Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
    • Education
  • Online Sections
    • COVID-19
    • Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, Anti-racism, & Social Justice (IDEAS)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • Topics A-Z
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Patient Pages
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Center

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
    • Education
  • Online Sections
    • COVID-19
    • Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, Anti-racism, & Social Justice (IDEAS)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • Topics A-Z
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Patient Pages
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Center
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Residents & Fellows

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Neurology
Home
The most widely read and highly cited peer-reviewed neurology journal
  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
Site Logo
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Residents & Fellows

Share

January 24, 2006; 66 (2) Clinical/Scientific Notes

Acute motor conduction block neuropathy followed by axonal degeneration and poor recovery

Yusuf A. Rajabally, L.H.A. Strens, R. J. Abbott
First published January 24, 2006, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000194305.04983.ed
Yusuf A. Rajabally
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L.H.A. Strens
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. J. Abbott
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Full PDF
Citation
Acute motor conduction block neuropathy followed by axonal degeneration and poor recovery
Yusuf A. Rajabally, L.H.A. Strens, R. J. Abbott
Neurology Jan 2006, 66 (2) 287-288; DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000194305.04983.ed

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions

Make Comment

See Comments

Downloads
219

Share

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Loading

Acute motor neuropathies with conduction block are rare and often fully recover within weeks without residual axonal involvement.1,2 We report a case occurring after Campylobacter jejuni infection, with anti-GM1 antibody positivity, which presented axonal degeneration. Clinical improvement remained minimal 6 months after onset.

This 50-year-old woman presented, 4 weeks after a gastrointestinal illness, with weakness of the lower limbs, which progressed to the arms over 3 days. Her past personal and family medical histories were unremarkable. On examination, she had weakness proximally and distally in all limbs (grade 2 on the Medical Research Council [MRC] scale). Sensory examination showed mild distal hypoesthesia to pinprick and vibration sense up to the ankles. She was areflexic, and plantar reflexes were flexor. Cranial nerve functions were unimpaired. All routine blood investigations were normal. C. jejuni serology for IgM (1:640) and IgG anti-GM1 antibodies were positive. CSF examination done 6 days after onset of the weakness showed no cells and protein level of 0.36 g/L (normal 0.20 to 0.45). Nerve conduction studies also performed on day 6 revealed a pure motor neuropathy with multiple definite or probable partial conduction blocks (table). Maximal temporal dispersion including at Erb point did not exceed 20%. Distal sensory studies were normal. Needle electromyography (EMG) showed no spontaneous activity.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint

Table 1 Nerve conduction studies

A diagnosis of acute motor conduction block neuropathy was made. Minimal sensory signs were present, but electrophysiologically the involvement was purely motor. The patient did not undergo a search for sensory conduction blocks. The criteria for definite or probable partial motor conduction block according to the American Academy of Electrodiagnostic Medicine3 were fulfilled by five of eight motor nerves. F waves were all absent.

The patient was treated with IV immunoglobulins (400 mg/kg/day for 5 days). No substantial improvement occurred. Nine weeks into the illness, electrophysiology was repeated (see table). Compound muscle action potentials (CMAPs) were all reduced. F waves remained absent. Sensory potentials remained within normal limits. Needle EMG showed active denervation in all tested muscles. Only minimal functional progress was achieved after a further 14 weeks, with persisting, diffuse MRC grade 3 weakness.

Few cases of acute conduction block neuropathy have been reported,1,2 most of which had a rapidly favorable outcome. Two patients described recently each recovered completely in 6 weeks.1 Although conduction blocks were found in some nerves for each patient, both also had nerves with initially reduced CMAPs. The conduction blocks resolved, and in the case of the second patient, the CMAPs improved to at least twice the baseline value for median and ulnar nerves without temporal dispersion. No major indication of demyelination was observed in either patient, and the authors concluded that the conduction blocks observed could have resulted from immune-mediated conduction failure at the nodes of Ranvier, without underlying demyelination.

The initial electrophysiologic picture in our patient resembled that of the two described above. In our case, however, instead of reversible block of conduction, axonal degeneration appeared to have occurred. Such progression can be observed in typical acute motor axonal neuropathy (AMAN) where hypothesized distal conduction failure, either resolving rapidly or, alternatively, leading to axonal degeneration, could explain prognostic variability.4 Alternatively, the mechanism in AMAN of poor prognosis, as in our patient, could be one of acute primary axonal degeneration, which can also show, electrophysiologically, conduction blocks in the initial stages, followed by low distal CMAPs.5 Other causes of conduction block followed by axonal degeneration such as vasculitic neuropathy6 were otherwise most unlikely in our patient, given the history, pure motor involvement, positive C. jejuni serology and anti-GM1 antibodies, as well as negative vasculitic markers.

