Psychiatric comorbidities in patients with Parkinson disease and psychosis
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

Abstract
Objective: To determine the prevalence and impact of comorbid psychiatric disturbances in Parkinson disease (PD) patients with psychosis.
Methods: Subject data were derived from a research database of 116 PD patients participating in standardized motor, cognitive, psychiatric, and caregiver assessments.
Results: There were 25 patients (22%) with psychosis manifest as hallucinations (n = 9), delusions (n = 1), or hallucinations and delusions (n = 15) and 25 patients (22%) who had no current or past psychiatric comorbidities (PDN). In the psychotic group, 44% had psychosis only (PSY), and 56% had psychosis plus at least one other comorbid psychiatric disturbance (PSY+), including depressive disorders (71%), anxiety disorders (21%), apathetic syndromes (14%), and delirium (14%). There were no differences in age, sex, education, or age onset or duration of PD among the PSY, PSY+, and PDN groups. Both psychotic groups had greater motor, functional, and frontal cognitive deficits and increased caregiver burden scores relative to PDN. PSY+ showed greater global and selective cognitive deficits compared to PDN. Psychosis was a primary predictor of caregiver burden, whereas depressive symptoms indirectly enhanced motor impairments.
Conclusions: Nonpsychotic psychiatric disturbances, especially affective disturbances, are common comorbidities in PD patients with psychosis and warrant clinical attention to reduce morbidity and caregiver distress.
Psychosis is a frequent complication of Parkinson disease (PD), affecting 15 to 40% of patients.1,2⇓ Most common are visual hallucinations, which range from benign visual hallucinations with insight to florid hallucinations and delusions that can be associated with disruptive behavior. The development of psychosis in idiopathic PD is virtually always drug-induced, but factors such as older age and cognitive impairment are also relevant in its occurrence.3 For example, in a community-based sample, patients with dementia had higher rates of psychosis (40%) relative to those without dementia (15%).2
The impact of psychosis in PD on clinical management is substantial. Pharmacotherapy is more complicated as antiparkinsonian medications contribute to psychosis and antipsychotic agents can aggravate motor and cognitive impairments. Psychosis can also be extremely taxing to caregivers4 and is associated with a greater likelihood of nursing home placement5 and increased morbidity and mortality.6
Little attention has been paid to comorbid psychiatric disturbances in psychotic PD patients. Previous studies report increased depressive symptom severity in patients with only visual hallucinations3 or with hallucinations and delusions2 relative to nonpsychotic patients. Others suggest that depressive syndromes predispose to development of psychosis.7,8⇓ However, actual prevalence rates for additional syndromic psychiatric disturbances in psychotic PD patients have not been addressed. As depressive and other psychiatric syndromes are important targets for interventions to reduce the burdens of psychosis, the purpose of the present analysis was to quantify the extent of comorbid psychiatric disturbances associated with psychosis in PD and determine the additional impact of psychiatric comorbidities on motor and cognitive deficits, physical disability, and caregiver distress.
Patients and methods.
Subject selection.
Subject data were derived from a research database maintained by the Clinical Research Core of the PD Research Center at Johns Hopkins. In this database, 138 subjects (n = 116 PD, n = 20 non-neurologic controls, n = 2 non-PD movement disorders) underwent baseline clinical assessments as part of a longitudinal research protocol to evaluate prospectively relationships between motor, cognitive, and psychiatric aspects of PD.
Individuals with PD were recruited from multiple sources, including the Johns Hopkins PD and Movement Disorder Center outpatient clinics (34%), movement disorders specialist neurology practices in the Baltimore-Washington area (28%), the Johns Hopkins inpatient and outpatient neuropsychiatry programs (13%), and self-referrals subsequent to presentations at support group meetings, word of mouth, or the Internet (25%). Since the longitudinal study is a component of an affiliated brain donation program, recruitment efforts were multi-tiered, with sampling for patients with advanced disease as well as less affected individuals who could be followed longitudinally for a longer duration. Diagnoses of idiopathic PD, based on UK Brain Bank clinical criteria,9 were established in each subject by movement disorders specialists affiliated with the Hopkins PD Research Center. No patient met clinical diagnostic criteria for dementia with Lewy bodies.10 Subjects or their designated power of attorneys gave their written informed consent to participate. The Johns Hopkins University Institutional Review Board approved the assessment protocol.
