Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Education
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, Anti-racism, & Social Justice (IDEAS)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Neurology Future Forecasting Series
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Topics A-Z
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Center

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Education
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, Anti-racism, & Social Justice (IDEAS)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Neurology Future Forecasting Series
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Topics A-Z
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Center
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Neurology Video Journal Club
  • Residents & Fellows

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Neurology
Home
The most widely read and highly cited peer-reviewed neurology journal
  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
Site Logo
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Neurology Video Journal Club
  • Residents & Fellows

Share

July 25, 2000; 55 (2) Article

Ischemic stroke in young women

Risk of recurrence during subsequent pregnancies

C. Lamy, J.B. Hamon, J. Coste, J.L. Mas, for the French Study Group on Stroke in Pregnancy
First published July 25, 2000, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.55.2.269
C. Lamy
From the Service de Neurologie (Drs. LamyHamon, and Mas), Hôpital Sainte-Anne, and the Département de Biostatistique et d’Informatique Médicale (Dr. Coste), Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.B. Hamon
From the Service de Neurologie (Drs. LamyHamon, and Mas), Hôpital Sainte-Anne, and the Département de Biostatistique et d’Informatique Médicale (Dr. Coste), Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Coste
From the Service de Neurologie (Drs. LamyHamon, and Mas), Hôpital Sainte-Anne, and the Département de Biostatistique et d’Informatique Médicale (Dr. Coste), Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J.L. Mas
From the Service de Neurologie (Drs. LamyHamon, and Mas), Hôpital Sainte-Anne, and the Département de Biostatistique et d’Informatique Médicale (Dr. Coste), Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
From the Service de Neurologie (Drs. LamyHamon, and Mas), Hôpital Sainte-Anne, and the Département de Biostatistique et d’Informatique Médicale (Dr. Coste), Hôpital Cochin, Paris, France.
Full PDF
Citation
Ischemic stroke in young women
Risk of recurrence during subsequent pregnancies
C. Lamy, J.B. Hamon, J. Coste, J.L. Mas, for the French Study Group on Stroke in Pregnancy
Neurology Jul 2000, 55 (2) 269-274; DOI: 10.1212/WNL.55.2.269

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions

Make Comment

See Comments

Downloads
1203

Share

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Loading

Abstract

Objective: To assess whether subsequent pregnancies increase the risk of recurrent stroke and whether the occurrence of an ischemic stroke affects reproductive history.

Methods: The authors identified 489 consecutive women aged 15 to 40 years with a first-ever arterial ischemic stroke or cerebral venous thrombosis from the record system of nine French neurologic centers. Information on stroke recurrence and reproductive history was obtained by means of chart review, written questionnaire, and telephone interview.

Results: Data were analyzed from 441 women (373 with arterial ischemic stroke and 68 with cerebral venous thrombosis). During a mean follow-up of 5 years, 13 arterial recurrent ischemic strokes occurred. There were no cases of recurrent cerebral venous thrombosis. The overall risk of recurrence was 1% within 1 year and 2.3% within 5 years. The risk of recurrence was significantly higher in patients with stroke of definite cause. Eleven recurrent strokes occurred outside pregnancy (absolute risk of recurrence = 0.5%; 95% CI 0.3, 0.95) and two during pregnancy or the puerperium (absolute risk of recurrence = 1.8%; 95% CI 0.5, 7.5). The relative risk of recurrence was significantly higher during the postpartum period (risk ratio = 9.7; 95% CI 1.2, 78.9) than during pregnancy (risk ratio = 2.2; 95% CI 0.3, 17.5) itself. The outcome of the 187 subsequent pregnancies was similar to that expected from the general population. Thirty-four percent of women indicated that they would have desired more pregnancies after their initial stroke. The main reasons for not considering pregnancy were concern of a recurrent stroke, medical advice against pregnancy, and residual handicap.

