Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Education
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion (DEI)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Neurology Future Forecasting Series
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Topics A-Z
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit New Manuscript
    • Submit Revised Manuscript
    • Author Center

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Education
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion (DEI)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Neurology Future Forecasting Series
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Topics A-Z
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit New Manuscript
    • Submit Revised Manuscript
    • Author Center
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Neurology Video Journal Club
  • Residents & Fellows

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Neurology
Home
The most widely read and highly cited peer-reviewed neurology journal
  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
Site Logo
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Neurology Video Journal Club
  • Residents & Fellows

Share

November 12, 2002; 59 (9) Articles

Diagnostic criteria for respiratory chain disorders in adults and children

F.P. Bernier, A. Boneh, X. Dennett, C.W. Chow, M.A. Cleary, D.R. Thorburn
First published November 12, 2002, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/01.WNL.0000033795.17156.00
F.P. Bernier
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
A. Boneh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
X. Dennett
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C.W. Chow
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M.A. Cleary
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D.R. Thorburn
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Full PDF
Citation
Diagnostic criteria for respiratory chain disorders in adults and children
F.P. Bernier, A. Boneh, X. Dennett, C.W. Chow, M.A. Cleary, D.R. Thorburn
Neurology Nov 2002, 59 (9) 1406-1411; DOI: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000033795.17156.00

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions

Make Comment

See Comments

Downloads
2736

Share

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Loading

Abstract

Background: Respiratory chain (RC) disorders are clinically, biochemically, and molecularly heterogeneous. The lack of standardized diagnostic criteria poses difficulties in evaluating diagnostic methodologies.

Objective: To assess proposed adult RC diagnostic criteria that classify patients into “definite,” “probable,” or “possible” categories.

Methods: The authors applied the adult RC diagnostic criteria retrospectively to 146 consecutive children referred for investigation of a suspected RC disorder. Data were collected from hospital, genetics, and laboratory records, and the diagnoses predicted by the adult criteria were compared with the previously assigned assessments.

Results: The authors identified three major difficulties in applying the adult criteria:lack of pediatric-specific criteria; difficulty in segregating continuous data into circumscribed major and minor criteria; and lack of additivity of clinical features or enzyme tests. They therefore modified the adult criteria to allow for pediatric clinical and histologic features and for more sensitive coding of RC enzyme and functional studies. Reanalysis of the patients’ data resulted in congruence between the diagnostic certainty previously assigned by the authors’ center and that defined by the new general RC diagnostic criteria in 99% of patients.

Conclusions: These general diagnostic criteria appear to improve the sensitivity of the adult criteria. They need further assessment in prospective clinical and epidemiologic studies.

Disorders of the mitochondrial respiratory chain (RC) may present with various neurologic features, including encephalopathy, myopathy, and hearing loss. However non-neurologic presentations occur in over 30% of pediatric patients.1 The clinical features are rarely pathognomonic, and laboratory investigations are frequently required to confirm the diagnosis. These investigations might include indicators of cell redox status (e.g., lactate and lactate/pyruvate ratio), numerical or structural abnormalities of mitochondria in tissue biopsies, molecular studies, enzyme histochemistry, and studies of RC function. The latter studies typically involve measurement of RC function in intact mitochondria and spectrophotometric assays of the individual RC complexes.

In some cases, diagnostic investigations provide definitively abnormal results. However, in many cases the results can be intermediate or ambiguous because of problems in distinguishing primary pathologic changes from secondary phenomena.2-4⇓⇓ The confirmation or exclusion of a RC disorder is therefore a common dilemma for clinicians. In addition, the lack of standardized diagnostic criteria is a barrier to comparing and improving diagnostic methodologies and in interpreting published reports.

In the current work, we attempt to begin the development of consensus diagnostic criteria for RC disorders by evaluating a comprehensive set of current diagnostic criteria that were proposed in 1996.5 These criteria have never formally been applied to a patient population and were suggested solely on the experience derived from an adult neurology clinic. Therefore, we have referred to them as the adult criteria. We evaluated these criteria in a pediatric patient population referred for mitochondrial investigations and modified them to derive general criteria of acceptable specificity and sensitivity.

Materials and methods.

Adult RC diagnostic criteria.

