Mania following deep brain stimulation for Parkinson’s disease
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

Abstract
Three patients with PD developed manic behavior after bilateral implantation of electrodes for deep-brain stimulation (DBS). Common to all three patients were manic symptoms unremitting after levodopa reduction or stimulation “off,” lower electrodes positioning caudal to the subthalamic nucleus area, postoperative DBS with the lower contacts (0) of the quadripolar electrodes, and resolution of the manic episodes coinciding with stimulation through higher contacts.
Depression is a relatively frequent adverse effect of functional neurosurgery in PD. Transient depression induced by deep-brain stimulation (DBS) of the left substantia nigra has been reported in a PD patient with electrodes targeting the subthalamic nucleus (STN) area.1 Among our first 15 consecutive patients with PD receiving STN-DBS (June 1999 to December 2000), we identified three patients who instead developed manic symptoms (elation, inflated self-esteem, overactivity, logorrhea with flight of ideas, sexual indiscretion, and insomnia) within 48 hours after the implantation of bilateral electrodes targeted to the STN.
Cases.
All patients had presurgical motor fluctuations with disabling “on” dyskinesias and severe parkinsonism in “off” periods (table 1). None had a history of psychiatric disorders, impaired cognition, or mood fluctuations with dopaminergic drugs. The quadripolar electrodes (DBS 3389, Medtronic, Minneapolis, MN) were implanted stereotactically in a single operative session using microelectrode confirmation. The STN target was defined by brain CT, and the postoperative location of the electrodes was confirmed by MRI. All preoperative medications continued to be given at the same doses, and DBS with the lower contact of the electrodes (see table 1) was initiated after 24 hours using external screener stimulators (Medtronic, 3625) and, at day 7, 2 subcutaneous programmable pulse generators (ITREL 2, 7424, Medtronic). There was no rationale for the unusual practice of initially stimulating through the lowest contact in each patient other than the routine taken from our previous experience in DBS of the pars interna of the globus pallidus. Active electrode contacts and stimulation parameters were progressively adjusted in the follow-up and resulted in significant improvement in parkinsonism (see table 1). The initial monopolar stimulation through the lower contacts of the quadripolar electrodes was changed in each patient at the end of the 1st postoperative week because they all showed a better motor response with higher contacts. In all three cases, this change was followed by a gradual resolution of mania over the following week. The diagnoses of mania were based on Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition2 (DSM-IV), and severity was assessed with the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS).3 Blinded raters of the postsurgical MRI and the microrecording charts of the 15 STN-DBS patients correctly identified the three manic patients by both a lower positioning of the tip of the electrodes at the midbrain level surpassing the substantia nigra reticulata and a longer presumed STN activity in the microrecording (extending in all three manic patients from 0 to 70 mm), suggestive of excessive deepening of the tip of the electrode. A more precise anatomic localization of the tip of the electrode was made difficult by artifacts.
Table 1 Characteristics of the three patients with secondary mania after subthalamic surgery
Illustrative case report (Patient 1).
A 49-year-old man developed euphoria the day after electrode implantation approximately 2 hours after the beginning of DBS stimulation. Forty-eight hours after the intervention, he also showed logorrhea with press of speech, overactivity, and increased sexual drive. He repeatedly asked why he had not been operated on earlier. He demanded immediate discharge from the hospital because he “had never felt so good” and argued that he wanted to take a plane to complete a business deal. He also had grandiose delusions but no hallucinations. The manic syndrome was persistent throughout the day; there was no relation with the timing of the antiparkinsonian drugs, and no mood changes were evidenced during brief test periods (∼ 30 minutes) of stimulation “off.” Manic symptoms also persisted after reducing antiparkinsonian drugs on the 3rd postoperative day (table 2). The DBS parameters of the bipolar external stimulator, however, were maintained unchanged until the internalization of the two programmable pulse generators. On the 5th postoperative day, the patient obtained high scores (33 points) on the YMRS,3 indicating the persistence of manic behavior. No immediate mood changes were observed at day 7 after internalization of the generators using monopolar stimulation through contacts 0 (see table 2). The DBS parameters were changed at day 8 with no more stimulation through the lower contacts. On the following 2 days, overactivity and disturbances in mood partially improved, and the patient was discharged 10 days after surgery without mood stabilizers. Hypomania resolved few days after discharge. During this time, antiparkinsonian drug dose and stimulation parameters remained unchanged, with persistent improvement in parkinsonism.
Table 2 Characteristics of the deep brain stimulation of the three patients
At the control visit at month 10, left foot dyskinesias similar to that from the presurgical period appeared. After many trials with different electrode combinations, monopolar stimulation through the lower right contact was found to have a better antidyskinetic and antiparkinsonian effect. However, he became elated a few hours after DBS recombination (see table 2). On the 3rd day, he was again euphoric, developed inappropriate sexual behavior, and scored 20 points on the YMRS.3 Although mild right leg dyskinesias reappeared, hypomania resolved the day after a new right monopolar DBS combination using higher contacts was initiated. No other mood or behavioral changes appeared in a 6 month-follow-up using the same DBS parameters.
