Subacute meningoencephalitis in a subset of patients with AD after Aβ42 immunization
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

Abstract
Background: AD is characterized by cerebral deposition of β-amyloid plaques with amyloid β-peptide (Aβ) 42 as the major peptide constituent, along with neurofibrillary tangles and neuronal loss. In transgenic mice, active immunization against Aβ42 removes these plaques and improves cognitive function. A Phase I study in AD patients demonstrated good safety and tolerability of multiple injections of aggregated Aβ42 (AN1792) with QS-21 as adjuvant.
Methods: Three hundred seventy-two patients with mild to moderate AD were randomized to receive IM injections of AN1792 or placebo (4:1) at baseline and at months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 in a multicenter Phase II safety, tolerability, and pilot efficacy study. Dosing was terminated after four early reports of meningoencephalitis, but follow-up continued. The study remains blinded, and further results will be reported after its termination.
Results: Symptoms and laboratory findings consistent with meningoencephalitis occurred in 18 of 298 (6%) patients treated with AN1792 compared with 0 of 74 on placebo (p = 0.020). Sixteen of the 18 had received two doses, one had received one dose, and one had received three doses of the study drug before symptoms occurred. The median latency from the first and last injections to symptoms was 75 and 40 days. No case occurred later than 6 months after the first immunization. Anti-Aβ42 antibody titers were not correlated with the occurrence or severity of symptoms or relapses. Twelve patients recovered to or close to baseline within weeks, whereas six remain with disabling cognitive or neurologic sequelae. All 18 patients remain alive to date (December 31, 2002), 6 months to >1 year after symptom onset.
Conclusions: Postvaccination meningoencephalitis occurred without clear relation to serum anti-Aβ42 antibody titers. Potential mechanisms such as T-cell and microglial activation may be responsible and are under consideration to develop a safer anti-Aβ immunotherapy for AD.
AD is characterized by progressive memory loss, cognitive decline, and loss of functional abilities, ultimately leading to complete dependency and death. It affects approximately 30 million people worldwide.1 Although acetylcholinesterase inhibitors are efficient as symptomatic therapy for AD, they do not stop or reverse disease progression, so there is currently no cure for this devastating illness. Much evidence supports the central role of the amyloid β-peptide (Aβ) 42 in the pathogenesis of AD.2,3⇓ Thus, treatment strategies aimed at reducing the formation or promoting the clearance of Aβ42 are being developed with the aim of halting the progression of the disease process.
Active immunization against preaggregated Aβ42 effectively reduced the amount of β-amyloid plaques in the brains of transgenic mice expressing the mutations implicated in dominantly inherited AD.4,5⇓ After immunization with Aβ42, a reduction in Aβ neuropathology4,6,7⇓⇓ and improvements in cognitive performance were reported, with8,9⇓ or without10 a reduction of the amyloid deposits in the brain. Based on these preclinical findings and after extensive preclinical safety studies in several species, immunization with preaggregated synthetic Aβ42 (AN1792) combined with the immunogenic adjuvant QS-21 was tested in Phase I studies which demonstrated good safety and tolerability in 104 AD patients treated with single or multiple doses of AN1792 or with QS-21 alone and elicited a detectable rise of anti-Aβ42 antibodies in about 25% of patients who received AN1792.11 Thus, an international, multicenter Phase II study of active immunotherapy with Aβ42 (AN1792) plus QS-21 as adjuvant was initiated in 2001 to evaluate its safety, tolerability, and pilot clinical efficacy.
Dosing was terminated in January 2002 after signs, symptoms, and laboratory findings consistent with meningoencephalitis were reported in four patients treated with AN1792.12 Thorough clinical follow-up and monitoring of the nonaffected patients are continuing under blinded conditions. This article provides an overview of the design of the Phase II study and describes in detail or summarizes in tables the case histories of patients who developed manifestations of meningoencephalitis, including clinical signs and symptoms, CSF abnormalities, serum antibody titers, MRI findings, and outcome.
Patients and methods.
Patients.
