Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Specialty Sites
    • COVID-19
    • Practice Current
    • Practice Buzz
    • Without Borders
    • Equity, Diversity and Inclusion
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
  • Collections
    • Topics A-Z
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Infographics
    • Patient Pages
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Center

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Specialty Sites
    • COVID-19
    • Practice Current
    • Practice Buzz
    • Without Borders
    • Equity, Diversity and Inclusion
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
  • Collections
    • Topics A-Z
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Infographics
    • Patient Pages
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Author Center
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Residents & Fellows

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out

Search

  • Advanced search
Neurology
Home
The most widely read and highly cited peer-reviewed neurology journal
  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
  • Log out
Site Logo
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Residents & Fellows

Share

March 18, 2008; 70 (12) Articles

Diffusion tensor imaging of acute mild traumatic brain injury in adolescents

E. A. Wilde, S. R. McCauley, J. V. Hunter, E. D. Bigler, Z. Chu, Z. J. Wang, G. R. Hanten, M. Troyanskaya, R. Yallampalli, X. Li, J. Chia, H. S. Levin
First published March 17, 2008, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000305961.68029.54
E. A. Wilde
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
S. R. McCauley
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. V. Hunter
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
E. D. Bigler
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Z. Chu
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Z. J. Wang
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
G. R. Hanten
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
M. Troyanskaya
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
R. Yallampalli
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
X. Li
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
J. Chia
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
H. S. Levin
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Full PDF
Citation
Diffusion tensor imaging of acute mild traumatic brain injury in adolescents
E. A. Wilde, S. R. McCauley, J. V. Hunter, E. D. Bigler, Z. Chu, Z. J. Wang, G. R. Hanten, M. Troyanskaya, R. Yallampalli, X. Li, J. Chia, H. S. Levin
Neurology Mar 2008, 70 (12) 948-955; DOI: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000305961.68029.54

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions

Make Comment

See Comments

Downloads
1808

Share

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Loading

Abstract

Background: Despite normal CT imaging and neurologic functioning, many individuals report postconcussion symptoms following mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI). This dissociation has been enigmatic for clinicians and investigators.

Methods: Diffusion tensor imaging tractography of the corpus callosum was performed in 10 adolescents (14 to 19 years of age) with MTBI 1 to 6 days postinjury with Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15 and negative CT, and 10 age- and gender-equivalent uninjured controls. Subjects were administered the Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire and the Brief Symptom Inventory to assess self-reported cognitive, affective, and somatic symptoms.

Results: The MTBI group demonstrated increased fractional anisotropy and decreased apparent diffusion coefficient and radial diffusivity, and more intense postconcussion symptoms and emotional distress compared to the control group. Increased fractional anisotropy and decreased radial diffusivity were correlated with severity of postconcussion symptoms in the MTBI group, but not in the control group.

Conclusions: In adolescents with mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) with Glasgow Coma Scale score of 15 and negative CT, diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) performed within 6 days postinjury showed increased fractional anisotropy and decreased diffusivity suggestive of cytotoxic edema. Advanced MRI-based DTI methods may enhance our understanding of the neuropathology of TBI, including MTBI. Additionally, DTI may prove more sensitive than conventional imaging methods in detecting subtle, but clinically meaningful, changes following MTBI and may be critical in refining MTBI diagnosis, prognosis, and management.

Glossary

ADC=
apparent diffusion coefficient;
BSI=
Brief Symptom Inventory;
CC=
corpus callosum;
DTI=
diffusion tensor imaging;
ED=
Emergency Department;
EPI=
echoplanar imaging;
FA=
fractional anisotropy;
FFE=
fast field echo;
FOV=
field of view;
GCS=
Glasgow Coma Scale;
ICC=
intraclass correlation coefficients;
MTBI=
mild traumatic brain injury;
PTA=
post-traumatic amnesia;
RD=
radial diffusivity;
ROI=
region of interest;
RPCSQ=
Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire;
SWI=
susceptibility weighted imaging;
TAI=
traumatic axonal injury;
TE=
echo time;
TI=
inversion time;
TR=
repetition time.

Mild traumatic brain injury (MTBI) is defined as brief loss or alteration of consciousness (i.e., <30 minutes) and post-traumatic amnesia (PTA) of short duration (i.e., <24 hours) following either blunt head trauma or an acceleration/deceleration of the freely moving head and is frequently associated with an absence of intracranial abnormality on head CT performed in the Emergency Department (ED).1 Adolescents are frequently affected by MTBI as the incidence of TBI-related ED visits is 661.1 per 100,000 in the 15- to 19-year age range.2 This is likely an underestimate of the true incidence of MTBI in this age range as an unknown number of cases never present to an ED for treatment.

