Progressive supranuclear palsy
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

WHAT DID THE AUTHORS STUDY?
In the article, “Tau forms in CSF as a reliable biomarker for progressive supranuclear palsy,” Dr. Borroni and her coauthors (Neurology®2008;71:1796–1803) looked at specific medical tests that could help physicians accurately diagnose this illness. Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) is rare and has similarities to several other progressive neurologic disorders. Because of this, they looked at the results of these tests not only in people with PSP, but also in those who had the “similar” illnesses. In addition, the authors compared the results of the tests to test results of people who did not have progressive neurologic disease.
Dr. Borroni and coauthors carefully studied the tests results for 166 people. All had undergone a detailed history, physical examination, and neurologic examination. All were monitored for more than 2 years. The reason for this long period of monitoring is that the illnesses, especially when they begin, can look like something else. As the illness progresses and other symptoms develop, the diagnosis becomes more clear. By following this group for more than 2 years, Dr. Borroni minimized any errors in diagnosis.
Of the 166 people, 21 were diagnosed with PSP. One hundred twenty-five people had progressive neurologic conditions such as Parkinson disease and Alzheimer disease. There were also a few other illnesses. Twenty-seven patients acted as the “controls.” They were “normal.” This last group needs more explaining. The “controls” were a group of people who had an MRI and lumbar puncture for other reasons. For instance, they may have had a headache, and in the process of evaluating the headache, these tests were needed. Although not entirely “normal,” as this group had experienced a neurologic symptom (for example, headache), they did not have a progressive neurologic illness.
A subset of patients had a specialized MRI of the brain and brainstem. Dr. Borroni …
Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Related Articles
- No related articles found.