (frontotemporal dementia parkinsonism linked to chromosome 17) has further strengthened the argument that tau dysfunction may be involved in the pathogenesis of PSP.21 However, in our patients we did not detect any DNA mutation in the tau exons (1 to 5, 7, and 9 to 11) analyzed. Direct sequencing of coding exons could miss mutations affecting the regulatory region of the gene as well as mutations affecting the splicing of the exons, although the introns surrounding the exons were also sequenced. Exclusion of linkage, by multipoint analysis of the region, rules out a direct involvement of this gene in the etiologic process even taking into account that we did not sequence the promotor and internal regions of the introns of the tau gene. Interestingly, all patients for whom tau sequences were available were homozygous for the polymorphism, conferring higher risk for the disease.
Consistent with the above findings, the study by RT-PCR analysis of different brain samples from PSP patients, AD patients, and controls revealed no significant differences in the level of expression of exon 10. However, a small increase in the level of expression of four-repeat tau was observed in samples from PSP brain when compared with AD brain samples. The difference, however, is too small to be relevant in the pathogenesis of PSP because differences of expression of exon 10 of similar magnitude are found in different brain areas with pathologic involvement of similar severity in brains of patients with PSP.
The role of tau and tau intronic polymorphism in PSP is intriguing even if it is neither specific nor causative. From the available evidence it seems that the genotype A0/A0 may play a “permissive” role in the effects of mutations of other, yet unknown, causative genes. The possible, yet unproven, role of A0 in familial parkinsonism is also of interest. A positive association was reported by Lazzarini et al.16 and, though we found no statistical significance, there was a tendency that does not allow us to disregard a putative role of this polymorphism in some cases of familial PD. In any case, the association between the A0/A0 genotype and PSP was stronger than that with PD. In conclusion, our findings do not suggest that a mutation in the tau gene contributes to the pathogenesis of familial PSP. However, the tau A0 allele may be a marker for some molecular genetic risk factors on a pathway that leads to neurodegeneration.
Acknowledgments
Supported in part by a grant from Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid (96/07/072). R.A. and M.P. are fellows of Comunidad Autónoma de Madrid.
Acknowledgment
The authors thank Dr. Javier Benítez, Departamento de Genética, Fundación Jiménez Díaz, for providing blood samples of control patients, Dr. Jose Serratosa for help with linkage analysis, Dr. Ana Rojo and Aurora Fontan for providing clinical information about the patients with progressive supranuclear palsy, and Liselotte Gulliksen for editorial help.
- Received October 20, 1998.
- Accepted April 29, 1999.
References
- ↵
Steele JC, Richardson JC, Olszewski J. Progressive supranuclear palsy: a heterogeneous degeneration involving the brainstem, basal ganglia and cerebellum with vertical gaze and pseudobulbar palsy, nuchal dystonia and dementia. Arch Neurol 1964;10:333–359.
- ↵
Brown J, Lantos P, Stratton M, Roques P, Rossor M. Familial progressive supranuclear palsy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1993;56:473–476.
-
Gazeley S, Maguire JA. Familial progressive supranuclear palsy. Brain Pathol 1994;4:534. Abstract.
-
Golbe LI, Dickson DW. Familial autopsy-proven progressive supranuclear palsy. Neurology 1995;45 (suppl 4):A255. Abstract.
- ↵
de Yébenes JG, Sarasa JL, Daniel SE, Lees AJ. Familial progressive supranuclear palsy: description of a pedigree and review of the literature. Brain 1995;118:1095–1103.
- ↵
- ↵
Hauw JJ, Daniel SE, Dickson D, et al. Preliminary NINDS neuropathologic criteria for Steele-Richardson-Olszewski syndrome (progressive supranuclear palsy). Neurology 1994;44:2015–2019.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
Higgins JJ, Litvan I, Pho LT, Li W, Nee LE. Progressive supranuclear gaze palsy is in linkage disequilibrium with the τ and not the α-synuclein gene. Neurology 1998;50:270–273.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
Lazzarini AM, Golbe LI, Dickson DW, Duvoisin RC, Johnson WC. Tau intronic polymorphism in Parkinson’s disease and progressive supranuclear palsy. Neurology 1997;48 (suppl 2):A427. Abstract.
- ↵
Litvan I, Agid Y, Calne D, et al. Clinical research criteria for the diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy (Steele-Richardson-Olszewski syndrome): report of the NINDS-SPSP International Workshop. Neurology 1996;47:1–9.
- ↵
- ↵
Lathrop GM, Lalovel JM, Julier C, Ott J. Strategies for multilocus linkage analysis in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1984;81:3443–3446.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
Litvan I, Campbell G, Mangone CA, et al. Which clinical features differentiate progressive supranuclear palsy (Steele-Richardson-Olszewski syndrome) from related disorders? A clinicopathological study. Brain 1997;120:65–74.
- ↵
Bower JH, Maraganore DM, McDonnell SK, Rocca WA. Incidence of progressive supranuclear palsy and multiple system atrophy in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1976 to 1990. Neurology 1997;49:1284–1288.
- ↵
David NJ, Mackey EA, Smith JL. Further observations in progressive supranuclear palsy. Neurology 1968;18:349–356.
-
Mata M, Dorovini-Zis K, Wilson M, Young AB. New form of familial Parkinson-dementia syndrome: clinical and pathologic findings. Neurology 1983;33:1439–1443.
-
Tertrud JW, Golbe LI, Forno LS, Farmer PM. Autopsy-proven progressive supranuclear palsy in two siblings. Neurology 1996;46:931–934.
- ↵
Rojo A, Pernaute RS, Fontán A, et al. Clinical genetics of familial progressive supranuclear palsy. Brain 1999;122:1233–1245.
- ↵
Ohara S, Kondo K, Morita H, Maruyama K, Ikeda S, Yanagisawa N. Progressive supranuclear palsy-like syndrome in two siblings of a consanguineous marriage. Neurology 1992;42:1009–1014.
Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Related Articles
- No related articles found.