Assessment procedures.
For the entire sample of 116 PD subjects, most clinical evaluations (74.1%) were conducted in outpatient clinical research settings; patients with more advanced PD, limited mobility, or severe psychiatric conditions were evaluated in their home or a nursing home (22.4%) or as inpatients (3.5%). Details of medical and PD history, drug therapy, and demographic variables were obtained by direct interview with the patient and a reliable informant (usually a spouse/caregiver) and review of their clinical neurologic records.
Current and past psychiatric diagnoses were established according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria11 using all available reliable information and comprehensive assessment procedures. This included the Schedule for Clinical Interview and Diagnosis (SCID) for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders–Patient Edition,12 a general clinical interview to supplement the SCID and identify conditions not included in the SCID (e.g., apathetic syndromes, delirium, and dementia), mental status examination of the patient, interviews with informants (family members/caregivers and clinicians) using the SCID and supplemental interview questions, and reviews of past and current clinical records, including psychiatric records. Psychotic symptoms were considered present if the patient or informant described hallucinations (sensory perceptions in the absence of an external stimulus) or delusions (fixed, false idiosyncratic beliefs held despite evidence to the contrary) in clear consciousness within 30 days prior to the baseline assessment. Patients with delirium as the sole cause of psychotic symptoms were not categorized as having psychosis. Dementia was diagnosed using DSM-IV-TR criteria.
Psychiatric symptom severity was quantified using the self-administered Beck Depression Inventory (BDI),13 the clinician-administered 21-item Hamilton Depression Rating Scale,14 and the informant-based Neuropsychiatric Interview (NPI),15 which was administered to a caregiver/informant accompanying the subject or who was available by phone and saw the patient on a regular basis. The NPI was developed for use in patients with brain disorders to assess the severity and frequency of 12 domains of psychopathology (hallucinations, delusions, agitation, depression, anxiety, elation, apathy, disinhibition, irritability, aberrant motor behavior, sleep disturbances, and appetite disturbances). Most informants (95%) were in direct contact with the patient at least weekly if not daily; 80% of the patients lived with family and 75% were married.
The Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS)16 and Hoehn and Yahr Staging system17 were used to rate motor deficits, activities of daily living (ADL) abilities, and complications of dopaminomimetic therapy. Global cognitive performance was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE)18 and the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale (DRS).19 The DRS also provides five subscores: attention, memory, construction, conceptualization, and initiation-perseveration. The DRS was not administered to five subjects who were seen in their homes. Three others did not complete the DRS because of severe fatigue (n = 1) or psychiatric status (n = 2) and inability to be rescheduled. The National Adult Reading Test–Revised Edition (NART-R)20 provided an estimate of pre-morbid verbal IQ. Caregivers completed the self-administered Zarit Caregiver Burden Scale.21 The NPI also provided a Caregiver Distress Score to assess this dimension as it related to the patient’s psychiatric symptoms.
Statistical analysis.
The current analysis focused on comparisons of three groups of PD patients in the sample: 1) PDN, a control group with no current or past psychiatric diagnoses, including psychotic symptoms; 2) PSY, patients with current psychosis but no psychiatric comorbidities; and 3) PSY+, patients with current psychosis plus at least one additional syndromic psychiatric disturbance. Analyses were performed using SPSS for Windows statistical software (Version 11.5.0, Lead Technologies, Inc., Chicago, IL). Descriptive analyses of the sample included calculations of proportions. Differences among the PDN, PSY, and PSY+ groups were tested using three-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) or nonparametric tests as appropriate for demographic and clinical variables. When p < 0.05, post hoc tests were conducted to parse group differences. For post hoc comparisons, significance was set at the 0.05 level. Predictors of function and caregiver burden were investigated using stepwise linear regression analyses.