Conclusion: Young women with a history of ischemic stroke have a low risk of recurrence during subsequent pregnancies. The postpartum period, not the pregnancy itself, is associated with an increased risk of recurrent stroke. The outcome of pregnancies in these women appears to be similar to that expected in the general population. A previous ischemic stroke is not a contraindication to a subsequent pregnancy.

The incidence of ischemic stroke in women of childbearing age is estimated between 3.5 and 18 per 100,000 per year in Western countries.1-7 This risk may be slightly increased during pregnancy, particularly during the postpartum period.8-13 To our knowledge, no data are available on the influence of pregnancy on the risk of recurrent stroke,14-16 thereby making it difficult to counsel women with a history of ischemic stroke regarding future pregnancies. We studied whether subsequent pregnancies increase the risk of recurrent strokes and whether the occurrence of an ischemic stroke affects reproductive history.

Methods.

The study was conducted in nine neurologic centers in France. In June 1998, each participating center was asked to identify all consecutive women aged 15 to 40 years admitted for a first-ever arterial ischemic stroke or a cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) until January 1997. The starting date of the study ranged from January 1987 to January 1991, depending on the time at which each center had implemented a prospective record system of stroke.

An information and consent form was mailed to all surviving patients. Those who agreed to participate in the study were asked to complete a questionnaire and answer questions in a telephone interview.

For patients who could not be directly contacted (current address not available), information regarding the occurrence of death, recurrent strokes, and subsequent pregnancies since the initial stroke was obtained from the last known treating physician. The date of the last visit was used as the follow-up date. When a patient was lost to follow-up we contacted, when possible, the local administration of her city of birth to determine if she had died.

The questionnaire included inquiries regarding recurrent vascular events and current antithrombotic treatment, reproductive history (number of live births, induced or spontaneous abortions, mode of delivery, fetal outcome, and contraceptive use), modification of the family, and limitations in professional functioning.

Telephone interview was used to verify responses to the questionnaire and ask for additional information regarding current handicap and desire for pregnancy. It was conducted by the same investigator for seven centers and by the local investigator for the other two centers. Current handicap was assessed at the time of the telephone interview with the modified Rankin scale.17 The question concerning the desire for pregnancy was “Are you satisfied with the number of pregnancies that you have had since your stroke?” A semistructured interview was used to determine the reasons that some women decided not to consider subsequent pregnancies (concern of a recurrent stroke, medical advice against pregnancy, residual deficit, changes in personal life or sexual behavior, hypofertility). All medical records were reviewed by two neurologists in the study.

Initial and recurrent stroke.

Stroke was defined according to the criteria of the World Health Organization.18 The diagnosis of arterial ischemic stroke was confirmed in all patients by CT or MRI of the brain. The etiologic workup included MR angiography or ultrasonographic examination of cervical and cerebral arteries, 12-lead electrocardiography, transthoracic echocardiography, and routine laboratory tests. Transesophageal echocardiography and detailed coagulation studies, including antiphospholipid assessment, were performed in 60% of patients, and angiography in selected patients. Risk factors for stroke (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, current cigarette smoking, hypercholesterolemia, and current contraceptive use) were systematically recorded. The cause of stroke was classified as definite (large artery atherosclerosis, small artery disease, major cardiac source of embolism, other definite cause, and combination), uncertain, or undetermined, according to modified Trial of Org 10172 in Acute Stroke Treatment classification.19

The diagnosis of CVT was confirmed in all patients by MRI or angiography. Search for antinuclear antiphospholipid antibodies and detailed coagulation studies were performed in all patients.

Stroke recurrence was defined as a new neurologic deficit or an exacerbation of a previous deficit lasting more than 24 hours, according to Burn et al.20 The records of patients with a suspected stroke recurrence were reviewed by the coordinating center.

Statistical analysis.

Recurrence of stroke was assessed by life-table analysis according to Kaplan-Meier. Risk factors for recurrence were tested using proportional hazards models (Cox models). The hazard ratio and 95% CI were calculated for each factor; the hazard ratio may be interpreted as the relative risk of recurrence during the study period.