The adult RC diagnostic criteria5 classify patients into a definite, probable, possible or unlikely RC disorder based on the presence of major and minor criteria for clinical features and laboratory markers of increased mitochondrial content, decreased RC function, molecular data and metabolic indicators of RC dysfunction (tables 1 and 2⇓). A definite diagnosis is defined as the identification of either two major criteria or one major plus two minor criteria. A probable diagnosis is defined as either one major plus one minor criterion or at least three minor criteria. A possible diagnosis is defined as either a single major criterion or two minor criteria, one of which must be clinical. Evidence from at least two relatively independent types of investigation (i.e., clinical, histologic, biochemical, or molecular) is required to establish a definitive diagnosis. This principle was also supported in a previous review of biochemical diagnosis of RC disorders.2

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Table 1 Major diagnostic criteria*

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup

Table 2 Minor diagnostic criteria*

Patients.

We performed a retrospective review of the hospital, genetics, and laboratory records of all patients from the Royal Children’s Hospital in Melbourne referred to the mitochondrial diagnostic laboratory at the Murdoch Institute between January 1994 and January 1997. Of a total of 146 patients, 28 were excluded because of inadequate clinical records (11) or the subsequent confirmation of a nonmitochondrial diagnosis (17). The male/female ratio in the resulting study cohort of 118 patients was 1.4, and the median age at presentation was 10 months (range newborn to 16 years). At the time of the study, 48 patients (40%) had died; the median age at death being 29 months. Each patient’s available data were re-evaluated using the adult criteria. Agreement or disagreement with the assignment of individual criteria was monitored, and the overall certainty of diagnosis based on the adult criteria system was compared with the patient’s previously assigned assessment. Modifications were then proposed to correct systematic errors in the assignment of individual criteria and to improve the overall performance.

Tissues: histology, enzyme, functional, and molecular analysis.

Tissue samples were processed as described previously.6,7⇓ Histology reports from biopsies of skeletal muscle (58 patients), liver (33 patients), and heart (37 patients) were reviewed. RC studies were performed on 173 samples (76 skeletal muscles, 45 livers, 25 fibroblast cell lines, 14 lymphoblast cell lines, and 13 heart muscles) taken from 97 patients, 57 of whom had more than one tissue assayed. Complex I, II, II and III, III, IV, and citrate synthase (CS) activities were assayed in tissues and cell lines as described previously.6,7⇓ Enzyme complex activities were expressed as ratios relative to the CS activity and to the complex II activity for that sample. RC function was assessed by measuring rates of adenosine triphosphate synthesis in permeabilized skin fibroblasts and by determining whether patient fibroblasts could grow in a culture medium containing the slowly metabolized sugar galactose instead of glucose.7 DNA from patient tissues and cell lines was assessed for common mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) point mutations (A3243G, A8344G, T8993G, T8993C) and mtDNA rearrangements, as described previously.6 DNA was extracted from 137 samples (35 skeletal muscles, 20 livers, 1 heart, 22 fibroblast cultures, and 59 lymphocyte or lymphoblast pellets) from 101 patients.

Results.

Clinical features.

Eleven (9.2%) of the patients met the major clinical criterion: eight had Leigh disease, one had Alpers disease, and two had mitochondrial encephalomyopathy, lactic acidosis, and stroke-like episodes (MELAS) syndrome. Of the remaining 107 patients, 88 met the minor clinical criterion. The scoring of clinical features differed from our original interpretation in eight patients (7%). Details are provided in the supplementary table related to this article, which can be found on the Neurology Web site (go to www.neurology.org). Patient 1 presented at 4 weeks of age with vomiting and liver disease, which was followed by progressive neurodegeneration with choreoathetosis, neuropathy, optic atrophy, external ophthalmoplegia, and growth retardation leading to her demise at the age of 4 years. This patient received the same score with the adult criteria as a patient with only a single clinical feature (e.g., cardiomyopathy), highlighting a limitation in the ability of a system based on only major or minor criteria to weigh quantitative and continuous data.