Results.
Prevalence of psychosis and diagnostic subgroups.
Of the 116 PD patients enrolled in the longitudinal study, 25 (22%) were in the PDN group and 25 (22%) had psychotic symptoms at their baseline evaluation. Of those, 44% (n = 11) were in the PSY group and 56% (n = 14, 12% of the total sample) were in the PSY+ group. The remaining patients in the sample (who are not included in group comparisons) did not experience current psychotic symptoms and either had some other current or past psychiatric diagnosis (n = 52, 45%) or insufficient reliable information to establish current or past non-psychotic DSM-IV psychiatric diagnoses (n = 14, 12%). Among subjects with non-psychotic psychiatric disturbances, 19% had a current syndromic depressive disorder (n = 22) and 10% had either a remitted depressive disorder that was asymptomatic on antidepressant therapy (n = 6) or a past depressive disorder from which they had fully recovered and did not require chronic therapy (n = 6). Demographic characteristics of the PDN, PSY, and PSY+ groups were comparable (table 1).
Table 1 Group characteristics
Hallucinations were present in 92% and delusions in 64% of the patients with psychosis, representing 20% (hallucinations) and 14% (delusions) of the total sample of 116 PD patients (table 2). Severity and frequency of hallucinations and delusions, as reflected by NPI scores (table 3), were comparable between the PSY and PSY+ groups (χ2 = 0.86, NS). Nine patients (36%) had hallucinations only and two patients (8%) had delusions only. Visual hallucinations, as defined by Fénelon et al.1 (see table 2), were the most common (91%) psychotic symptom. Four patients (17%) experienced only one type of hallucination (2 passage, 1 formed visual, and 1 auditory). Auditory hallucinations were present in almost two-thirds (n = 15, 65%) of patients with hallucinations and 12.9% of the total sample. The auditory hallucinations included musical hallucinations, indistinct whispering, hearing one’s name called, and voices talking, including in threatening tones or comments such as “Get up and go out” or “Just kidding.” Systematized paranoid delusions (i.e., a single delusion with multiple elaborations or a group of delusions that are related to a single event or theme) were more frequent (64%) than nonspecific paranoid ideation (44%).
Table 2 Characteristics and frequency of psychotic symptoms
Table 3 Psychiatric symptom severity, caregiver distress, and cognitive performance
Prevalence of psychiatric comorbidities associated with psychosis.
For the total sample of 116 PD patients, prevalence rates were 8.6% for psychosis with a comorbid depressive disorder, 4.3% for psychosis with other affective conditions (anxiety and apathetic disorders), and 1.7% for chronic psychosis with a superimposed delirium. In the PSY+ group, comorbid DSM-IV psychiatric diagnoses included depressive disorders (n = 10, 71%), anxiety disorders (n = 3, 21%), apathetic syndrome (personality change secondary to a general medical condition [PD] with apathy, n = 2, 14%), and delirium (n = 2, 14%). There were nine patients with major depression (3 single episode, 6 recurrent episodes) and one with recurrent minor depressive disorder. Two patients with depressive disorders were in full remission on antidepressants, three had comorbid panic disorder, and two had mood congruent delusions. One patient with an apathetic syndrome had a past major depressive episode. There were 2 (20%) PSY and 7 (50%) PSY+ in psychiatric care, including 3 PSY+ who were inpatients on a psychiatry unit. At the time of assessment, two patients with chronic hallucinations and delusions had a comorbid and transient delirium (as defined by DSM-IV and manifest by enhanced confusion and agitation) that was attributed to the recent addition of tramadol in one case and anticholinergic medications in the other. Cognitive data for these two patients were obtained when their mental state was stable.