The person-time at risk (exposed person-time) during pregnancies and the 6 weeks after pregnancy was estimated from the numbers and average duration of spontaneous and induced abortions, stillbirths, and live births that have occurred in the population after the initial stroke. According to Kittner et al.,11 the duration of pregnancy was assumed to be 10 weeks for spontaneous and induced abortions, 28 weeks for stillbirths, and 38 weeks for live births. The postpregnancy period was defined as 6 weeks for each pregnancy outcome. Spontaneous abortion was defined as spontaneous fetal death before 20 weeks of gestation, and stillbirth was defined as spontaneous fetal death at 20 weeks of gestation or later. The person-time during which women in the population were not exposed (not pregnant or within 6 weeks after pregnancy) was estimated by subtracting the person-time calculated for exposure from the total person-time in the study population.

The recurrence rate (absolute risk and 95% CI) was estimated using the Poisson regression model. The relative risk of recurrence associated with pregnancy and postpartum exposure, adjusted for arterial or venous origin of initial stroke, was estimated using the Poisson regression model.

Results.

Study population.

A total of 489 patients were identified during the study period. Twenty patients were deceased at the time of the study (seven patients during the acute phase of their initial stroke and 13 before the beginning of the study [one vascular death and 12 nonvascular deaths]). None of these deaths were related to recurrent stroke or pregnancy.

Of the 469 surviving women, 9 declined to participate and 19 were lost to follow-up since the initial stroke. For five of them, we know only that they were still alive but were unable to obtain further information. A total of 411 women answered the questionnaire and the telephone interview. Information regarding stroke recurrence and subsequent pregnancies was obtained from the personal physician for 30 other women, leaving 441 women for the analysis. The baseline data, vascular risk factors, and causes of stroke for the 19 women who were lost to follow-up were similar to those of the 441 women included in the study.

The baseline characteristics and obstetric history of patients are given in table 1. A total of 260 women were monoparous (n = 74) or multiparous (n = 186) before stroke, with a parity ranging from one to eight. Seventeen patients had a definitive contraception before stroke (hysterectomy in three and tubal ligation in 14).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Baseline characteristics and obstetric history of patients, and risk factors and causes of initial stroke, according to venous or arterial origin of stroke

Initial ischemic stroke.

Of the 373 initial arterial ischemic strokes, 28 (7.5%) occurred during pregnancy or the puerperium (major cardiac source of embolism [n = 2], other definite cause [n = 11], and undetermined [n = 15]). Antithrombotic treatment was advocated for 330 patients (antiplatelet treatment [n = 216], warfarin [n = 110], and both [n = 4]). Sixteen women were discharged from the hospital without antithrombotic treatment, and information regarding prophylactic antithrombotic treatment was missing for 27 women. At the time of the interview (mean follow-up after initial ischemic stroke of 5 years), 232 (62%) women were taking antiplatelet drugs (n = 196), warfarin (n = 31), or both (n = 5).

Among the 68 initial CVT, nine occurred during the puerperium, two of which were associated with hematologic disease. Antithrombotic treatment was advocated for 54 patients (antiplatelet treatment [n = 8] and warfarin [n = 46]); information was missing for 14 patients. At the time of the interview, 23 (34%) women were taking antiplatelet drugs (n = 16), warfarin (n = 6), or both (n = 1).

Most patients (81.5%) had a minor or moderate residual handicap (Rankin score <3), including 42% of patients who had made a complete recovery from their stroke. Fifty-eight percent of women in our study returned to work. For 68 (15%) patients, a change in their marital status had occurred since the initial stroke (38 marriages or cohabitation, 25 divorces, and five deaths of the husband).

Recurrent strokes.