Patients 2 through 8 did not receive any clinical score with the adult criteria but had one or more features consistent with a possible mitochondrial disorder with onset in utero,8 the neonatal period,9 or childhood1 (see details in the online table on the Neurology Web site). The following additional features were identified: unexplained hydrops fetalis or neonatal/infant collapse/death, stillbirth associated with a paucity of intrauterine movement and correlated with thin long bones with multiple fractures, isolated non-neurologic involvement such as liver failure, significant failure to thrive, movement disorder, hypotonia or hypertonia, and significant developmental delay.

Histology.

None of the 67 skeletal muscle biopsies showed true ragged red fibers. Four patients had marked subsarcolemmal accumulation of mitochondria (SSAM; see Patients 9 through 12 in the online table) on electron microscopy (EM), but these findings do not warrant any score in the adult criteria. In children with RC defects, true ragged red fibers are a rare finding, and SSAM is much more common,7 so the scoring of histology differed from our original interpretation in these four patients.

Light microscopy showed abnormal liver pathology in 20 of the 33 patients biopsied; 10 of whom had microvesicular steatosis, whereas the remainder had nonspecific pathologic abnormalities. Only three patients (all with microvesicular steatosis) had significant abnormalities on EM, including an increase in mitochondrial number, abnormal stacking of the cristae, pallor of the matrix, and loss of mitochondrial granules, as previously described.10 These three patients met the minor histology criterion in the adult criteria. Of the 37 heart biopsies reviewed, only one patient with Barth syndrome had widespread EM abnormalities of the mitochondria meriting a minor histology criterion.

Enzyme activity.

Of the 59 patients with skeletal muscle submitted for histochemistry, four had significantly abnormal results on COX histochemistry (one with absent COX activity and three with a mosaic staining pattern). All four met the major enzyme criterion.

An additional 14 patients met the major enzyme criterion of less than 20% residual enzyme activity and 10 patients met the minor enzyme criterion of 20 to 30% residual activity. A number of concerns with this criterion were identified, and the scoring differed from our interpretation for six patients (Patients 13 through 18 in the online table on the Neurology Web site). The results of RC studies for the following two patients exemplify these concerns. Patient 13 was a 10-month-old boy seen for a history of failure to thrive, hypotonia, nystagmus, and lactic acidemia. His residual complex I activity was 30 to 40% in skeletal muscle and fibroblasts and 40% to 50% in liver and lymphoblasts (figure 1). None of the individual results meet the criteria for a minor enzyme code (i.e., 20% to 30% activity), but collectively they appear to warrant at least a minor enzyme code. Patient 14 presented in infancy with cyclical vomiting, cerebellar ataxia, and lactic acidosis. Residual activity of complex IV in fibroblasts and skeletal muscle was just over 20% (figure 2), meriting a minor enzyme code. However, given the consistency of the results, we would interpret them as warranting a major enzyme code.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 1. Respiratory chain enzyme profiles for skeletal muscle (black), liver (gray), lymphoblasts (angled stripes), and fibroblasts (dotted) from Patient 13. Bars represent residual enzyme activities expressed as percentages of control means relative to citrate synthase (CS) activity. Complex III activity was not measured in the liver sample. Complex I CS ratios are all greater than 30%, so the data do not score either a major or minor enzyme criterion, despite complex I activity being less than all other RC enzymes in all four tissues.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 2. Respiratory chain enzyme profiles for skeletal muscle (black) and fibroblasts (dotted) from Patient 14. Bars represent residual enzyme activities expressed as percentages of control means relative to citrate synthase (CS) activity. Complex IV CS ratios are marginally greater than 20% in both tissues so the data score a minor enzyme criterion, despite the complex IV activity being consistently low in both tissues.

Significant levels of residual activity are common in RC disorders, and the enzyme activities are prone to secondary effects,4 making the delineation of circumscribed boundaries difficult. For example, the results of the complex I to CS ratio for all the skeletal muscle biopsies reveal no clear cut-off between normal and abnormal activities (figure 3), and therefore the choice of less than 20% and 20 to 30% as major and minor criteria is arbitrary. Altogether, the scoring of enzyme data by the adult criteria differed from our interpretation in a total of six patients since it did not allow for additivity of results from more than one tissue or for the more robust nature of data from patient cell lines.

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 3. Residual activity of complex I CS ratios in the 66 skeletal muscle biopsies analyzed in this patient series. The values are expressed as a percentage of the normal control mean and arranged in order of increasing activity. Note that the data appear continuous without any obvious cut-off between normal and abnormal values.