The mean (SD, range) duration of psychosis was 3.1 (3.2, 1 to 12, n = 10) years in PSY and 1.7 (1.6, 0.1 to 6, n = 13) years in PSY+. There were no group differences in duration of psychosis. The mean (SD, range) duration of affective syndromes (including depressive, anxiety, and apathetic disturbances) was 8.1 (7.7, 2 to 25) years in the PSY+ group. Development of the affective disorder coincided with psychosis onset in 3 patients and preceded psychosis onset in 9 patients. The mean (SD, range) duration between onset of affective disorder and psychosis was 4.9 (6.5, 0 to 22.7) years (n = 11, data not available for one subject).
As shown in table 3, overall psychopathology (based on total NPI scores) was more severe in both psychotic groups compared to PDN [F(2,46) = 18.7, p < 0.001]. Severity of overall psychopathology and psychotic symptoms was comparable between the psychotic groups, although the NPI psychotic symptom subscore was slightly higher for PSY relative to PSY+. As expected, non-psychotic psychopathology based on depression rating scales was more severe in PSY+ compared to PDN and PSY [BDI: F(2,44) = 11.6, p < 0.001; HDRS: F(2,47) = 22.4, p < 0.001].
Impact of psychiatric comorbidities on motor, ADL, cognitive, and caregiver status.
Motor and ADL effects.
Motor and ADL effects are detailed in table 1. The mean and distribution of Hoehn and Yahr stage scores were different [ANOVA: F (df = 2,47) = 9.4, p < 0.001; χ2 = 18.8, p < 0.05]. In post hoc tests, Hoehn and Yahr stages were comparable for the psychotic groups, but PDN had more individuals at a less advanced stage relative to PSY (p < 0.05) and PSY+ (p < 0.01). There were also group differences in UPDRS Motor (F = 8.0, p < 0.01) and ADL (F = 10.3, p < 0.001) subscales. Post hoc tests showed greater motor and functional (ADL) deficits in both psychotic groups compared to PDN, but no differences between the psychotic subgroups. There was a group effect for the daily dose of dopaminomimetic therapy (expressed as l-dopa equivalents),22 with the PSY+ group, as compared to PDN, using higher doses of dopaminergic medications (F = 7.0; p < 0.01).
In analyses of UPDRS motor subscores,23 PSY and PSY+ bradykinesia scores were higher than PDN (F = 10.0, p < 0.01) and PSY+ rigidity scores were greater than PDN (F = 3.6, p < 0.05), but there were no group differences in tremor scores. On the UPDRS complications of therapy subscale, there were group differences in dyskinesia (F = 5.3, p < 0.01) and on-off (F = 9.1, p < 0.001) subscores. Post hoc tests showed higher dyskinesia scores in PSY compared to PDN and greater on-off scores for both psychotic groups compared to PDN.
Cognitive effects.
Cognitive effects are detailed in table 3. Dementia was present in 4 (16%) PDN, 7 (64%) PSY, and 10 (71%) PSY+. There were group differences in global cognitive performance, based on MMSE (F = 7.4, p < 0.01) and total DRS (F = 5.8, p < 0.01) scores; post hoc tests showed significant group differences only between PDN and PSY+. Analyses of DRS subscores suggested group-specific patterns of selective deficits. Compared to PDN, both psychotic groups had significantly worse Initiation-Perseveration subscores and PSY+ also had greater deficits on the Memory and Conceptualization subscores. There were no group differences for the Attention and Construction subscores or between the psychotic groups on any cognitive measures.
Caregiver effects.
Caregiver effects are detailed in table 3. Caregivers of patients with psychosis reported a greater sense of general burden, based on the Zarit scale, compared to caregivers of PDN patients [F(2,44) = 9.7, p < 0.001]. PSY+ caregivers reported greater distress related to the presence of psychiatric symptoms than did caregivers for the PDN or PSY groups [NPI Caregiver Distress Score: F(2,46) = 17.9, p < 0.001].
Predictors of functional abilities and caregiver burden.