Eligible patients were aged 50 to 85 years and met the clinical criteria for a diagnosis of probable AD according to National Institute of Neurological and Communication Disorders and Stroke/Alzheimer’s Disease and Related Disorders Association criteria.13 A baseline MRI was required to support the diagnosis of AD and to exclude other structural causes of dementia. Additional criteria included a score of 15 to 26 on the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE),14 a Rosen modified ischemic score of ≤4 to exclude vascular dementia, and written, informed consent from the patient and patient’s caregiver. Nonprescription or prescription medications other than acetylcholinesterase inhibitors for cognitive enhancement were not permitted in the 3-month period prior to inclusion. The study was carried out according to the Declaration of Helsinki and subsequent revisions and was approved by appropriate local or national ethics committees.
Study design.
This multicenter, randomized, parallel, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was undertaken in 30 centers in the USA and Europe. It was scheduled to run for 2 years, including screening, enrollment, follow-up, and analysis. A total of 372 patients with mild to moderate AD were randomized to receive active treatment or placebo in a 4:1 ratio, with the aim of achieving a final 1:1 comparison of patients with an AN1792 antibody response vs placebo.
The planned immunization schedule involved injections in the deltoid muscle (0.5 mL) of 225 μg AN1792 (synthetic, preaggregated Aβ42) combined with 50 μg QS-21 (immunogenic adjuvant) or saline placebo (saline solution without adjuvant) at baseline and at months 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12.
The primary outcome measures were safety and tolerability, the AD Assessment Scale—Cognitive to assess changes in memory and other cognitive functions, and MRI scanning to evaluate change in whole-brain volume. Immunogenicity was assessed by ELISA analysis of serum samples for anti-AN1792 antibody titers at baseline and at monthly intervals thereafter. CSF levels of anti-AN1792, tau, and Aβ were also evaluated at baseline and planned for evaluation at the end of the trial. Safety monitoring throughout the study was assessed by adverse event (AE) reporting, physical and neurologic examinations, vital signs, and standard laboratory evaluations.
Statistical methods.
After suspension of active dosing because of the first reports of serious CNS AE described herein, the blind was broken for the serious AE (SAE) cases. As the study remains blinded for the non-SAE cases, the statistics for this report are limited to 1) comparisons of the probability of occurrence of these SAE cases in the actively immunized vs placebo group and comparisons within groups with the Fisher’s exact test, two tailed; and 2) comparisons of the frequency of occurrence with the χ2 test between Europe and the USA and between France, other European countries, and the USA.
Results.
Enrollment of patients began in October 2001 and continued through December 2001. Active dosing of the study drug was suspended by the Safety Monitoring Committee on January 11, 2002, after the first reports of four patients who developed signs and symptoms consistent with aseptic meningoencephalitis during the preceding 3 weeks. At that time, most of the 372 patients had received two injections (338), whereas 4 had only one injection and 30 had received three injections. All SAE cases were included in the investigational new drug safety reports. To date (December 31, 2002), 18 patients have been withdrawn from the study because they developed meningoencephalitis (table 1). The latency period from the last injection to symptom onset varied from 5 to 71 days (median 40 days) with two outliers at 156 and 168 days. The time from the first injection to onset of symptoms varied from 16 to about 100 days, excluding the two outliers (median 75 days). The most delayed case (Patient 18) was retrospectively identified as having occurred 195 days after the first injection. No case was reported >6 months after the last injection during the 1-year scheduled follow-up (figure 1). The blind was broken for these patients, and all had received AN1792. Blinding stays unbroken for most of the other 355 patients, including some patients who have elected to stop participation in the study. Monitoring of patients in the study continued for 12 months after the baseline evaluation until the last scheduled follow-up, and the last protocol-scheduled follow-up visit was on December 17, 2002. As the study remains blinded, no definitive statement can be made about injection site reactions and whether they unblinded to the investigators: Mild to moderate pain occurred in some patients in the Phase I 102 study, but as all raters in the current study were blinded to AE data, it is unlikely that these local reactions may have biased the diagnosis of meningoencephalitis.
