High-resolution MRI of isolated intraluminal clot of the common carotid artery
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

Article Figures & Data
Figures
Figure. (A) Three-dimensional conventional gadolinium enhanced MR angiography demonstrating an irregular stenosis of the left common artery (small white arrows). (B) Gadolinium enhanced black blood T1-weighted turbo spin echo MRI perpendicular to the common carotid artery axis showing a large plaque (black arrows) associated with an intraluminal thrombus (white arrow).
Additional Files
Spanish Translation
Files in this Data Supplement:
- Spanish Translation - (PDF file)
- L. Boussel, MD,
- P. Douek, MD, PhD and
- N. Nighoghossian, MD, PhD
- Address correspondence and reprint requests to Dr. Douek Philippe, Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Cardiologique Louis Pradel, 28 avenue du Doyen Lépine, 69677 Bron, France; e-mail: philippe.douek{at}creatis.univ-lyon1.fr
A 60-year-old man developed an acute right hemiparesis with aphasia. He had hypertension and high cholesterol level. Neck ultrasound and conventional MR angiography showed a moderate left common carotid artery stenosis (figure, A). High-resolution MRI, performed at 1.5 Tesla using a post gadolinium T1-weighted EKG triggered black blood turbo spin echo sequence, revealed a large heterogeneous plaque with a high-intensity intraluminal thrombus (figure, B). Prothrombotic state screening was negative. Clot of common carotid artery is rare. Conventional gadolinium enhanced MR angiography may miss the clot. High-resolution MRI may better identify1 the atheromatous plaque with intraluminal thrombus.
Figure. (A) Three-dimensional conventional gadolinium enhanced MR angiography demonstrating an irregular stenosis of the left common artery (small white arrows). (B) Gadolinium enhanced black blood T1-weighted turbo spin echo MRI perpendicular to the common carotid artery axis showing a large plaque (black arrows) associated with an intraluminal thrombus (white arrow).
1.
Footnotes
-
Disclosure: The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.