A reversible cause of “vascular dementia”
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

A 63-year-old woman presented with progressive dementia over 2 years. Plain head CT demonstrated dilated parenchymal vessels and vascular channels in the left occipital bone (figure 1, A and B). Angiography confirmed a dural arteriovenous malformation (dAVM) centered on the left sigmoid sinus with reflux into all venous sinuses (figure 1, C and D). Cerebral venous drainage was rerouted via cortical veins. Coil occlusion of the recipient venous pouch restored normal venous drainage and reduced the caliber of cortical veins (figure 2, A and B), helping improve cognitive function.
Figure 1 Pretreatment head CT and angiogram
(A) Plain head CT demonstrating dilated cortical veins (arrowheads). (B) Transosseous vascular channels in left occipital bone (inset). (C) Angiogram of cerebral venous phase with dilated cortical veins and absent drainage via dural sinuses. (D) Extracranial feeders to dural arteriovenous malformation with reflux into dural sinuses (arrowheads: retrograde flow).
Figure 2 Posttreatment head CT and angiogram
(A) Post-coiling head CT demonstrating decreased caliber of cortical veins. (B) Post-coiling cerebral venous phase with normal venous drainage via dural sinuses (arrowheads: anterograde flow).
Dementia secondary to dAVMs results from venous hypertension causing ischemic neuronal dysfunction.1 Fistula obliteration may reverse the dementia.
1.
Footnotes
-
Disclosure: The authors report no disclosures.
Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence
NOTE: All authors' disclosures must be entered and current in our database before comments can be posted. Enter and update disclosures at http://submit.neurology.org. Exception: replies to comments concerning an article you originally authored do not require updated disclosures.
- Stay timely. Submit only on articles published within the last 8 weeks.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- 200 words maximum.
- 5 references maximum. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- 5 authors maximum. Exception: replies can include all original authors of the article.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Related Articles
- No related articles found.