Molecular analysis.

The A3243G mutation was identified in blood of two adolescents with typical features of MELAS. This mutation merits a major molecular criterion because it meets the six indicators of pathogenicity outlined by the authors of the adult criteria.5 Since completing this review, we have identified pathogenic mtDNA mutations in two of the complex I–deficient patients (C3303T in Patient 12 and G14459A in a patient with Leigh disease) and pathogenic nuclear gene mutations in one complex IV–deficient patient (SURF1 mutations in Patient 14, see figure 2) and in the patient with Barth syndrome (BTHS gene). The relatively low yield of mtDNA mutation analysis in our pediatric population is in agreement with previous reports.11-13⇓⇓

Metabolic evaluation.

Twenty-six patients received a minor metabolic code for elevated lactate in blood or CSF. Our evaluation of this criterion did not identify any specific problems. However, marginal elevations received the same weight as significant and persistent elevations. The sensitivity and specificity of metabolic investigations could potentially be improved by more comprehensive metabolic screening such as a daily lactate and pyruvate profiles,14 exercise testing,15 or functional imaging studies such as magnetic resonance spectroscopy or PET.5

Functional studies.

Functional studies do not receive any score in the adult criteria, resulting in our disagreement with the scoring in two patients. Fibroblasts from Patient 19 had only 15% of the control mean value for complex I–linked ATP synthesis.7 Fibroblasts from patients 19 and 20 also failed to grow in galactose medium. Relevant functional studies used in other laboratories include oxygen consumption,16,17⇓ fibroblast lactate/pyruvate ratio,18 and oxidation of radiolabeled substrates.19

Discussion.

In the current study we applied the adult criteria for diagnosis of RC disorders5 to pediatric patients suspected of having a RC disorder. This resulted in scoring of individual criteria and final diagnoses in full agreement with our previous interpretation of results for 98 of the 118 patients (83%). The adult criteria classified 12 patients (10%) as having a definite RC defect, 11 (9%) as having a probable RC defect, and 14 (12%) as having a possible RC defect; the remaining 61 patients were classified as unlikely to have a RC defect. Seventeen patients were withdrawn from this study owing to the subsequent confirmation of a non-RC diagnosis. Three would have received a diagnosis of a possible RC disorder if assessed using the adult criteria because they had a minor clinical criterion and a minor metabolic criterion for raised lactate. This suggests that the criteria show high specificity and are unlikely to assign a high certainty of diagnosis to patients presenting with related disorders whose symptoms overlap with those of RC defects.

In 20 patients (17%) the adult criteria interpreted results in a way that differed from our interpretation (summarized in the online table on the Neurology Web site). Of greater importance, in 12 of these 20 patients (60%), we also regarded the final diagnosis as being more certain than that proposed by the adult criteria. The poor sensitivity of the adult criteria in this study was caused by inappropriate interpretation of clinical information in children (Patients 1, 4, and 6); lack of coding for morphologic changes that have more significance in children than in adults (Patients 10 and 11); inappropriate interpretation of RC enzyme studies in tissues and cell lines (Patients 13 through 18); and lack of coding for functional studies (Patient 20).

Based on this assessment we propose modifications to the adult criteria to improve their sensitivity and enable them to be used for pediatric patients as well as adults. Our “general criteria” for diagnosis of RC disorders incorporate the following changes: 1) addition of clinical features of RC disorders found in pediatric patients and removal of the requirement for at least one neurologic feature. We also allowed for additivity of clinical features such that unexplained multisystemic disease that is highly suggestive of a mitochondrial cytopathy may qualify for a major clinical criterion even though it doesn’t fit into the classic RC encephalomyopathies listed elsewhere (see table 1);5 2) recognition of typical SSAM in patients younger than 16 years of age now resulting in a minor histology classification; 3) enzyme criteria allowing for additivity and regarding enzyme activities measured in cell lines as more robust than tissue enzyme activities; and 4) addition of a new criterion for functional studies of the RC (see tables 1 and 2⇑).

