Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Education
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion (DEI)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Neurology Future Forecasting Series
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Topics A-Z
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit New Manuscript
    • Submit Revised Manuscript
    • Author Center

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Education
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion (DEI)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Neurology Future Forecasting Series
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Topics A-Z
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit New Manuscript
    • Submit Revised Manuscript
    • Author Center
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Neurology Video Journal Club
  • Residents & Fellows

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Neurology
Home
The most widely read and highly cited peer-reviewed neurology journal
  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
Site Logo
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Neurology Video Journal Club
  • Residents & Fellows

Share

November 27, 2001; 57 (10) Brief Communications

The efficacy of epidural blood patch in spontaneous CSF leaks

Drahomira Sencakova, Bahram Mokri, Robyn L. McClelland
First published November 27, 2001, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.57.10.1921
Drahomira Sencakova
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Bahram Mokri
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robyn L. McClelland
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Full PDF
Citation
The efficacy of epidural blood patch in spontaneous CSF leaks
Drahomira Sencakova, Bahram Mokri, Robyn L. McClelland
Neurology Nov 2001, 57 (10) 1921-1923; DOI: 10.1212/WNL.57.10.1921

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions

Make Comment

See Comments

Downloads
1003

Share

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Loading

Abstract

Of 25 consecutive patients with spontaneous CSF leaks treated with epidural blood patch (EBP), nine patients (36%) responded well to the first EBP. Of 15 patients who received a second EBP, five became asymptomatic (33%). Of eight patients who received three or more EBP (mean 4), four patients (50%) responded well.

Epidural blood patch (EBP) has emerged as the most important nonsurgical treatment for spontaneous CSF leaks.1-3⇓⇓ We have attempted to determine the efficacy of EBP in the treatment of spontaneous CSF leaks. These leaks typically occur at the level of the spine and only rarely occur at the skull base.2

Materials and methods.

Utilizing our institution’s diagnostic indexing system for computer retrieval, we identified 54 patients with symptomatic and documented spontaneous CSF leaks seen from 1986 through 1998. Twenty-nine had EBP as a treatment modality. Follow-up was obtained through review of records, correspondence, and telephone calls. Four patients were eliminated from this study (three because of unavailability of follow-up and one because of leak from cribriform plate). Our study thus consisted of 20 women and five men, all with documented CSF leaks at the spine level. Age ranged from 18 to 62 years (mean 42 years). Follow-up ranged from 3 months to 11 years. All patients had received EBP using 10 to 20 mL (mean 17 mL) of autologous blood.

A logistic regression model was constructed to assess the joint effects of site and number of the EBP application on the odds of a positive response.4

Results.

The implemented diagnostic imaging studies are listed in the table. Overall, the level of the leak was determined in 16 patients and the actual site of the leak in nine. All patients had headaches with orthostatic features. Other less common manifestations were nausea and emesis, change in hearing, horizontal diplopia, upper limb pain, photophobia, blurred vision, and face pain. Spinal taps had been performed in 23 patients.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1.

Diagnostic imaging studies and level and site of spontaneous CSF leaks in 25 patients

All 25 patients had failed an initial period of conservative, noninvasive management that ranged from 1 week to 3 years (median 1 month) and consisted of one, but often more of the following: bedrest, analgesics, hydration, nonsteroidal drugs, caffeine, steroids, tricyclic antidepressants, and ergot preparations.

With the first epidural blood patch, nine patients (36%) improved (seven became entirely asymptomatic within a few weeks, and two markedly improved but had mild lingering headaches for more than 2 years). One patient who had not responded to the first EBP underwent surgical correction of the leak and became asymptomatic. Fifteen patients who had failed the first EBP underwent a second EBP. Five of these (33%) responded to the second EBP and became asymptomatic. Of the 10 patients who failed the second EBP, two were treated surgically. One became asymptomatic and one, although improved, was still symptomatic but responded to a third EBP. The remaining eight patients had received three or more epidural blood patches (range 3 to 6, mean 4). Four patients (50%) responded well and the remaining four were treated surgically, with complete resolution of symptoms in two.

