Subarachnoid hemorrhage is followed by temporomesial volume loss
MRI volumetric study
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

Abstract
Objective: To assess whether subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and its treatment is followed by volume loss in temporomesial structures.
Methods: One hundred fifty-five consecutive patients with aneurysmal SAH were randomly assigned to surgical or endovascular treatment. Volumetric MRI was performed in 77 SAH patients with good or moderate clinical outcome 1 year after hemorrhage. A comprehensive neuropsychological test battery was used to evaluate the cognitive performance of the subjects. Thirty healthy individuals were imaged as MRI controls.
Results: The normalized hippocampal (HC) volumes were 24.7/23.7 (right/left), and the amygdaloid (AM) volumes were 21.0/20.5 in the matched control population. In SAH patients, the corresponding volumes were smaller, HC 23.2/21.3 (p = 0.072/0.002) and AM 18.4/18.7 (p = 0.012/0.045). In addition, the AM ipsilateral to the ruptured aneurysm was smaller in patients who had undergone surgical treatment (15.7) vs endovascular treatment (20.3; p < 0.001). Treatment modality did not significantly affect the measured HC volumes. The hippocampal but not amygdaloid volumes correlated with the scores of several neuropsychological tests.
Conclusion: Subarachnoid hemorrhage and its treatment may be followed by atrophy in temporomesial structures. A clear correlation was demonstrated between neuropsychological performance and reduced temporomesial volumes.
Despite the fact that measurement of temporomesial volumes has established magnetic resonance (MR) morphometry as useful in the study of neuropsychiatric diseases,1 we found no previously published studies on changes in volumetry after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and repair of the ruptured aneurysm. In our clinical work, we had observed that by visual estimation, the temporomesial structures sometimes seemed to be atrophic after SAH, even if the lesions in the MRI of the brain were otherwise scanty. This observation gave rise to this prospective volumetric study.
In this study, we assessed whether 1) SAH and the treatment of the ruptured aneurysm is followed by volume loss in temporomesial structures (hippocampus and amygdala), 2) the treatment modality (coil embolization or surgical clipping) affects the volumes, and 3) the clinical neuropsychological outcome is associated with quantitative temporomesial volume loss.
Methods.
Study design, patients, and controls.
During February 1, 1995, and December 1999, all consecutive patients with SAH admitted to Kuopio University Hospital were candidates for a prospective, randomized study. According to the study protocol inclusion criteria,2,3 155 patients with acute aneurysmal SAH were randomly assigned to either endovascular treatment (n = 77) or surgical ligation (n = 78). All randomized aneurysmal SAH patients were scheduled to undergo brain MRI and neuropsychological assessment 1 year after SAH. The current study included 77 aneurysmal SAH patients (41 with originally endovascular, 36 surgical treatment). In addition, 30 age- and sex-matched healthy control subjects were imaged. The baseline characteristics of the study population patients are shown in table 1.
Table 1 Patient and control individual characteristics
The study design was approved by the ethical committee at our hospital. All participants or their nearest relative gave informed consent for their participation in the study.
MR image acquisition and analysis.
The patients and the control individuals underwent MRI scanning on a Siemens Vision 1.5-T scanner (Erlangen, Germany) with circular polarized head coil. The MRI protocol consisted of T2- and proton density (PD)-weighted images, magnetic resonance angiography, and three-dimensional T1-weighted sequences.3 The areas of high signal on T2- and PD-weighted images were evaluated on consensus reading with an experienced neuroradiologist (R.V.) and an experienced neurosurgeon (T.K.). The experienced neurosurgeon (T.K.) did not perform any of the operations in this study population. Three-dimensional T1-weighted anatomic images were obtained using the magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo sequence (repetition time = 9.7 milliseconds; echo time = 4 milliseconds; inverse time = 20 milliseconds; flip angle = 12 °; field of view = 250 mm; matrix size = 256 × 256). The oblique coronal slices (thickness 2.0 mm) included the whole cerebrum. The three-dimensional T1 sequence for the volumetry was scheduled at the end of the imaging, if the patient was cooperative and there were no movement artifacts and the patient was willing to stay the extra time in the MR scanner.
