Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

Abstract
Background: Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is characterized by vasogenic subcortical edema without infarction. It has been associated with hypertensive crises and with immunosuppressive medications but not with neuromyelitis optica (NMO).
Methods: We reviewed the clinical and neuroimaging features of five NMO–immunoglobulin G (IgG) seropositive white women who experienced an episode of PRES and had a coexisting NMO spectrum disorder (NMOSD). We also tested for the aquaporin-4 (AQP4) water channel autoantibody (NMO-IgG) in 14 patients from an independently ascertained cohort of individuals with PRES.
Results: All five patients developed abrupt confusion and depressed consciousness consistent with PRES. The encephalopathy resolved completely within 7 days. Comorbid conditions or interventions recognized to be associated with PRES included orthostatic hypotension with supine hypertension, plasma exchange, IV immunoglobulin treatment, and high-dose IV methylprednisolone. Brain MRI studies revealed bilateral T2-weighted (T2W) hyperintense signal abnormalities, primarily in frontal, parieto-occipital, and cerebellar regions. Three patients had highly symmetric lesions and three had gadolinium-enhancing lesions. Follow-up neuroimaging revealed partial or complete disappearance of T2W hyperintensity or gadolinium-enhancing lesions in all five patients. Patients with PRES without NMOSD were uniformly NMO-IgG seronegative.
Conclusions: Brain lesions in some patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD) may be accompanied by vasogenic edema and manifest as posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES). Water flux impairment due to aquaporin-4 autoimmunity may predispose to PRES in patients with NMOSD who experience blood pressure fluctuations or who are treated with therapies that can cause rapid fluid shifts.
ADC = apparent diffusion coefficient; AQP4 = aquaporin-4; DWI = diffusion-weighted imaging; FLAIR = fluid-attenuated inversion recovery; Gd = gadolinium; IgG = immunoglobulin G; IVIg = IV immunoglobulin; IVMP = IV methylprednisolone; LETM = longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis; NMO = neuromyelitis optica; NMOSD = neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder; ON = optic neuritis; PLEX = plasma exchange; PRES = posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome; T2W = T2-weighted.
Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES) is a neurologic disorder with neuroimaging features of reversible subcortical vasogenic edema, typically without infarction, that usually symmetrically and preferentially affects posterior head regions. Clinical manifestations include encephalopathy, seizures, headache, and visual symptoms.1–3 PRES is precipitated by hypertensive crises such as eclampsia, and by immunosuppressive agents.4–7 It has not been previously associated with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders (NMOSDs).
Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is an idiopathic, inflammatory CNS demyelinating disease characterized by a predilection for the spinal cord and optic nerves, although symptomatic brain lesions are known to occur in children.8 Typically, spinal cord lesions are longer than three vertebral segments at the time of acute myelitis attacks, brain lesions are absent at the onset of disease, and aquaporin-4 (AQP4)-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) (NMO-IgG) autoantibody is positive.9–11 NMOSDs include limited or inaugural forms of NMO, such as recurrent longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis (LETM) or recurrent optic neuritis (ON) in NMO-IgG seropositive patients.12–14
NMO-IgG binds to the extracellular domain of AQP4, the dominant water channel in the CNS that controls bidirectional water flux in the brain.15
We and others have previously reported that brain MRI lesions may develop in patients with NMO. These lesions are most commonly nonspecific and asymptomatic subcortical white matter T2 hyperintensities, but occasionally are detected in periventricular, diencephalic, or brainstem locations, and may be symptomatic.16–19 We describe clinical and radiographic findings diagnostic of PRES in patients with NMOSD that implicate a role for AQP4 channelopathy in the pathogenesis of some cases of PRES.
METHODS
Ascertainment and data collection.
We identified five patients from Mayo Clinic’s NMO clinical-serologic database who were evaluated clinically between October 2002 and May 2006. All fulfilled clinical criteria for NMO or had recurrent LETM before developing PRES, and all were seropositive for NMO-IgG by indirect immunofluorescence in the Mayo Clinic Neuroimmunology Laboratory. We abstracted the following data from the medical record: demographic characteristics, disease duration, clinical presentation, treatments before and following PRES diagnosis, and blood pressure at the onset of PRES symptoms. CSF results were available for three patients. Additionally, we tested serum specimens for NMO-IgG that were available from 14 patient subjects of a previously published PRES cohort (n = 36).20 There were no known selection biases for risk factors or comorbidities among those for whom sera were archived. Testing was performed blinded to clinical diagnosis of PRES or NMOSD. This research was approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board.
