Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Specialty Sites
    • COVID-19
    • Practice Current
    • Practice Buzz
    • Without Borders
    • Equity, Diversity and Inclusion
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
  • Collections
    • Topics A-Z
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Infographics
    • Patient Pages
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Center

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Specialty Sites
    • COVID-19
    • Practice Current
    • Practice Buzz
    • Without Borders
    • Equity, Diversity and Inclusion
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
  • Collections
    • Topics A-Z
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Infographics
    • Patient Pages
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Center
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Residents & Fellows

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Neurology
Home
The most widely read and highly cited peer-reviewed neurology journal
  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
Site Logo
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Residents & Fellows

Share

September 09, 2003; 61 (5) Special Articles

The utility of MRI in suspected MS

Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology

E. M. Frohman, D. S. Goodin, P. A. Calabresi, J. R. Corboy, P. K. Coyle, M. Filippi, J. A. Frank, S. L. Galetta, R. I. Grossman, K. Hawker, N. J. Kachuck, M. C. Levin, J. T. Phillips, M. K. Racke, V. M. Rivera, W. H. Stuart
First published September 8, 2003, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/01.WNL.0000082654.99838.EF
E. M. Frohman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
D. S. Goodin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. A. Calabresi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. R. Corboy
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. K. Coyle
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Filippi
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. A. Frank
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. L. Galetta
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. I. Grossman
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
K. Hawker
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N. J. Kachuck
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. C. Levin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. T. Phillips
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. K. Racke
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
V. M. Rivera
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W. H. Stuart
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Full PDF
Citation
The utility of MRI in suspected MS
Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology
E. M. Frohman, D. S. Goodin, P. A. Calabresi, J. R. Corboy, P. K. Coyle, M. Filippi, J. A. Frank, S. L. Galetta, R. I. Grossman, K. Hawker, N. J. Kachuck, M. C. Levin, J. T. Phillips, M. K. Racke, V. M. Rivera, W. H. Stuart
Neurology Sep 2003, 61 (5) 602-611; DOI: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000082654.99838.EF

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions

Make Comment

See Comments

Downloads
22780

Share

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Loading

Abstract

Advancements in imaging technologies and newly evolving treatments offer the promise of more effective management strategies for MS. Until recently, confirmation of the diagnosis of MS has generally required the demonstration of clinical activity that is disseminated in both time and space. Nevertheless, with the advent of MRI techniques, occult disease activity can be demonstrated in 50 to 80% of patients at the time of the first clinical presentation. Prospective studies have shown that the presence of such lesions predicts future conversion to clinically definite (CD) MS. Indeed, in a young to middle-aged adult with a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), once alternative diagnoses are excluded at baseline, the finding of three or more white matter lesions on a T2-weighted MRI scan (especially if one of these lesions is located in the periventricular region) is a very sensitive predictor (>80%) of the subsequent development of CDMS within the next 7 to 10 years. Moreover, the presence of two or more gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing lesions at baseline and the appearance of either new T2 lesions or new Gd enhancement on follow-up scans are also highly predictive of the subsequent development of CDMS in the near term. By contrast, normal results on MRI at the time of clinical presentation makes the future development of CDMS considerably less likely.

  • Received December 12, 2002.
  • Accepted May 29, 2003.
View Full Text

Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence

  • The utility of MRI in suspected MS: Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subc.
    • B.M. J. Uitdehaag, VU Medical Centre, Amsterdam, bmj.uitdehaag@vumc.nl
    • J.J.G. Geuerts, F. Barkhof, C.H. Polman
    Submitted April 20, 2004
  • Reply to Uitdehaag et al
    • Douglas S. Goodin, MD, Chair, TTA Subcommittee, wedlund@aan.com
    • Elliot M. Frohman, MD, PhD
    Submitted April 20, 2004
  • The utility of MRI in suspected MS: Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommitte
    • Elliot M. Frohman, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, 5323 Harry Hines Blvd., Dallas, TX 75390elliot.frohman@utsouthwestern.edu
    Submitted October 13, 2003
  • The utility of MRI in suspected MS: Report of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommitte
    • James M Gordon, 1570 N 115th St., Suite 14, Seattle, WA 98133jgordon@nwhsea.org
    Submitted October 13, 2003
Comment

NOTE: All authors' disclosures must be entered and current in our database before comments can be posted. Enter and update disclosures at http://submit.neurology.org. Exception: replies to comments concerning an article you originally authored do not require updated disclosures.

  • Stay timely. Submit only on articles published within the last 8 weeks.
  • Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
  • 200 words maximum.
  • 5 references maximum. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
  • 5 authors maximum. Exception: replies can include all original authors of the article.
  • Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.

More guidelines and information on Disputes & Debates

Compose Comment

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
NOTE: The first author must also be the corresponding author of the comment.
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Publishing Agreement
NOTE: All authors, besides the first/corresponding author, must complete a separate Disputes & Debates Submission Form and provide via email to the editorial office before comments can be posted.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

You May Also be Interested in

Back to top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Overview.
    • Methods.
    • Discussion.
    • Appendix 1: Members of the Therapeutics and Technology Assessment Subcommittee
    • Appendix 2: Classification of evidence definitions
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Advertisement

Related Articles

  • Is multiple sclerosis still a clinical diagnosis?

Alert Me

  • Alert me when eletters are published
Neurology: 96 (9)

Articles

  • Ahead of Print
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Popular Articles
  • Translations

About

  • About the Journals
  • Ethics Policies
  • Editors & Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise

Submit

  • Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Information for Reviewers
  • AAN Guidelines
  • Permissions

Subscribers

  • Subscribe
  • Activate a Subscription
  • Sign up for eAlerts
  • RSS Feed
Site Logo
  • Visit neurology Template on Facebook
  • Follow neurology Template on Twitter
  • Visit Neurology on YouTube
  • Neurology
  • Neurology: Clinical Practice
  • Neurology: Genetics
  • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • AAN.com
  • AANnews
  • Continuum
  • Brain & Life
  • Neurology Today

Wolters Kluwer Logo

Neurology | Print ISSN:0028-3878
Online ISSN:1526-632X

© 2021 American Academy of Neurology

  • Privacy Policy
  • Feedback
  • Advertise