An atypical intronic deletion widens the spectrum of mutations in hereditary spastic paraplegia
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

Abstract
Objective: To identify the genetic mutation responsible for autosomal dominant spastic paraplegia (HSP) in a large family with a “pure” form of the disorder. Background: The disease locus in most families with HSP is genetically linked to the SPG4 locus on chromosome 2p21-p22. Some of these families have mutations in the splice-site or coding regions of the spastin gene (SPAST). Methods: Linkage and mutational analyses were used to identify the location and the nature of the genetic defect causing the disorder in a large family. After the disease phenotype was linked to the SPG4 locus, all 17 coding regions and flanking intronic sequences of SPAST were analyzed by single-strand conformation polymorphism analysis (SSCP) and compared between affected and normal individuals. Direct sequencing and subcloning methods were used to investigate incongruous mobility shifts. Results:The genomic sequence of SPAST showed a heterozygous four–base pair deletion (delTAAT) near the 3' splice-site of exon three in all 11 affected individuals but not in 21 normal family members or in 50 unrelated controls (100 chromosomes). Conclusions: This study identifies an atypical intronic microdeletion in SPAST that causes HSP and widens the spectrum of genetic abnormalities that cause the disorder.
The principal features of hereditary spastic paraplegia are bilateral lower extremity spasticity accompanied by the neuropathologic features of axonal degeneration involving the caudal ends of the corticospinal tract and posterior columns. When other abnormal physical signs (e.g., mental retardation, ichthyosis, pigmentary retinal degeneration, optic atrophy, amyotrophy, extrapyramidal features, sensory neuropathy, and ataxia) are absent, the disorder is said to be “pure.”1 The disorder is autosomal dominant in most families with the “pure” form, but it can be inherited as an autosomal recessive, or X-linked, trait.2 The clinical signs are similar in individuals with “pure” autosomal dominant spastic paraplegia (HSP)3 but at least five loci on chromosomes 14q11.2-q24.3 (SPG3),4 2p (SPG4),5 15q11.1 (SPG6),6 8q23-q24 (SPG8),7 and 12q13 (SPG10)8 are genetically linked to the disorder. The nosology of HSP is undergoing a transformation based on these studies and the identification of specific mutations in the spastin gene (SPAST) in families genetically linked to the SPG4 locus.9-11⇓⇓ SPAST encodes for a protein product that shares homology with members of the AAA-protein family (ATPases Associated with diverse cellular Activities), but the precise role that it has in the pathogenesis of HSP awaits clarification.9 SPAST DNA changes have been identified in families linked to the SPG4 locus including splice-site mutations, nonsense, missense, and frameshift mutations.9-11⇓⇓ We describe a genetic mutation involving an intronic microdeletion in SPAST and discuss its significance in terms of the HSP clinical phenotype and its role in the molecular biology of the disorder.
Methods.
Genealogic and clinical assessment.
Informed consent was obtained before clinical and genetic testing. A detailed neurologic examination was performed on all study participants, including evaluation of the cranial nerves, deep tendon reflexes, motor, and sensory systems. Information on 116 individuals established the pedigree and the affection status of a seven-generation family with HSP (figure 1). The founder couple was born in the United States in the late 18th century. The Cyrillic 2.1.3 software program (Cherwell Scientific Publishing Ltd., Oxford, UK) was used to draw the pedigree and enter the haplotype data.
Figure 1. Pedigree of a family with spastic paraplegia. Black circles (females) and squares (males) represent affected individuals with spastic paraplegia. Three individuals (V-43, VI-26, and VI-30) with early clinical signs of the disorder are represented by cross-hatched symbols. Unaffected individuals are not shaded. Reconstructed haplotypes for the five chromosome 2p loci D2S146, D2S35, D2S367, D2S2230, and D2S177are shown below individuals. Individual VI-2, VI-10, V-46, and V-47 are recombinants at locus D2S146, and Individuals VI-20, VI-34, and VII-1 are recombinants at D2S177. For reasons of confidentiality, the order and sex of at-risk individuals are changed.
Genetic linkage analyses of candidate loci.