Neuroimaging.
At least one brain MRI study was available for review from all patients before and following the encephalopathic event. We analyzed T2-weighted (T2W), T1W+ gadolinium (Gd), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) map, and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences for the following radiographic features during and following PRES: lesion location, Gd enhancement, resolution over the imaging interval, and interval from onset of PRES to initial neuroimaging and to subsequent neuroimaging.
RESULTS
Patient demographics and predisposing factors.
All five patients were white women (table). Three had NMO and two had recurrent LETM. Median age at PRES onset was 48 years (range 12 to 57 years). The median duration of NMOSD was 6 years (3 months to 24 years). Patients 1 and 2 developed PRES at 9 and 13 days subsequent to a LETM attack. A third (patient 5) was recovering from an episode of coma accompanied by vasogenic edema when paraplegia was noted and a LETM lesion was discovered. The remaining two patients had not experienced a recent episode of ON or LETM. Four patients had comorbid conditions or interventions that might have precipitated PRES: orthostatic hypotension and PLEX (n = 1), IVIg (n = 1), orthostatic hypotension with supine hypertension (n = 1), and orthostatic hypotension with supine hypertension and high-dose IVMP (n = 1). The median interval between detection of the comorbid factor or intervention to development of PRES was 24 hours (range 24 hours to 7 days).
Table Clinical and radiographic features of the PRES cohort
Clinical presentation.
All patients experienced confusion or impaired consciousness. Coma developed in three. Three patients had visual abnormalities, including nystagmus and diplopia (n = 1), cortical blindness (n = 1), and diplopia alone (n = 1). The encephalopathic syndrome resolved completely in all patients, with a median recovery time of 4 days (range 1 to 7 days). None experienced seizures. Blood pressure recordings were not available for one of the patients at the onset of PRES who was evaluated at another institution and subsequently referred to Mayo Clinic for evaluation. Patient 3 had a blood pressure of 220/140 mm Hg, potentially contributing to PRES (table). Three patients were treated for the PRES episode: one patient received five sessions of PLEX, one received IVMP with concurrent withholding of midodrine pressor therapy administered for orthostatic hypotension, and one received IVIg and IVMP.
Laboratory investigations.
NMOSD group.
NMO-IgG was detected by indirect immunofluorescence in all five patients (median titer 7,680; range 120 to 7,680). CSF analyses at the time of PRES revealed lymphocytic pleocytosis in all four with available data (median leukocytes 23; range 4 to 69) and elevated protein in two patients (median 80 mg/dL; range 76 to 84; normal reference 14–45 mg/dL). Oligoclonal bands were detected in none.
Unselected PRES group.
Thirteen of 14 patients in the previously ascertained PRES cohort were NMO-IgG seronegative. The 14th seropositive patient was reported in the original series as a patient with NMO and PRES, and in our NMOSD series is patient 3.20 Thus, none of the patients who had PRES but who did not have an NMOSD were seropositive for NMO-IgG.
Neuroimaging.
MRI studies, performed within 24 hours from onset of encephalopathy in all five patients, revealed T2W hyperintense signal abnormalities, Gd enhancement in three of four patients with available studies, DWI restriction in three of three patients, and increased ADC signal in two of three patients (patients 2 and 3) (figure and figure e-1 on the Neurology® Web site at www.neurology.org). None had decreased ADC signal to suggest infarction. Areas of T2W signal abnormality included frontal (n = 4), parieto-occipital (n = 5), thalami (n = 1), corpus callosum (n = 3), and cerebellum (n = 3). Lesions in all patients were bilateral and were very symmetric in patients 1, 2, and 3. Neuroimaging was repeated in all patients (median delay 10 days; range 4 days to 10 months) and revealed complete resolution of T2W signal abnormalities (n = 1), partial resolution (n = 3), and no resolution (n = 1). Complete resolution of Gd enhancement was observed in two of two patients with available follow-up T1W+Gd studies. Follow-up imaging revealed complete resolution of DWI restriction detected at the PRES episode in one of two patients.