In spite of normal head CT findings, reports of postconcussion symptoms, including cognitive (e.g., poor memory and concentration), somatic (e.g., headache, dizziness), and affective (e.g., depression, irritability) symptoms, are common following MTBI.3 Although these symptoms can resolve within weeks to a few months, they persist in a minority of cases,4 diminishing quality of life for these patients.5,6 Although neuropathology studies of MTBI in fatal noncranial injuries have implicated a continuum of traumatic axonal injury (TAI) in regions such as the corpus callosum (CC), internal capsule, and cerebral peduncles,7,8 and neuropsychological studies have demonstrated reduced interhemispheric transfer of information,9 conventional MRI has generally failed to reveal evidence of TAI in patients with MTBI. This dissociation during the initial weeks and months post-MTBI between relatively normal conventional imaging results in patients who exhibit cognitive dysfunction and postconcussion symptoms has remained enigmatic for clinicians and investigators.

Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is an imaging technique acquired on a standard MRI scanner that has been shown to be far more sensitive to white matter injury than conventional MRI.10,11 DTI, which reflects myelin integrity in vivo, is based on the characteristic of myelin sheaths and cell membranes of white matter tracts that restricts the movement of water molecules. Consequently, water molecules tend to move faster along nerve fibers rather than perpendicular to them. This characteristic, which is referred to as anisotropic diffusion and is most commonly measured by fractional anisotropy (FA), is determined by several factors including the thickness of the myelin sheath and of the axons, and the distribution of directions, and density of white matter fiber tracts. FA ranges from 0 to 1, where 0 represents completely isotropic diffusion (free diffusion) and 1 represents the most anisotropic diffusion, i.e., diffusion restricted to one direction. In addition, radial diffusivity (RD) denotes the extent of diffusion perpendicular to the direction of maximal diffusivity, which presumably includes diffusion through intracellular and extracellular space perpendicular to the predominant orientation of the axons. The apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) is the overall average measure of diffusion. FA and ADC are considered proxies for white matter integrity.12

Pathologic processes that alter the microstructure such as loss or disorganization of fibers associated with breakdown of myelin and downstream nerve terminals,13 neuronal swelling or shrinkage, and increased or decreased extracellular space, could affect both diffusion and anisotropy. An initial DTI study of five adults with MTBI who were scanned within 24 hours postinjury indicated that FA was reduced in normal-appearing white matter, including regions highly susceptible to shearing effects of TAI such as anterior and posterior CC, and the anterior and posterior limbs of the internal capsule.10 These findings were corroborated by another cross-sectional DTI study of 20 patients with acute and 26 patients with chronic MTBI using region of interest (ROI) analysis.14 Reductions in FA have also been confirmed in the CC as long as 5 years post-TBI of varying severity.14,15 Validity of DTI in adult TBI has been supported by a positive correlation of FA in the internal capsule and splenium with the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS)16 score, i.e., patients with less severe TBI had higher FA, reflecting preservation of white matter.17

Most previous DTI studies of MTBI have not excluded patients with lesions on CT, thus complicating the impact of disparate pathologies on DTI results. Concurrent assessment of postconcussion symptoms has also been neglected in previous DTI studies. The time from injury to imaging has also been inconsistent across DTI studies, thus also complicating interpretation of the findings. Consequently, we studied changes in white matter integrity using DTI in relation to neurobehavioral findings of patients with MTBI.

Because of the known vulnerability of the CC in TBI, we sought to determine if FA, ADC, and RD were altered in the CC in the acute phase of MTBI in adolescents with GCS scores of 15 and negative CT findings. DTI measures were obtained within 6 days postinjury and analyzed in relation to postconcussion symptoms and general emotional distress. We hypothesized that DTI abnormalities would be detected in the acute phase of injury and related to the severity of postconcussion symptoms.

METHODS

Subjects.