Standard neuroanatomic landmarks (such as anterior commissure-posterior commissure line, hemispheres, and orbits) were used to reconstruct slices (thickness 2 mm) perpendicular to the long axis of the left hippocampus. These 16-bit Siemens format images were converted to the ANALYZE format (Mayo Foundation, MN). The volumes of the amygdalae and hippocampi were manually measured by a single observer (A.K.). To maintain blind assessment and confidentiality, data were registered and coded by subject numbers only. The intraclass correlation coefficients for intrarater reliability (bilateral measurements of 10 patients) were 0.94 for the amygdala and 0.88 for the hippocampal volumes. In our study, the point counting method (EasyMeasure, version 1.0, MariArc, Liverpool, Great Britain) was used to calculate the volumes of the hippocampus and the amygdala. The point-counting method consists of overlaying a systematic array of the test points (one point per nine pixels) completely over each slice. Instances in which a point, in fact a cross, lies within the area of interest, are recorded by clicking a computer mouse. The cross was chosen or not chosen according to the following rules: If the upper right quadrant of the cross is inside the area, the cross is recorded; otherwise, the cross is excluded. When the cross is lying in a 45 ° angle to the slice, the cross is accepted, if the right quadrant is within the area. In both cases, the area must extend to the intersection of the cross. Subsequently, the total number of the test points is multiplied by the volume of the test point (17.17 mm3). Boundaries of these nuclei were identified with the use of the neuroanatomy atlas4 and the previously published research.5 The point counting of the structures proceeded from anterior to posterior. The method of the volumetry is shown in figure 1.
Figure 1. The method of volumetry. Coronal three-dimensional T1-weighted images from anterior to posterior demonstrate the marked structures of left amygdala (A through C, white crosses) and left hippocampus (B through F, no crosses) in a healthy 23-year-old female control individual.
This intracranial area has been noted to give a reliable correlation to the whole brain volume.6 To remove the influence of the head size to the volumes of nuclei, the volumes were normalized by dividing the volume of the nucleus with the slice volume of the intracranial area: (volume of the structure/intracranial area in reference slice) × 100.7 Normalized volumes were further defined as ipsilateral or contralateral according to the side (right or left) the ruptured aneurysm was filling from. In midline (basilar) aneurysms, ipsilateral side was defined as the side where the surgery or endovascular catheterization was performed.
As a rough measurement of the ventricular size and possible central type of brain atrophy, the ventricular-to-intracranial width ratio was measured.
Neuropsychological analysis.
Neuropsychological assessments were performed by a single neuropsychologist (H.H.) 12 months after treatment. The comprehensive evaluation included tests of general intelligence, memory and selected language abilities, and assessment of attention and flexibility of mental processing.3
General intellectual ability.
On the basis of subtests of the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale–Revised,8 the scores for general verbal and nonverbal ability and total IQs were calculated. The Modified Boston Naming test9 was used to examine naming ability, and the Finnish version of the Verbal Fluency Test on letters10 was used to evaluate word fluency.
Learning and memory.
Memory was tested by the Wechsler Memory Scale.11 The Memory Quotient was calculated to assess short-term memory performance. Delayed recall of Logical Memory Subtest11 and the Visual Reproduction Subtest11 was asked 45 minutes later. Nonverbal memory was also assessed by the Rey Complex Figure Test.9
Statistical analysis.
The statistical software SPSS for Windows 11.5 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) was used to analyze the data. In all statistical analyses, the volumes normalized for intracranial area were used. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. Because each volumetric (right/left and ipsilateral/contralateral) parameter was used twice in subgroup analysis, the Bonferroni correction was used, and the level of significance in these analyses was set at p < 0.025. Ordered categorical data and dichotomous variables were examined by χ2 statistics. A t test was used to compare normally distributed data for the volumes for comparisons between the patients and controls and the different treatment groups. The Pearson correlation coefficient was used to analyze the correlation between the volumes of hippocampal and amygdaloid structures, age, ventricular size, and neuropsychological test results.
Results.
Descriptive characteristics of the patients.
One year after subarachnoid hemorrhage, 129 of the original 155 randomized SAH patients underwent brain MRI. At that time, 20 patients (12.9%) had died. Claustrophobia prohibited MRI examination in 4 cases (2.6%), and 2 patients (1.3%) declined the examination.
Altogether, 77 patients from the randomized population (33 endovascular, 36 surgical, and 8 combination treatment patients) underwent three-dimensional T1-weighted examinations. Nine randomized patients had additional one or more nonruptured aneurysms, which were treated surgically in 4 patients, endovascularly in 2 patients, and with both treatment modalities in 3 patients before the MRI at the 1-year follow-up. A majority (84.4%) of the patients had good clinical outcome (GOS 5), 11 (14.3%) had moderate disability (GOS 4), and 1 (1.3%) had poor outcome (GOS 3) at 1 year after subarachnoid hemorrhage.