Discussion.
All three patients fulfilled DSM-IV diagnostic criteria for manic disorder due to a general medical condition2 because all had the classic features of mania (i.e., elation, overactivity, grandiose delusions) in the absence of impaired consciousness or hallucinations. Although the behavioral change could represent a psychological reaction to improvement in mobility4 after surgery or successful outcome of a life-threatening intervention, the current findings suggest that the misplacement of electrodes at the midbrain level—probably surpassing the substantia nigra reticulata—and the initiation of DBS with the lowest contacts were responsible for the manic behavior. The artifact induced by the electrodes makes the exact position of the tip of the electrode uncertain (figure). However, the electrode trajectory spared the limbic-related regions (orbitofrontal and basotemporal cortex, thalamus),5-7⇓⇓ previously linked with the emergence of manic behavior after brain injury. In our three cases, DBS might have affected projections destined from the midbrain to the orbitofrontal or anterior cingulate striato-pallido-thalamo-cortical circuits or fibers from the ventral tegmental area to the limbic striatum, causing symptoms typical of mania.5-8⇓⇓⇓ Intracranial stimulation of the ventral midbrain in experimental animals elicits self-stimulation, flight, ambivalence, and other complex behaviors that are phylogenetically involved in the development of motor and cognitive functions and likely also in the behavioral manifestations of major psychiatric illnesses.9 The tip of the electrode in our patients—caudal to the STN—might have affected one or more of the described neuroanatomic projections to the periaqueductal gray and its connections, mediating their behavioral alterations.9
Figure. Postoperative coronal T1-weighted MRI of Patient 1 illustrating the position of the deep brain electrodes in the midbrain (similar in Patients 2 and 3).
The fact that in all three cases manic episodes were observed only after the stimulation was turned “on,” the recurrence of the manic syndrome after repeating the stimulation with the lower right contact, coupled with the disappearance of the manic state after modifying the stimulation to higher contacts in Patient 1 lend support to a stimulation effect. Nevertheless, the concurrent edema and partial lesion effect due to the implantation procedure may constitute a favorable scenario for mania to develop in the first postoperative days.
Contrarily, as it occurred with transient depression associated with DBS in the left substantia nigra reticulata in an earlier study,1 mood changes in all our three patients did not rapidly return to euthymia when the stimulation was turned off. Thus, we reasoned that systematic trials of stimulation trying to reproduce mania using the lower contacts might put our patients at risk for lengthy mood changes.
The question also arises why DBS induced transient acute depression in a previous case1 but induced mania in our three patients. Although this is not easy to solve because our knowledge about the action of DBS on neurotransmission is still limited,10 manic behavior in our patients would be the expected reaction if DBS enhances dopaminergic transmission facilitating strong positive emotional states (i.e., elation). Depression and mania are the opposite poles of a continuum of mood changes that may alternate in the same patient as a result of oscillatory changes in brain dopamine release,8 presumably associated in these PD cases to local changes induced by DBS in midbrain structures. Moreover, relatively subtle differences in electrode placement may cause the effects of DBS to largely surpass the nigra reticulata spreading to the retrorubral region and other ventral midbrain regions,9 such as the ventral tegmental area, as well as to other nondopaminergic nuclei, thus explaining contrasting mood responses (mania or depression).
Acknowledgments
Supported in part by grant Marató-TV3 025/97.
Footnotes
-
See also pages 1298, 1425, and 1427
-
Presented in abstract form at the 53rd annual meeting of the American Academy of Neurology; Philadelphia, PA; April 2001.
- Received July 20, 2001.
- Accepted May 16, 2002.
References
- ↵
- ↵
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th ed. Washington, DC. 1994.
- ↵
Young RC, Biggs JT, Ziegler VE, Meyer DA. A mania rating scale for mania: reliability, validity and sensitivity. Br J Psychiatry . 1978; 133: 429–435.
- ↵
- ↵
Kulisevsky J, Berthier ML, Pujol J. Hemiballismus and secondary mania following a right thalamic infarction. Neurology . 1993; 43: 1422–1424.
- ↵
- ↵
Kulisevsky J, Avila A, Berthier ML. Bipolar affective disorder and unilateral parkinsonism after brainstem infarction. Mov Disord . 1995; 10: 799–802.
- ↵
Swerdlow NR, Koob GF. Dopamine, schizophrenia, mania, and depression: toward a unified hypothesis of corticostriato-pallido-thalamic function. Behav Brain Sci . 1987; 10: 197–245.
- ↵
- ↵
Ashby P. What does stimulation in the brain actually do? Prog Neurol Surg . 2000; 15: 236–245.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Hemiplegic Migraine Associated With PRRT2 Variations A Clinical and Genetic Study
Dr. Robert Shapiro and Dr. Amynah Pradhan