Table 1 Patient characteristics
Figure 1. Schematic representation of serum antibody titers in temporal relation to scheduled immunizations and the time to onset of symptoms. With the exception of Patient 2 (one dose) and Patient 7 (three doses), all patients received two immunizations with AN1792 plus QS-21 as adjuvant before dosing was discontinued. No case occurred later than 6 months after the last immunization. Filled circles = experience onset; LOD = below lower assay limit of detection (50 ELISA U/mL); ED = sample taken at early discontinuation visit, not at monthly visit; Month 3: only one patient (Case 7) received a third injection.
Eighteen of 298 immunized patients developed postimmunization aseptic meningoencephalitis (6%; 95% CI = 3.3 to 8.7%). This proportion is significantly higher than in the placebo group (0/74; Fisher’s exact test, p = 0.03). There was no difference in the frequency of meningoencephalitis between Europe (12/160 exposed) and the USA (6/138) with stratified randomization (χ2 = 1.30, p = 0.25) and between France (6/97), other Europe (6/103), and the USA (6/172) when all patients enrolled were included (χ2 = 1.28, p = 0.25). Most of the cases diagnosed with meningoencephalitis presented with progressively increased confusion, headache, or lethargy. Other symptoms have been varied but consistent with possible meningitis and encephalitis, for example, fever, nausea, vomiting, seizures, drowsiness, disorientation, ataxia, difficult walking, decreased alertness, hemiparesis, and aphasia or speechlessness (see the case vignettes and table 1). The course was monophasic in most cases; four patients experienced relapses, which were severe in two cases.
CSF was studied in 17 of the 18 cases. With the exception of Patient 14, who had a CSF white blood cell count of 3 cells/μL, all 17 had mononuclear pleocytosis (71 to 100% lymphocytes) with an initial white blood cell count that ranged from 15 to 130 cells/μL. Maximum protein content was between 0.33 and 3.1 g/L. Glucose level was between 3.3 and 5.4 mmol/L. With the exception of one patient, no oligoclonal bands were initially reported at electrophoresis; another case had oligoclonal bands at a later time. Virology was negative in most and slightly positive for herpes simplex virus (HSV) 1 in only one case. No bacteria were found in any case. IgG content was markedly elevated in three of four patients in whom it was tested, up to 98 mg/L.
ELISA titrations of anti-Aβ antibodies in CSF were performed in a subset of this meningoencephalitis cohort. Of the symptomatic patients, five have only baseline, four have only follow-up samples, and four have both. None of the baseline data are positive. The results for the follow-up cases show that six of the eight tested have elevated anti-AN1792 IgG titers and four have elevated IgM titers in CSF samples.
The cases have varied substantially in severity: Twelve patients have recovered to or close to their baseline status, whereas six have persistent disabling cognitive worsening, two of whom also have focal neurologic sequelae, extensive and severe in one case (table 2⇓). All of these patients remain alive at the time of this report. The MRI findings with and without contrast have been variable: A few patients showed only meningeal enhancement, whereas others had meningeal thickening, white matter lesions, with or without enhancing or edema, and a majority had posterior cerebral cortical or cerebellar lesions (see table 2⇓). None of the cases had a hemorrhagic component visible at MRI. With the exception of Patients 2 and 7, who received one and three immunizations, patients who experienced SAE received two doses of the study drug before symptom onset. Most patients were initially treated with antiviral therapy and antibacterials until an infectious etiology was ruled out. Some patients also received IV corticosteroids empirically, at variable doses and duration, the response to which was also variable but resulted in some level of improvement in most. Two patients (Patients 2 and 3) with severe signs and symptoms who did not respond to corticosteroid therapy received plasmapheresis. Patient 3 was reported as definitely having a positive response, whereas Patient 2 may have had a modest response, but this was not clear even after seven runs of plasmapheresis.
Table 2 Summary of clinical signs and MRI scans in patients experiencing encephalitis
Table 2 Continued
Analysis of serum samples by ELISA indicated that 15 of the 18 patients experiencing meningoencephalitis had antibodies against AN1792 (see figure 1). Serum IgG was not detectable in Patients 1, 17, and 18, although Patient 1 had a measurable IgM titer at the early discontinuation visit. All serum IgM levels in the meningoencephalitis patients were positive, though some are only minimally so.
Case vignettes.