The volumes of the amygdalae of three patients had to be excluded from analysis because of the clip artifact (figure 2) after the surgery. No disturbing artifacts due to clips or coils were detected in the regions of hippocampi. When comparisons between treatment groups (endovascular treatment vs surgery) were performed, crossover patients (n = 8) and those patients whose nonruptured aneurysms had been treated before the 1-year MRI (n = 9) were excluded from the analysis. After exclusion, 30 endovascular and 31 surgical patients were included in the final analysis comparing the actual treatment modalities. The flow diagram of the original cohort of randomized SAH patients is demonstrated in figure 3. The baseline characteristics of these patients (age, sex, education years, preoperative Hunt and Hess grades and Fischer grades, and the location of the ruptured aneurysm) maintained statistically balanced between the different treatment groups. The whole study population was ethnically homogenous.
Figure 2. Exclusion of the right amygdala from volumetric analysis due to the clip artifact after the surgery of a right posterior communicating artery aneurysm.
Figure 3. Flow diagram of the randomized subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) patients included in the study. PD = proton density; MRA = magnetic resonance angiography; 3D = three-dimensional.
Temporomesial volumes.
Normalized temporomesial volumes in SAH patients and controls are summarized in table 2. When comparing the normalized volumes of the hippocampi (HC) and amygdalae (AM), differences between SAH patients and controls were seen in the measured volumes of right (23.2 ± 3.9 vs 24.7 ± 3.7; p = 0.072) and left HC (21.3 ± 3.5 vs 23.7 ± 3.6; p = 0.002) and right (18.4 ± 4.9 vs 21.0 ± 3.9; p = 0.012) and left AM (18.8 ± 4.1 vs 20.5 ± 3.7; p = 0.045) after SAH, the last three volumes being significantly smaller in the SAH patients.
Table 2 Normalized temporomesial volumes ± SDs in aneurysmal SAH patients and control individuals 1 year after SAH
Comparisons of the temporomesial volumes between the endovascularly treated patients and controls did not reach significant differences: right AM, 20.7 ± 4.38 vs 20.96 ± 3.91 (p = 0.790); left AM, 19.66 ± 2.90 vs 20.52 ± 3.67 (p = 0.319); right HC, 23.56 ± 4.43 vs 24.71 ± 3.71 (p = 0.281); left HC, 21.79 ± 3.76 vs 23.67 ± 3.64 (p = 0.055). However, the corresponding comparisons between the surgically treated patients and controls revealed the following differences: right AM, 16.31 ± 4.82 vs 20.96 ± 3.91 (p < 0.001); left AM, 18.97 ± 3.69 vs 20.52 ± 3.67 (p = 0.111); right HC, 22.50 ± 3.73 vs 24.71 ± 3.71 (p = 0.024); left HC, 20.81 ± 3.70 vs 23.67 ± 3.64 (p = 0.004). Among all the aneurysmal SAH patients, smaller ipsilateral (17.8 ± 5.0) than contralateral amygdaloid volumes (19.4 ± 3.9) were observed (p = 0.008). In the surgical subgroup (n = 31), the difference between the mean volumes of the ipsilateral and contralateral amygdalae was evident (15.7 ± 5.1 vs 19.4 ± 2.9; p = 0.001), whereas in the endovascular subgroup (n = 30), no such difference in the normalized volumes of the ipsilateral (20.3 ± 4.1) and contralateral (20.0 ± 3.1) amygdalae was found (p = 0.650). There was no difference in the ipsilateral and contralateral volumes of hippocampi. Ipsilateral amygdaloid volumes were (after Bonferroni correction) smaller after surgical (15.7 ± 5.1) than after endovascular (20.3 ± 4.3) treatment of SAH (p < 0.001). There were no differences in volumes of contralateral amygdalae or hippocampi between the different treatment groups. Normalized temporomesial volumes after endovascular and surgical treatment are summarized in table 3 and illustrated in figures 4 and 5.