During a mean follow-up of 5 years (SD = 2.4; range 0.8 to 11.3), 13 women had a recurrent ischemic stroke. Two of these 13 women had pregnancy-associated strokes. All recurrent strokes were arterial in origin, and all were confirmed by neuroimaging studies. The initial stroke was arterial in 12 women and venous in another. No death or other vascular events occurred during the study period. The overall risk of recurrence was 1% (SD 0.5) within 1 year and 2.3% (SD 0.8) within 5 years (figure). Eleven factors were analyzed for an association with stroke recurrence, including age, vascular risk factors, subtype of initial stroke (arterial or venous), presence of a definite cause of stroke, and antithrombotic treatment advocated at time of discharge. The only statistically significant association was with an initial stroke of definite cause. The risk ratio was 8.6 for initial arterial stroke of definite cause (95% CI 1.9, 39.3; p = 0.005) and 7.9 for initial CVT of definite cause (95% CI 0.7, 88.7; p = 0.09).

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure. Kaplan-Meier curve shows the probability that patients will remain free of stroke recurrence.

Table 2 shows the absolute risk of recurrence outside and during pregnancy and the type of antithrombotic treatment at the time of recurrence. The relative risk of recurrence (see table 2), adjusted for the arterial or venous nature of initial stroke, was significantly higher for the postpartum period (risk ratio = 9.7; 95% CI 1.2, 78.9), but not during pregnancy itself (risk ratio = 2.23; 95% CI 0.3, 17.5).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2.

Absolute and relative risk of recurrent stroke

Various regimens of antithrombotic drugs were advocated during subsequent pregnancies and the puerperium (table 3). Approximately half of women with a history of arterial ischemic stroke received antiplatelet treatment at least during a part of subsequent pregnancies or the puerperium, whereas most women who had CVT received no treatment during subsequent pregnancies or prophylactic heparinotherapy during the puerperium.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 3.

Antithrombotic regimens during subsequent pregnancies that proceeded to delivery (n = 115)

Reproductive history after stroke.

During a mean follow-up of 5 years (SD 2.4; range 0.8 to 11.3) after the initial stroke, 187 pregnancies occurred in 125 women, including 115 live births (61%), 37 induced abortions (20%), 30 miscarriages (16%), four ectopic pregnancies, and one stillbirth caused by retroplacental hemorrhage in a woman receiving low-dose aspirin (3%). The rates of subsequent pregnancies and of live births were 8.4 and 5 per 100 women-years. The mean delay between the initial stroke and the first subsequent pregnancy was 2.7 years (SD 1.84; range 1 to 7.9). Twenty-one pregnancies, including three live births, occurred in the first year after the initial stroke. Forty-six patients had two or more pregnancies after stroke. Of the 37 women whose initial stroke occurred during pregnancy or the puerperium (arterial ischemic stroke [n = 28] and CVT [n = 9]), 15 had one (n = 9), two (n = 5), or five (n = 1) subsequent pregnancies, including 11 live births. None of these pregnancies were associated with a recurrent stroke.

Among the 115 pregnancies that proceeded to delivery, 88 were vaginal deliveries (77%) and 19 (17%) were deliveries by cesarean section. The mode of delivery was unknown for eight patients. Peridural analgesia was used in 37 (32%) women.

Among the 352 women who answered the question regarding desire for pregnancy, 119 (34%) were unsatisfied with the number of pregnancies that they had after the initial stroke. Of these women, 91 (76.5%) had no subsequent pregnancies. The reasons given for not having the desired number pregnancies were related to the potential for stroke recurrence (n = 56, 47%), medical advice against pregnancy (n = 46, 39%), the existence of a residual deficit (n = 28, 24%), changes in sexual behavior (n = 12, 10%), hypofertility (n = 11, 9%) or modification of the family (n = 4, 3%). Women who had subsequent pregnancies were younger (mean age, 27.3 years versus 33.1 years; p = 0.0001) and less frequently hypertensive (4% versus 10%; p = 0.03) and more frequently had a Rankin score <3 (90% versus 78%, p = 0.015) than did women who had no subsequent pregnancy. The initial stroke was more frequently a CVT (23.2% versus 12.3%) than an arterial ischemic stroke (76.8% versus 87.7%; p = 0.004).

