Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Education
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion (DEI)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Neurology Future Forecasting Series
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Topics A-Z
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit New Manuscript
    • Submit Revised Manuscript
    • Author Center

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Education
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion (DEI)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Neurology Future Forecasting Series
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Topics A-Z
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit New Manuscript
    • Submit Revised Manuscript
    • Author Center
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Neurology Video Journal Club
  • Residents & Fellows

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Neurology
Home
The most widely read and highly cited peer-reviewed neurology journal
  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
Site Logo
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Neurology Video Journal Club
  • Residents & Fellows

Share

November 26, 2002; 59 (10) Views & Reviews

Do published criteria improve clinical diagnostic accuracy in multiple system atrophy?

Y. Osaki, Y. Ben-Shlomo, G.K. Wenning, S.E. Daniel, A. Hughes, A.J. Lees, C.J. Mathias, N. Quinn
First published November 26, 2002, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/01.WNL.0000028690.15001.00
Y. Osaki
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Y. Ben-Shlomo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G.K. Wenning
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S.E. Daniel
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Hughes
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A.J. Lees
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C.J. Mathias
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N. Quinn
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Full PDF
Citation
Do published criteria improve clinical diagnostic accuracy in multiple system atrophy?
Y. Osaki, Y. Ben-Shlomo, G.K. Wenning, S.E. Daniel, A. Hughes, A.J. Lees, C.J. Mathias, N. Quinn
Neurology Nov 2002, 59 (10) 1486-1491; DOI: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000028690.15001.00

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions

Make Comment

See Comments

Downloads
1512

Share

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Loading

Abstract

Objective: To assess the accuracy of a clinical diagnosis of multiple system atrophy (MSA) and compare it to the Quinn and Consensus criteria for MSA using neuropathologically examined cases from the Queen Square Brain Bank for Neurological Disorders.

Methods: Fifty-nine cases with a neurologic diagnosis of MSA when last assessed prior to death were studied.

Results: In 51 (86%) of these cases, the diagnosis of MSA was confirmed pathologically. False positive diagnoses included PD (n = 6), progressive supranuclear palsy (n = 1), and cerebrovascular disease (n = 1). When applying either set of diagnostic criteria, a diagnosis of probable MSA gave lower sensitivity but higher positive predictive value than one of possible MSA. Application of either set of diagnostic criteria was superior to actual clinical diagnosis made early in the disease, but there was little difference by the last clinic visit.

Conclusions: This study shows a high diagnostic accuracy for the clinical diagnosis of MSA by neurologists, with PD accounting for most of the false positive diagnoses. Application of either Quinn or Consensus criteria was superior to actual clinical diagnosis made early in the disease, but there was little difference by last clinic visit.

Multiple system atrophy (MSA) is a progressive sporadic neurodegenerative disease of undetermined etiology that causes parkinsonism and cerebellar, autonomic, and pyramidal dysfunction in varying combinations.1 Neuropathologically, MSA is characterized by neuronal cell loss, astrogliosis, and oligodendroglial cytoplasmic inclusions that affect the striatonigral and olivopontocerebellar systems as well as the spinal cord (intermediolateral cell column and Onuf’s nucleus).2,3⇓ Epidemiologic data are limited but a recent cross-sectional study in a primary health care setting reported a prevalence of 4.4 per 100,000 in the United Kingdom.4 A meta-analysis of all published case reports calculated a mean age at onset of 54.2 years (range 31 to 78) and median survival of 6.2 years, although the latter showed a marked improvement between past (4.9 years) and recent publications (6.8 years).5

The accuracy of a clinical diagnosis of MSA appears relatively poor, with up to 55% of postmortem confirmed cases being misdiagnosed even at last neurologic evaluation.6 Similarly, most of the patients with MSA identified in the cross-sectional survey were only diagnosed during the study,4 highlighting its poor recognition in everyday clinical practice. MSA is commonly mistaken for PD owing to a number of overlapping features, including asymmetry, and resting tremor and a positive levodopa response in some patients. However, it may also be confused with progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP)7,8⇓ and other atypical parkinsonian syndromes.

We examined a large series of autopsied cases who were considered, in life, to have MSA in order to assess the accuracy of neurologists’ diagnosis in predicting pathologically proven MSA and to determine whether the retrospective application of either of two sets of published diagnostic criteria further improves diagnostic accuracy either in the early or late stages of the disease.

Subjects and methods.