Table 3 Normalized temporomesial volumes ± SDs in randomly assigned aneurysmal SAH patients according to the treatment modality (surgery vs embolization)
Figure 4. Normalized amygdaloid volumes (mean with 95% CI) after endovascular and surgical treatment according to the side of approach with comparison to the bilateral amygdaloid volumes in the control group. SAH = subarachnoid hemorrhage; ipsi = amygdala ipsilateral to the ruptured aneurysm treatment side; contra = amygdala contralateral to the ruptured aneurysm treatment side.
Figure 5. Normalized hippocampal volumes (mean with 95% CI) after endovascular and surgical treatment according to the side of approach with comparison to the bilateral hippocampal volumes in the control group. SAH = subarachnoid hemorrhage; ipsi = hippocampus ipsilateral to the ruptured aneurysm treatment side, contra = hippocampus contralateral to the ruptured aneurysm treatment side.
The possible effects of the other contributing factors to the measured volumes were also analyzed. Patients with lower Hunt and Hess grades (I and II) showed smaller volumes in both right (17.8 ± 4.6) and left (18.2 ± 4.3) amygdalae compared with patients with higher Hunt and Hess grades (III through V) (right, 20.2 ± 5.1; p = 0.04; left, 20.2 ± 2.5; p = 0.04). However, after Bonferroni correction, this difference was not significant. The hippocampal volumes were almost identical in both dichotomized Hunt and Hess grade groups: right, 22.9 ± 4.2 Hunt and Hess grades I and II vs 22.7 ± 4.0 Hunt and Hess grades III through V (p = 0.79); left, 21.1 ± 3.6 Hunt and Hess grades I and II vs 21.1 ± 3.9 Hunt and Hess grades III through V (p = 0.78). In terms of preoperative Fischer grades or hydrocephalus, no differences in the volumes could be found.
Surgical and endovascular patient groups did not differ in regard to complications. The volumetric patient study population consisted of patients with relatively good clinical outcome after SAH, a fact probably explaining the relatively low rate of complications. No postoperative hematomas were seen in this study population. One patient in both treatment groups (2.4% of endovascular and 2.7% of surgical patients; p = 0.92) developed seizures. Twenty-four (39.3%, 11 endovascular, 13 surgical; p = 0.67) of 61 patients had external ventricular drainage (EVD) for treatment of acute hydrocephalus. Two originally endovascular patients (4.9%) and 4 originally surgical patients (11.1%) developed either clinical or subclinical meningitis (positive bacteria in postoperative ventricular drainage or lumbar puncture), indicating no difference (p = 0.31) between the treatment groups. External ventricular drainage placement, a permanent shunt device, ventriculitis, or development of seizures had no effect on measured volumes of amygdalae or hippocampi.
Twenty-six (33.8%, 11 endovascular, 15 surgical; p = 0.17) of 77 patients developed symptoms that were interpreted to be caused by clinical vasospasm. However, the signs of clinical vasospasm were not associated with reduced temporomesial volumes.
In the volumetric study population, parenchymal lesions were seen in 52 (67.5%) of 77 patients (including any high–signal intensity lesions seen in T2- and PD-weighted images, e.g., lesions due to ischemic attacks, hematomas, brain retraction deficits, or lesion associated with ventricular catheterization or permanent shunt placement). The presence of a parenchymal lesion was not significantly associated with any of the measured temporomesial volumes (neither AM nor HC).
Among the aneurysmal SAH patients (n = 77), the presence of any high-intensity lesion in either of the temporal lobes seen in T2- and PD-weighted images was associated with smaller amygdalae both on the right (15.9.1 ± 5.2 vs 19.7 ± 4.3; p = 0.01) and on the left (17.6 ± 5.1 vs 19.5 ± 3.4; p = 0.034). However, after Bonferroni correction, this difference on the left side was not significant. The ipsilateral amygdala was smaller (14.7 ± 4.0 vs 19.2 ± 4.0; p < 0.001) if a temporal lobe deficit was present, and on the contralateral side, the difference was not significant (p = 0.07). Furthermore, if a temporal lobe high-intensity lesion was present, the volume of ipsilateral amygdala tended to be smaller in the surgical subgroup (p = 0.04) but not in the endovascular subgroup (p = 0.85). No differences in the hippocampal volumes were noted with respect to temporal lobe high–signal intensity lesions.