Ten adolescents (four boys, six girls) with ages ranging from 14 to 17 years (mean = 15.7) who sustained closed head MTBI with brief loss of consciousness (<10 minutes) and a GCS score of 15 on arrival in the ED of Texas Children's Hospital were studied (table 1). No child demonstrated posttraumatic amnesia (PTA), as defined by the Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test,18 at the time of scanning or testing. Three children sustained high-speed injuries (e.g., motor vehicle accident) and seven children sustained low-speed injuries (e.g., sports-related, bicycle, fall or assault). Subjects were imaged and completed assessment of postconcussion symptoms and emotional distress within 1 to 6 days after injury.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint

Table 1 Demographic and injury characteristics

The control group was comprised of 10 normally developing adolescents (four male, six female) who ranged in age from 14 to 19 years (mean = 15.7) who we recruited from the local community to match the demographic characteristics of the MTBI group in terms of age, gender, and an estimate of premorbid intellectual functioning19 (table 1). Subjects in both groups were attending regular or advanced school classes. All subjects in each group were right-handed, English-speaking, and had no history of preexisting neurologic disorder or substance abuse. Scanning and testing were performed on the same day in 8/10 subjects with TBI and all subjects in the control group. Due to scheduling conflicts, two patients with TBI were tested 2 and 5 days after the MRI scan was performed. Informed consent was obtained from the parent or legal guardian of each subject under age 18, with assent to participate given by each adolescent subject; the subject over age 18 provided informed consent.

Imaging acquisition.

Nine of the 10 adolescents with MTBI underwent CT scanning during hospital admission on a 16-slice General Electric Lightspeed scanner (Waukesha, WI), using a standard clinical protocol with 5 mm contiguous axial slices covering the skull base to the vertex, performed without contrast at Texas Children's Hospital, Houston. One child underwent CT scanning at an outside facility, and the written report was obtained. In all cases, scans were reviewed by a board-certified neuroradiologist, and no abnormalities were reported for any subject. All subjects in both groups underwent MRI without sedation using a sensitivity encoding (SENSE) 8-channel head coil on a Philips 3.0T Achieva scanner (Philips, Cleveland, OH) at Texas Children's Hospital.

Conventional MR imaging.

A coronal T2-weighted fluid attenuated inversion recovery sequence was used (11,000 msec repetition time [TR], 120 msec echo time [TE], 2800 msec inversion time [TI], 5.0 mm slices, without SENSE) to detect any areas of abnormality in all subjects. For this sequence, a 230 mm field of view (FOV) was used with an acquired voxel size of 0.9 × 1.25 × 5.0 mm and a reconstructed voxel size of 0.45 × 0.45 × 5.0 mm. Axial fast field echo (FFE) was also employed to detect any blood products (847 msec TR, 16 msec TE, 4.0 mm slices, 0.0 mm gap, SENSE factor = 2). For this sequence, a 230 mm FOV was used with an acquired voxel size of 0.9 × 1.13 × 4.0 mm and a reconstructed voxel size of 0.45 × 0.45 × 4.0 mm. T1-weighted and T2-weighted images were also acquired in both patient groups. Parameters for the three-dimensional turbo field echo T1-weighted sequence included a TR = 0.9 msec, TE = 3.1 msec, 1.0 mm slice thickness, FOV = 256 mm, acquired and reconstructed voxel size of 1.0 × 1.0 × 1.0 mm, SENSE factor = 2. Parameters for the three-dimensional turbo spin echo T2-weighted sequence included a TR = 5,000 msec, TE = 80 msec, 1.5 mm slice thickness, FOV = 256 mm, acquired voxel size of 1.0 × 1.0 × 1.0 mm and a reconstructed voxel size of 1.0 × 1.0 × 1.5 mm, SENSE factor = 2. One subject in the MTBI group was noted to have signal dropout with surrounding hyperintensity on the T2-weighted spin echo imaging which was interpreted as being consistent with hemorrhagic contusion with surrounding edema affecting the left greater than right frontal orbital region. Additional abnormalities interpreted as small areas of hemorrhagic contusion were noted on the gradient echo imaging in the fronto-orbital (left greater than right), left anterior temporal pole, and right posterior medial parieto-occipital region. No other subject in either group was noted to have trauma-related abnormalities on any of the conventional imaging sequences.

DTI acquisition.

Transverse multislice spin echo, single shot, echoplanar imaging (EPI) sequences were used (6,318.0 msec TR, 51 msec TE, 2.0 mm slices, 0 mm gap). A 224 mm FOV (RFOV = 100%) was used with a measured voxel size of 2.0 × 2.0 × 2.0 mm and a reconstructed voxel size of 1.75 × 1.75 × 2.0 mm, and a SENSE factor of 2. Diffusion was measured along 30 directions using an electrostatic gradient model20 (number of b-value = 2, low b-value = 0, and high b-value = 1,000 sec/mm2). To improve signal to noise ratio, two acquisitions were taken and averaged using Philips diffusion affine registration tool.21 Each acquisition took approximately 4 minutes 50 seconds, and 70 slices were acquired.

Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI) acquisition.