Overall, 49 EBP had been delivered with complete and durable response in 17. EBP had been given at the level of the leak in 24 instances and at a different level in 13 (typically patients with CSF leak at cervical or thoracic levels who received EBP at lumbar level). In 12 cases, either the exact level of the leak had not been identified or adequate information was not available. A logistic regression model was constructed with a generalized estimating equations approach to account for the correlation between multiple EBP applications on the same subject utilizing an exchangeable correlation structure.4 The odds ratios were determined comparing the odds of responding to the treatment in a particular group with the odds of the reference category for that group. In general, relative to those patients with the EBP at the same level as the leak (the reference group), those with EBP at a different level tended to do worse, although the difference did not reach significance (p = 0.07).

For the first EBP, those who responded had a significantly shorter average duration of symptoms than those who did not respond (median 2 weeks vs 3 months, p = 0.02, Wilcoxon’s rank sum test), but for the eventual response there was no significant difference in the duration of the symptoms or length of follow-up for the responders vs the nonresponders, either for the first patch or overall.

Discussion.

The initial reports on application of EBP in CSF leaks involved epidural injection of only 1 to 3 mL of autologous blood.5-6⇓ The recommended volume has increased over the years. Although the optimal volume remains controversial, a 20 mL volume EBP has been mostly recommended,7 commonly referred to as the “target volume.” Some have practiced application of even larger volumes.1 The recommended duration of post-EBP recumbency is about 2 hours.9

Despite almost one-half century of experience with application of EBP in CSF leaks, there have been no controlled studies. Utilization of EBP has been based on the clinical observation of its effectiveness.10 The criticism of lack of control for spontaneous recovery can also be extended to our study; although most of our patients had been referred from other centers, many had received other treatments (including EBP in some) before our evaluation.

Leaks resulting from spinal taps (typically done with small needles) respond better to EBP than those resulting from inadvertent dural puncture from epidural needles or the spontaneous type, which may result from leaking meningeal diverticula or dural defects confirming the importance of anatomy of the leak. Also important is the durability of response. Although over 90% of post–dural puncture headaches respond initially to an EBP, a durable response is noted in only 61 to 75%.8

An early effect from EBP may take place within minutes and is likely related to the displacement of dura toward the cord and cauda equina, decreasing the volume of the “container,” therefore compensating for some of the depleted volume of CSF. A latent effect results from sealing of the leak. The interval between the two effects varies considerably. Sometimes the interval may be so short that the two effects may fuse, accounting for patients who obtain immediate and persistent relief from EBP. Sometimes the interval may be more prolonged, accounting for those who obtain early relief but the effect wears off either partially or completely, and then after a period of delay patients begin to improve. Sometimes the latent effect may never appear or may occur only partially. In these cases, the dural leak has either completely failed to seal or has sealed only partially and inadequately.

Our data confirm that the results of EBP in spontaneous CSF leaks are not as dramatic as those reported from diagnostic lumbar punctures or even from inadvertent dural punctures. However, EBP is considered the treatment of choice in those patients who have failed the initial noninvasive treatments. Failure to respond to one EBP does not guarantee failure of subsequent EBP.

Epidural blood patch given at the level of the leak is somewhat more effective than given at a distant site. In CSF leaks with firmly established diagnosis, it would seem reasonable to proceed with at least one lumbar EBP. If unsuccessful, further investigation could localize the site or at least the level of the leak for a possible targeted EBP. These studies might also show single or multiple meningeal diverticula, more than one site of CSF leak, or dural defects with high-flow leaks accounting for some of the failures. The investigations could also help with selection of the patients who might be reasonable surgical candidates.

  • Received March 27, 2001.
  • Accepted August 16, 2001.

