[99mTc]TRODAT-1 SPECT imaging correlates with odor identification in early Parkinson disease
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

Abstract
Background: In vivo imaging of the dopamine transporter with [99mTc]TRODAT-1 (TRODAT) and olfactory testing have both been proposed as potential biomarkers in Parkinson disease (PD).
Objective: To evaluate the relationship between TRODAT SPECT imaging, odor identification skills, and motor function in patients with early PD.
Methods: Twenty-four patients with a clinical diagnosis of early-stage PD (mean Hoehn & Yahr stage = 1.4) underwent TRODAT imaging, Unified PD Rating Scale (UPDRS) ratings of motor function, and administration of the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT). Brain images were obtained using a standardized processing protocol and specific uptake ratios for striatal regions of interest were calculated. Partial correlations between the imaging indices, disease duration, UPSIT scores, and UPDRS motor scores were then calculated.
Results: UPSIT scores were correlated with TRODAT uptake in the striatum as a whole (r = 0.66, p = 0.001). The putamen showed the strongest correlation with the UPSIT (r = 0.74; p < 0.001). The correlation between dopamine transporter density in the caudate and UPSIT was moderate (r = 0.36, p = 0.11), but was not significant.
Conclusions: Olfactory function is highly correlated with dopamine transporter imaging abnormalities in early Parkinson disease (PD). Further studies are warranted to determine whether changes over time in these two measures are also correlated in early PD.
Impairment in olfactory function is an early manifestation of the neuropathologic process in Parkinson disease (PD),1 and clinical deficits in the sense of smell may precede the development of overt motor symptoms. Several studies have found olfactory deficits in asymptomatic relatives of patients with PD,2,3 some of whom have subsequently developed clinically manifest PD.4 In cross-sections of patients with PD, deficits in odor identification have been noted to be largely independent of motor status, medication use, or disease duration.5–8 These studies suggest that the olfactory deficit is present, but may be largely static during the progressive course of motor impairment in PD. Studies using PET and SPECT imaging of the dopaminergic system have detected marked abnormalities in dopaminergic function either in the absence of clinical features of PD4,9 or in the unaffected side of patients with hemiparkinsonism.10 In contrast to deficits in odor identification, imaging abnormalities appear to correlate with severity of motor dysfunction in PD.11,12
A prior study13 examined odor detection threshold sensitivity, recognition memory, and identification in 13 patients with PD who also underwent SPECT imaging, using the ligand [123I]β-CIT. Results from this study showed a relationship between disease severity (i.e., Hoehn & Yahr ratings) and β-CIT ratios (r = 0.76, p < 0.001). No significant correlations were observed between the olfactory measures and β-CIT uptake or other clinical ratings of disease duration, motor dysfunction, or cognitive status. These findings supported the idea that impaired olfactory function in PD is independent of physiologic measures of dopamine transporter density as well as motor features. In the current study, we evaluated the relationship between [99mTc]TRODAT-1 (TRODAT) SPECT imaging, odor identification, and motor function specifically in patients with early PD. We sought to determine if an association between olfaction and dopamine transporter imaging is present early in the course of PD at a time when progressive loss of olfactory function may be most likely to occur.
Methods.
Subjects.
All subjects were recruited from the University of Pennsylvania Parkinson’s Disease and Movement Disorders Center at Pennsylvania Hospital. Inclusion criteria for the study were age > 35 years and the presence of early clinical signs of parkinsonism (Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale [UPDRS] motor score < 25) or recently diagnosed early-stage PD (symptom duration < 2 years). Women had to be postmenopausal, surgically sterilized, or have a negative urine pregnancy test at the time of study. Patients either met diagnostic criteria for PD14 at the time of imaging (n = 22) or progressed sufficiently to satisfy research diagnostic criteria over a period of 2 years of follow-up (n = 2). All subjects gave written informed consent for the procedures and the Institutional Review Board at the University of Pennsylvania approved all research protocols.
Clinical evaluations.
Demographic information, including age, sex, and duration of symptoms, was collected for all patients. Motor symptoms were assessed using the UPDRS.15 Subjects were also rated for severity of illness with the Hoehn and Yahr Scale.16 For patients receiving dopaminergic medications (n = 3), all ratings were done in the practically defined “off” state,17 12 hours after their last dose of medication.
Olfactory testing.