All subjects underwent SWI using a three-dimensional FFE sequence (50 msec TR, 40 msec TE, 2.0 mm slices, 0 mm gap, 64 or more slices depending on the size of the head, SENSE factor = 2). A 256 mm FOV was used with an acquired voxel size of 0.375 × 0.985 × 2.0 mm and a reconstructed voxel size of 0.5 × 0.5 × 2.0 mm. Post-processing of the images was performed using SPIN software (The MRI Institute, Detroit, MI) to enhance the signal loss caused by microscopic hemorrhage by multiplying the original magnitude contrast images by a normalized phase mask resulting in the final SWI images.22 The patient with MTBI with abnormalities on conventional imaging was noted to have a small area of abnormality in the right posterior medial region on SWI, which was interpreted as an additional hemorrhagic lesion. No other subject demonstrated abnormal findings on SWI.

DTI imaging analysis.

Based upon our previously published DTI quantitative tractographic methods using Philips PRIDE software v4.0,23 we calculated FA, ADC, and RD in the total CC (figure 1). To examine intrarater agreement, each case was measured twice; intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) exceeded 0.98 for all DTI indices. Inter-rater agreement was also assessed by measurement of the CC by two different raters in half of the cases in both groups; ICCs again exceeded 0.98.

Figure1
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 1 Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) tractography illustrating the commissural fibers coursing through the corpus callosum in an uninjured control subject

Red indicates fibers oriented in a right to left direction, green reflects fibers oriented in an anterior-posterior direction, and blue reflects fibers coursing in a superior-inferior orientation.

Postconcussion and emotional distress symptom severity measures.

The severity of postconcussion symptoms and level of general emotional distress were measured using participant reports from the Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire (RPCSQ)24 and the Global Severity Index from the Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI),25 respectively. The RPCSQ has three subscales26 including indices of cognitive (e.g., memory and concentration difficulties), emotional (e.g., anxiety, restlessness, and depression) and somatic (e.g., fatigue, headaches, dizziness, nausea, sleep disturbance, and changes in vision) symptoms. The Global Severity Index from the BSI is a measure of general emotional functioning which encompasses multiple areas of psychiatric symptoms (e.g., affective and somatic domains). Raw scores were used for the RPCSQ while the T-score from the Global Severity Index T-score (BSI) was used. Higher scores on these measures indicate a greater number of symptoms or greater symptom severity.

Statistical analysis.

Group differences for DTI, postconcussion, and emotional functioning variables were tested using Student t tests and analysis of variance for balanced groups. To test the relation between emotional functioning measures and DTI indices for the CC, Spearman rho correlations were computed for FA, ADC, and RD for the small samples.

RESULTS

Imaging.

Analyses revealed significant group differences for the whole CC on measures of FA (t18 = −2.24, p = 0.038), ADC (t18 = 3.09, p = 0.006), and RD (t18 = 2.90, p = 0.010). The MTBI group demonstrated increased FA and decreased ADC and RD relative to the control group. Figure 2 illustrates the relation of DTI indices FA and ADC in the CC for each patient with MTBI relative to an age- and gender-matched control subject.

Figure2
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 2 Bar graphs illustrating the relation of diffusion tensor imaging indices fractional anisotropy (FA) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in the corpus callosum for each subject with mild traumatic brain injury (TBI) relative to an age- and gender-matched control subject

Increased FA (A) and decreased ADC (B) and radial diffusivity (not shown) were evident in 8 of 10 pairs, indicating the frequency of this pattern.

Emotional functioning.

The MTBI group reported more intense postconcussion symptoms compared to the uninjured control group (F1,18 = 12.3, p < 0.0025, Cohen d = 1.57). A trend was found on the BSI (F1,18 = 2.9, p = 0.10, Cohen d = 0.76); participants with MTBI tended to report increased emotional distress compared to controls. Further analyses of the three subscales (i.e., cognitive, affective, somatic) of the RPCSQ demonstrated large effect sizes (i.e., Cohen d ≥ 0.80) and significant group difference on the cognitive and somatic subscales, even after Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons as reflected in table 2.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint

Table 2 Group differences in postconcussion symptom severity

Relation between neuroimaging indices and behavioral data.

Spearman rho correlations were computed between DTI measures of FA, ADC, and RD of the total CC with postconcussion symptoms (RPCSQ) and general emotional distress (BSI). In the control group, FA did not correlate with postconcussion symptom severity on the RPCSQ (rho = −0.04, p = 0.90) or level of general emotional distress on the BSI (rho = 0.28, p = 0.43). Only a trend was noted for correlation between ADC and severity of postconcussion symptoms (rho = 0.57, p = 0.08), and no significant correlations between the ADC and emotional distress were found. No significant correlations were found between the RD and the level of postconcussion symptom severity (rho = 0.17, p = 0.63) or general emotional distress (rho = −0.09, p = 0.78).