Preceding C. jejuni infection and anti-GM1 positivity have been associated with typical AMAN, acute motor neuropathy with reversible conduction blocks1 and in a syndrome described as acute multifocal motor neuropathy with conduction blocks,2 where conduction blocks persist irrespective of clinical outcome. The common etiologic and prognostic factors for these three entities, as illustrated by our case, make it possible that they, in fact, represent electrophysiologic forms of the same disorder. Conduction blocks, possibly distal and undetectable in AMAN or more proximal as in our patient, may disappear with normalization of conduction and complete clinical improvement or lead to axonal degeneration, with poor recovery; or persist with or without recovery, or with the disorder becoming chronic and relapsing. The precise pathophysiology underlying this prognostic variability are unknown. It is possible that there are two distinct mechanisms, with either reversible conduction failure or primary axonal degeneration. Interestingly, our patient was areflexic and had an unfavorable course, whereas normal reflexes or hyperreflexia are associated with better outcome.7

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Mr. G. Swana (Department of Immunology, St. Thomas’ Hospital, London, UK), where the immunologic studies were performed.

Footnotes

  • Disclosure: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

    Received June 30, 2005. Accepted in final form October 25, 2005.

References

  1. 1.↵
    Capasso M, Caporale CM, Pomilio F, Gandolfi P, Lugaresi A, Uncini A. Acute motor conduction block neuropathy. Another Guillain–Barré syndrome variant. Neurology 2003;61:617–622.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  2. 2.↵
    Lefaucheur JP, Gregson NA, Gray I, von Raison F, Bertocchi M, Créange A. A variant of multifocal neuropathy with acute, generalised presentation and persistent conduction blocks. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003;74:1555–1561.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    American Association of Electrodiagnostic Medicine. Consensus criteria for the diagnosis of partial conduction block. Muscle Nerve 1999; 8(suppl):S225–S229.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    Kuwabara S, Asahina M, Koga M, Mori M, Yuki N, Hattori T. Two patterns of clinical recovery in Guillain–Barré syndrome with IgG anti- GM1 antibody. Neurology 1998;51:1656–1660.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    Kuwabara S, Mori M, Ogawara K, et al. Axonal involvement at the common entrapment sites in Guillain–Barré syndrome with IgG anti- GM1 antibody. Muscle Nerve 1999;22:840–845.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  6. 6.↵
    McCluskey L, Feinberg D, Cantor C, Bird S. “Pseudo-conduction block” in vasculitic neuropathy. Muscle Nerve 1999;22:1361–1366.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    Yuki N, Hirata K. Preserved tendon reflexes in Campylobacter neuropathy. Ann Neurol 1998;43:546–547.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract

Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence

  • Acute motor conduction block neuropathy followed by axonal degeneration and poor recovery
    • Antonino Uncini, MD, University “Gabriele d’Annunzio”, Clinica Neurologica, Ospedale “SS Annunziata”, Via dei Vestini, I-66013, Chieti, Italyuncini@unich.it
    • Margherita Capasso, MD, PhD
    Submitted March 28, 2006
  • Response from the authors
    • Yusuf A. Rajabally, University Hospitals of Leicester, Department of Neurology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, U.K LE5 4PWyusuf.rajabally@uhl-tr.nhs.uk
    • Richard J. Abbott, M.D. (Leicester General Hospital)
    Submitted March 28, 2006
Comment

REQUIREMENTS

If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org

Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.

If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.

Submission specifications:

  • Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
  • Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
  • Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
  • Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
  • Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.

More guidelines and information on Disputes & Debates

Compose Comment

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
NOTE: The first author must also be the corresponding author of the comment.
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Publishing Agreement
NOTE: All authors, besides the first/corresponding author, must complete a separate Publishing Agreement Form and provide via email to the editorial office before comments can be posted.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

You May Also be Interested in

Back to top
  • Article
    • Acknowledgment
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Advertisement

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.

Topics Discussed

  • Peripheral neuropathy
  • Guillain-Barre syndrome

Alert Me

  • Alert me when eletters are published
Neurology: 98 (21)

Articles

  • Ahead of Print
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Popular Articles
  • Translations

About

  • About the Journals
  • Ethics Policies
  • Editors & Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise

Submit

  • Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Information for Reviewers
  • AAN Guidelines
  • Permissions

Subscribers

  • Subscribe
  • Activate a Subscription
  • Sign up for eAlerts
  • RSS Feed
Site Logo
  • Visit neurology Template on Facebook
  • Follow neurology Template on Twitter
  • Visit Neurology on YouTube
  • Neurology
  • Neurology: Clinical Practice
  • Neurology: Genetics
  • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Neurology: Education
  • AAN.com
  • AANnews
  • Continuum
  • Brain & Life
  • Neurology Today

Wolters Kluwer Logo

Neurology | Print ISSN:0028-3878
Online ISSN:1526-632X

© 2022 American Academy of Neurology

  • Privacy Policy
  • Feedback
  • Advertise