Odor identification performance was assessed using the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT).18,19 The UPSIT is a standardized, four-alternative, forced-choice test comprised of four booklets containing 10 odorants apiece, one odorant per page. The stimuli are embedded in “scratch and sniff” microcapsules fixed and positioned on strips at the bottom of each page. A multiple-choice question with four response alternatives for each item is located above each odorant strip.
The specific stimuli, basis for their selection, and reliability and sensitivity of this test have been described in detail previously.18,19 Raw scores are calculated as the number of correct identifications. Respondents can be divided into categories of normosmic, microsmic, anosmic, or malingering based on age- and sex-standardized cut-offs for the number of correctly identified odorants. The UPSIT was administered by a trained technician, who released the microencapsulated stimuli, placed them under each patient’s nostrils, and recorded the answer following the patient’s response.
Image acquisition and processing.
The TRODAT imaging protocol has been described previously.12 All individuals in the study were injected with a single bolus dose of 740 MBq (20 mCi) of [99mTc]TRODAT-1. Brain SPECT images were obtained from 3 to 4 hours after injection at a framing rate of 10 minutes per scan, utilizing a triple-head camera equipped with fanbeam collimators (Picker 3000; Picker International, Cleveland, OH). All image data were acquired in a 128 × 128 matrix through 40 projection angles over a 120° arc with a pixel width of 2.11 mm and a slice thickness of 3.56 mm. Using a standard backprojection technique with a Butterworth low-pass filter, the images were reconstructed and reoriented in planes parallel to the fronto-occipital pole. Attenuation correction was accomplished using Chang’s first order correction method. A set of standardized templates representing various structures of the whole brain was superimposed upon the acquired images. Three primary regions of interest (ROI) were assessed: the caudate, the putamen, and the whole striatum. Each ROI on the template was slightly smaller than the actual structure it represented, and was placed only on the two slices with the highest activity, in order to minimize problems with ill-defined edges and effects of volume averaging. Supratentorial areas other than the occipital cortex or cerebellum were used to model nonspecific activity, because previous experience has shown that the occipital cortex and cerebellum may have low counting rates, which could destabilize kinetic analyses. Mean specific uptake values (SUVs) were calculated for each structure by adding up the total number of counts in each ROI and dividing by the total number of corresponding pixels. All analyses of imaging parameters were conducted without knowledge of either olfactory test results or UPDRS ratings.
Statistical analysis.
Partial correlation coefficients were calculated for each of the three striatal ROI between the specific striatal TRODAT uptake values and UPSIT scores, UPDRS motor ratings (as a measure of disease severity), disease duration, and age. Partial correlation coefficients were also calculated between UPDRS motor score, UPSIT score, disease duration, and age. Comparisons of specific striatal uptake values between UPSIT impairment categories were conducted using multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) with age, disease duration, and disease severity as covariates. Significant multivariate effects followed with univariate planned comparisons. All statistical analysis was carried out using STATA statistical software, version 7.0 (Stata Corporation, College Station, TX).
Results.
The 24 subjects ranged in age from 39 to 75 years (mean [± SD] = 58.7 ± 12.6) (table 1). Seventeen (71%) were men. All patients had mild symptoms, with a mean UPDRS motor score off medication of 12.3 ± 5.7 (range 4 to 23) and a Hoehn and Yahr stage of 2 or less (mean = 1.4 ± 0.5). Four patients were taking antiparkinsonian medicines at the time of the SPECT scan: one on carbidopa/levodopa only, one on agonist monotherapy, one on both carbidopa/levodopa and a dopamine agonist, and one on selegiline. The mean duration since symptom onset was 20.8 ± 12.1 months (range 3 to 48), and the mean time since diagnosis was 6.8 ± 6.5 months (range 0 to 20).
Table 1 Demographic and clinical characteristics of patients at the time of imaging
Mean UPSIT score was 26.7 ± 8.0. Based on age and sex normative data from the UPSIT,19 eight subjects were categorized as normosmic (i.e., normal sense of smell), 10 as microsmic (i.e., diminished sense of smell), and six as anosmic (i.e., complete inability to smell).
Consistent with the pattern of striatal denervation seen in PD, the mean SUV was higher in the caudate (1.29 ± 0.31) than in the putamen (0.57 ± 0.16). The SUV for the whole striatum was 0.69 ± 0.17. The differences in specific binding among the three ROI were all significant (p < 0.001 for all pairwise comparisons).