High-molecular-weight genomic DNA was isolated from whole-blood lysate by phenol-chloroform extraction with isopropanol precipitation. Polymorphic fluorescently labeled microsatellite loci linked to the SPG3, SPG4, SPG6, SPG8, and SPG10 loci were used to identify the disease locus.4-8⇓⇓⇓⇓ Fifty nanograms of genomic DNA was used in a PCR in a total volume of 15 μL with 0.8 μmmol/L of each primer, 1.5 mmol/L MgCl2, 200 μmol/L dNTP, 50 mmol/L KCl, 10 mmol/L Tris HCl (pH = 8.3), 0.01% gelatin, and 0.5 units Taq DNA polymerase (Perkin Elmer-Cetus, Foster City, CA). Reactions were performed in a 96-well microtiter plate, and amplification was performed out for 30 cycles (45 seconds denaturation at 95 °C, 45 seconds annealing at 55 °C or 60 °C, and 45 seconds extension at 72 °C) on a Genius thermocycler (Techne Inc., Princeton, NJ). The last extension step was 7 minutes at 72 °C. Four microliters of the reaction mixture was electrophoresed on an EASIgel (6.0% acrylamide/0.3% bis-acrylamide [7 mol/L urea] (Scotlab, Strathclyde, Scotland]). The PCR products were visualized on an FMBIOII (Hitachi Software Engineering Co., Ltd., South San Francisco, CA) scanning unit. Genotypes were determined blind to the diagnosis. All of the assumptions regarding phenotype definition and genetic parameters (mode of inheritance, penetrance and frequency of the susceptibility allele) were made a priori without any information about the genetic marker phenotypes.
Pairwise linkage analyses were performed by using the MLINK program of the FASTLINK package (Version 4.0P).12-15⇓⇓⇓ The lod score calculations assumed an autosomal dominant mode of inheritance, no sex differences, and a mutant gene frequency of 1/10,000. Allele frequencies were set at 1/n, where n is equal to the number of published alleles for each locus (http://gdb.infobiogen.fr). The recombination fractions and the order of genetic markers were set as reported in the Marshfield Genetic Database (http://www.marshmed.org). A conservative “affecteds only” model was used to calculate the lod scores. An unknown status was assigned to all other individuals including Individuals V-43, VI-26, and VI-30 (figure 1) with an uncertain diagnosis.
SSCP and mutational analysis.
PCR amplifications were performed on individual family members using genomic DNA and primer sequences flanking all 17 exons of the SPAST gene. An initial, standard 10-μL PCR reaction was performed on genomic DNA with primers for a given exon. One microliter of this reaction was then used in a new 10-μL PCR reaction containing 8 microCuries/μL of α-32P dCTP (NEN, Boston MA; 10 microCuries/μL, 3,000 Ci/mmol/L) and 12.5 μmol/L dCTP. Single-strand conformation (SSCP) analysis was performed on the samples as follows: 120 μL of gel loading dye containing 54% formamide, 10 mmol/L ethylenediaminetetra-acetic acid (EDTA), and dyes (0.025% xylene cyanol and 0.025% bromophenol blue)16 was added to each PCR reaction. The reactions were heat denatured for 5 minutes at 95 °C, and quenched on ice before loading on a 30 × 40-cm MDE gel (FMC, Rockland, ME). Electrophoresis was performed at 6 to 8 Watts for 14 to 16 hours at room temperature. The gel was transferred to filter paper and dried, and exposed to x-ray film with an intensifying screen (Reflection; NEN, Boston MA) at room temperature until a suitable exposure was obtained (typically, 3 hours). PCR fragments with mobility shifts that segregated with the disease were ligated to the vector pCR2.1 by using a TA cloning kit (Invitrogen Co., Carlsbad, CA). The vector and insert were transfected into INVaF' competent Escherichia coli cells (Invitrogen) and plated on Luria Broth agar containing ampicillin (50 μg/mL) and X-gal (20 mg/mL in dimethylformamide) to test for α-complementation. Approximately 50 white colonies were chosen, and DNA was extracted by alkaline mini-prep.17 The first 20 colonies were sequenced by using an ABI 373 sequencer.
Results.
Clinical features.