Stepwise linear regression analyses were used to evaluate the extent to which motor, cognitive, and psychiatric deficits predicted functional disability (as measured by the UPDRS-ADL subscore) and caregiver burden (table 4). In the first analysis, the UPDRS-Motor subscore predicted 50% of the variance in ADLs. However, depressive symptoms also contributed 11% of the variance to ADL-related disability. MMSE score and presence of psychosis did not significantly predict ADL deficits. In the second analysis, presence of psychosis was the major predictor of caregiver burden. The UPDRS-ADL subscore was also significantly associated with caregiver burden, but motor deficits, depressive symptoms, and global cognitive performance were not.
Table 4 Regression analyses
Discussion.
Previous studies of comorbid psychiatric disturbances in PD patients with psychosis focused primarily on correlations between visual hallucinations and depressive symptom rating scales, which are nonspecific for psychiatric pathology and do not yield prevalence rates for syndromic disturbances. The present analyses were based on comprehensive assessments of PD patients to determine current and past syndromic psychiatric diagnoses, careful characterization of hallucinatory and delusional phenomena, and quantitative measures of motor, cognitive, and psychiatric status. We found that PD patients with psychosis have a high rate of comorbid psychiatric disorders, especially affective syndromes, and that this additional psychopathology is associated with greater cognitive impairment and caregiver distress. Whereas psychosis directly and significantly impacted overall caregiver burden, depression added to functional impairment. Since affective disorders are treatable, specific attention should be paid to the detection and treatment of mood disorders in psychotic PD patients to reduce this added morbidity and caregiver distress. The association of affective disturbances with psychosis also supports a role for non-dopaminergic influences, especially serotonergic dysfunction.24
These data indicate that affective disturbances, including depression, anxiety, and apathetic syndromes, are common in PD patients with psychosis. We did not observe psychosis with comorbid hypersexuality or mania, as previously described25 and, in most cases, psychotic phenomena were independent of the affective disorder, i.e., the patients did not have mood-congruent psychotic features. Our findings support studies showing high rates of depressive symptoms in PD-related psychosis,1-3,7,26,27⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓ but low rates of psychotic affective syndromes.2,7⇓
Two other investigations established psychiatric diagnoses, but only determined rates for comorbid depressive disorders and characterization of psychotic phenomena and cognitive deficits was limited. In the first study, a population-based sample of 245 PD patients from Norway,2 16% had psychotic symptoms and 3.4% of the total sample had psychosis plus comorbid major depression. An earlier analysis of their sample showed that psychosis (based on UPDRS Thought Disorder ratings) was a significant risk factor for presence of major depressive disorder.8 The other study, based on 172 patients from a university-based movement disorders clinic in Israel, reported a 30% prevalence rate for psychosis, with 78% (23% of the total sample) having a DSM-IV depressive disorder as well as psychosis.7 Our rates of psychiatric comorbidities are intermediate between the Norwegian and Israeli samples, with sampling differences the most likely explanation for different prevalence rates. For example, age and disease severity are risk factors for psychosis2 and these may have been greater in patients in the Israeli sample who attended a tertiary care clinic, had at least a 5-year history of PD, and were only regarded as psychotic if symptoms were disruptive. The smaller sample size and recruitment of some participants from psychiatry clinics may have influenced our findings.
In our study, onset of affective disturbances preceded or coincided with onset of psychosis. Since this study was cross-sectional and did not include nonpsychotic patients with affective disorders, we cannot test specifically whether affective disorders per se increase the risk of psychosis. However, supportive data are provided by the Israeli sample, mentioned above,7 in which depression, especially in early onset PD, predicted later onset of psychosis. In their study, psychosis frequently accompanied comorbid depressive disorders and dementia, with higher rates of psychosis among patients with depression compared to those with dementia. Fénelon et al.1 also found higher depressive symptom ratings in patients with minor hallucinations than in non-hallucinators. One other study reported significantly higher rates of a history of depression in patients with visual hallucinations (43%) as compared to non-hallucinators (17%),28 but details regarding current affective disturbances were not provided. By contrast, another study3 failed to detect an association between visual hallucinations and prior history of a psychiatric disorder, although the role of past depressive disorders was not specified. Others26 found that PD patients with hallucinations and PD duration over 5 years had lower depressive symptom scores compared to non-hallucinators. However, the authors suggested that cognitive impairment may have contributed to underreporting of depressive symptoms. Prospective longitudinal studies are necessary to better understand these relationships among affective disturbances, psychosis (including hallucinations and delusions), and other non-motor aspects of PD.