References

  1. ↵
    Dillon WP, Fishman RA. Some lessons learned about the diagnosis and treatment of spontaneous intracranial hypotension [editorial]. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol . 1998; 19: 1001–1002.
    OpenUrl
  2. ↵
    Mokri B. Spontaneous cerebrospinal fluid leaks: from intra-cranial hypotension to cerebrospinal fluid hypovolemia: evolution of a concept. Mayo Clin Proc . 1999; 74: 1113–1123.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Vilmig ST, Titus F. Low cerebrospinal fluid pressure. In: Olesen J. Tfelt-Hansen P. Welch KMA eds. The headache. New York: Raven Press, 1993: 687–695.
  4. ↵
    Liang KY, Zeger SL. Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrica . 1986; 73: 13–22.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. ↵
    Nosik WA. Intracranial hypotension secondary to lumbar nerve sleeve tear. JAMA . 1955; 157: 1110–1111.
    OpenUrl
  6. ↵
    Gormley JB. Current comment: treatment of postspinal headache. Anesthesiology . 1960; 21: 565–566.
    OpenUrl
  7. ↵
    Crawford JS. Experiences with the epidural blood patch. Anaesthesia . 1980; 35: 513–515.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  8. ↵
    Duffy PJ, Crosby ET. The epidural blood patch. Resolving the controversies. Can J Anesth . 1999; 46: 878–886.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    Martin R, Jourdain S, Clairoux M, Tétrault JP. Duration of decubitus position after epidural blood patch. Can J Anaesth . 1994; 41: 23–25.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. ↵
    Taivainen T, Pitkänen M, Tuominen M, Rosenberg PH. Efficacy of epidural blood patch for postdural puncture headache. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand . 1993; 37: 702–705.
    OpenUrlPubMed

Letters: Rapid online correspondence

No comments have been published for this article.
Comment

REQUIREMENTS

If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org

Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.

If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.

Submission specifications:

  • Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
  • Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
  • Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
  • Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
  • Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.

More guidelines and information on Disputes & Debates

Compose Comment

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
NOTE: The first author must also be the corresponding author of the comment.
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Publishing Agreement
NOTE: All authors, besides the first/corresponding author, must complete a separate Publishing Agreement Form and provide via email to the editorial office before comments can be posted.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

You May Also be Interested in

Back to top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and methods.
    • Results.
    • Discussion.
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Advertisement

SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Safety in Guillain-Barré Syndrome, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy, and Multifocal Motor Neuropathy

Dr. Jeffrey Allen and Dr. Nicholas Purcell

► Watch

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.

Topics Discussed

  • All Neuropsychology/Behavior
  • Alzheimer's disease
  • MRS

Alert Me

  • Alert me when eletters are published

Recommended articles

  • Articles
    Orthostatic headaches caused by CSF leak but with normal CSF pressures
    B. Mokri, S. F. Hunter, J.L.D. Atkinson et al.
    Neurology, September 01, 1998
  • Brief Communications
    Absent pachymeningeal gadolinium enhancement on cranial MRI despite symptomatic CSF leak
    B. Mokri, J.L. D. Atkinson, D.W. Dodick et al.
    Neurology, July 01, 1999
  • Article
    Diskogenic microspurs as a major cause of intractable spontaneous intracranial hypotension
    Jürgen Beck, Christian T. Ulrich, Christian Fung et al.
    Neurology, August 26, 2016
  • Articles
    Heavily T2-weighted MR myelography vs CT myelography in spontaneous intracranial hypotension
    Y. -F. Wang, J. -F. Lirng, J. -L. Fuh et al.
    Neurology, November 30, 2009
Neurology: 100 (12)

Articles

  • Ahead of Print
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Popular Articles
  • Translations

About

  • About the Journals
  • Ethics Policies
  • Editors & Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise

Submit

  • Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Information for Reviewers
  • AAN Guidelines
  • Permissions

Subscribers

  • Subscribe
  • Activate a Subscription
  • Sign up for eAlerts
  • RSS Feed
Site Logo
  • Visit neurology Template on Facebook
  • Follow neurology Template on Twitter
  • Visit Neurology on YouTube
  • Neurology
  • Neurology: Clinical Practice
  • Neurology: Education
  • Neurology: Genetics
  • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • AAN.com
  • AANnews
  • Continuum
  • Brain & Life
  • Neurology Today

Wolters Kluwer Logo

Neurology | Print ISSN:0028-3878
Online ISSN:1526-632X

© 2023 American Academy of Neurology

  • Privacy Policy
  • Feedback
  • Advertise