Among all aneurysmal SAH patients (including the crossover patients and patients whose unruptured aneurysms were also treated), the presence of a parenchymal retraction injury detected on T2-weighted images was strongly associated with smaller ipsilateral amygdala volumes: 14.7 ± 5.3/19.3 ± 4.0 (p < 0.001). Contralateral amygdala volumes did not correlate with the presence of parenchymal retraction lesions (p = 0.86). When only the patients in the surgical subgroup were included in this analysis (n = 31), the corresponding volumes were 14.3 ± 5.1 and 17.6 ± 4.0 (p = 0.09), not reaching the level of statistical significance. Retraction injury on T2-weighted images had no effect on the hippocampal volumes. Reduced temporomesial volumes are demonstrated in figures 6 and 7.
Figure 6. The amygdalae (A) and hippocampi (B) of a 45-year-old male patient whose ruptured right anterior communicating artery aneurysm was surgically ligated. The amygdaloid volume loss is asymmetric and more clear on the right side (ipsilateral to the ruptured aneurysm). The volume loss in hippocampi is bilateral and symmetric.
Figure 7. Amygdaloid (A) and hippocampal (B) volume loss of a 74-year-old man after embolization of a ruptured right anterior communicating artery aneurysm.
In the matched control population, the following correlation coefficients between the age of the individual and the measured temporomesial volumes were obtained: right AM, r = −0.41, p = 0.03; left AM, r = −0.52, p = 0.004; right HC, r = −0.60, p = 0.001; left HC, r = −0.60, p = 0.002. Age of the individual also correlated with ventricular/parenchymal ratio in the control group: r = 0.381, p = 0.038.
In the aneurysmal SAH population, correlation between age and both ipsilateral and contralateral hippocampal volumes was somewhat lower: ipsilateral HC, r = −0.31, p = 0.006; contralateral HC, r = −0.33, p = 0.003. The volumes of amygdalae did not correlate with age: ipsilateral AM, r = −0.057, p = 0.61; contralateral AM, r = −0.071, p = 0.538. Age of the SAH patient correlated with the measured ventricular/parenchymal ratio: r = 0.366, p = 0.001. Furthermore, SAH patients had higher mean ventricular/parenchymal ratios (0.23 ± 0.06) than did the control individuals (0.20 ± 0.04; p = 0.021). SAH patients with higher ventricular/parenchymal width ratios showed smaller volumes of contralateral hippocampi (r = −0.278, p = 0.014), but no correlation was demonstrated between the volumes of ipsilateral hippocampus (r = −0.162, p = 0.160) or the volumes of ipsilateral (r = 0.054, p = 0.648) or contralateral amygdalae (r = −0.157, p = 0.172). Furthermore, among SAH patients, education years and hippocampal volumes showed clear positive correlation (right HC, r = 0.408, p < 0.001; left HC, r = 0.367, p = 0.001), but no correlation between the amygdaloid volumes and education years was found (right AM, r = −0.041, p = 0.724; left AM, r = 0.206, p = 0.07).
Neuropsychological results and temporomesial volume correlation.
Among the SAH patients, age of the patient correlated with all neuropsychological parameters. The neuropsychological test results and the correlation to the measured volumes of the hippocampi and amygdalae are seen in table 4. The hippocampal volumes correlated with a visual memory test (Visual Reproduction Subtest11 and several tests of attention, flexibility of mental processing, intellectual ability, and psychomotor speed. A test of verbal episodic memory11 and another visual memory test (Rey)9 did not correlate with hippocampal volumes. The volumes of the amygdalae did not significantly correlate with neuropsychological test results.
Table 4 Correlations between the normalized hippocampal and amygdala volumes and the neuropsychological outcome 1 year after aneurysmal SAH (n = 77 patients)
Discussion.
Most of the cognitive outcome studies after SAH have thus far been performed on patients who have undergone surgical clipping of the ruptured aneurysm.14 Endovascular embolization using detachable coils has been an alternative to surgical clipping since 1991.15,16 Recent studies suggest comparable3 neuropsychological or even more favorable cognitive outcome after endovascular than surgical treatment of the ruptured aneurysm.17–19
Measuring temporomesial and especially hippocampal volume with MRI has provided information about several neurologic and neuropsychiatric diseases.1 Smaller hippocampal volumes have been reported in epilepsy,20 Alzheimer disease,21 mild cognitive impairment,7 and traumatic brain injury,22 for example. In addition to memory system impairments, volume loss has also been detected in several neurologic and neuropsychiatric diseases, affecting the temporal lobes, such as schizophrenia23 and post–traumatic stress disorders.24 Temporomesial volumes have also been widely studied in major depressive disorder; however, the results have been inconsistent.25 Furthermore, hippocampal structures may have a more pronounced vulnerability to global brain ischemia than the temporal lobe in general.26 Generalized brain atrophy after SAH has been well documented.14 Despite the fact that measurement of the temporomesial volumes has recently established the role of MR morphometry as a useful tool in the study of neuropsychiatric diseases,27 we found no volumetric studies after SAH and repair of the ruptured aneurysm. Because the most common surgical approach to ligate an aneurysm is along the temporal lobe surface, we wanted especially to analyze whether the presence of a temporal lobe lesion in MRI is associated with the volumetric results. However, in our study, this association was found only in the volumetry of amygdalae on the side of surgery.