Among 806 patients with parkinsonism whose brains were donated to the Queen Square Brain Bank for Neurological Disorders between 1984 and 2000, we identified 59 consecutive cases with a clinical diagnosis of MSA when last assessed prior to death. Clinicopathologic details of up to 34 of these 59 cases have been reported previously.9-12⇓⇓⇓ Clinical data abstracted from the patients’ medical records included autonomic, cerebellar, pyramidal, and parkinsonian symptoms and signs. These enabled individual patients to be classified by both the modified Quinn criteria13 and Consensus criteria.14 The Consensus criteria use the terms “criteria” and “features” in a specific and precise way. To avoid confusion, we will use the terms “criteria” and “features” in quotes when referring to their usage according to the Consensus statement. Response to levodopa was graded on a four-point scale, and initial as well as last recorded response was noted. The occurrence of symptoms and signs was determined at both the first and last neurologic visit.

In this article, we refer to pathologically confirmed cases as true MSA and to clinically misdiagnosed cases as false positive cases. At first visit, 11 of the 51 true MSA cases and one of the eight false positive MSA cases were diagnosed as MSA, all by consultant neurologists. None of the other 47 patients later clinically diagnosed with MSA were initially diagnosed as such by either neurologists (n = 23) or non-neurologists (n = 24). The two other common diagnoses at the first clinic visit were PD (n = 12) and parkinsonism (n = 12). Among the eight false positive cases, seven had been seen by consultant neurologists at first clinic visit; their diagnoses at this time were PD (n = 4), MSA (n = 1), postprandial hypotension (n = 1), and unknown (n = 1). The eighth false positive case had been initially diagnosed as parkinsonism by a non-neurologist. By the time of the last clinic visit, all cases had been seen by consultant neurologists.

Clinical and pathologic data from patient subgroups were compared using Student t-test. The proportion of cases with each clinical feature was compared between true MSA and false positive cases using the χ2 test for proportions for a two-by-two contingency table. To assess the validity of each clinical feature as well as the diagnostic criteria, we chose sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) as our outcome measures. We report the results for both categories of diagnosis (probable or possible) for both criteria. We do not report the specificity as it is statistically imprecise owing to the small number of false positive cases.

Results.

The 59 MSA cases comprised 37 men and 22 women. The mean age at onset was 54.3 years (range 34 to 74), the mean survival from first symptom was 7.8 years (range 2 to 17), and mean age at death was 62.1 years (range 39 to 77) for the whole group. Fifty-one cases were confirmed pathologically, resulting in a PPV of 86%. The remaining 8 cases (14%) had a false positive clinical diagnosis of MSA. Lewy body PD with variable degrees of cortical Lewy body involvement was established in six of these eight cases; one case was found to have PSP and one had cerebrovascular disease.

False positive cases tended to be older at onset (58.3 ± 9.1 vs 53.6 ± 9.7 years) and had significantly longer survival (10.4 ± 4.0 vs 7.5 ± 3.3 years) as well as older age at death (68.6 ± 6.7 vs 61.1 ± 8.8 years) than true MSA cases. Table 1 shows clinical details of the eight false positive cases, according to the two sets of criteria. Four cases were Quinn probable and Consensus possible, and three were probable and one possible on both sets of criteria, suggesting lower potential for false positive diagnosis with the Consensus criteria.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Table 1 Clinical, diagnostic, and pathologic features of the eight false positive cases

Table 2 compares the sensitivity and PPV of the Quinn and Consensus criteria at both first and last visit. The mean duration between these visits was 66 ± 46 months; i.e., 5.5 years. The sensitivity and PPV of the clinical diagnosis made in the patients are also presented for comparison. Details of the levodopa response at first visit were lacking in 16 cases. To avoid a loss in statistical power, the patients’ first ever levodopa response record was used; this was recorded on average 15 (range 3 to 48) months after the first visit. Sensitivity with the Quinn criteria was higher than that for Consensus criteria at first visit and vice versa for PPV. Quinn possible and probable categories and Consensus possible category had higher sensitivities than the initial clinical diagnosis.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Table 2 Sensitivity and PPV of the two sets of diagnostic criteria

At the last clinic visit, sensitivities were over 90% for the Quinn possible and probable and Consensus possible categories, but only 63% for the Consensus probable category. There was little difference between the PPV, and the Quinn probable and Consensus probable categories had only slightly higher PPV than the last clinical diagnosis.