Detailed neurologic examinations were performed on 35 individuals (figure 1). The mean age at examination of the 21 unaffected individuals (57 ± 18, 20–86; mean age, range) was similar to the 11 affected individuals (56 ± 13, 36–80). Five women and six men were affected by lower extremity hyperreflexia and a spastic gait. No differences were found between the sexes in the age of onset (41 ± 13, 20–60) or the disease duration (16 ± 6, 6–24). The initial symptoms were stiffness in the lower extremities in men and weakness or sensory loss in the lower extremities in women. All affected women had some degree of weakness of hip flexion, extension, abduction, or adduction. The diagnosis was suspected in three individuals (figure 1; V-43, VI-26, and VI-30). Individual V-43, age 70, began having difficulty walking at age 60 because of proximal muscle weakness in her lower extremities. She had proprioceptive loss at the lateral malleolus with proximal muscle weakness of the lower extremity. Spasticity and hyperreflexia were absent. Individual VI-26, age 39, was asymptomatic except for hyperreflexia, and increased tone at the heel cords. Individual VI-30, age 38, had a left foot drop for 1 year. Her left knee and ankle deep tendon reflexes were brisk, but the left plantar response was mute. She exhibited weakness of plantar flexion and dorsiflexion, and ankle inversion and eversion.
Identification of the SPG4 locus.
Exclusionary lod scores less than −2.0 were obtained at loci in the SPG3, SPG6, SPG8, and SPG10 regions. Five loci (D2S146-2.4 cM-D2S352-3.3 cM-D2S367-2.8 cM-D2S2230-1.5 cM-D2S177) defined the SPG4 interval with a maximum lod score of 4.26 for locus D2S367 (table). Haplotype analysis (figure 1) showed recombination at locus D2S177 in Individual VI-34. Although phase could not be established, a historic recombination at locus D2S146 is present in Individuals VI-2, VI-10, and VII-1. Multipoint analysis (data not shown) further narrowed the candidate region to a 6.1 cM interval between D2S352 and D2S2230. This region is identical to the SPG4 interval known to contain the SPAST gene.9
Pairwise lod scores (Z) between chromosome 2p markers and the SPAST disease locus
SPAST mutation detection.
SSCP analysis of SPAST exon 3 and its flanking intronic sequences identified a distinct mobility shift that segregated with the disease haplotype (figure 2). This pattern was not found when the other 16 exons of the SPASTgene were analyzed. The exon 3 mobility shift was present in the 11 affected individuals and in the three individuals suspected of having the disorder but not in the 21 unaffected family members. The PCR product was inserted into a vector, and the sequence of the 20 clones was examined. The sequence of 9 of 20 clones was identical to sequence with BAC 336P14 (http://www.genoscope.cns.fr). Eleven of the 20 clones showed a four-base-pair intronic deletion (delTAAT) located nine bases from the last codon of SPAST exon 3 (figure 3). The ratio of clones that contain delTAAT is close to the expected ratio of 50% for wild type and mutant sequences in a heterozygous state.
Figure 2. Autoradiograph of mobility shifts on SSCP. Using oligonucleotide primers SPAST3F (5'-3') CTGTATAAAGACTGTGACTCC and SPAST3R (5'-3') CCACATTTTCAATCACTGATC, a 290 base pair fragment was analyzed by SSCP. Lanes 1-9 are affected individuals (figure 1, Individuals VI-2, V-24, VI-24, VI-30, VI-31, VI-34, V-45, V-23, and V-20). Lanes 10 and 11 are normal individuals from the CEPH panel (1331-01, 1344-02). Lanes 12 and 13 are unrelated spouses (figure 1, Individuals V-22 and V-15). All affected individuals have two doublets representing an allele with the delTAAT.
Figure 3. Partial genomic structure of the SPAST gene showing a four-base-pair deletion in intron 3. The black block is the 3' end of exon 3. The open block represents the intervening sequence between exons 3 and 4 (IVS-3) called intron 3. The four base pair intronic deletion that causes hereditary spastic paraplegia in our family is boxed. The sequence corresponds to nucleotides 35825 to 35849 in GenBank (accession number AJ246003).
Discussion.
Although families with SPG4 have similar phenotypic features (lower-extremity hyperreflexia and a progressive spastic gate) and gene penetrance is nearly complete, differences exist in terms of the clinical severity, the age of onset,18,19⇓ and pathology.11 This variability is not explained by whether an individual inherits a SPAST missense mutation or a truncated protein10 but may be a function of disease duration or other unknown factors. The atypical presentation of an affected woman (figure1; Individual V-43) with proximal muscle weakness and a lack of spasticity may be an example of variable expressivity and reflect the clinical differences between the men and women in our family. Initially, men complained of stiffness in the lower extremities, but the first symptoms in all of the women involved weakness or sensory loss. This limited observation suggests that the phenotypic expression of the disorder may be influenced by the sex of the affected person.