Figure Neuroimaging of three patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder–posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (PRES)
Images are displayed according to the following MRI sequences, as available: diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), apparent diffusion coefficient, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery/T2-weighted (T2W), T1W+Gd. The top rows represent neuroimaging at time of PRES, and the bottom rows represent post-PRES repeat neuroimaging. DWI (patient 1) reveals changes consistent with vasogenic edema; T2 signal abnormalities resolved completed as did DWI signal abnormality over the imaging interval. Gadolinium enhancement resolved completely and T2 signal abnormalities partially in patient 4. Patient 5 had large asymmetric, enhancing lesions; there is minimal resolution of T2 signal abnormalities. Figure e-1 (at www.neurology.org) shows neuroimaging of patients 2 and 3.
DISCUSSION
In most respects, patients in our series had typical characteristics of PRES, including encephalopathy, visual disturbances, and rapidly reversible changes consistent with vasogenic edema on MRI. Although some patients in this series had features considered to be atypical for PRES, it is now accepted that the clinicoradiographic spectrum of PRES is broader than previously appreciated and includes irreversible clinical features, atypical neuroimaging features such as frontal involvement,20–22 gray matter/cortical lesions,20 unilateral lesions,20–22 asymmetric lesions,21 basal ganglia lesions,21,22 deep white matter and holohemispheric watershed lesions,21 hemorrhage,20,22 Gd enhancement,20,22,23 confluent lesions,20 brainstem and cerebellar involvement,20–22 and corpus callosum lesions.21 Foci of irreversible MRI signal abnormality occur in approximately 26% of patients.20 In our series, clinical resolution was complete in all patients within 7 days of PRES onset, and no recurrent clinical episodes were reported. Resolution of neuroimaging abnormalities was incomplete; one of five patients had complete resolution of T2W signal abnormality and two of two had complete resolution of Gd enhancement after a median interval of 7 days. Resolution of Gd enhancement likely precedes resolution of T2W hyperintensity. The optimal timing for repeat imaging to document resolution has not been established.20 The presence of Gd-enhancing lesions in two patients with available T1W+Gd studies suggests that PRES in the setting of an NMOSD can be accompanied by brain inflammation, with superimposed disruption of water channel physiology resulting in vasogenic edema. Further support for inflammation comes from the CSF pleocytosis that was present in three of four patients with available data. Additionally, patient 5, who experienced rapidly reversible coma with extensive vasogenic edema and patchy enhancement accompanied by asymmetric lesions between the right and left hemispheres, was found to have focal demyelination and extensive macrophage infiltration with relative axonal preservation in a brain biopsy specimen.
This study’s retrospective nature and potential referral bias of atypical cases do not allow us to confidently state that PRES occurs with a higher frequency in patients with AQP4 autoimmunity as compared to those with other acute illnesses in which treatments may result in blood pressure fluctuations or osmotic or fluid stresses (e.g., IVIg or PLEX). However, in the interval during which these patients were ascertained, a total of 70 patients evaluated at Mayo Clinic sites were found to be NMO-IgG seropositive. PRES is generally considered a rare disorder, but was diagnosed in 5 of 70 (7%) consecutive NMO-IgG-positive patients identified at Mayo Clinic. This suggests that the co-occurrence of NMOSD and PRES is not coincidental. Two of 5 (40%) patients who were NMO-IgG seropositive among an Israeli cohort of 10 patients with clinical NMOSD developed what was interpreted as an acute disseminated encephalomyelitis-like syndrome. The clinical characteristics and radiologic evolution were consistent with a PRES-like syndrome. The authors speculated that interference with water channels by aquaporin-4 specific IgG may have contributed to the development of these lesions.24 It is also conceivable that severe AQP4 functional impairment by IgG can cause a knock-out phenotype and an increase in brain edema in these patients.
Despite advances in its neuroimaging characterization and consensus about its clinical context, the pathogenesis of PRES remains enigmatic. The most widely accepted mechanism is that rapid changes in cerebral perfusion in patients with increased blood–brain permeability, especially in posterior head regions that are relatively deficient in sympathetic innervation, compromise autoregulation.25 Alteration in CNS water flux due to AQP4 autoimmunity may predispose to PRES especially in the setting of rapid fluctuations in cerebral perfusion and therapies altering blood pressure or osmotic gradients. AQP4-null mice have reduced blood–brain barrier water permeability and consequently less cytotoxic edema compared to wild-type animals.26 However, AQP-null mice also develop higher intracranial pressure and brain water content when challenged by continuous intraparenchymal fluid infusion.27 Thus AQP4 is critical both for development of cytotoxic edema and resolution of vasogenic edema. We propose that autoimmune-mediated disruption of the CNS AQP4 water channel function predisposes to a higher frequency of PRES relative to other illnesses that produce comparable levels of acute illness. The uniform NMO-IgG seronegativity that we found in this study among stored serum from a previously reported PRES cohort ascertained by clinical presentation20 suggests that NMO accounts for only rare cases of PRES, specifically in individuals with a preexisting NMOSD.