The upper half of table 3 shows the sensitivity and PPV of key clinical manifestations at first clinic visit. The highest sensitivity (78%) was observed for both the Consensus “criterion” and “feature” for parkinsonism. The lower half of table 3 shows sensitivity and PPV of the same key clinical manifestations at last clinic visit. The sensitivity, as might be expected, had increased for all these clinical features as the disease had progressed. By this time, autonomic and cerebellar manifestations presented equal or higher, and parkinsonian manifestations fractionally lower, PPV than the last clinical diagnosis.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Table 3 Sensitivity and PPV for key clinical manifestations at first and last clinic visit

Discussion.

This is the first study that has empirically attempted to validate two existing sets of diagnostic criteria for MSA in a large neuropathologically examined series of cases. The mean age at onset of our true MSA cases was 53.6 years and the mean survival from first symptom was 7.5 years. These results are consistent with previous reports and indicate that our case series is comparable to other studies.5,9,11,12,15⇓⇓⇓⇓

A probable diagnosis on either set of criteria was associated with lower sensitivity and higher PPV because a higher diagnostic threshold is required for a probable diagnosis. Thus some true MSA cases will not be classified as probable cases as they fail to exhibit all the required clinical signs. By the last visit, there was little difference in either sensitivity or PPV between the Quinn possible and probable categories. However, Consensus probable category had considerably lower sensitivities than the possible category. The possible category requires a greater number of dysfunction items as options, whereas the probable category requires fewer, but more obligatory, items. This same pattern was generally observed for Consensus “criteria,” which are stricter than mere “features,” although surprisingly this was not the case for parkinsonism, where “criterion” and “feature” performed almost identically.

At first visit, sensitivity with Quinn possible (63%) and probable (37%) and Consensus possible (28%) categories was higher than the initial clinical diagnosis (22%). However, by the last visit there was little difference in either sensitivity or PPV (see table 2). These data show that, using Quinn probable or Consensus possible criteria, one can make a definitive clinical diagnosis in a quarter to a third of MSA cases, even very early in the natural history of the disease.

Parkinsonism was the most frequent feature of true MSA, followed by autonomic and cerebellar and pyramidal signs (see table 3). This may be biased as all cases were ascertained from a PD brain bank, and therefore parkinsonian cases are likely to be overrepresented.

Overall, 14% of the cases were clinically misdiagnosed, most commonly owing to confusion with PD or PD with cortical involvement. All false positive cases fulfilled either possible or probable criteria for MSA. All had parkinsonism and all but one were reported to have a poor levodopa response. The second most common feature among them was autonomic symptomatology. Five of the six cases that were pathologically diagnosed as PD or PD with cortical involvement showed both “autonomic and urinary dysfunction” and “levodopa poorly responsive parkinsonism,” a combination that presumably had led to their misdiagnosis as MSA. Wenning et al.7 previously reported that 23% of Queen Square Brain Bank cases with PD showed a poor initial levodopa response compared with 58% poor initial responders within the MSA group, and that autonomic failure had developed in 84% of the MSA cases but in only 26% of the PD cases. Conversely, when looking at patients diagnosed with PD from 1996 to 1998 in the same brain bank, Hughes et al.16 found that the condition most often mistaken for PD was MSA. Distinguishing these problem cases purely on the basis of clinical examination may be difficult and laboratory-based diagnostic procedures such as sphincter EMG,17 further autonomic function tests like the clonidine-growth hormone stimulation test,18 or neuroimaging19-21⇓⇓ may be helpful in this subgroup of patients, although this awaits empirical confirmation. In addition, some of the clinically misdiagnosed cases in the current series were reported to have cerebellar features such as lower limb ataxia, although this is difficult to identify with certainty in severely disabled patients with postural instability of whatever cause. Thus, motor features of parkinsonism may partly overlap with the incoordination of cerebellar ataxia, leading one to an erroneous diagnosis of MSA rather than PD. One clinically diagnosed MSA case with brainstem and cortical Lewy bodies (Case 7) satisfied National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke–Society for Progressive Supranuclear Palsy, Inc. criteria for possible PSP22 as well.

Establishing accepted diagnostic criteria is necessary to enable researchers to standardize case definition and enable greater comparability between studies. Both sets of existing criteria were developed on the basis of expert opinion rather than a robust empirical evidence-based or clinicopathologic correlation. Our data indicate that further development and refinement are needed.