A general feature of the adult criteria is difficulty in assigning a major or minor criterion to some clinical features and to data, in particular RC enzyme results, that are more quantitative than qualitative. The adult criteria apply a simple approach to interpretation of RC enzyme activities, specifying arbitrary cut-offs for residual enzyme activities that define major or minor criteria. Actual reference ranges quoted by different centers vary widely depending on the methods used, the type of normal controls, and the method of expressing activity or enzyme ratios. For example, some centers quote normal ranges based on mean ± 2 SD, giving lower limits for normal skeletal muscle complex I activity of 24%,20 25%,21 28%,22 and 51%.23 Others quote observed ranges with lower limits for complex I or complex I CS ratio of 36%,7 40%,24 and 42%.25 The narrowest reported reference range for muscle complex I quotes a lower limit (based on mean ± 2 SD) for the complex I/COX ratio of 79%.26

Distinguishing between normal and abnormal values of RC enzyme activities remains a contentious issue, and the varied approaches used by different centers may make it impractical to develop a consensus on specific cut-offs to delineate major and minor criteria. Nonetheless, despite the arbitrary nature of the adult criteria enzyme cut-offs, for most of the patients in our series they reflected the interpretation that our laboratory had already provided.

It could be argued that RC enzyme activities and RC function may be too reliant on each other to be used as independent criteria. However, substantial numbers of patients with normal enzyme activities have been reported to show abnormal RC function.4 We regard their use as separate criteria as warranted, provided conservative criteria are used for defining RC function in order to avoid borderline or artifactual results contributing to misdiagnosis.

Having modified the adult criteria, we reevaluated the 20 patients in whom there had been a difference between our original assessment and that based on the adult criteria (see the online table). In all 20 patients, the general criteria resulted in the patient being given a new minor or major criterion. The modifications also resulted in a change of diagnosis for 11 (92%) of the 12 patients where disagreement with the final diagnosis occurred. The diagnosis changed from no evidence to possible in three patients, possible to probable in five patients, and probable to definite in another three patients. Thus we were left with only one patient (Patient 20 in the online table) out of our cohort of 118 (0.8%) in whom the overall diagnosis generated by the general criteria differed from our original interpretation. We had previously regarded this boy as having just sufficient evidence to be regarded as a definite RC disorder. The general criteria assigned him four minor criteria (clinical, enzyme, functional, and metabolic) and classified him as having a probable disorder since he lacked any major criteria.

An alternative approach to creating diagnostic criteria with higher sensitivity would be to develop a scheme with multiple levels of certainty (rather than just major and minor) in each category. For example, residual enzyme activities of <10%, 11% to 20%, 21% to 30%, 31% to 40%, and 41% to 50% might score 5, 4, 3, 2, and 1 points. We assessed this scheme and found it dealt with the continuous nature of enzyme and other changes. However, it is more difficult for nonexpert users and may have poor specificity as it could give excess weight to a series of relatively nonspecific findings. Thus, the general criteria are our preferred approach and could provide a step toward the development of consensus criteria.

Acknowledgments

Supported in part by a Centre Grant from the Australian National Health & Medical Research Council (NHMRC). D.R.T. is an NHMRC Senior Research Fellow.

Acknowledgment

The authors thank D. Kirby for enzyme and functional studies, W. Hutchison for SURF1 mutation analysis, Dr. A. Gedeon for BTHS mutation analysis, and all the referring clinicians.

Footnotes

  • Dr. Bernier’s current affiliation is Department of Medical Genetics, University of Calgary, Canada.

  • M.A.C.’s current affiliation is Willink Biochemical Genetics Unit, Manchester, UK.

  • See also page 1402

  • Additional material related to this article can be found on the Neurology Web site. Go to www.neurology.org and scroll down the Table of Contents for the November 12 issue to find the title link for this article.

  • Received September 12, 2001.
  • Accepted July 12, 2002.

