Teaching NeuroImage: Acute spastic monoplegia secondary to spinal epidural venous engorgement in pregnancy
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

A 20-year-old, 33-week-pregnant woman presented with 2 days of backache and left leg weakness. She denied sphincter or sensory disturbance. Examination revealed proximal left leg weakness, bilateral hyperreflexia, and extensor plantars. A cesarean section was performed 5 days later. Two days postpartum, neurologic examination results returned to normal. Spine/abdomen MRIs before (figure, A–C) and after (figure, D–F) are presented.
Figure Spine/abdomen MRIs pre- and postpartum
(A) T2-weighted MRI of thoracic and lumbar spine revealing prominent epidural and paravertebral vessels in the lower thoracic and lumbar spinal canal consistent with vascular congestion. (B) Transverse T2-weighted image of the cord at level of T12-L1 showing increased signal, likely representing cord edema (white arrow). (C) MRI of the abdomen highlights compression of the inferior vena cava (IVC) (white arrow). (D) Repeated T2-weighted MRI of thoracic and lumbar spine showing resolution of vascular congestion. (E) Repeated transverse T2-weighted image of the cord at level of T12-L1 showing absence of the previously noted hyperintensity (white arrow). (F) MRI of the abdomen showing resolution of the IVC compression (white arrow).
Increased blood flow to the epidural venous plexus occurs due to compression on the inferior vena cava (IVC) by the pregnant uterus or by increased abdominal pressure.1 This may present as acute spastic paraparesis, but may also be asymptomatic,2 which can be explained by the severity of IVC compression. MRI is helpful in excluding cord pathology, assuring favorable outcome.
Footnotes
-
Disclosure: The authors report no disclosures.
Series editor: Mitchell S.V. Elkind MD, MS, Section Editor
REFERENCES
Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence
NOTE: All authors' disclosures must be entered and current in our database before comments can be posted. Enter and update disclosures at http://submit.neurology.org. Exception: replies to comments concerning an article you originally authored do not require updated disclosures.
- Stay timely. Submit only on articles published within the last 8 weeks.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- 200 words maximum.
- 5 references maximum. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- 5 authors maximum. Exception: replies can include all original authors of the article.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Related Articles
- No related articles found.