The case histories of two patients representative of the spectrum of clinical, brain imaging, and CSF manifestations encountered in the series are described in detail below. These and the other reported cases are summarized in tables 1 and 2⇑⇑, in chronologic order of reporting.
Patient 2.
A 67-year-old man with mild AD (MMSE = 21) presented 16 days after the first injection of AN1792 with a 2-day history of frontal headache, nausea, and vomiting, but no fever. He developed weakness of the left leg and difficulty with balance and gait. The weakness progressed to involve the left arm, and he was admitted to the hospital the following day with a left hemiparesis and temporal–spatial disorientation. Two days later, he developed a right facial paralysis and lost the ability to swallow. He became less responsive but remained afebrile. CSF showed a marked elevation of protein (1.2 g/L), with normal glucose level and a white cell count of 165/μL (95% lymphocytes). A CT scan on day 3 revealed widespread subcortical periventricular hypodensity of the white matter, cortical atrophy, and ventricular enlargement. MRI showed widespread subcortical hyperintensities on fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences in both hemispheres (figure 2A). Acyclovir therapy was initiated because of a positive test (later proven false) for HSV in the CSF. By day 5, the patient still had reduced consciousness and a left spastic hemiparesis. He was diagnosed as having acute disseminated encephalitis, probably postimmunization. On day 7, cognitive function became profoundly decreased, and the patient became mute and bedridden. Anti-AN1792 serum IgG measured at the onset was at 2,213 ELISA U. A repeat MRI scan was consistent with meningoencephalitis, including cerebellitis (see figure 2B). On day 16, the patient developed acute dyspnea with left pulmonary atelectasis, hypoxia, and hypocapnia. Antimicrobial therapy was initiated, together with a 4-day regimen of high-dose (1 g/day) IV methylprednisolone (MP) when HSV infection had been ruled out. By the second day of steroid therapy, the patient awakened, although the left-sided motor deficit persisted. An additional 3-day course of IV MP was begun on day 29, but there was no further improvement and his diabetes became severely decompensated. His neurologic status worsened around day 52 with new bilateral cortical–subcortical lesions on MRI, predominantly in the right frontal lobe and the left temporal lobe (see figure 2C). After a cerebral sinus thrombosis was ruled out by MRI, a series of plasmapheresis runs was started, with a total of seven treatments over 2 weeks. The patient’s level of consciousness continued to fluctuate, and akinesia with left hemiplegia persisted. On day 74, the patient was transferred to a rehabilitation ward with a persistent severe left hemiplegia, akinesia, and loss of speech. At the time of this report, >12 months after the initial onset of symptoms, he remains hospitalized and totally dependent, although his level of consciousness and language continue to improve slowly. His most recent MRI showed bilateral widespread supratentorial white matter lesions (see figure 2D).
Figure 2. Serial brain MRI scans of Patient 2. A set of fast fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR; repetition time = 11,000 milliseconds, echo time = 140 milliseconds, inversion time = 2,500 milliseconds) T2-weighted images performed 22 days (A1 and A2), 41 days (B1 and B2), 64 days (C1 and C2), 87 days (D), and 170 days (E) after immunization. (A) Presence of high signal intensities in the subcortical white matter and in the central sulcus (A1); numerous high signal intensities in the deep white matter (A2). (B) All sulci present an increased signal intensity that is related to the presence of protein in the CSF (B1); new lesions in the white matter of the right cerebellar peduncle (B2). (C) Worsening in the number and location of the lesions, now affecting the white matter and the gray matter of the cerebral (C1) and the cerebellar cortex (C2), while the lesions in the cerebellar peduncle have disappeared. (D) Extensive new lesions in the deep posterior white matter also affecting the adjacent cortex. (E) New lesions in the deep frontal white matter, while some lesions in the posterior white matter disappeared. (Courtesy of Prof. Vincent Dousset, trial neuroradiologist).
Patient 7.