There is no one set of ideal criteria as these will vary depending on the clinical or research objectives and the nature of therapeutic intervention. A clinical trial that aims to recruit true MSA cases for a proposed intervention that is costly and relatively toxic will need to sacrifice sensitivity for a high PPV. In this case the use of the Consensus probable category seems the optimum choice. Conversely, a pragmatic trial of a cheap, safe, and potentially effective therapy that requires initiation early in the natural history would favor high sensitivity at the expense of PPV. In this scenario, the Quinn possible category performs best, because even at first visit it will lose relatively few true MSA cases, but the number of cases needed to achieve adequate power may need to be increased to correct for misdiagnosis.

Published diagnostic criteria are often not used for making a diagnosis in routine practice. This is probably because in a classic case, clinicians have a high a priori probability (or conviction) that they are correct, and hence there is apparently little added value in applying the criteria. This is true in our series, and also in a subset of the cases seen by movement disorder specialists,12 in both of which the overall PPV was high at 86%. However, early in the natural history, or with difficult gray cases, the use of evidence-based criteria might improve clinical performance if clinicians are trained in the use of criteria that are sufficiently user-friendly to be adopted readily within the context of normal clinical care. For example, the Consensus criteria are more complex and time consuming to apply than the Quinn criteria, although this may be facilitated through a computer-administered algorithm. One should not overinterpret our data for the purpose of clinical diagnosis. This is because our sample consisted of clinically diagnosed cases of MSA rather than gray cases. As such, by the last visit we observed a ceiling effect so that both actual clinical diagnosis and diagnostic criteria all had very high PPV. We are currently extending this work to a sample of gray cases, which present a greater diagnostic challenge, to test whether existing criteria can outperform clinical opinion.

In conclusion, this study demonstrates high clinical diagnostic accuracy for MSA in a series of postmortem confirmed cases. The clinical misdiagnosis of MSA was predominantly due to confusion with PD, and may be ascribed to both “autonomic and urinary dysfunction” and “levodopa poorly responsive parkinsonism” occurring in PD or PD with dementia cases in this study. Although at first visit, the application of current diagnostic criteria for MSA may improve accuracy of diagnosis, at last visit they are no more accurate than neurologists’ final diagnosis.

Appendix 1

⇓

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Quinn criteria (adapted from Wenning et al.13)

Appendix 2

Consensus criteria (adopted from Gilman et al.14) Table 1 Clinical domains, features, and criteria used in the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy (MSA) (a feature [A] is a characteristic of the disease and a criterion [B] is a defining feature or composite of features required for diagnosis)

  • I. Autonomic and urinary dysfunction

  • A. Autonomic and urinary features

  • 1. Orthostatic hypotension (by 20 mm Hg systolic and 10 mm Hg diastolic)

  • 2. Urinary incontinence or incomplete bladder emptying

  • B. Criterion for autonomic failure or urinary dysfunction in MSA

  • Orthostatic fall in blood pressure (by 30 mm Hg systolic or 15 mm Hg diastolic) or urinary incontinence (persistent, involuntary partial or total bladder emptying, accompanied by erectile dysfunction in men) or both

  • II. Parkinsonism

  • A. Parkinsonian features

  • 1. Bradykinesia (slowness of voluntary movement with progressive reduction in speed and amplitude during repetitive actions)

  • 2. Rigidity

  • 3. Postural instability (not caused by primary visual, vestibular, cerebellar, or proprioceptive dysfunction)

  • 4. Tremor (postural, resting or both)

  • B. Criterion for parkinsonism in MSA

  • Bradykinesia plus at least one of items 2 to 4

  • III. Cerebellar dysfunction

  • A. Cerebellar features

  • 1. Gait ataxia (wide-based stance with steps of irregular length and direction)

  • 2. Ataxic dysarthria

  • 3. Limb ataxia

  • 4. Sustained gaze-evoked nystagmus

  • B. Criterion for cerebellar dysfunction in MSA

  • Gait ataxia plus at least one of items 2 to 4

  • IV. Corticospinal tract dysfunction

  • A. Corticospinal tract features

  • 1. Extensor plantar responses with hyperreflexia

  • B. Corticospinal tract dysfunction in MSA: no corticospinal tract features are used in defining the diagnosis of MSA

Table 2 Diagnostic category of MSA (the features and criteria for each clinical domain are shown in table 1)

  • I. Possible MSA: one criterion plus two features from separate other domains. When the criterion is parkinsonism, a poor levodopa response qualifies as one feature (hence only one additional feature is required).