Overall, the correlations between TRODAT imaging and olfaction were much stronger than correlations between imaging and UPDRS ratings (table 2). As can be seen in table 2, UPSIT scores were related to dopamine transporter binding in the whole striatum (r = 0.66, p = 0.001). Of the ROIs examined, the strongest correlation between TRODAT values and the UPSIT was seen in the putamen (r = 0.74, p < 0.001) (figure). The correlation between the UPSIT and caudate binding was moderate (r = 0.36), but did not reach significance (p = 0.11). There were no significant correlations between any of the imaging measures and UPDRS total motor scores. There also was no association between UPSIT score and motor function as measured by the UPDRS (r = −0.12, p = 0.57).
Table 2 Partial correlation coefficients between UPSIT, motor scores, symptom duration, and age with specific uptake values for various striatal regions of interest
Figure. Scatterplot showing relationship between University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test (UPSIT) scores and [99mTc]TRODAT-1 SPECT specific binding for the whole putamen (p < 0.001). Specific uptake values are the average of values for the left and right putamen.
Consistent with the results of the correlation analysis, a MANCOVA with impairment rating on the UPSIT (normosmic, or normal sense of smell; microsmic, or reduced sense of smell; and anosmic, or loss of smell function) as the grouping factor, and TRODAT binding in the caudate and putamen as dependent variables and age, duration of illness, and illness severity as covariates revealed a main effect of impairment category (F[2,18] = 4.4, p = 0.027), with normosmic patients showing greater TRODAT binding in the putamen relative to microsmic- (F[1,18] = 8.0, p = 0.01) or anosmic- (F[1,18] = 18.4, p = 0.0004) patients (table 3). Differences in TRODAT binding in the putamen also differed between microsmic and anosmic subgroups (F[1,18] = 4.5, p = 0.048), with anosmic subjects showing significantly reduced dopamine transporter binding compared with microsmic subjects. Identical findings were obtained when examining the whole striatum ROI. No significant differences in caudate binding were observed among the normosmic, microsmic, and anosmic subgroups.
Table 3 Mean (±SD) specific striatal [99mTc] TRODAT uptake values for the caudate, putamen, and whole striatum by UPSIT impairment classification
Discussion.
The present findings reveal a strong and consistent relationship between dopamine transporter binding, as measured by TRODAT SPECT, and odor identification in patients with early PD. We found a strong correlation between UPSIT scores and dopamine transporter binding in the putamen. There was a moderate correlation between olfaction and TRODAT binding in the caudate nucleus, however, this correlation was not significant given our sample size. Ratings of motor impairment did not correlate with either TRODAT binding or UPSIT scores.
Our results suggest that olfactory testing may be a useful biomarker early in the course of PD, and may capture some of the same differences in severity of the underlying neurodegenerative process as dopamine transporter imaging in early PD. The finding of a relationship between odor identification performance and dopamine transporter binding stand in contrast to an earlier study13 that found that measures of odor detection threshold, recognition memory, and identification were not related to dopamine transporter binding in the striatum as measured by (123I)β-CIT SPECT. The difference between our results and those of the prior study may be due to the fact that our sample included only subjects with early, mild PD, and the other study included patients with a wider range of disease severity. The mean Hoehn and Yahr stage in our cohort was 1.4 (range = 1.0 to 2.0), as opposed to 2.4 (range 1.0 to 4.0) in the other study. It may be that the association between dopamine transporter binding and odor identification is present only early in the disease process, since olfactory abilities may demonstrate a “floor-effect” that potentially masks any relationship with illness progression and dopamine transporter binding levels later in the course of the disease.
We did not find a relationship between either dopamine transporter binding or odor identification and UPDRS motor scores. The lack of association between motor scores and the imaging and olfactory measures suggests that neither TRODAT nor the UPSIT is a useful surrogate marker for motor performance in early PD. There are several potential explanations for the lack of association between motor performance and the other measures. The idea that olfactory deficits manifest early in the course of PD and reach their maximal severity even as motor impairments continue to progress may explain the lack of a relationship between disease severity and degree of olfactory impairment found in many studies, as most have examined patients with PD with greater disease duration and more disability than our cohort.5,20–22 Moreover, although a number of studies have shown a strong relationship between SPECT imaging and disease severity in cross-sections of patients with PD,11,23–26 this relationship has not been found when the analysis is confined to patients with early, mild disease such as ours.10 It is possible that the compensatory mechanisms that allow normal motor function to persist in spite of significant losses in dopamine transporter density in presymptomatic PD4,9,27 may also attenuate the relationship between motor performance and dopamine transporter density in early, clinically manifest PD.