References

  1. ↵
    Munnich A, Rotig A, Chretien D, et al. Clinical presentation of mitochondrial disorders in childhood. J Inherit Metab Dis . 1996; 19: 521–527.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  2. ↵
    Trijbels JMF, Scholte HR, Ruitenbeek W, Sengers RCA, Janssen AJM, Busch HFM. Problems with the biochemical diagnosis in mitochondrial (encephalo-)myopathies. Eur J Pediatr . 1993; 152: 178–184.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. ↵
    Thorburn DR. Practical problems in detecting abnormal mitochondrial functions and genomes. Hum Reprod . 2000; 15 (suppl 2): 57–67.
  4. ↵
    Thorburn DR, Smeitink J. Diagnosis of mitochondrial disorders: clinical and biochemical approach. J Inherit Metab Dis . 2001; 24: 312–316.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. ↵
    Walker UA, Collins S, Byrne E. Respiratory chain encephalomyopathies: a diagnostic classification. Eur Neurol . 1996; 36: 260–267.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. ↵
    Rahman S, Blok RB, Dahl HHM, et al. Leigh syndrome: clinical features and biochemical and DNA abnormalities. Ann Neurol . 1996; 39: 343–351.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. ↵
    Kirby DM, Crawford M, Cleary MA, Dahl HHM, Dennett X, Thorburn DR. Respiratory chain complex I deficiency: an underdiagnosed energy generation disorder. Neurology . 1999; 52: 1255–1264.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. ↵
    Laubscher B, Janzer RC, Krahenbuhl S, Hirt L, Deonna T. Ragged-red fibers and complex I deficiency in a neonate with arthrogryposis congenita. Pediatr Neurol . 1997; 17: 249–251.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. ↵
    Sue CM, Hirano M, DiMauro S, De Vivo DC. Neonatal presentations of mitochondrial metabolic disorders. Semin Perinatol . 1999; 23: 113–124.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  10. ↵
    Chow CW, Thorburn DR. Morphological correlates of mitochondrial dysfunction. Hum Reprod . 2000; 15 (suppl 2): 68–78.
  11. ↵
    Shoffner JM. Maternal inheritance and the evaluation of oxidative phosphorylation diseases. Lancet . 1996; 348: 1283–1288.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. ↵
    Lamont PJ, Surtees R, Woodward CE, Leonard JV, Wood NW, Harding AE. Clinical and laboratory findings in referrals for mitochondrial DNA analysis. Arch Dis Child . 1998; 79: 22–27.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  13. ↵
    Liang MH, Wong LJ. Yield of mtDNA mutation analysis in 2,000 patients. Am J Med Genet . 1998; 77: 395–400.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  14. ↵
    Munnich A, Rustin P. Clinical spectrum and diagnosis of mitochondrial disorders. Am J Med Genet (Semin Med Genet) . 2001; 106: 4–17.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Taivassalo T, Abbott A, Wyrick P, Haller RG. Venous oxygen levels during aerobic forearm exercise: an index of impaired oxidative metabolism in mitochondrial myopathy. Ann Neurol . 2002; 51: 38–44.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  16. ↵
    Tulinius MH, Holme E, Kristiansson B, Larsson NG, Oldfors A. Mitochondrial encephalomyopathies in childhood : 1. Biochemical and morphologic investigations. J Pediatr . 1991; 119: 242–250.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. ↵
    Bourgeron T, Chretien D, Rotig A, Munnich A, Rustin P. Isolation and characterization of mitochondria from human B-lymphoblastoid cell lines. Biochem Biophys Res Commun . 1992; 186: 16–23.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  18. ↵
    Robinson BH. Human complex I deficiency: clinical spectrum and involvement of oxygen free radicals in the pathogenicity of the defect. Biochim Biophys Acta . 1998; 1364: 271–286.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. ↵
    Trijbels FJ, Ruitenbeek W, Huizing M, Wendel U, Smeitink JA, Sengers RC. Defects in the mitochondrial energy metabolism outside the respiratory chain and the pyruvate dehydrogenase complex. Mol Cell Biochem . 1997; 174: 243–247.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  20. ↵
    Morris AA, Leonard JV, Brown GK, et al. Deficiency of respiratory chain complex I is a common cause of Leigh disease. Ann Neurol . 1996; 40: 25–30.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. ↵
    Zheng X, Shoffner JM, Voljavec AS, Wallace DC. Evaluation of procedures for assaying oxidative phosphorylation enzyme activities in mitochondrial myopathy muscle biopsies. Biochim Biophys Acta . 1990; 1019: 1–10.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  22. ↵
    Pitkanen S, Merante F, Mcleod DR, Applegarth D, Tong T, Robinson BH. Familial cardiomyopathy with cataracts and lactic acidosis: a defect in complex I (NADH-dehydrogenase) of the mitochondria respiratory chain. Pediatr Res . 1996; 39: 513–521.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  23. ↵
    Birch-Machin MA, Briggs HL, Saborido AA, Bindoff LA, Turnbull DM. An evaluation of the measurement of the activities of complexes I-IV in the respiratory chain of human skeletal muscle mitochondria. Biochem Med Metab Biol . 1994; 51: 35–42.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. ↵
    Bentlage HA, Wendel U, Schagger H, ter Laak HJ, Janssen AJ, Trijbels JM. Lethal infantile mitochondrial disease with isolated complex I deficiency in fibroblasts but with combined complex I and IV deficiencies in muscle. Neurology . 1996; 47: 243–248.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  25. ↵
    Rotig A, de Lonlay P, Chretien D, et al. Aconitase and mitochondrial iron-sulphur protein deficiency in Friedreich ataxia. Nat Genet . 1997; 17: 215–217.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  26. ↵
    Chretien D, Rustin P, Bourgeron T, Rotig A, Saudubray JM, Munnich A. Reference charts for respiratory chain activities in human tissues. Clin Chim Acta . 1994; 228: 53–70.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed

