Dopamine transporter imaging study in parkinsonism occurring in fragile X premutation carriers
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

Abstract
The authors studied four patients with parkinsonism carrying the fragile X premutation using SPECT with [23I]FP-CIT. They found evidence of preserved presynaptic nigrostriatal function, suggesting that parkinsonism in the X fragile premutation might be related to postsynaptic dopaminergic changes or different neurotransmitter alterations.
The fragile X premutation is caused by an expansion of 55 to 200 repeats of the trinucleotide element (CGG)n located in the 5′ UTR of the fragile X mental retardation 1 (FMR1) gene. A syndrome characterized by tremor, parkinsonism, and ataxia (FXTAS) has been described in association with the fragile X premutation.1,2 The prevalence of such a premutation in groups of patients affected by movement disorders needs to be clarified.3–8 In this study, we investigated nigrostriatal dopaminergic function in vivo using dopamine transporter (DAT) imaging in four patients who were carriers of the fragile X premutation with clinical parkinsonism.
Methods.
Patient 1 was a 75-year-old married man with no children with a 5-year history of progressive action tremor and dysmetria (more in the right arm), ataxia, and mild parkinsonism. A computerized analysis of the eye movements showed cerebellar impairment, autonomic tests (Valsalva test and tilt test) were abnormal, motor evoked potentials and somatosensory evoked potentials suggested pyramidal and coronal impairment, cranial MRI showed a symmetrically increased T2 signal in the middle cerebellar peduncles with expansion to the white matter of the cerebellar hemispheres, and genetic assays for spinocerebellar ataxia (SCA) were negative. The genetic assay for the FMR1 allele showed an expansion of 105 CGG. The score of the clinical rating scale for tremor was 14, the score on the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor section was 10, and the score on the International Cooperative Ataxia Rating Scale (ICARS) was 14.
Patient 2 was a 76-year-old married man with two children with a 2-year history of mild progressive action tremor and postural instability. Genetic testing revealed an expansion of 73 CGG triplets in the FMR1 gene. He also had two grandsons with mental retardation and fragile X syndrome. His neurologic examination showed mild postural and action tremor (more on the left side), mild bradykinesia of the upper limbs (left > right), no rigidity, and no resting tremor. His gait was normal, but he could not walk in tandem and the pull test was altered. Neuropsychological testing revealed normal cognitive status. The score on the clinical rating scale for tremor was 17, the score of the UPDRS motor section was 12, and the score on the ICARS was 15. Brain MRI showed no signal abnormalities in the middle cerebellar peduncles or in the cerebellar hemispheres; however, very mild cortical atrophy was present.
Patient 3 was a 52-year-old man with a 2-year history of gait disorder, irregularity of steps, lateral veering, inability to walk without assistance, dysarthria, nystagmus evoked in lateral gaze in both directions, mild dysmetria, urge incontinence, orthostatic hypotension, and mild cognitive impairment. Cranial MRI showed olivopontocerebellar atrophy and mild cortical atrophy; genetic assays for different SCAs were negative. Tilt testing confirmed orthostatic hypotension, and neuropsychological tests showed alterations in attention and short-term memory tasks. Motor response to the l-Dopa acute challenge test (200 mg orally) was negative. The score on the UPDRS motor section was 14. The genetic assay for the FMR1 allele showed an expansion of 85 CGG.
Patient 4 was a 71-year-old man with a grandchild with fragile X syndrome with a 10-year history of intentional tremor of the right arm, complicated by resting tremor in the past 3 years. He had had mood disorders for the previous 20 years and memory problems for 5 years. He was diagnosed with Parkinson disease (PD), but the acute or chronic response to levodopa was poor (the score on the UPDRS motor section was 16). Brain CT scan showed cortical atrophy and diffuse white matter lesions. The genetic assay for the FMR1 allele showed an expansion of 97 CGG.
In addition to routine clinical examination, all patients were videotaped and blindly evaluated by two neurologists who are experts in movement disorders (A.A., U.B.) who graded the presence and severity of parkinsonism.
FP-CIT SPECT scanning.
SPECT studies were carried out according to standard procedure. Scanning took place between 3 and 4 hours after injection of [123I]FP-CIT (185 MBq). All subjects were scanned with a double-head scanner. The images were acquired on a 128 × 128 matrix, and the overall scanning time for each patient was 30 to 45 minutes. All the images were automatically reconstructed, and after uniform correction for tissutal attenuation, the transaxial pictures were reoriented along the fronto-occipital axis. Usually five to eight slices were acquired starting at the cerebellum level upward to include the basal ganglia. Regular circular regions of interest were used to calculate the average striatal (caudate nucleus, putamen) to nonspecific areas with few or no dopamine receptors such as occipital lobes and radioactivity ratios for both hemispheres. SPECT data were then compared with those obtained from seven healthy controls (three women, four men, mean age 65.5 ± 9.3 years) and seven patients with mild PD (two women, five men, mean age 62.3 ± 7.1 years) by Mann-Whitney signed rank U test.
