Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Education
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion (DEI)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Neurology Future Forecasting Series
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Topics A-Z
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit New Manuscript
    • Submit Revised Manuscript
    • Author Center

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Education
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion (DEI)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Neurology Future Forecasting Series
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Topics A-Z
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit New Manuscript
    • Submit Revised Manuscript
    • Author Center
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Neurology Video Journal Club
  • Residents & Fellows

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Neurology
Home
The most widely read and highly cited peer-reviewed neurology journal
  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
Site Logo
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Neurology Video Journal Club
  • Residents & Fellows

Share

March 22, 2005; 64 (6) Brief Communications

Long-term outcome of endovascular stenting for symptomatic basilar artery stenosis

W. Yu, W. S. Smith, V. Singh, N. U. Ko, S. P. Cullen, C. F. Dowd, V. V. Halbach, R. T. Higashida
First published March 21, 2005, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/01.WNL.0000154600.13460.7B
W. Yu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
W. S. Smith
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
V. Singh
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N. U. Ko
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. P. Cullen
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
C. F. Dowd
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
V. V. Halbach
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. T. Higashida
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Full PDF
Citation
Long-term outcome of endovascular stenting for symptomatic basilar artery stenosis
W. Yu, W. S. Smith, V. Singh, N. U. Ko, S. P. Cullen, C. F. Dowd, V. V. Halbach, R. T. Higashida
Neurology Mar 2005, 64 (6) 1055-1057; DOI: 10.1212/01.WNL.0000154600.13460.7B

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions

Make Comment

See Comments

Downloads
658

Share

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Loading

Abstract

Eighteen patients underwent stenting for symptomatic basilar artery stenosis. There were three major periprocedural complications (16.7%) without fatality. At a mean 26.7 ± 12.1-month follow-up, 15 patients (83.3%) had an excellent long-term outcome. Only one patient (5.6%) had moderate disability from recurrent stroke, and two patients died of medical illness at 30 and 36 months after stenting. In this uncontrolled study, stenting appeared to be effective in reducing stroke risk and death and worthy of further scrupulous trial.

Basilar artery (BA) stenosis portends a high risk of TIAs, stroke, or death.1–3 In a prospective study of posterior circulation stroke, 30% of patients with ≥50% BA stenosis had mortality or severe disability at 30 days after hospital discharge.2 In other retrospective studies, 1-year stroke-free survival was 67% and the risk of recurrent stroke was approximately 11% per year in the stenotic BA territory despite medical therapy.4,5

Endovascular angioplasty of the cerebral vasculature was introduced as a promising therapy for high-grade BA stenosis in 1980.6 However, case series at selected centers revealed periprocedural morbidities of 7 to 50%, with mortalities as high as 16.7%.7 The common complications of balloon angioplasty include elastic recoil, acute closure, plaque embolization, arterial dissection or perforation, and occlusion of the perforating branches during balloon inflation. Some of these limitations may be overcome with use of a compact and flexible stent.8 Although a number of case series have described the feasibility and short-term results of stenting for symptomatic BA stenosis,8,9 the long-term outcome of such therapy has not been previously reported.

Methods.

We have searched the databases of the Neurointerventional Radiology and Neurovascular Service at our institute to identify patients who underwent endovascular stenting for symptomatic BA stenosis from 1999 to August 2003. Patients who were treated only with angioplasty or those who presented with BA occlusion, artery dissection, or angiitis were excluded. In all eligible cases, patient demographics and clinical characteristics were reviewed and abstracted by an experienced stroke neurologist. The stenosis rate, (1 − N/D) × 100%, was estimated from measurements of the diameters at the narrowest point (N) and normal artery distal to the lesion (D) on digital subtraction angiography.

All patients presented with either TIAs or ischemic stroke referable to a high-grade BA stenosis. They were evaluated by stroke neurologists and pretreated with aspirin 325 mg and clopidogrel 75 mg daily. Stenting was performed under general anesthesia by one of the neurointerventional radiologists. Percutaneous access was obtained using a 6- or 7-French catheter sheath via one of the femoral arteries. Complete diagnostic angiography was performed to identify areas of stenosis and collateral circulation. A guiding catheter was then coaxially placed in the cervical vertebral artery (VA) providing the best access to the BA stenosis. The stenoses were then primarily crossed with a 0.035-in. microwire, and a premounted balloon expandable coronary stent was delivered across the lesion and deployed, with or without predilatation. IV heparin was administered during the procedure to maintain an activated clotting time between 2 and 2.5 times normal for adequate systemic anticoagulation.

After stenting, all patients were admitted to the Neurologic Intensive Care Unit for observation and management under the care of the Stroke and Neurocritical Care Service. The Modified Rankin Scale (MRS) was used to evaluate functional outcome. All patients had either clinic or telephone follow-up.

Results.