Few women (n = 39, 8.8%) used oral contraceptives after initial stroke (pure progestin pills [n = 27] or estroprogestative pills [n = 12]). Other methods of contraception, reported by 200 women, included intrauterine device (n = 119), condoms (n = 53), and vaginal foam (n = 28). Forty-four women had a definitive sterilization after stroke (tubal ligation [n = 37] or hysterectomy [n = 7]); in two other women, the husband had a vasectomy. One hundred thirty-five women used no contraceptive method (n = 135) after stroke; the method of birth control used was unknown for 21 women.

Discussion.

To our knowledge, this study is the first to assess the risk of recurrent stroke associated with subsequent pregnancies in a large and multicentered series of young women with a first-ever ischemic stroke. Risk factor profiles, causes of stroke, and residual handicap of women included in this study were similar to those reported in other series of young stroke patients in Western Europe.21-27

Recurrent strokes.

The overall risk of recurrent stroke in this study (1% within 1 year and 2.3% within 5 years) was comparable to that reported by others.21-23,25,26 The only prognostic factor significantly associated with recurrence was an initial stroke of definite cause, a finding consistent with the results of other series.23,28 Age, vascular risk factors, arterial or venous origin of stroke, and antithrombotic treatment advocated at time of discharge did not influence the risk of recurrence, but these observations are limited by the small number of events.

Only two of the 13 recurrent strokes observed in our study occurred during subsequent pregnancies or the puerperium, and these two strokes were related to rare definite causes of stroke (essential thrombocytemia and primary antiphospholipid syndrome). It is noteworthy that no woman whose initial stroke occurred during pregnancy had a recurrent stroke during subsequent pregnancies. The postpartum period, not the pregnancy itself, was associated with an increased relative risk of stroke recurrence. These results are in agreement with our previous collaborative study, based on surveillance at 63 public maternity departments in Ile de France, showing that the risk of ischemic stroke per day is higher during the postpartum period than during any trimester of pregnancy.10 Likewise, in the study by Kittner et al.11 dealing with all female patients aged 15 to 44 years discharged from any of 46 hospitals in central Maryland and Washington DC in 1988 or 1991, the relative risk of ischemic stroke was increased in the 6 weeks after delivery (relative risk = 8.7; 95% CI 4.6, 16.7), but not during pregnancy itself (relative risk = 0.7; 95% CI 0.3, 1.6). The higher relative risk of first or recurrent ischemic stroke associated with the postpartum period suggests a causal role for the large decrease in blood volume or the rapid changes in hormonal status that follow a live birth or stillbirth, perhaps by means of hemodynamic, coagulative, or vessel wall changes.11,15

There is no consensus on the risk–benefit ratio of antithrombotic treatment to prevent recurrent ischemic stroke during pregnancy.16,29 The various antithrombotic drug regimens that were used during pregnancy and the puerperium in our study (see table 3) reflect this lack of guidelines. If prophylactic antithrombotic treatment proves to be beneficial, it is likely to be so during late pregnancy or the puerperium.

Reproductive history.

A total of 187 pregnancies occurred during the 5-year follow-up after initial stroke. The annual incidence of pregnancy and the distribution of the various outcomes of pregnancy observed in our study (see results) are similar to those reported in women of reproductive age in France30 (annual incidence of pregnancy, nine per 100 women; live births, 65%; induced abortions, 18%; miscarriages, 15%; other, 2%). These results cannot be directly compared because many factors, such as parity, socioeconomic status, and fertility, can influence these figures.31

