This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the muscle biopsy findings from 240 patients who had isolated muscle pain.
Methods: Histopathology, immunohistochemistry for dystrophin, dystrophin-related proteins, major histocompatibility complex type I, and biochemical analysis of glycolytic and mitochondrial respiratory chain enzymes were performed on muscle biopsies. An attempt was made to correlate pathologic data and clinical findings (sex, age, quality and distribution of symptoms, serum CK levels, and EMG recording).
Results: We have described five groups of patients based on muscle biopsy findings: 51.6% had heterogeneous myopathic abnormalities; only 19% of them had a specific myopathic picture, i.e., central nuclei myopathy, central core disease, myopathy with tubular aggregates or with trabecular fibers or abnormalities of fiber typing; 20% had signs of respiratory chain dysfunction but only one patient had a probable mitochondrial disease; 7% had a neurogenic pattern; 2.4% had a metabolic myopathy (phosphorylase or phosphofructokinase deficiency); and 19% had normal muscle biopsy. No clear-cut correlation between muscle biopsy and clinical data was observed except for those patients with a metabolic myopathy.
Conclusions: The probability that a patient complaining only of muscle pain and with a normal neurologic examination has a definite muscle pathology is 2%. Only patients with sole exercise-related muscle pain and sCK seven times higher than the normal value are strongly suspected of having a metabolic myopathy. A rigorous selection of patients is needed before performing a muscle biopsy.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.