The minimally conscious state
Definition and diagnostic criteria
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

Abstract
Objective: To establish consensus recommendations among health care specialties for defining and establishing diagnostic criteria for the minimally conscious state (MCS).
Background: There is a subgroup of patients with severe alteration in consciousness who do not meet diagnostic criteria for coma or the vegetative state (VS). These patients demonstrate inconsistent but discernible evidence of consciousness. It is important to distinguish patients in MCS from those in coma and VS because preliminary findings suggest that there are meaningful differences in outcome.
Methods: An evidence-based literature review of disorders of consciousness was completed to define MCS, develop diagnostic criteria for entry into MCS, and identify markers for emergence to higher levels of cognitive function.
Results: There were insufficient data to establish evidence-based guidelines for diagnosis, prognosis, and management of MCS. Therefore, a consensus-based case definition with behaviorally referenced diagnostic criteria was formulated to facilitate future empirical investigation.
Conclusions: MCS is characterized by inconsistent but clearly discernible behavioral evidence of consciousness and can be distinguished from coma and VS by documenting the presence of specific behavioral features not found in either of these conditions. Patients may evolve to MCS from coma or VS after acute brain injury. MCS may also result from degenerative or congenital nervous system disorders. This condition is often transient but may also exist as a permanent outcome. Defining MCS should promote further research on its epidemiology, neuropathology, natural history, and management.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
- The minimally conscious state: Definition and diagnostic criteria
- Calixto Machado, Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery Ciudad de La Habana Cuba[email protected]
Submitted June 24, 2002 - The minimally conscious state: Definition and diagnostic criteria
- William J Burke, St. Louis University St. Louis, MO[email protected]
Submitted June 24, 2002 - Reply to Letters to the Editor by Burke and Machado
- Douglas Katz, Boston University School of Medicine Boston MA[email protected]
- JT Giacino, S Ashwal, N Childs, R Cranford, B Jennett, JP Kelly, JH Rosenberg, J Whyte, R Zafonte and ND Zasler
Submitted June 24, 2002 - The minimally conscious state: Definition and diagnostic criteria
- Joseph J Fins, New York Presbyterian Hospital-Weill Cornell Center New York[email protected]
- Nicholas D. Schiff
Submitted June 24, 2002
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Hastening the Diagnosis of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis
Dr. Brian Callaghan and Dr. Kellen Quigg