However, in the MTBI group, FA of the total CC correlated with the severity of postconcussion symptoms (rho = 0.76, p = 0.01), and general emotional distress (rho = 0.76, p = 0.01). There were trends noted for correlations between ADC and postconcussion symptom severity (rho = −0.60, p = 0.07) and general emotional distress (rho = −0.57, p = 0.08). RD was correlated with postconcussion symptom severity (rho = −0.78, p = 0.008) and general emotional distress (rho = −0.75, p = 0.02). In each of these analyses, increased FA and decreased ADC and RD in the MTBI group were associated with greater symptom severity. Figure 3 illustrates the strong relation between FA and scores on the RPCSQ and BSI in the MTBI group.

Figure3
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint

Figure 3 Scatterplots illustrating the relation between FA and scores on the RPCSQ (A), and BSI (B) for both the MTBI group and the uninjured control group

FA = fractional anisotropy; RPCSQ = Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire; BSI = Brief Symptom Inventory; ADC = apparent diffusion coefficient; MTBI = mild traumatic brain injury.

DISCUSSION

Our preliminary DTI findings show that despite normal CT findings, unremarkable conventional MRI findings in all but one patient, and a GCS score of 15, adolescents who sustained MTBI had increased FA and decreased diffusivity in the CC within 6 days postinjury. Cognitive, affective, and somatic postconcussion symptoms were all related to DTI indices of CC integrity including FA, ADC, and RD. Consequently, we infer that the DTI indices were sensitive to pathologic processes of MTBI that contributed to the postconcussion symptom severity of our patients.

In contrast to previous DTI studies of small samples of adult MTBI10,14 which reported reduced FA and normal diffusivity as early as within 24 hours postinjury,10 we found that FA was increased and diffusivity (ADC and RD) was reduced within 6 days after injury. In comparison with our adolescent sample whose GCS scores were 15, the patients with MTBI studied in previous reports were older (mean age nearly 36 years) and had GCS scores which ranged between 13 and 15 indicating more variation in severity of impaired consciousness.10 Consequently, other pathologic processes such as TAI might have been more prominent in the patients in these studies. In addition, our patients were generally scanned more than 24 hours (but less than 1 week) postinjury, at an interval where different injury mechanisms may have been occurring.

Our finding of a reduction in ADC likely reflects trauma-induced cytotoxic edema and inflammation,27,28 transient effects that occur during the subacute period after TBI.28 Synthesis of the TBI and DTI literature suggests that cytotoxic edema and inflammation may result from ion homeostasis failure and membrane dysfunction. Acute and subacute reduction in ADC using diffusion weighted imaging in human studies have also been reported,28,29 though these studies have typically focused on patients with moderate to severe TBI. In other causes of inflammatory reaction,29 reduced ADC is considered an indication of cytotoxic edema.30,31

Though previous reports using DTI in TBI have generally revealed decreased FA and increased measures of diffusivity including ADC and RD which were ascribed to diffuse degenerative changes such as Wallerian degeneration, axonal collapse, and myelin degeneration,10,14,17,23,32,33 these reports have generally examined or included more severe cases of TBI after longer postinjury intervals than our study. We found that FA was increased and ADC and RD were decreased within 6 days postinjury, findings we attribute to subtle cytotoxic edema associated with compressed intracellular space between CC fibers, thus restricting diffusion in a more uniform direction. Our findings of increased FA are consistent with a single case report of increased anisotropy in an infant with possible nonaccidental injury imaged with DTI within 24 hours after TBI which preceded the development of overt cerebral swelling.34 In nontraumatic disorders including acute cerebral ischemia or infarction, elevated FA and decreased ADC have been reported to reflect basic alterations in cerebral microstructure.35,36 Furthermore, in animal models of secondary trauma-related ischemia, cytotoxic edema was related to decreased ADC values in the postacute time period, presumably related to disruption of energy metabolism and failure of membrane pumps.37

The time course of cytotoxic edema after TBI has not been definitively established, though human models have suggested that cytotoxic edema may reach maximal levels at 24 to 48 hours postinjury.38 In our study, the pattern of increased FA and reduced measures of diffusivity was present in 8 of 10 adolescents with MTBI relative to their matched normal control subjects. Interestingly, the two patients who had the opposite pattern of reduced FA and increased diffusivity had the longest intervals between injury and scanning (4 and 6 days, respectively). It is possible that these early findings of increased FA and decreased diffusivity are evident only in the first few days following injury, but further investigation into the mechanism of injury and time course related to these findings is necessary.