The 13% overall prevalence rate for auditory hallucinations was unexpected. However, this is not substantially higher than reported rates of 9.7%1 and 8%29 for auditory hallucinations in recent studies. Even higher rates (35.5%) were associated with levodopa in the past.30 In most patients, auditory hallucinations were accompanied by visual hallucinations, as in other studies. Although auditory hallucinations may be associated with mood disorders, we did not find group differences with respect to psychiatric comorbidities (see table 2). It is possible that clinicians underappreciate auditory hallucinations in PD patients; our use of structured interviews (the SCID and NPI) may have facilitated ascertainment.
Greater cognitive impairment, one of the most consistently reported correlates of psychosis,1-3,7,26,28⇓⇓⇓⇓⇓ was also evident in our psychotic group and especially prominent in patients with psychiatric comorbidities. Compared to PDN, the PSY+ group was significantly more impaired on global cognitive measures (MMSE and DRS) as well as on the DRS memory and conceptualization subscores. However, both psychotic groups showed relative deficits on an index of frontal lobe functioning, the DRS Initiation-Perseveration scale. This combination of global and enhanced frontal cognitive deficits adds to the complexities of disease management.
Other than the association with dementia, previous studies have paid little attention to patterns of cognitive deficits in PD patients with psychosis. Most PD patients show selective cognitive deficits, especially on tests of executive function.31 As the disease progresses, up to 75% of patients develop more severe and widespread deficits that correspond to the diagnosis of dementia, but the average prevalence of dementia ranges from 15 to 30%.32 One study showed greater deficits on letter fluency in addition to greater global cognitive impairment in hallucinators,26 but the study design may have precluded demonstration of selective memory and executive function deficits as the more impaired psychotic patients were unable to complete the more demanding tasks. This was also the case for some patients in our study. Although the relationship between early cognitive deficits and later dementia is unclear, greater executive dysfunction is associated with a transition to dementia over a 1-year follow-up period33 and may thus represent an earlier and more specific risk factor or marker for development of psychosis.
Although the pathophysiology of psychosis in PD is not known, our findings suggest that affective disturbances contribute to development of psychosis. Dopaminergic antiparkinsonian medications and secondary dopamine receptor hypersensitivity and overstimulation in mesocortical and mesolimbic regions are most commonly implicated.26 However, development of psychosis is not directly related to the dose of dopaminomimetic medications2 or levodopa plasma level34 and non-dopaminergic neurotransmitter systems are also involved.24 A few reports describe development of psychosis in PD patients taking antidepressants that inhibit dopaminergic (e.g., bupropion)35 and serotonin reuptake,36 which may enhance dopamine release by stimulation of 5HT-3 receptors. Although antidepressant therapy typically improves affective psychoses, longitudinal analyses are needed to evaluate the possibility that antidepressants over time, when used with antiparkinsonian medications, exert a priming effect that contributes to development of psychosis.30
Depression in PD further involves changes in the serotonin and dopamine systems that could drive emergence of psychosis in the setting of neurochemical or structural changes associated with dopaminergic therapy, aging, disease progression, and cognitive impairment. For example, sleep-wake disturbances, which are common in depression and anxiety, could predispose to development of psychosis.37 Imbalance between dopaminergic and serotonergic systems24 or overstimulation of serotonergic receptors by dopaminergic medications38 may be relevant when there are comorbid affective disorders, which are known to be associated with serotonergic deficits.39 For example, higher depressive symptom scores in PD patients with psychosis were associated with an apomorphine-induced growth hormone response,40 an index of central dopaminergic receptor sensitivity. Thus, efficacy and tolerability of atypical antipsychotic agents in PD-related psychosis may be related to their potent antiserotonergic properties but reduced dopamine D2 receptor blockade.38