An optimal way to detect and to quantitate temporomesial volume loss caused by SAH would include comparisons with the volumes on admission or, rather, even before hemorrhage. However, adding volumetric MRI examination to the already busy clinical routine of these critically ill patients might cause ethical concerns. An additional volumetric MRI might delay the treatment of the ruptured aneurysm. Also, a majority of SAH patients would need general anesthesia to enable sufficient image quality for three-dimensional images for volumetry. Furthermore, the examination in the acute phase of SAH would include major sources of error: the brain parenchyma is swollen because of vasogenic edema, altered pressure conditions, hyperperfusion and periods of ischemia, or displaced due to mass effect by the hematoma or hydrocephalus. Therefore, temporomesial volumes measured shortly after SAH would not probably represent the condition before SAH.
In the current study, patients with relatively good clinical outcome were enrolled to the volumetric analysis. The patients with suboptimal recovery and severe neurologic deficits could not participate in the longer MRI examination protocol necessary for the volumetric analysis. Therefore, the results cannot be generalized in a straightforward manner to all consecutive SAH patients. The damage that SAH causes to the temporomesial structures is probably as severe in patients with poorer clinical outcomes. However, in patients with poor outcome, the clinical consequences of temporomesial volume loss would probably vanish among the major neurologic deficits, making the possible volumetric measurements somewhat irrelevant.
Many neuropsychological difficulties are missed in rough neurologic examination.28 Despite the seemingly good outcome in the majority of our patients, the current study clearly demonstrated neuropsychological impairments and reduced temporomesial volumes 1 year after SAH. Furthermore, a clear correlation was demonstrated between the neuropsychological test scores and the reduced temporomesial volumes. Our study protocol did not include assessment of handedness or possible depression among the SAH patients, which must be considered as a limitation of our study.
In the control group, age of an individual corresponded to measured temporomesial volumes as reported in previous studies.29 In contrast, after SAH, the volumes of amygdalae did not correlate with age or education years, suggesting etiologic factors other than the age of the patient behind the observed amygdaloid volume loss. The relation between hippocampus and memory performance is well established.30 In our study, the correlations between neuropsychological test results and hippocampal volumes were somewhat unexpected. Namely, significant correlations were consistently found between hippocampal volumes and several tests of attention, flexibility of mental processing, intellectual ability, and psychomotor speed. On the other hand, only one of three memory tests correlated with hippocampal volumes. A possible explanation is that the changes in hippocampal volumes are also associated with more widespread brain changes that affect several aspects of cognition and are not specific to memory. The amygdaloid volumes did not correlate with any used measures of cognitive performance. Considering memory tests, this is not surprising because memory tests that are considered specific for involvement of amygdala31 were not included in our test battery.
This is a small study, and the results are preliminary. However, neuropsychological impairments are commonly observed after SAH despite otherwise good clinical outcome of the patient. The relation between hippocampal volume and memory performance has previously been well established in several neurologic and neuropsychiatric patient populations, but not in patients with SAH. The current study demonstrates that temporomesial volume loss is frequently seen on MRI 1 year after SAH. Interestingly, amygdaloid volume loss ipsilateral to the ruptured cerebral aneurysm seems to be more pronounced after surgical than endovascular treatment of the aneurysm. The scores of several neuropsychological measurements are correlated with the hippocampal but not amygdaloid volumes.
Footnotes
-
Supported by Kuopio University Hospital, grant 5063515.
Disclosure: The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Received September 30, 2005. Accepted in final form April 20, 2006.
References
- 1.↵
- 2.↵
- 3.↵
Koivisto T, Vanninen R, Hurskainen H, Saari T, Hernesniemi J, Vapalahti M. Outcomes of early endovascular versus surgical treatment of ruptured cerebral aneurysms: a prospective randomized study. Stroke 2000;31:2369–2377.