The high frequency of splice-site mutations in SPAST in families with SPG4 supports the concept that altered RNA-splicing is a cause of HSP.10 Similarly, the delTAAT that is located nine bases from the last codon of SPAST exon 3 in affected members of our family probably leads to aberrant RNA processing and altered spastin protein function. Although expression studies in the brains and spinal cords of the affected individuals in our family need to be performed, there are several possible mechanisms by which the intronic deletion can cause HSP. The deletion may alter the original splice-site consensus sequence or create a cryptic splice site downstream. One possibility is the creation of a new splice-donor-site at the ‘gt’ immediately after the deletion (figure 3). Both mechanisms probably cause a deleterious, unstable transcript and a loss of function rather than enhancing expression. Despite the lack of expression data in this study, we show that an atypical intronic SPAST mutation segregates with the disease in a family genetically linked to SPG4. This finding will extend the search for other mutations that cause SPG4 to include other intronic regions of SPAST.
Acknowledgments
Initially supported by the intramural program at NINDS (J.J.H., L.E.N.) and completed with support from the New York State Department of Health (J.J.H.) and extramural funding from NINDS (NS39353 to J.J.H., NS35932 to D.R.R.).
- Received December 7, 2000.
- Accepted February 8, 2001.
References
- ↵
Harding AE. Hereditary “pure” spastic paraplegia: a clinical and genetic study of 22 families. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry . 1981; 44: 871–883.
- ↵
Reid E. Pure hereditary spastic paraplegia. J Med Genet . 1997; 34: 499–503.
- ↵
Dürr A, Brice A, Serdaru M, et al. The phenotype of “pure” autosomal dominant spastic paraplegia. Neurology . 1994; 44: 1274–1277.
- ↵
- ↵
Hazan J, Fontaine B, Bruyn RPM, et al. Linkage of a new locus for autosomal dominant familial spastic paraplegia to chromosome 2p21-p24. Hum Mol Genet . 1994; 3: 1569–1573.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
Fonknechten N, Mavel D, Byrne P, et al. Spectrum of SPG4 mutations in autosomal dominant spastic paraplegia. Hum Mol Genet . 2000; 9: 637–644.
- ↵
White KD, Ince PG, Lusher M, et al. Clinical and pathologic findings in hereditary spastic paraparesis with spastin mutation. Neurology . 2000; 55: 89–94.
- ↵
- ↵
Lathrop GM, Lalouel J-M, Julier C, Ott J. Strategies for multilocus analysis in humans. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA . 1984; 81: 3443–3446.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
Ish-Horowicz D, Burke JF. Rapid and efficient cosmid cloning. Nucleic Acids Res . 1981; 9: 2989–2998.
- ↵
Harding AE. Hereditary “pure” spastic paraplegia: a clinical and genetic study of 22 families. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry . 1981; 44: 871–883.
- ↵
Santorelli FM, Patrono, Fortini D, et al. Intrafamilial variability in hereditary spastic paraplegia associated with SPG4 mutations. Neurology 2000;55:702–705.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Dr. Sevil Yaşar and Dr. Behnam Sabayan
► Watch
Related Articles
- No related articles found.
Topics Discussed
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Articles
High frequency of partial SPAST deletions in autosomal dominant hereditary spastic paraplegiaC. Beetz, A.O.H. Nygren, J. Schickel et al.Neurology, October 11, 2006 -
ARTICLES
A missense mutation in the neurofibromatosis 2 gene occurs in patients with mild and severe phenotypesDaniel R. Scoles, Michael E. Baser, Stefan-M. Pulst et al.Neurology, August 01, 1996 -
Articles
Autosomal dominant spastic paraplegia with peripheral neuropathy maps to chr12q23-24R. Schüle, M. Bonin, A. Dürr et al.Neurology, April 08, 2009 -
Expedited Publication
A novel sodium channel mutation in a family with hypokalemic periodic paralysisD.E. Bulman, K.A. Scoggan, M.D. van Oene et al.Neurology, December 01, 1999