Since cognitive deficits in PD are associated with cholinergic deficits41 and the most consistent clinical correlate of psychosis is cognitive impairment, cholinergic deficits are also likely to play a role in the development of psychosis. Therapeutically, cholinesterase inhibitors in PD patients are reported to reduce psychosis42 and, in controlled trials, improve cognitive impairments in PD.43,44⇓
Although psychosis in general is associated with greater motor dysfunction and disability, we showed that comorbid psychopathology in psychotic patients has a substantial impact on PD at additional levels, including greater cognitive impairment and perceived caregiver burden. Whereas psychosis has a direct and significant impact on overall caregiver burden, depressive symptoms predicted greater motor impairments in ADLs and thus indirectly added to caregiver burden. Even though psychosis is reported as a main reason for nursing home admission of PD patients,5 nonpsychotic psychiatric disturbances, especially depression and anxiety, are an important source of additional physical morbidity and caregiver strain that may contribute to need for institutionalized care. Since clinically significant nonmotor symptoms occur in most PD patients and most patients have more than one comorbidity,45 identification of one psychiatric symptom suggests a need to evaluate for other psychopathologic symptoms and syndromes. Unfortunately, despite their clinical impact, comorbid psychiatric conditions and other non-motor symptoms in PD tend to be underrecognized and undertreated.46
Patients with advanced PD, who are already challenging to manage, often have multiple neuropsychiatric disturbances that add to treatment complexity and affect the well-being of caregivers. Early recognition of psychosis in addition to other psychiatric disturbances, patient and caregiver education, and thoughtful use of antiparkinsonian and psychiatric medications is integral to treatment. Since treatment of psychiatric comorbidities can reduce the burdens of the disease, clinicians should screen PD patients regularly for psychotic and affective symptoms. In particular, presence of psychosis should trigger assessment of affective pathology and, conversely, affective pathology should prompt an inquiry about psychotic symptoms. However, overlap among depressive symptoms, motor signs of PD, medication effects, and cognitive impairment can confound recognition of psychopathology.39 In our sample, the PSY had more severe psychotic symptoms, but overall cognitive and motor status was similar between the PSY and PSY+ groups. Accordingly, without specific inquiry, comorbid psychiatric states may not be detected and patients and caregivers will have unwarranted additional morbidity.
Acknowledgments
Supported by the Morris K. Udall PD Research Center of Excellence at Johns Hopkins (NIH P50-NS-58377), the General Clinical Research Center at Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine (National Center for Research Resources/NIH M01-RR00052), the Weldon Hall Trust, and The PD Foundation, Inc. (2002 Summer Fellowship Program for Investigative Work in PD, J.R.W.).
The authors thank Lisette Bunting-Perry, RN, MScN, for research coordination.
Footnotes
-
Presented in part at the Movement Disorders Society annual meeting; November 2002.
- Received December 8, 2003.
- Accepted March 4, 2004.
References
- ↵
Fénelon G, Mahieux F, Huon R, Ziégler M. Hallucinations in Parkinson’s disease. Prevalence, phenomenology, and risk factors. Brain. 2000; 123: 733–745.
- ↵
- ↵
Holroyd S, Currie L, Wooten GF. Prospective study of hallucinations and delusions in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001; 70: 734–738.
- ↵
- ↵
Goetz CG, Stebbins GT. Risk factors for nursing home placement in advanced Parkinson’s disease. Neurology. 1993; 43: 2227–2229.
- ↵
Factor S, Feustel PJ, Friedman J, et al. Longitudinal outcome of Parkinson’s disease patients with psychosis. Neurology. 2003; 60: 1756–1761.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Kilford L, Lees AJ. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease: a clinico-pathological study of 100 cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1992; 55: 181–184.