  • II. Probable MSA: criterion for autonomic failure/urinary dysfunction plus poorly levodopa responsive parkinsonism or cerebellar dysfunction.

  • III. Definite MSA: pathologically confirmed by the presence of high-density glial cytoplasmic inclusions in association with a combination of degenerative changes in the nigrostriatal and olivopontocerebellar pathways.

Table 3 Exclusion criteria for the diagnosis of MSA

  • I. History

  • Symptomatic onset under 30 years of age

  • Family history of a similar disorder

  • Systemic disease or other identifiable causes for features listed in table 1

  • Hallucinations unrelated to medication

  • II. Physical examination

  • DSM criteria for dementia

  • Prominent slowing of vertical saccades or vertical supranuclear gaze palsy

  • Evidence of focal cortical dysfunction such as aphasia, alien limb syndrome, and parietal dysfunction

  • III. Laboratory investigation

  • Metabolic, molecular, genetic, and imaging evidence of an alternative cause of features listed in table 1

*In practice, MSA is most frequently confused with PD or progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP). Mild limitation of upward gaze alone is nonspecific, whereas a prominent (50%) limitation of upward gaze or any limitation of downward gaze suggests PSP. Before the onset of vertical gaze limitation, clinically obvious slowing of voluntary saccades is usually easily detectable in PSP and assists in the early differentiation of these two disorders.

Acknowledgments

Acknowledgment

The authors thank S. Stoneham and L. Kilford for their assistance.

  • Received March 6, 2002.
  • Accepted June 20, 2002.

References

  1. ↵
    Quinn N. Multiple system atrophy. In: Marsden CD, Fahn S, eds. Movement disorders 3. London: Butterworth-Heinemann, 1994: 262–281.
  2. ↵
    Oppenheimer DR. Diseases of the basal ganglia, cerebellar and motor neurons. In: Hume Adams J, Corsellis JAN, Duchen LW, eds. Greenfield’s neuropathology, 4th ed. London: Arnold, 1984:699–747.
  3. ↵
    Daniel SE. The neuropathology and neurochemistry of multiple system atrophy. In: Mathias CJ, Bannister R, eds. Autonomic failure. A textbook of clinical disorders of the autonomic nervous system, 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999:321–328.
  4. ↵
    Schrag A, Ben-Shlomo Y, Quinn NP. Prevalence of progressive supranuclear palsy and multiple system atrophy: a cross-sectional study. Lancet . 1999; 354: 1771–1775.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Ben-Shlomo Y, Wenning GK, Tison F, Quinn NP. Survival of patients with pathologically proven multiple system atrophy: a meta-analysis. Neurology . 1997; 48: 384–393.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  6. ↵
    Litvan I, Goetz CG, Jankovic J, et al. What is the accuracy of the clinical diagnosis of multiple system atrophy? A clinicopathologic study. Arch Neurol . 1997; 54: 937–944.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Wenning GK, Ben-Shlomo Y, Hughes A, Daniel SE, Lees A, Quinn NP. What clinical features are most useful to distinguish definite multiple system atrophy from Parkinson’s disease? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry . 2000; 68: 434–440.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Litvan I, Booth V, Wenning GK, et al. Retrospective application of a set of clinical diagnostic criteria for the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy. J Neural Transm . 1998; 105: 217–227.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  9. ↵
    Wenning GK, Ben-Shlomo Y, Magalhaes M, Daniel SE, Quinn NP. Clinicopathological study of 35 cases of multiple system atrophy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry . 1995; 58: 160–166.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. ↵
    Fearnley JM, Lees AJ. Striatonigral degeneration: a clinicopathological study. Brain . 1990; 113: 1823–1842.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. ↵
    Colosimo C, Albanese A, Hughes AJ, de Bruin VMS, Lees AJ. Some specific clinical features differentiate multiple system atrophy (striatonigral variety) from Parkinson’s disease. Arch Neurol . 1995; 52: 294–298.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Ben-Shlomo Y, Lees AJ. The accuracy of parkinsonian syndrome in a specialist movement disorder service. Brain . 2002; 125: 861–870.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Wenning GK, Ben-Shlomo Y, Magalhaes M, Daniel SE, Quinn NP. Clinical features and natural history of multiple system atrophy. Brain . 1994; 117: 835–845.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  14. ↵
    Gilman S, Low PA, Quinn N, et al. Consensus statement on the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy. J Neurol Sci . 1999; 163: 94–98.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Wenning GK, Tison F, Ben-Shlomo Y, Daniel SE, Quinn NP. Multiple system atrophy: a review of 203 pathologically proven cases. Mov Disord . 1997; 12: 133–147.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Lees AJ. Improved accuracy of clinical diagnosis of Lewy body Parkinson’s disease. Neurology . 2001; 57: 1497–1499.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  17. ↵
    Palace J, Chandiramani VA, Fowler CJ. Value of sphincter electromyography in the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy. Muscle Nerve . 1997; 20: 1167–1172.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Mathias CJ, Bannister R. Investigation of autonomic disorders. In: Mathias CJ, Bannister R, eds. Autonomic failure. A textbook of clinical disorders of the autonomic nervous system. 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999:169–195.
  19. ↵
    Schrag A, Kingsley D, Phatouros C, et al. Clinical usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging in multiple system atrophy. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry . 1998; 65: 65–71.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  20. ↵
    Davie CA, Wenning GK, Barker GL, et al. Differentiation of multiple system atrophy from idiopathic Parkinson’s disease using proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Ann Neurol . 1995; 37: 204–210.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Braune S, Reinhardt M, Schnitzer R, Riedel A, Lücking CH. Cardiac uptake of [123I] MIBG separates Parkinson’s disease from multiple system atrophy. Neurology . 1999; 53: 1020–1025.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  22. ↵
    Litvan I, Agid Y, Calne D, et al. Clinical research criteria for the diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy (Steele-Richardson-Olszewski syndrome): report of the NINDS-SPSP International Workshop. Neurology . 1996; 47: 1–9.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text