These data are consistent with previous findings documenting differences in dopamine transporter imaging between relatives of patients with PD with and without significant olfactory impairment.4,28 Specifically, in this series of studies, a reduction in binding was observed in 4 out of 40 hyposmic relatives of patients with PD, all of whom went on to develop clinical parkinsonism. No similar reductions were seen in the normosmic relatives. These data suggest that olfactory deficits precede the clinical motor signs of PD and may reflect the earliest stage of the evolution of the pathophysiology of PD. The current findings extend this work by documenting differences in dopamine transporter binding in the striatum across different levels of odor identification impairment in patients with early stage clinically manifest PD. Patients with normal UPSIT scores (i.e., normosmic range) showed significantly higher levels of dopamine transporter binding in the putamen and striatum as a whole compared to patients with PD falling in the microsmic or anosmic ranges. The observation that the microsmic and anosmic subgroups also differed significantly from each other in mean TRODAT binding lends further support to the idea that dopamine transporter density and olfactory function are related across a range of levels of olfactory impairment in early PD.
There is evidence from the neuropathologic literature to support our findings. A recent report29 described an increase (possibly compensatory) in dopaminergic neurons in the olfactory bulb in PD, and a number of studies have shown extensive extranigral changes in idiopathic PD that include the olfactory bulb and related portions of the anterior olfactory nucleus.30,31 Braak and coworkers have put forward a neuropathologic staging system for PD in which they argue that Lewy body pathology in the olfactory bulb and anterior olfactory nucleus actually precedes degeneration of the substantia nigra.1,32 The developers of this staging system speculate that the anterior olfactory system may represent one of the induction sites of the neuropathologic process in PD. Although Consistent with this model, degeneration in the olfactory system and the nigrostriatal system may proceed in parallel in the early stages of clinical PD, and olfactory loss may be a marker for nigrostriatal dopaminergic cell loss, even though degeneration in the olfactory system is not causally related to the clinical motor features of PD.
A few caveats must be noted. First, the sample of subjects is relatively small, and a larger cohort will be required to fully assess these findings. However, it is notable that the effect size (Cohen’s d) for the relationship between the UPSIT and dopamine transporter binding in the putamen is quite large (d+ = +2.13, 95% CI = +1.42 < δ < +2.83), and we would expect this effect to be robust in other samples. Second, we only examined the domain of odor identification, and it is important to assess other olfactory abilities such as odor detection and discrimination to see if the relationships we found extend to other measures of olfactory function. For example, a relationship between disease severity and odor discrimination but not odor identification has been reported.8 However, it is important to note that most tests of olfactory function are strongly correlated and, in most instances, are likely to be measures of the same physiologic attributes.33
One small study has suggested that progression in olfactory deficits can be measured in the early stages of PD.21 Larger, longitudinal studies are needed to assess the relationship between olfaction and dopamine transporter binding or other measures of the integrity of the nigrostriatal dopaminergic system in patients with recently diagnosed PD and possibly in asymptomatic, at-risk individuals.
Footnotes
-
Supported by National Institutes of Health Grants R01 AG-17524 (A.N.), MH63381 (P.J.M.), M01-RR00040 (General Clinical Research Center; R.L.D.), and R01-AG 17496 (R.L.D.). A.S. is supported by grant K-08 HS00004 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). J.E.D. is supported by an Advanced Career Development Award from the Biomedical Laboratory Research and Development Service of the Department of Veterans Affairs.
Drs. Siderowf and Newberg have served as consultants to Amersham Health. Dr. Newberg has also received research support from Amersham Health. This research was not supported or supervised in any way by Amersham.
Received September 6, 2004. Accepted in final form January 27, 2005.
References
- 1.↵
- 2.↵
Markopoulou K, Larsen KW, Wszolek EK, et al. Olfactory dysfunction in familial parkinsonism. Neurology 1997;49:1262–1267.
- 3.