Results.
In our patients with FXTAS, parkinsonism was mild to moderate (the score on the UPDRS motor section ranging from 10 to 16) and the response to dopaminergic therapy was poor or absent (table).
Table Clinical and neuroimaging findings in the study population
The uptake of [123I]FP-CIT (semiquantitative measure as specific/nonspecific binding ratio) in patients with FXTAS was similar to that reported in healthy subjects in the putamen (FXTAS: right [mean ± SD] 2.52 ± 0.19; left 2.47 ± 0.13; controls: right 2.30 ± 0.26, left 2.36 ± 0.24) and in the caudate nucleus (FXTAS: right 2.63 ± 0.13, left 2.69 ± 0.12; controls: 2.60 ± 0.21, left 2.58 ± 0.35). Because the motor impairment as assessed by UPDRS was mild to moderate in our patients, seven patients with PD with mild parkinsonism were chosen as pathologic controls (UPDRS 10.6 ± 1.5). In this mild PD group, the uptake measures were 1.43 ± 0.39 for the right putamen, 1.35 ± 0.25 for the left putamen, 1.95 ± 0.15 for the right caudate, and 1.88 ± 0.20 for the left caudate. These values were lower in all striatal areas vs the results obtained in the FXTAS group and in the healthy controls (p < 0.005) (figure).
Figure. [123I]FP-CIT SPECT images obtained in a fragile X premutation carrier with parkinsonism (tremor, parkinsonism, and ataxia), a patient with PD at Hoehn and Yahr stage 2 (maximum 5), and a healthy control.
Discussion.
The pathophysiology of parkinsonism occurring in FXTAS is not well known. Neuroimaging studies carried out on fragile X premutation carriers have shown a reduction in volume of cerebellar and cerebral cortex and an increase in the hippocampal volume.9 Interestingly, a decrease in the volume of the bilateral caudate nuclei in a group of fragile X premutation female carriers was also reported.10 This evidence supporting the involvement of basal ganglia could contribute to the explanation of the occurrence of parkinsonism in FXTAS. In our FXTAS patients with parkinsonism, a normal striatal [123I]FP-CIT uptake was observed, suggesting the preservation of presynaptic nigrostriatal dopaminergic nerve terminals in these subjects. Our findings indicate that parkinsonism in FXTAS patients could be caused by dysfunction involving the nigrostriatal pathway at the postsynaptic level or different neurotransmitter systems. This hypothesis is consistent with the poor or absent response to dopaminergic therapy reported in our patients, although some degree of levodopa response, moderate or transient, has been reported in a minority of FXTAS patients.1
Patients with tremor, ataxia, or parkinsonism have been screened for the fragile X premutation in other studies.3–8 Whereas 4 to 5% premutation has been reported in ataxia patients, indicating the utility of this analysis in the molecular investigation of ataxia,7,8 only a few studies have been performed on subjects with movement disorders. Our findings suggest that genetic screening for the fragile X premutation should be carried out on those patients with parkinsonism otherwise unexplained with a negative DAT imaging study. Our study population was small; thus, no definitive conclusion regarding the molecular basis of parkinsonism in the fragile X premutation can be made; our observations warrant further study in larger populations.
Footnotes
-
Disclosure: The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Received March 3, 2005. Accepted in final form September 13, 2005.
References
- 1.↵
Hagerman RJ, Leehey M, Heinrichs W, et al. Intention tremor, parkinsonism, and generalized brain atrophy in male carriers of fragile X. Neurology 2001;57:127–130.
- 2.
- 3.↵
- 4.
Tan EK, Puong KY, Law HY, et al. Fragile X premutations alleles in SCA, ET, and parkinsonism in an Asian cohort. Neurology 2004;63:362–363.
- 5.
Hall DA, Berry-Kravis E, Jacquemont S, et al. Initial diagnoses given to persons with the fragile X associated tremor/ataxia syndrome (FXTAS). Neurology 2005;65:299–301.
- 6.
Kamm C, Healy DG, Quinn NP, et al. The fragile X tremor ataxia syndrome in the differential diagnosis of multiple system atrophy: data from the EMSA Study Group. Brain 2005;128:1855–1860.
- 7.↵
- 8.
Brussino A, Gellera C, Saluto A, et al. FMR1 gene premutation is a frequent cause of late-onset sporadic cerebellar ataxia. Neurology 2005;64:145–147.
- 9.↵
- 10.↵
Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Related Articles
- No related articles found.