- ↵
McKeith IG, Ballard CG, Perry RH, et al. Prospective validation of consensus criteria for the diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies. Neurology. 2000; 54: 1050–1058.
- ↵
American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th edition, text revision (DSM-IV-TR). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association, 2000.
- ↵
First MB, Spitzer RL, Gibbon M, Williams JBW. Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders–Patient Edition. New York: 1995.
- ↵
Beck AT, Ward CH, Mendelson M, Mock J, Erbaugh J. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1961; 4: 561–571.
- ↵
Hamilton M. A rating scale for depression. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960; 23: 56–62.
- ↵
- ↵
Fahn S, Elton RL, members of the UPDRS Development Committee. Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale. In: Fahn S, Marsden CD, Goldstein M, eds. Recent developments in Parkinson’s disease II. New York: Macmillan, 1987; 153–163.
- ↵
Hoehn MM, Yahr MD. Parkinsonism: onset, progression, and mortality. Neurology. 1967; 17: 427–442.
- ↵
- ↵
Mattis S. Dementia Rating Scale (DRS) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources, 1988.
- ↵
- ↵
Zarit SH, Reever KE, Bach-Peterson J. Relatives of the impaired elderly: correlates of feeling of burden. Gerontologist. 1980; 20: 649–655.
- ↵
Romito LMA, Scerrati M, Contarino MF, Bentivoglio AR, Tonali P, Albanese A. Long-term follow up of subthalamic stimulation in Parkinson’s disease. Neurology. 2002; 58: 1546–1550.
- ↵
Levy G, Tang M-X, Cote LJ, et al. Motor impairment in PD. Relationship to incident dementia and age. Neurology. 2000; 55: 539–544.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
Graham JM, Grunewald RA, Sagar HJ. Hallucinations in idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997; 63: 434–440.
- ↵
Barnes J, David AS. Visual hallucinations in Parkinson’s disease: a review and phenomenological survey. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2001; 70: 727–733.
- ↵
- ↵
Inzelberg R, Kipervasser S, Korczyn AD. Auditory hallucinations in Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1998; 64: 533–535.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
Aarsland D, Andersen K, Larsen JP, Lolk A, Nielsen H, Kragh-Sørensen P. Risk of dementia in Parkinson’s disease. A community-based prospective study. Neurology. 2001; 56: 730–736.
- ↵
- ↵
Goetz CG, Pappert EJ, Blasucci LM. Intravenous levodopa in chronically-treated hallucinating Parkinson’s patients: high dose pharmacological challenge does not precipitate visual hallucinations. Neurology. 1998; 50: 515–517.
- ↵
Goetz CG, Tanner CM, Klawans HL. Bupropion in Parkinson’s disease. Neurology. 1984; 34: 1092–1094.
- ↵
Lauterbach EC. Dopaminergic hallucinosis with fluoxetine in Parkinson’s disease. Am J Psychiatry. 1993; 150: 1750.
- ↵
Juncos JL. Management of psychotic aspects of Parkinson’s disease. J Clin Psychiatry. 1999; 60: 42–53.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
Mellers JD, Quinn NP, Ron MA. Psychotic and depressive symptoms in Parkinson’s disease. A study of the growth hormone response to apomorphine. Br J Psychiatry. 1995; 167: 522–526.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
Aarsland D, Laake K, Larsen JP, Janvin C. Donepezil for cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease: a randomized controlled study. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002; 72: 708–712.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
Shulman LM, Taback RL, Rabinstein AA, Weiner WJ. Non-recognition of depression and other non-motor symptoms in Parkinson’s disease. Parkinsonism Related Disord. 2002; 8: 193–197.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Hemiplegic Migraine Associated With PRRT2 Variations A Clinical and Genetic Study
Dr. Robert Shapiro and Dr. Amynah Pradhan
Related Articles
- No related articles found.