Montgomery EBJ, Baker KB, Lyons K, Koller WC. Abnormal performance on the PD test battery by asymptomatic first-degree relatives. Neurology 1999;52:757–762.
- 4.↵
- 5.↵
Doty RL, Deems DA, Stellar S. Olfactory dysfunction in parkinsonism: a general deficit unrelated to neurologic signs, disease stage, or disease duration. Neurology 1988;38:1237–1244.
- 6.
Doty RL. Odor perception in neurodegenerative diseases and schizophrenia. In: Doty RL, ed. Handbook of olfaction and gustation. New York: Marcel Dekker, 2003;479–502.
- 7.
Doty RL, Stern MB, Pfeiffer C, Gollomp SM, Hurtig HI. Bilateral olfactory dysfunction in early stage treated and untreated idiopathic Parkinson’s disease. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1992;55:138–142.
- 8.↵
- 9.
- 10.↵
Marek KL, Seibyl JP, Zoghbi SS, et al. [123I] beta-CIT/SPECT imaging demonstrates bilateral loss of dopamine transporters in hemi-Parkinson’s disease. Neurology 1996;46:231–237.
- 11.↵
- 12.↵
Mozley PD, Schneider JS, Acton PD, et al. Binding of [99mTc]TRODAT-1 to dopamine transporters in patients with Parkinson’s disease and in healthy volunteers. J Nucl Med 2000;41:584–589.
- 13.↵
Lehrner J, Brucke T, Kryspin-Exner I, Asenbaum S, Podreka I. Impaired olfactory function in Parkinson’s disease. Lancet 1995;345:1054–1055.
- 14.↵
Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Kilford L, Lees AJ. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease: a clinico-pathological study of 100 cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1992;55:181–184.
- 15.↵
Fahn S, Elton RL. Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale. In: Fahn S, Marsden CD, Calne D, Goldstein M, eds. Recent developments in Parkinson’s disease. Florham Park, NJ: Macmillan Health Care Information, 1987;153–164.
- 16.↵
Hoehn MM, Yahr MD. Parkinsonism: onset, progression and mortality. Neurology 1967;17:427–442.
- 17.↵
- 18.↵
- 19.↵
- 20.
- 21.↵
Muller A, Reichmann H, Livermore A, Hummel T. Olfactory function in idiopathic Parkinson’s disease (IPD): results from cross-sectional studies in IPD patients and long-term follow-up of de-novo IPD patients. J Neural Transm 2002;109:805–811.
- 22.
Stern MB, Doty RL, Dotti M, et al. Olfactory function in Parkinson’s disease subtypes. Neurology 1994;44:266–268.
- 23.
- 24.
- 25.
Huang WS, Lin SZ, Lin JC, Wey SP, Ting G, Liu RS. Evaluation of early-stage Parkinson’s disease with 99mTc-TRODAT-1 imaging. J Nucl Med 2001;42:1303–1308.
- 26.
- 27.
Morrish PK, Rakshi JS, Bailey DL, Sawle GV, Brooks DJ. Measuring the rate of progression and estimating the preclinical period of Parkinson’s disease with [18F]dopa PET. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998;64:314–319.
- 28.
- 29.↵
- 30.↵
- 31.
- 32.
- 33.↵
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Cutaneous α-Synuclein Signatures in Patients With Multiple System Atrophy and Parkinson Disease
Dr. Rizwan S. Akhtar and Dr. Sarah Brooker
► Watch
Related Articles
- No related articles found.
Topics Discussed
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Article
Prospective clinical and DaT-SPECT imaging in premotor LRRK2 G2019S-associated Parkinson diseaseMaría Sierra, Isabel Martínez-Rodríguez, Pascual Sánchez-Juan et al.Neurology, July 05, 2017 -
Article
Is normosmic Parkinson disease a unique clinical phenotype?Dong H. Lee, Jungsu S. Oh, Jee H. Ham et al.Neurology, September 09, 2015 -
Article
Olfactory deficits predict cognitive decline and Alzheimer dementia in an urban communityD.P. Devanand, Seonjoo Lee, Jennifer Manly et al.Neurology, December 03, 2014 -
Articles
A cross-sectional study contrasting olfactory function in autonomic disordersE.M. Garland, S.R. Raj, A.C. Peltier et al.Neurology, January 31, 2011