We focused on the CC in this study because of its vulnerability to TAI39 and robustness in measurement of both FA and diffusivity in this structure11,23 as the largest white matter fasciculus. In a detailed biomechanical examination of 22 sports concussions in National Football League players using real-time image reconstruction of the brain to model brain deformation, the CC was observed to be one of the structures to receive the highest strain concentration, and the degree of strain concentration in the CC was associated with removal from play.40 Consistent with the vulnerability of the CC, MRI investigation of pediatric TBI encompassing a wide range of severity41 has demonstrated a high frequency of CC lesions, especially in the splenium. In more severe injury, postmortem studies have consistently demonstrated the CC as a structure most frequently damaged, with early axonal damage noted as early as 35 minutes postinjury.42

In the acute phase of injury there are a multitude of pathologic effects, some of which are transient in nature in milder head injury. These pathologic processes include disruption of axonal filaments that provide axonal ultrastructure, disruption of myelin integrity, excitotoxic biochemical reactions, localized inflammatory responses including macrophage and cytokine activation, and edematous reactions.13,43 All of these pathologic responses may follow different time courses of expression, with some leading to permanent changes in cell function or actual neuronal death. How each of these neuropathologic factors independently or in combination relates to DTI findings is incompletely understood at this time. Furthermore, the extent of the impact of each of these factors in the immature brain vs the mature brain still warrants further investigation.

The primary limitations of the current study include the small number of subjects, the cross-sectional design, and the absence of an additional later follow-up assessment. Despite the balance between the groups on age, gender, ethnicity, premorbid intellectual functioning estimate, and education, replication of these findings in a larger sample is required. In addition, histopathology in experimental studies is required to confirm that cytotoxic edema and inflammatory responses are mechanisms of injury that account for these DTI findings. Future studies should examine additional brain regions and determine whether there are areas of the brain more prone to the injury apparent using these DTI indices. This methodology should also be explored in broader age ranges as the effects of MTBI on FA and diffusivity may be age-dependent. Finally, longitudinal studies are needed to determine how changes in DTI indices are related to recovery of postconcussion sequelae and objective measures of cognitive functioning. Nonetheless, this study demonstrates that acute DTI changes in the CC after MTBI are related to postconcussion symptoms. In the past, the neuropathologic underpinnings of human MTBI have been difficult to study due to the inability of older imaging modalities to reveal injury effects. Advanced MRI-based DTI methods may enhance our understanding of the neuropathology of TBI, including MTBI. Additionally, rapidly evolving techniques such as DTI may prove more sensitive than conventional imaging methods in detecting subtle, but clinically meaningful, changes following MTBI and may be critical in refining diagnosis, therapeutic intervention, and management of MTBI.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors thank Donna Mendez, MD, for assistance in patient recruitment and Stacey K. Martin for assistance in manuscript preparation. They also thank Douglas H. Smith, MD, and Andrew L. Alexander, PhD, for comments on an early draft of this manuscript.

Footnotes

  • Supported by grant NS021889 awarded to Harvey S. Levin, PhD, by the NIH and Mission Connect of the TIRR Foundation.

    Disclosure: The authors report no conflicts of interest.

    Received August 15, 2007. Accepted in final form November 5, 2007.