An 83-year-old woman presented with fever 5 days after receiving her third dose of AN1792. The following day, she awoke extremely confused, shivering, and akinetic, but without headache, visual disturbances, or focal weakness. She was admitted to the hospital where a diagnosis of community-acquired pneumonia was considered, and treatment with gatifloxacin was initiated. By the third day after presentation, the patient still had a mild fever, although she was more alert, coherent, and closer to baseline. MRI performed on day 4 showed a right cortical–subcortical abnormality, suggesting a subacute infarction. CSF findings indicated mild meningitis, and tests for HSV-1 and -2 were negative. On day 8, the patient was afebrile, and a clinical diagnosis of encephalopathy related to aseptic meningitis was made. The patient was still lethargic, speechless, and unable to follow commands on day 10. Four weeks after the initial presentation, she was alert and oriented to time, place, and person, walked with assistance, and had a mild receptive aphasia. On day 35, she began experiencing hallucinations, which continued for several days. At a follow-up visit 123 days after symptom onset, she had become clinically stable. In a later follow-up, she had recovered to her baseline condition.
Discussion.
The subacute aseptic meningoencephalitis described in this report, which prompted cessation of the active dosing of AN1792, is probably a side effect of active anti-Aβ immunization, as it occurred only in patients who received active drug and meningoencephalitis is not a known complication of AD itself. This complication was unexpected, as it had not been observed in the preclinical studies or in the Phase I clinical trials in which AN1792 and QS-21 were administered alone and in combination.11 It occurred mostly (16/18 patients) within 3 months after the first injection and not later than 6 months after the last one. It was more often self-limiting within a few weeks, but relapses occurred in four patients within months and severe sequelae persisted in six after 6 to 12 months of follow-up.
Meningoencephalitis occurred in 16 of the 18 cases after two injections, after one injection in one (Patient 2, the most severely affected patient), and after three injections in one case (Patient 7, who had a favorable outcome). Thus, there is no obvious relationship between the number of injections and the severity of the postvaccination meningoencephalitis. Serum IgG against AN1792 was not detectable in three patients, and there was no consistent correlation of antibody titers with the delay to symptom onset, the severity of encephalitis, or the occurrence of relapses. None of these cases had any hemorrhagic component at brain imaging, in contrast to a report of increased cerebral microhemorrhage and hematomas in APP23 transgenic mice with cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA) passively immunized against human Aβ,15 a model naturally prone to cerebral hemorrhage. Microhemorrhages and small hematomas like those reported in this mouse model may not have been large enough to be detected by MRI in our patients. However, only three patients of 372 in the whole trial experienced a cerebral hemorrhage during the course of the study: one under placebo and two under active treatment (one hemorrhagic infarction and one possibly of the CAA type). These two cases had no features in common with the complication described in this article.
This postvaccination meningoencephalitis series has several features in common with the rare syndrome of delayed postvaccination meningoencephalomyelitis,16 which occurs in 1 of 1,000,000 measles vaccinations,17 and the more frequent postinfection acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM),18,19⇓ which occurs in about 1 of 1,000 cases of measles.20 The clinical presentation of some of our cases is similar to that of ADEM, with the acute or subacute onset of fever with symptoms and signs of diffuse or multifocal CNS involvement. ADEM consists of a monophasic, self-limiting course in a majority of cases but sometimes follows a relapsing course,21 as in our Patients 2, 3, 17, and 18. For some authors, MRI abnormalities are mandatory for the diagnosis of ADEM22 or are consistently found,18 whereas for others, they are not.23 When MRI abnormalities are present, some of the parenchymal MRI aspects of ADEM are similar to those of our cases.22,24⇓
The syndrome reported here, however, differs from ADEM in several respects. First, ADEM was described mainly in children22,24⇓ and young adults,19,23,25⇓⇓ whereas the patients in this series were from 61 to 84 years old (see table 1). Second, the syndrome reported here occurred with a median delay of 75 days (minimum of 16 days) after the first immunization, the two most delayed cases as late as 6 and 6.5 months, in contrast to the typical 6- to 15-day onset of ADEM after an infectious episode or vaccination.23 Third, there was no clinical or MRI evidence of myelitis in our cases. In addition, cranial nerve palsies and optic neuritis frequently occur in ADEM,23,25⇓ but they did not appear in any of our cases. Finally, the almost consistent CSF meningeal reaction in our cases was absent in half the reported cases of ADEM.19,23⇓ Nevertheless, ADEM is a heterogeneous disorder, and some of the cases described as such in the literature in older adults are similar to those described here.
