This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective: To determine whether the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale–revised (ALSFRSr), a predictor of survival time in ALS clinical trials, predicts survival time in an ALS clinic population.
Methods: The authors prospectively evaluated 267 consecutive patients with ALS at first visit to an ALS clinic using the ALSFRSr and pulmonary function testing. The association of ALSFRSr score at baseline with death or tracheostomy in ALS was examined using Cox proportional hazards models, adjusting for age at baseline, sex, and symptom duration.
Results: Of 267 patients with ALS, 103 (39%) reached the endpoint, defined as either death (79 patients) or tracheostomy (24 patients), during a mean follow-up of 1.0 ± 0.7 years. Among the 103 patients who reached the endpoint during follow-up, 77 (75%) had a baseline ALSFRSr score of less than 38 (the median baseline score of all patients), compared to 53 of 164 (32%) who remained alive without tracheostomy. Patients with a total ALSFRSr score below the median had a 4.4-fold increased risk of death or tracheostomy compared to those who scored above the median (HR: 4.38, 95% CI: 2.79 to 6.86, p < 0.001). Both the total ALSFRSr score at baseline (HR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.91 to 0.98, p < 0.001) and forced vital capacity at baseline (HR: 0.99, 95% CI: 0.98 to 1.00, p = 0.02) were associated with death or tracheostomy when included in the same Cox model.
Conclusions: In an ALS clinic population, the total Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale–revised score at baseline is a strong predictor of death or tracheostomy independently of forced vital capacity and after adjustment for age at baseline, sex, and symptom duration.
- Received February 10, 2004.
- Accepted September 15, 2004.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.