This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective: To determine the relative contributions of psychological (mood and anxiety), social, and seizure-related variables to quality of life (QOL) scores in epilepsy.
Methods: Outpatients (n = 435) with epilepsy completed the Quality of Life in Epilepsy 31 Inventory (QOLIE-31), Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-II), Beck Anxiety Inventory, and a social survey. Stepwise linear regression and general linear model analyses determined the set of best predictors and the most unique predictors of composite QOLIE-31 score and subscale scores.
Results: A three-variable model accounted for 56% of the variance for the composite QOLIE-31 score. The BDI-II was the strongest (often by several multiples in terms of variance explained) and most consistent predictor of the composite and QOLIE subscales in both types of analytic approaches. In no case did BDI-II significantly interact with the other variables, suggesting that its effect on QOL was direct and not mediated by other factors. Throughout the results, depression had an inverse relation to scores, i.e., lower levels of depression correlated with high QOL scores. Separate correlational analyses showed that poor seizure control was associated with increased numbers of depressive symptoms.
Discussion: Quality of Life in Epilepsy (QOLIE) scores, reflecting both general and specific aspects of quality of life, are strongly influenced by mood state, such as depression. Factors such as seizure control exert a more limited effect on the QOLIE. Health-related quality of life measures are needed in which mood does not play such a dominant role.
Footnotes
-
Editorial, see page 1095
This article was previously published in electronic format as an Expedited E-Pub on September 20, 2006, at www.neurology.org.
Dr. Sperling is supported in part by grants NS4039601A1, HS09986-01, NS32375-06, and NS39466-01A1 from the NIH.
This work was presented in part at the American Academy of Neurology meeting in Denver, CO, in April 2002.
Disclosure: The authors report no conflicts of interest.
Received October 8, 2003. Accepted in final form July 7, 2006.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.