Letters: Rapid online correspondence

No comments have been published for this article.
Comment

REQUIREMENTS

If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org

Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.

If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.

Submission specifications:

  • Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
  • Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
  • Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
  • Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
  • Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.

More guidelines and information on Disputes & Debates

Compose Comment

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
NOTE: The first author must also be the corresponding author of the comment.
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Publishing Agreement
NOTE: All authors, besides the first/corresponding author, must complete a separate Publishing Agreement Form and provide via email to the editorial office before comments can be posted.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

You May Also be Interested in

Back to top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Subjects and methods.
    • Results.
    • Discussion.
    • Appendix 1
    • Appendix 2
    • Acknowledgments
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Advertisement

SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Safety in Guillain-Barré Syndrome, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy, and Multifocal Motor Neuropathy

Dr. Jeffrey Allen and Dr. Nicholas Purcell

► Watch

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.

Topics Discussed

  • All Movement Disorders
  • Parkinson's disease/Parkinsonism
  • Multiple system atrophy

Alert Me

  • Alert me when eletters are published

Recommended articles

  • Articles
    Involvement of vagal autonomic nuclei in multiple system atrophy and Lewy body disease
    E. E. Benarroch, A. M. Schmeichel, P. Sandroni et al.
    Neurology, February 13, 2006
  • Article
    When DLB, PD, and PSP masquerade as MSA
    An autopsy study of 134 patients
    Shunsuke Koga, Naoya Aoki, Ryan J. Uitti et al.
    Neurology, July 02, 2015
  • ARTICLES
    Accuracy of clinical criteria for the diagnosis of progressive supranuclear palsy (Steele-Richardson-Olszewski syndrome)
    I. Litvan, Y. Agid, J. Jankovic et al.
    Neurology, April 01, 1996
  • Articles
    Second consensus statement on the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy
    S. Gilman, G. K. Wenning, P. A. Low et al.
    Neurology, August 25, 2008
Neurology: 100 (13)

Articles

  • Ahead of Print
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Popular Articles
  • Translations

About

  • About the Journals
  • Ethics Policies
  • Editors & Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise

Submit

  • Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Information for Reviewers
  • AAN Guidelines
  • Permissions

Subscribers

  • Subscribe
  • Activate a Subscription
  • Sign up for eAlerts
  • RSS Feed
Site Logo
  • Visit neurology Template on Facebook
  • Follow neurology Template on Twitter
  • Visit Neurology on YouTube
  • Neurology
  • Neurology: Clinical Practice
  • Neurology: Education
  • Neurology: Genetics
  • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • AAN.com
  • AANnews
  • Continuum
  • Brain & Life
  • Neurology Today

Wolters Kluwer Logo

Neurology | Print ISSN:0028-3878
Online ISSN:1526-632X

© 2023 American Academy of Neurology

  • Privacy Policy
  • Feedback
  • Advertise