Our study focused on the impact of stroke on the desire for pregnancy. An interesting finding is that more than one-third of women stated that they were unsatisfied with the number of pregnancies that they had after stroke. Desire for pregnancy, however, is a complex notion for which there is no standardized and validated questionnaire. It depends on multiple factors, including age, number of children, general health of the woman, and neurologic impairment after stroke. In our study, women who had subsequent pregnancies were younger and had a less severe deficit than did those who had no subsequent pregnancies. The main reasons that women gave for not having subsequent pregnancies after stroke were, in order of decreasing frequency, concern of recurrent stroke during pregnancy, medical advice against pregnancy, and residual deficit. The belief that subsequent pregnancy was associated with a high risk of recurrent stroke was sometimes carried out by general physicians or obstetricians who warned women to avoid pregnancy. Some women were even encouraged by their physician to undergo sterilization or induced abortion solely because they had suffered a stroke and such advice was not related to the presence of a definite cause of stroke. The low risk of recurrent stroke during pregnancy in our study does not support these recommendations and suggests that the occurrence of an ischemic stroke should not contraindicate a subsequent pregnancy. The final decision depends on several factors, including the cause of initial stroke, the desire for pregnancy, and the residual deficit. Although neurologic impairment was more frequent in women who had no pregnancy after stroke, only 46% of women who stated that residual deficit was the reason for not considering pregnancy had a Rankin score >2, which corresponds to a moderate or severe handicap. This finding is probably explained by physical or emotional limitations that could not be measured by the Rankin score. Hypofertility or sexual behavior changes since stroke were rarely mentioned.

No data and no guidelines are available for the management of labor and delivery in women with a history of ischemic stroke. In our study, cesarean section delivery and fetal outcomes were similar to those reported in the French population,32 although direct comparison is difficult. Peridural analgesia has been used in a small proportion of vaginal deliveries without any adverse event. It has not been performed in many cases because of perceived complications rather than documented risks associated with this technique in women who had previous ischemic stroke. In our experience, a history of ischemic stroke is not sufficient in itself to contraindicate peridural analgesia or to recommend cesarean section delivery.

Concerning contraception after stroke, our study shows that most women used, as expected, mechanical methods of birth control. Only a few used oral contraceptives. No recurrent stroke occurred in these women, but the small number of events precludes any conclusion on the risk of recurrent stroke associated with oral contraception.

Study limitations.

Our study has several potential limitations. First, the results are based on a small number of observed events that resulted in large CIs for the relative and absolute risk of recurrent stroke. Because of the small number of events, we cannot exclude the possibility that some nonsignificant results could become significant with increases in sample size. Second, recurrent cerebrovascular events and subsequent pregnancies were not prospectively recorded. As a consequence, we may have missed some events that occurred during follow-up. Most women in our study, however, were regularly followed up by their neurologist, and all medical records were reviewed. In addition, strokes in young women are always unusual events that engender a high degree of concern and lead to hospitalization for nearly all patients. Therefore, it is unlikely that significant cerebrovascular events were missed. It also seems unlikely that subsequent pregnancies, in particular those that resulted in a live birth, may have been not mentioned by the women. Because some cases of spontaneous or induced abortions may have been unrecognized or unreported, it is possible that we may have underestimated the risk of recurrent stroke associated with abortion. Third, 19 (4%) women were lost to follow-up. A selection bias could have occurred if these women were more likely to have recurrent strokes associated with pregnancy. The baseline data, vascular risk factors, and causes of stroke, however, were similar to those of women included in the study. Because their general physicians had no follow-up information since the initial stroke, it is probable that these patients moved away from the area.

Appendix

The participating centers are: Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Angers (F. Dubas and J.C. Roger) Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Hôpital Jean Minjoz, Besançon (T. Moulin); Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Brest (J.Y. Goas, F. Rouhart); Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Dijon (M. Giroud, T. Moreau); Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Hôpital B, Lille (D. Leys and I. Durieu); Centre Hospitalier, Meaux (F. Chedru); Centre Hospitalier Universitaire, Nancy (X. Ducrocq, J.C. Lacour, and L. Thillier); Hôpital Sainte-Anne (coordinating center), Paris (J.B. Hamon, C. Lamy, and J.L. Mas); and Hôpital Lariboisière, Paris (F. Woimant, N. Kubis).

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Dr. Warszawski (INSERM U 292 Santé Publique, Epidémiologie, Reproduction Humaine) for her advice.

Footnotes

  • ↵*See the Appendix on page 274 for a list of collaborators and participating centers.

  • Received March 7, 2000.
  • Accepted in final form April 6, 2000.