Eighteen patients were identified to have undergone endovascular stenting for symptomatic BA stenosis. The clinical and radiologic features of these patients are summarized in table 1. Sixteen patients (89%) had TIAs or stroke despite medical therapy with antiplatelet agents, anticoagulants, or both. All the patients had more than 60% BA stenosis. There were eight focal (<5 mm in length), five tubular (5 to 10 mm), and five segmental (>10 mm) lesions. Six patients had no collateral circulation, and three of them (50%) presented with TIAs. Twelve patients had one or two posterior communicating arteries. Patients with poor collateral circulation appeared to be more likely to have TIAs. Endovascular stenting was performed successfully in all patients with excellent flow restoration (figure). The residual stenosis ranged from 0 to 30%. Four patients had additional stenting for concomitant VA and ICA lesions. Two patients had balloon angioplasty for tandem VA stenoses.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint

Table 1 Patient demographics and clinical characteristics

Figure
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure. Cerebral angiograms show focal (A), tubular, preocclusive (B), and diffuse segmental (C) lesions before and after stent placement. A tandem distal left vertebral artery stenosis was also stented (C). All the lesions were revascularized with excellent angiographic results.

Major periprocedural complications occurred in three patients. One patient developed severe dysarthria and right-sided hemiparesis approximately 24 hours after stenting of severe tandem stenoses in BA, distal left vertebral artery (VA), and right petrous internal carotid artery (ICA). CT scan of the head showed a left pontine infarct and multifocal intracerebral hemorrhages. Another patient had oculomotor nerve palsy and depressed level of consciousness after stenting for tandem BA and left VA stenoses. He was found to have subarachnoid and intraventricular hemorrhages, which required an external ventricular drainage for 10 days. The third patient experienced profuse bleeding from a femoral artery, the oropharynx, and the urethra that required transfusion with two units of packed red blood cells. The overall rate of major periprocedural complications was 16.7% without fatality, and the rate of cerebrovascular complications was 11.1%.

Minor complications were noted in three patients with one cerebral microembolism and two asymptomatic VA dissections. The patients with VA dissection were treated with an oral anticoagulant for 6 months without neurologic sequelae.

The long-term follow-up results are summarized in table 2. Fifteen patients (83.3%) had excellent long-term functional outcome (MRS score ≤1) without disability. Five of them reported mild transient symptoms, including dizzy spells, sensation of head congestion, neck pain, and hand incoordination. Only one (5.6%) patient had a recurrent pontine infarct due to in-stent restenosis 9 months after the stenting. The lesion was treated with angioplasty without further events. Neither of the two deaths (11.1%) was related to the stenting or stroke.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint

Table 2 Functional outcome at 26.7 ± 12.1 months (range 2 to 50 months) after stenting

Discussion.

Endovascular stenting of symptomatic BA stenosis remains controversial due to the high risk of complications and lack of proven efficacy. Although emergent revascularization in unstable patients was associated with very high periprocedural morbility and mortality,7 elective stenting of BA stenosis appeared to be safe.9 In this case series, 18 patients had stenting for symptomatic BA stenosis. Four had additional stent placement for concomitant VA and ICA stenoses. Of the three patients with major periprocedural complications, two initially presented with acute stroke and were stented for BA lesions and additional tandem stenosis. Therefore, consistent with the results of a recent report,7 patients with acute stroke and tandem stenoses tended to have a higher risk of periprocedural complications and poorer outcome.

There have been limited data on the long-term outcome of stenting for symptomatic BA stenosis. Over the past 5 years, only two case series reported the outcome of stenting for up to 15 months.9,10 One of the two case series described elective stenting of symptomatic BA stenosis in 12 patients.9 Clinical follow-up was available for 0.5 to 16 months. During a mean 5.9-month follow-up after stenting, 10 patients (83%) were asymptomatic. One patient had a TIA and the other had nonspecific symptoms. In the other case series, 10 patients with BA stenting were followed for 2 to 42 months.10 At a mean 15.6-month follow-up, six (60%) of the patients were asymptomatic. Two patients (20%) had TIA or stroke. Of the other two patients, one died of metastatic lung carcinoma and the other died of coronary artery bypass. We demonstrate that, at a mean 26.7-month follow-up, 83.3% of patients had excellent long-term outcome. There were only one recurrent stroke (5.6%) and two deaths of medical illness. Therefore, endovascular stenting for symptomatic BA stenosis appeared to be effective in preventing stroke and reducing death.

Of note, there are a few limitations in this case series. First, it is a retrospective study. The patients were stented empirically without standard inclusion and exclusion criteria. Possible selection bias is one of the major limitations. Second, not every patient received maximal medical therapy before stenting. Last, these are single-center data and may not be generalizable for reasons of referral and selection bias, neurointerventional physicians' expertise, and multidisciplinary care. It should also be pointed out that although all stented patients were treated with aspirin and clopidogrel based on percutaneous coronary intervention data, we advise against using the combination therapy for stroke prevention in general patient population.

Because of the poor prognosis of symptomatic BA stenosis found in previous studies, prospective multicenter randomized trials of endovascular BA stenting are warranted despite the risk of major procedural complications.