Letters: Rapid online correspondence

No comments have been published for this article.
Comment

REQUIREMENTS

If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org

Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.

If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.

Submission specifications:

  • Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
  • Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
  • Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
  • Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
  • Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.

More guidelines and information on Disputes & Debates

Compose Comment

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
NOTE: The first author must also be the corresponding author of the comment.
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Publishing Agreement
NOTE: All authors, besides the first/corresponding author, must complete a separate Publishing Agreement Form and provide via email to the editorial office before comments can be posted.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

You May Also be Interested in

Back to top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Materials and methods.
    • Results.
    • Discussion.
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Advertisement

SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Safety in Guillain-Barré Syndrome, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy, and Multifocal Motor Neuropathy

Dr. Jeffrey Allen and Dr. Nicholas Purcell

► Watch

Related Articles

  • Mitochondrial disordersA proposal for consensus diagnostic criteria in infants and children

Topics Discussed

  • All Pediatric
  • Mitochondrial disorders
  • Metabolic disease (inherited)
  • Muscle disease

Alert Me

  • Alert me when eletters are published

Recommended articles

  • Articles
    Mitochondrial disorders
    A proposal for consensus diagnostic criteria in infants and children
    Nicole I. Wolf, Jan A.M. Smeitink et al.
    Neurology, November 12, 2002
  • Articles
    Respiratory chain complex I deficiency
    An underdiagnosed energy generation disorder
    D.M. Kirby, M. Crawford, M.A. Cleary et al.
    Neurology, April 01, 1999
  • Article
    Novel Mutation m.10372A>G in MT-ND3 Causing Sensorimotor Axonal Polyneuropathy
    Helene Bruhn, Kristin Samuelsson, Florian A. Schober et al.
    Neurology: Genetics, March 15, 2021
  • Articles
    Respiratory‐chain enzyme activities in isolated mitochondria of lymphocytes from untreated Parkinson's disease patients
    M. A. Martín, J. A. Molina, F. J. Jiménez-Jiménez et al.
    Neurology, May 01, 1996
Neurology: 100 (12)

Articles

  • Ahead of Print
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Popular Articles
  • Translations

About

  • About the Journals
  • Ethics Policies
  • Editors & Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise

Submit

  • Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Information for Reviewers
  • AAN Guidelines
  • Permissions

Subscribers

  • Subscribe
  • Activate a Subscription
  • Sign up for eAlerts
  • RSS Feed
Site Logo
  • Visit neurology Template on Facebook
  • Follow neurology Template on Twitter
  • Visit Neurology on YouTube
  • Neurology
  • Neurology: Clinical Practice
  • Neurology: Education
  • Neurology: Genetics
  • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • AAN.com
  • AANnews
  • Continuum
  • Brain & Life
  • Neurology Today

Wolters Kluwer Logo

Neurology | Print ISSN:0028-3878
Online ISSN:1526-632X

© 2023 American Academy of Neurology

  • Privacy Policy
  • Feedback
  • Advertise