References

  1. ↵
    Wiebers DO, Whisnant JP. The incidence of stroke among pregnant women in Rochester, Minn, 1955 through 1979. JAMA 1985;254:3055–3057.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. Nencini P, Inzitari D, Baruffi MC, et al. Incidence of stroke in young adults in Florence, Italy. Stroke 1988;19:977–981.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. Lidegaard O, Soe M, Andersen MN. Cerebral thromboembolism among women and men in Denmark 1977–1982. Stroke 1986;17:670–675.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. Giroud M, Milan C, Beuriat P, et al. Incidence and survival rates during a two-year period of intracerebral and subarachnoid hemorrhages, cortical infarcts, lacunes and transient ischemics attacks. The Stroke Registry of Dijon; 1985–1989. Int J Epidemiol 1991;20:892–899.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. Kittner SJ, McCarter RJ, Sherwin RW, et al. Black-white differences in stroke risk among young adults. Stroke 1993;24 (12 suppl):I13–I15.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. Petitti DB, Sidney S, Quesenberry CP, Bernstein A. Incidence of stroke and myocardial infarction in women of reproductive age. Stroke 1997;28:280–283.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  7. ↵
    Williams GR, Jiang JG, Matchar DB, Samsa GP. Incidence and occurrence of total (first-ever and recurrent) stroke. Stroke 1999;30:2523–2528.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Cross JN, Castro PO, Jennett WB. Cerebral strokes associated with pregnancy and the puerperium. BMJ 1968;3:214–218.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  9. Lidegaard O. Oral contraception and risk of a cerebral thromboembolic attack: results of a case control study. BMJ 1993;306:956–963.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Sharshar T, Lamy C, Mas JL. Incidence and causes of strokes associated with pregnancy and puerperium: a study in public hospitals of Ile de France. Stroke 1995;26:930–936.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Kittner SJ, Stern BJ, Feeser BR, et al. Pregnancy and the risk of stroke. N Engl J Med 1996;335:768–774.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. Lanska DJ, Kryscio RJ. Peripartum stroke and intracranial venous thrombosis in the National Hospital Discharge Survey. Obstet Gynecol 1997;89:413–418.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Lanska DJ, Kryscio RJ. Stroke and intracranial venous thrombosis during pregnancy and puerperium. Neurology 1998;51:1622–1628.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Grosset DG, Ebrahim S, Bone I, Warlow C. Stroke in pregnancy and puerperium: what magnitude of risk? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1995;58:129–131.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  15. ↵
    Lamy C, Sharshar T, Mas JL. Pathologie vasculaire cérébrale au cours de la grossesse et du post-partum. Rev Neurol (Paris) 1996;152:422–440.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  16. ↵
    Leys D, Lamy C, Lucas C, et al. Arterial ischemic strokes associated with pregnancy and puerperium. Acta Neurol Bel 1997;97:5–16.
    OpenUrl
  17. ↵
    Candelise L, Pinardi G, Aritzu E, Musicco M. Telephone interview for stroke outcome assessment. Cerebrovasc Dis 1994;4:341–343.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  18. ↵
    Hatano S. Experience from a multicenter stroke register: a preliminary report. Bull World Health Organ 1976;54:541–553.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    Adams HP, Bendixen BH, Kappelle LJ, et al. Classification of subtype of acute ischemic stroke. Definition for use in a multicenter clinical trial. Stroke 1993;24:35–41.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Burn J, Dennis M, Bamford J, Sandercock P, Wade D, Warlow C. Long-term risk of recurrent stroke after a first-ever stroke. The Oxfordshire Community Stroke Project. Stroke 1994;25:333–337.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  21. ↵
    Bogousslavsky J, Pierre P. Ischemic stroke in patients under age 45. Neurol Clin 1992;10:113–124.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. Hindfelt B, Nilsson O. Long term prognosis of ischemic stroke in young adults. Acta Neurol Scand 1992;86:440–445.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    Ferro JM, Crespo M. Prognosis after TIA and ischemic stroke in young adults. Stroke 1994;25:1611–1616.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  24. Woimant F, Rougemont D, Gardette J, et al. Facteurs de risque vasculaire des accidents ischémiques cérébraux des sujets agés de 45 ans ou moins. Etude prospective de 200 patients. In: Bès A BJ, Géraud G, eds. Coeur et cerveau. Paris:Masson, 1994:112–116.
  25. ↵
    Martin PJ, Enevoldson TP, Humphrey PRD. Causes of ischemic stroke in the young. Postgrad Med J 1997;73:8–16.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  26. ↵
    Neau JP, Ingrand P, Mouille-Brachet C, Couderq C, Alvarez A, Gil R. Functional recovery and social outcome after cerebral infarction in young adults. Cerebrovasc Dis 1998;8:296–302.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. ↵
    Ducrocq X, Lacour JC, Debouverie M, Bracard S, Girard F, Weber M. Accidents vasculaires cérébraux ischémiques du sujet jeune. Etude prospective de 296 patients âgés de 16 à 45 ans. Rev Neurol 1999;155:575–582.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. ↵
    Snyder BD, Ramirez-Lassepas M. Cerebral infarction in young adults. Long term prognosis. Stroke 1980;11:149–153.
    OpenUrl
  29. ↵
    Mas JL, Lamy C. Stroke in pregnancy and the puerperium. J Neurol 1998;245:305–313.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  30. ↵
    Houzard S, Bajos N, Warszawski J, et al. Analysis of the underestimation of induced abortions in a survey of the general population in France. Eur J Contracep Reprod Health Care 2000;5:52–60.
    OpenUrl
  31. ↵
    Juul S, Karmaus W, Olsen J. Regional differences in waiting time to pregnancy: pregnancy-based surveys from Denmark, France, Germany, Italy and Sweden. The European Infertility and Subfecundity Study Group. Hum Reprod 1999;14:1250–1254.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  32. ↵
    Bréart G, Darchy P. Evolution de la fréquence des césariennes en fonction des caractéristiques maternelle et de la grossesse. In: Rumeau-Rouquette C, Mazaubrun C, Rabarison Y, eds. Naître en France, 10 ans d’évolution. Paris:INSERM-Doin, 1984:83–88.