Footnotes

  • Received June 25, 2004. Accepted in final form December 14, 2004.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Pessin MS, Gorelick PB, Kwan ES, et al. Basilar artery stenosis: middle and distal segments. Neurology 1987;37:1742–1746.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Caplan LR, Wityk RJ, Glass TA, et al. New England Medical Center Posterior Circulation registry. Ann Neurol 2004;56:389–398.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.
    Thijs VN, Albers GW. Symptomatic intracranial atherosclerosis: outcome of patients who fail antithrombotic therapy. Neurology 2000;55:490–497.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    The Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease (WASID) Study Group. Prognosis of patients with symptomatic vertebral or basilar artery stenosis. Stroke 1998;29:1389–1392.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.
    Qureshi AI, Ziai WC, Yahia AM, et al. Stroke-free survival and its determinants in patients with symptomatic vertebrobasilar stenosis: a multicenter study Neurosurgery 2003;52:1033–1040.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    Sundt TM Jr, Smith HC, Campbell JK, et al. Transluminal angioplasty for basilar artery stenosis. Mayo Clin Proc 1980;55:673–680.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Gupta RH, Schumacher C, Mangla S, et al. Urgent endovascular revascularization for symptomatic intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis. Neurology 2003;61:1729–1735.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    Gomez CR, Orr SC. Angioplasty and stenting for primary treatment of intracranial arterial stenoses. Arch Neurol 2001;58:1687–1690.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    Gomez CR, Misra VK, Liu MW, et al. Elective stenting of symptomatic basilar artery stenosis. Stroke 2000;31:95–99.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    Levy EI, Hanel RA, Boulos AS, et al. Comparison of periprocedure complications resulting from direct stent placement compared with those due to conventional and staged stent placement in the basilar artery. J Neurosurg 2003;99:653–660.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed

Letters: Rapid online correspondence

  • Long-term outcome of endovascular stenting for symptomatic basilar artery stenosis
    • Osama O Zaidat, Duke University, Duke University Medical Center, Duke North, Box 3808, Durham, NC 27710ozaidat@hotmail.com
    • Tony P. Smith, Michael J. AlexanderBas
    Submitted May 23, 2005
  • Reply to Zaidat et al
    • Wengui Yu, University of California, San Francisco, Parnassus Avenue, CA 94143-0114wyu@uci.edu
    • Wade S. Smith, Vineeta Singh, Nerissa U. Ko, Sean P. Cullen, Christopher F. Dowd, Van V. Halbach, and Randall T. Higashida
    Submitted May 23, 2005
Comment

REQUIREMENTS

If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org

Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.

If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.

Submission specifications:

  • Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
  • Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
  • Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
  • Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
  • Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.

More guidelines and information on Disputes & Debates

Compose Comment

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
NOTE: The first author must also be the corresponding author of the comment.
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Publishing Agreement
NOTE: All authors, besides the first/corresponding author, must complete a separate Publishing Agreement Form and provide via email to the editorial office before comments can be posted.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

You May Also be Interested in

Back to top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods.
    • Results.
    • Discussion.
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Advertisement

Use of Whole-Genome Sequencing for Mitochondrial Disease Diagnosis

Dr. Robert Pitceathly and Dr. William Macken

► Watch

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.

Topics Discussed

  • Autonomic diseases
  • All Clinical trials
  • Clinical trials Observational study (Cohort, Case control)
  • Stroke prevention

Alert Me

  • Alert me when eletters are published

Recommended articles

  • Review
    Stroke due to large vessel atherosclerosis
    Five new things
    Erika Marulanda-Londoño, Seemant Chaturvedi et al.
    Neurology: Clinical Practice, March 24, 2016
  • Articles
    Levels and value of platelet activity in patients with severe internal carotid artery stenosis
    H. -K. Yip, C. -H. Lu, C. -H. Yang et al.
    Neurology, March 27, 2006
  • Contemporary Issues
    Real-world experience of treatment decision-making in carotid stenosis in a neurovascular board
    David Leander Rimmele, Axel Larena-Avellaneda, Anna C. Alegiani et al.
    Neurology, June 28, 2017
  • Article
    Body mass index and outcome after revascularization for symptomatic carotid artery stenosis
    Eline J. Volkers, Jacoba P. Greving, Jeroen Hendrikse et al.
    Neurology, April 26, 2017
Neurology: 100 (12)

Articles

  • Ahead of Print
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Popular Articles
  • Translations

About

  • About the Journals
  • Ethics Policies
  • Editors & Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise

Submit

  • Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Information for Reviewers
  • AAN Guidelines
  • Permissions

Subscribers

  • Subscribe
  • Activate a Subscription
  • Sign up for eAlerts
  • RSS Feed
Site Logo
  • Visit neurology Template on Facebook
  • Follow neurology Template on Twitter
  • Visit Neurology on YouTube
  • Neurology
  • Neurology: Clinical Practice
  • Neurology: Education
  • Neurology: Genetics
  • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • AAN.com
  • AANnews
  • Continuum
  • Brain & Life
  • Neurology Today

Wolters Kluwer Logo

Neurology | Print ISSN:0028-3878
Online ISSN:1526-632X

© 2023 American Academy of Neurology

  • Privacy Policy
  • Feedback
  • Advertise