At this stage, we can only speculate about the role of abnormal cellular or humoral immunoreactions in the pathogenesis of the postvaccination CNS reaction associated with Aβ immunization. The antibodies generated in the blood of vaccinated patients showed a high specificity for the Aβ in the plaques and blood vessels of the brain.26 There was neither a cross-reaction with endogenous Aβ-protein precursor and its derivatives nor with normal brain cells.
Serum antibodies against Aβ were detectable in 15 of the 18 cases, far in excess of the 25% expected from the previous Phase I trial for all patients exposed. CSF antibodies were present in six of eight patients tested after onset of encephalitis. So there is an obvious relation between the presence of the antibodies and the risk of encephalitis. But as there was no apparent correlation with the titers of serum anti-Aβ42 antibody and either delay, severity, or occurrence of relapses, a potential inflammatory mechanism mediated by activated T-cells is currently being debated,27 as it was shown that the Aβ42 molecule contains a T-cell-activating domain.28 Indeed, in the only pathologic case so far, recently reported from the previous Phase I study,29 postmortem examination of the brain from one patient who received AN1792 showed a widespread T-lymphocyte meningoencephalitis likely to correspond to the side effect described clinically in the patients in this study. That patient also had extensive infiltration of cerebral white matter by macrophages and evidence to suggest that the immune response had elicited clearance of Aβ plaques. This issue may be clarified in the current series when the analysis of the full data set will allow comparison of humoral and cellular immunity responses between cases and noncases.
Another possibility is that inflammatory signs may occur during the clearance of amyloid from the brain as part of the intended therapeutic process. Indeed, Aβ immunization was associated with a transient increase in microglial activation in transgenic mice vaccinated monthly for 3 to 5 months.30 Remarkably, microglial activation had vanished after 9 months of treatment. In our series, no case occurred later than 6 months after the first injection or 5 months after the last (see figure 1). Thus, it is possible that Aβ immunization and Aβ clearance from the brain are concomitant with transient periods of inflammation.
In addition, some of the Aβ deposited in AD is located in brain blood vessels, and amyloid-laden vessels may be included in the amyloid clearance process, thereby disrupting blood vessel integrity and allowing a leak of proteins through the blood–brain barrier and possibly microhemorrhages. The frequent posterior cortical involvement at MRI in patients with postvaccination meningoencephalitis in our cases (see table 2⇑) might be explained by the abundance of parenchymal β-amyloid deposits in the posterior cerebral31 and cerebellar32 cortices in advanced AD. It is not clear, however, why the brain areas most affected by amyloid deposition, namely, the temporal and associative cortices,33 were not predominantly or even consistently affected by the putative anti-Aβ autoimmune process.
The findings reported from this study represent analysis of only those patients who experienced a serious CNS AE consistent with the diagnosis of meningoencephalitis. Although dosing and follow-up were terminated after the fourth report, the study remains unblinded until all data are checked and the primary statistical analyses are completed. The analysis of the full study results, particularly the immunologic data, will yield additional clues in interpreting the observations reported here, as well as in obtaining information on the effect of AN1792 on efficacy endpoints, including MRI and cognitive parameters.
Future immunotherapeutic strategies may consider active immunization with immunoconjugates composed of parts of the Aβ molecule, specifically excluding the epitope that may provoke abnormal T-cell reactions.11 Therapeutically effective antibodies targeting Aβ residues 4 to 10 in mice can inhibit cytotoxicity and fibrillogenesis in cellular models.34 In addition, passive immunization strategies with humanized anti-Aβ antibodies are currently being developed. Information on safety and pilot efficacy collected from this and other immunization trials will be of crucial value for the future development of safe and effective immunotherapies for AD.
Note added in proof.
Since the manuscript was revised, one death was reported, on March 9, 2003 (Case 18), as a sudden death probably associated with inhalation, several months after the encephalitis.