Letters: Rapid online correspondence

No comments have been published for this article.
Comment

REQUIREMENTS

If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org

Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.

If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.

Submission specifications:

  • Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
  • Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
  • Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
  • Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
  • Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.

More guidelines and information on Disputes & Debates

Compose Comment

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
NOTE: The first author must also be the corresponding author of the comment.
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Publishing Agreement
NOTE: All authors, besides the first/corresponding author, must complete a separate Publishing Agreement Form and provide via email to the editorial office before comments can be posted.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

You May Also be Interested in

Back to top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods.
    • Results.
    • Discussion.
    • Appendix
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Advertisement

Hemiplegic Migraine Associated With PRRT2 Variations A Clinical and Genetic Study

Dr. Robert Shapiro and Dr. Amynah Pradhan

► Watch

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.

Alert Me

  • Alert me when eletters are published
Neurology: 100 (6)

Articles

  • Ahead of Print
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Popular Articles
  • Translations

About

  • About the Journals
  • Ethics Policies
  • Editors & Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise

Submit

  • Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Information for Reviewers
  • AAN Guidelines
  • Permissions

Subscribers

  • Subscribe
  • Activate a Subscription
  • Sign up for eAlerts
  • RSS Feed
Site Logo
  • Visit neurology Template on Facebook
  • Follow neurology Template on Twitter
  • Visit Neurology on YouTube
  • Neurology
  • Neurology: Clinical Practice
  • Neurology: Education
  • Neurology: Genetics
  • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • AAN.com
  • AANnews
  • Continuum
  • Brain & Life
  • Neurology Today

Wolters Kluwer Logo

Neurology | Print ISSN:0028-3878
Online ISSN:1526-632X

© 2023 American Academy of Neurology

  • Privacy Policy
  • Feedback
  • Advertise