- 4.↵
Martin J. Neuroanatomy text and atlas. 2nd ed. Stanford: Appleton & Lange, 1996.
- 5.↵
Watson C, Andermann F, Gloor P, et al. Anatomic basis of amygdaloid and hippocampal volume measurement by magnetic resonance imaging. Neurology 1992;42:1743–1750.
- 6.↵
Laakso MP, Soininen H, Partanen K, et al. MRI of the hippocampus in Alzheimer's disease: sensitivity, specificity, and analysis of the incorrectly classified subjects. Neurobiol Aging 1998;19:23–31.
- 7.↵
- 8.↵
Wechsler D. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised. New York: The Psychological Corporation, 1981.
- 9.↵
Lezak M. Neuropsychological assessment. New York: Oxford University Press, 1995.
- 10.↵
- 11.↵
Wechsler D. Wechsler Memory Scale manual. San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation, 1974.
- 12.↵
Golden C. Stroop Color and Word Tests. Chicago: Stoerting, 1978.
- 13.↵
Reitan R. Validity of the Trail Making tests as an indicator of organic brain damage. Percept Mot Skills 1958;8:271–276.
- 14.↵
- 15.↵
- 16.
Brilstra EH, Rinkel GJ, van der Graaf Y, van Rooij WJ, Algra A. Treatment of intracranial aneurysms by embolization with coils: a systematic review. Stroke 1999;30:470–476.
- 17.↵
- 18.
Molyneux AJ, Kerr RS, Yu LM, et al. International subarachnoid aneurysm trial (ISAT) of neurosurgical clipping versus endovascular coiling in 2143 patients with ruptured intracranial aneurysms: a randomised comparison of effects on survival, dependency, seizures, rebleeding, subgroups, and aneurysm occlusion. Lancet 2005;366:809–817.
- 19.
Hadjivassiliou M, Tooth CL, Romanowski CA, et al. Aneurysmal SAH: cognitive outcome and structural damage after clipping or coiling. Neurology 2001;56:1672–1677.
- 20.↵
Kalviainen R, Salmenpera T, Partanen K, Vainio P, Riekkinen P, Pitkanen A. Recurrent seizures may cause hippocampal damage in temporal lobe epilepsy. Neurology 1998;50:1377–1382.
- 21.↵
- 22.↵
- 23.↵
- 24.↵
- 25.↵
- 26.↵
- 27.↵
- 28.↵
- 29.↵
Mu Q, Xie J, Wen Z, Weng Y, Shuyun Z. A quantitative MR study of the hippocampal formation, the amygdala, and the temporal horn of the lateral ventricle in healthy subjects 40 to 90 years of age. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:207–211.
- 30.↵
- 31.↵
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
- Subarachnoid hemorrhage is followed by temporomesial volume loss: MRI volumetric study
- Alejandro A. Rabinstein, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW Mayo W8B Rochester, MN 55905rabinstein.alejandro@mayo.edu
Submitted October 25, 2006 - Reply from the Authors
- Paula Bendel, Kuopio University Hospital, Department of Clinical Radiology, Puijonlaaksontie 2, FI-70211 Kuopio, Finlandpaula.bendel@kuh.fi
- Timo Koivisto, Ritva Vanninen
Submitted October 25, 2006
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Cutaneous α-Synuclein Signatures in Patients With Multiple System Atrophy and Parkinson Disease
Dr. Rizwan S. Akhtar and Dr. Sarah Brooker
► Watch
Related Articles
- No related articles found.
Topics Discussed
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Article
Risk of rupture of unruptured cerebral aneurysms in elderly patientsTomohito Hishikawa, Isao Date, Koji Tokunaga et al.Neurology, October 28, 2015 -
Article
Association between aspirin dose and subarachnoid hemorrhage from saccular aneurysmsA case-control studyAnil Can, Robert F. Rudy, Victor M. Castro et al.Neurology, August 22, 2018 -
Articles
Cost-effectiveness of preventive treatment of intracranial aneurysmsNew data and uncertaintiesJacoba P. Greving, Gabriël J.E. Rinkel, Erik Buskens et al.Neurology, March 18, 2009 -
Article
Association of intracranial aneurysm rupture with smoking duration, intensity, and cessationAnil Can, Victor M. Castro, Yildirim H. Ozdemir et al.Neurology, August 30, 2017