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    The Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Committee of the Head Injury Interdisciplinary Special Interest Group of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine. Definition of mild traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1993;8:86–87.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  2. 2.↵
    Langlois JA, Kegler SR, Butler JA, et al. Traumatic brain injury-related hospital discharges: results from a 14-state surveillance system, 1997. MMWR Surveill Summ 2003;52:1–20.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    Carroll LJ, Cassidy JD, Peloso PM, et al. Prognosis for mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury. Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine 2004;36:84–105.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  4. 4.↵
    Iverson GL. Outcome from mild traumatic brain injury. Curr Opin Psychiatry 2005;18:301–317.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    McCauley SR, Boake C, Levin HS, Contant CF, Song JX. Postconcussional disorder following mild to moderate traumatic brain injury: anxiety, depression, and social support as risk factors and comorbidities. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 2001;23:792–808.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  6. 6.
    Alexander MP. Neuropsychiatric correlates of persistent postconcussive syndrome. J Head Trauma Rehabil 1992;7:60–69.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  7. 7.↵
    Oppenheimer DR. Microscopic lesions in the brain following head injury. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1968;31:299–306.
    OpenUrlFREE Full Text
  8. 8.
    Blumbergs PC, Scott G, Manavis J, Wainwright H, Simpson DA, McLean AJ. Topography of axonal injury as defined by amyloid precursor protein and the sector scoring method in mild and severe closed head injury. J Neurotrauma 1995;12:565–572.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    Mathias JL, Beall JA, Bigler ED. Neuropsychological and information processing deficits following mild traumatic brain injury. J Int Neuropsychol Soc 2004;10:286–297.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  10. 10.↵
    Arfanakis K, Haughton VM, Carew JD, Rogers BP, Dempsey RJ, Meyerand ME. Diffusion tensor MR imaging in diffuse axonal injury. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:794–802.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    Xu J, Rasmussen IA, Lagopoulos J, Haberg A. Diffuse axonal injury in severe traumatic brain injury visualized using high-resolution diffusion tensor imaging. J Neurotrauma 2007;24:753–765.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  12. 12.↵
    Alexander AL, Lee JE, Lazar M, Field AS. Diffusion Tensor Imaging of the Brain. Neurotherapeutics 2007;4:316–329.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  13. 13.↵
    Povlishock JT, Katz DI. Update of neuropathology and neurological recovery after traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil 2005;20:76–94.
  14. 14.↵
    Inglese M, Makani S, Johnson G, et al. Diffuse axonal injury in mild traumatic brain injury: a diffusion tensor imaging study. J Neurosurg 2005;103:298–303.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  15. 15.
    Rugg-Gunn FJ, Symms MR, Barker GJ, Greenwood R, Duncan JS. Diffusion imaging shows abnormalities after blunt head trauma when conventional magnetic resonance imaging is normal. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2001;70:530–533.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  16. 16.↵
    Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: a practical scale. Lancet 1974;2:81–84.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    Huisman TA, Schwamm LH, Schaefer PW, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging as potential biomarker of white matter injury in diffuse axonal injury. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2004;25:370–376.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  18. 18.↵
    Levin HS, O'Donnell VM, Grossman RG. The Galveston Orientation and Amnesia Test. A practical scale to assess cognition after head injury. J Nerv Ment Dis 1979;167:675–684.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    Barona A, Reynolds CR, Chastain R. A demographically based index of premorbid intelligence for the WAIS–R. J Consult Clin Psychol 1984;52:885–887.
    OpenUrlCrossRef
  20. 20.↵
    Jones DK, Horsfield MA, Simmons A. Optimal strategies for measuring diffusion in anisotropic systems by magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:515–525.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  21. 21.↵
    Netsch T, van Muiswinkel A. Quantitative evaluation of image-based distortion correction in diffusion tensor imaging. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2004;23:789–798.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  22. 22.↵
    Haacke EM, Xu Y, Cheng YC, Reichenbach JR. Susceptibility weighted imaging (SWI). Magn Reson Med 2004;52:612–618.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  23. 23.↵
    Wilde EA, Chu Z, Bigler ED, et al. Diffusion tensor imaging in the corpus callosum in children after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2006;23:1412–1426.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    King NS, Crawford S, Wenden FJ, Moss NE, Wade DT. The Rivermead Post Concussion Symptoms Questionnaire: a measure of symptoms commonly experienced after head injury and its reliability. J Neurol 1995;242:587–592.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    Derogatis LR. Brief Symptom Inventory (BSI): Administration, Scoring, and Procedures Manual. Minneapolis: NCS Pearson, Inc., 1993.
  26. 26.↵
    Smith-Seemiller L, Fow NR, Kant R, Franzen MD. Presence of post-concussion syndrome symptoms in patients with chronic pain vs mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury 2003;17:199–206.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    Barzo P, Marmarou A, Fatouros P, Hayasaki K, Corwin F. Contribution of vasogenic and cellular edema to traumatic brain swelling measured by diffusion-weighted imaging. J Neurosurg 1997;87:900–907.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  28. 28.↵
    Marmarou A, Signoretti S, Fatouros PP, Portella G, Aygok GA, Bullock MR. Predominance of cellular edema in traumatic brain swelling in patients with severe head injuries. J Neurosurg 2006;104:720–730.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  29. 29.↵
    Liu AY, Maldjian JA, Bagley LJ, Sinson GP, Grossman RI. Traumatic brain injury: diffusion-weighted MR imaging findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:1636–1641.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  30. 30.↵
    Gallucci M, Limbucci N, Paonessa A, Caranci F. Reversible focal splenial lesions. Neuroradiol 2007;49:541–544.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  31. 31.
    Kallenberg K, Bailey DM, Christ S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging evidence of cytotoxic cerebral edema in acute mountain sickness. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2007;27:1064–1071.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  32. 32.
    Benson RR, Meda SA, Vasudevan S, et al. Global white matter analysis of diffusion tensor images is predictive of injury severity in traumatic brain injury. J Neurotrauma 2007;24:446–459.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  33. 33.
    Newcombe VF, Williams GB, Nortje J, et al. Analysis of acute traumatic axonal injury using diffusion tensor imaging. Br J Neurosurg 2007;21:340–348.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  34. 34.↵
    Field AS, Hasan K, Jellison BJ, Arfanakis K, Alexander AL. Diffusion tensor imaging in an infant with traumatic brain swelling. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2003;24:1461–1464.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  35. 35.↵
    Green HA, Pena A, Price CJ, et al. Increased anisotropy in acute stroke: a possible explanation. Stroke 2002;33:1517–1521.
    OpenUrlAbstract/FREE Full Text
  36. 36.
    Bhagat YA, Emery DJ, Shuaib A, et al. The relationship between diffusion anisotropy and time of onset after stroke. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2006;26:1442–1450.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  37. 37.↵
    Ito J, Marmarou A, Barzo P, Fatouros P, Corwin F. Characterization of edema by diffusion-weighted imaging in experimental traumatic brain injury. J Neurosurg 1996;84:97–103.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  38. 38.↵
    Marmarou A. Traumatic brain edema: an overview. Acta Neurochir Suppl (Wien) 1994;60:421–424.
    OpenUrlPubMed
  39. 39.↵
    Adams JH, Graham DI, Murray LS, Scott G. Diffuse axonal injury due to nonmissile head injury in humans: an analysis of 45 cases. Ann Neurol 1982;12:557–563.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  40. 40.↵
    Viano DC, Casson IR, Pellman EJ, Zhang L, King AI, Yang KH. Concussion in professional football: brain responses by finite element analysis: part 9. Neurosurgery 57:891–916, 2005; discussion 891–916.
  41. 41.↵
    Mendelsohn DB, Levin HS, Harward H, Bruce D. Corpus callosum lesions after closed head injury in children: MRI, clinical features and outcome. Neuroradiol 1992;34:384–388.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  42. 42.↵
    Hortobagyi T, Wise S, Hunt N, et al. Traumatic axonal damage in the brain can be detected using beta-APP immunohistochemistry within 35 min after head injury to human adults. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 2007;33:226–237.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  43. 43.
    Kochanek PM, Clark RS, Ruppel RA, et al. Biochemical, cellular, and molecular mechanisms in the evolution of secondary damage after severe traumatic brain injury in infants and children: Lessons learned from the bedside. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2000;1:4–19.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
View Abstract

Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence

No comments have been published for this article.
Comment

NOTE: All authors' disclosures must be entered and current in our database before comments can be posted. Enter and update disclosures at http://submit.neurology.org. Exception: replies to comments concerning an article you originally authored do not require updated disclosures.

  • Stay timely. Submit only on articles published within the last 8 weeks.
  • Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
  • 200 words maximum.
  • 5 references maximum. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
  • 5 authors maximum. Exception: replies can include all original authors of the article.
  • Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.

More guidelines and information on Disputes & Debates

Compose Comment

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
NOTE: The first author must also be the corresponding author of the comment.
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Publishing Agreement
NOTE: All authors, besides the first/corresponding author, must complete a separate Disputes & Debates Submission Form and provide via email to the editorial office before comments can be posted.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

You May Also be Interested in

Back to top
  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Glossary
    • METHODS
    • RESULTS
    • DISCUSSION
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENT
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Advertisement

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.

Topics Discussed

  • All Imaging
  • All Neuropsychology/Behavior
  • Brain trauma
  • MRI
  • Adolescence

Alert Me

  • Alert me when eletters are published
Neurology: 96 (3)

Articles

  • Ahead of Print
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Popular Articles
  • Translations

About

  • About the Journals
  • Ethics Policies
  • Editors & Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise

Submit

  • Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Information for Reviewers
  • AAN Guidelines
  • Permissions

Subscribers

  • Subscribe
  • Activate a Subscription
  • Sign up for eAlerts
  • RSS Feed
Site Logo
  • Visit neurology Template on Facebook
  • Follow neurology Template on Twitter
  • Visit Neurology on YouTube
  • Neurology
  • Neurology: Clinical Practice
  • Neurology: Genetics
  • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • AAN.com
  • AANnews
  • Continuum
  • Brain & Life
  • Neurology Today

Wolters Kluwer Logo

Neurology | Print ISSN:0028-3878
Online ISSN:1526-632X

© 2021 American Academy of Neurology

  • Privacy Policy
  • Feedback
  • Advertise