Acknowledgments
All investigators listed as co-authors, except S.G. and J.-M.O., received a per-patient honorarium that covered the costs of the study; J.-M.O. serves as an external adviser for CNS Drug Development to Wyeth and Elan Pharmaceuticals; S.G. serves as chair of the Safety Monitoring Committee for the trial. The co-authors have no financial interests in the AN1792 development and no other financial relations to Elan Pharmaceuticals or Wyeth.
Acknowledgment
The authors thank Elan Pharmaceuticals and Wyeth for giving unrestricted access to the data presented in this article and for their editorial assistance. The names and institutions of all the participating investigators in the AN1792 trial will be listed in the full clinical and biological report to be issued after the end of the trial. The authors also thank Prof. James Nicoll for his help in discussing the only reported pathologic case of post-AN1792 meningoencephalitis, which was not part of this series.
Footnotes
-
See also page 7
-
The co-authors of this article are the study investigators who reported at least one case of meningoencephalitis and agreed to collaborate on the manuscript. J.-M.O. is a scientific adviser to the sponsors, and S.G. chairs the Safety Monitoring Committee for this trial.
- Received January 6, 2003.
- Accepted April 1, 2003.
References
- ↵
World Health Organization. Mental and neurological disorders, fact sheet no. 265. December 2001. Available at: http://www.who.int/inf-fs/en/fact265.html. Accessed October 21, 2002.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
DeMattos RB, Bales KR, Cummins DJ, Dodart JC, Paul SM, Holtzman DM. Peripheral anti-A beta antibody alters CNS and plasma A beta clearance and decreases brain A beta burden in a mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA . 2001; 98: 8850–8855.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
McKhann G, Drachman D, Folstein M, Katzman R, Price D, Stadlan EM. Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA Work Group under the auspices of Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer’s Disease. Neurology . 1984; 34: 939–944.
- ↵
- ↵
Pfeifer M, Boncristiano S, Bondolfi L, et al. Cerebral hemorrhage after passive anti-Aβ immunotherapy. Science . 2002; 298: 1379.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
Schwarz S, Mohr A, Knauth M, Wildemann B, Storch–Hagenlocher B. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis: a follow-up study of 40 adult patients. Neurology . 2001; 56: 1313–1318.
- ↵
Tselis AC, Lisak RP. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. In: Antel J, Birnbaum G, Hartung HP, eds. Clinical neuroimmunology. Boston: Blackwell Science, 1998: 116–147.
- ↵
Walker RW, Gawler J. Serial cerebral CT abnormalities in relapsing acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry . 1989; 52: 1100–1102.
- ↵
Kesselring J, Miller DH, Robb SA, et al. Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis. MRI findings and the distinction from multiple sclerosis. Brain . 1990; 113: 291–302.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
Hynson JL, Kornberg AJ, Coleman LT, Shield L, Harvey AS, Kean MJ. Clinical and neuroradiologic features of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis in children. Neurology . 2001; 56: 1308–1312.
- ↵
- ↵
Grubeck–Loebenstein B, Blasko I, Marx FK, Trieb I. Immunization with beta-amyloid: could T-cell activation have a harmful effect? Trends Neurosci . 2000; 23: 114.
- ↵
Monsonego A, Zota V, Selkoe DJ. Immunogenic aspects of amyloid beta-peptide: implications for the pathogenesis and treatment of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurobiol Aging . 2002; 23: S112.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
Delacourte A, Sergeant N, Champain D, Wattez A, Maurage CA, Lebert F. Nonoverlapping but synergetic tau and APP pathologies in sporadic Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology . 2002; 59: 398–407.
- ↵
- ↵
Braak H, Braak E. Pathology of Alzheimer’s disease. In: Calne DB, ed. Neurodegenerative diseases. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1994: 585–613.
- ↵
Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence
NOTE: All authors' disclosures must be entered and current in our database before comments can be posted. Enter and update disclosures at http://submit.neurology.org. Exception: replies to comments concerning an article you originally authored do not require updated disclosures.
- Stay timely. Submit only on articles published within the last 8 weeks.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- 200 words maximum.
- 5 references maximum. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- 5 authors maximum. Exception: replies can include all original authors of the article.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.