Brain lesions in NMO are heterogenous and the spectrum ranges from completely reversible symmetric or diffuse lesions causing primarily encephalopathy to bilateral but asymmetric lesions, as in patients 4 and 5, accompanied by focal neurologic syndromes, such as aphasia, and prominent Gd enhancement on neuroimaging. This spectrum may illustrate the dual nature of the pathogenesis of brain lesions in NMO: functional perturbation of brain water channels and blockade of water flux from the CNS leading to diffuse and symmetric cerebral vasogenic edema vs inflammatory attack of target aquaporin-4 leading to areas of persistent T2 signal abnormality and possibly focal neurologic signs at the other extreme. Inflammatory lesions associated with immune complex deposition may be both destructive and demyelinating as well as nondestructive and nondemyelinating, as we have reported previously.28 The role of AQP4-specific antibodies in the pathogenesis of these latter two lesion types is supported by the selective abolition of AQP4 immunoreactivity29 as well as by the in vitro effects of the autoantibody on cells expressing AQP4.29,30
Footnotes
-
Supplemental data at www.neurology.org
Disclosure: Drs. Lennon, Lucchinetti, and Weinshenker stand to receive royalties for intellectual property related to the AQP4 autoantigen.
Received August 4, 2008. Accepted in final form October 6, 2008.
REFERENCES
- ↵
- ↵
Truwit CL, Denaro CP, Lake JR, DeMarco T. MR imaging of reversible cyclosporin A-induced neurotoxicity. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1991;12:651–659.
- ↵
McKeon A, Lennon VA, Lotze T, et al. CNS aquaporin-4 autoimmunity in children. Neurology 2008;71:93–100.
- ↵
Wingerchuk DM, Lennon VA, Pittock SJ, et al. Revised diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica. Neurology 2006;66:1485–1489.
-
Lennon VA, Kryzer TJ, Pittock SJ, et al. IgG marker of optic-spinal multiple sclerosis binds to the aquaporin-4 water channel. J Exp Med 2005;202:473–477.
- ↵
de Seze J, Arndt C, Jeanjean L, et al. Relapsing inflammatory optic neuritis: is it neuromyelitis optica? Neurology 2008;70:2075–2076.
-
Matiello M, Lennon VA, Jacob A, et al. NMO-IgG predicts the outcome of recurrent optic neuritis. Neurology 2008;70:2197–2200.
- ↵
- ↵
-
Poppe AY, Lapierre Y, Melancon D, et al. Neuromyelitis optica with hypothalamic involvement. Mult Scler 2005;11:617–621.
-
Matsushita T, Matsuoka T, Ishizu T, et al. Anterior periventricular linear lesions in optic-spinal multiple sclerosis: a combined neuroimaging and neuropathological study. Mult Scler 2008;14:343–353.
- ↵
- ↵
Bartynski WS, Boardman JF. Distinct imaging patterns and lesion distribution in posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1320–1327.
-
Covarrubias DJ, Luetmer PH, Campeau NG. Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome: prognostic utility of quantitative diffusion-weighted MR images. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2002;23:1038–1048.
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
- ↵
Papadopoulos MC, Manley GT, Krishna S, Verkman AS. Aquaporin-4 facilitates reabsorption of excess fluid in vasogenic brain edema. FASEB J 2004;18:1291–1293.
- ↵
Lucchinetti CF, Mandler RN, McGavern D, et al. A role for humoral mechanisms in the pathogenesis of Devic’s neuromyelitis optica. Brain 2002;125:1450–1461.
- ↵
Roemer SF, Parisi JE, Lennon VA, et al. Pattern-specific loss of aquaporin-4 immunoreactivity distinguishes neuromyelitis optica from multiple sclerosis. Brain 2007;130:1194–1205.
-
Hinson SR, Pittock SJ, Lucchinetti CF, et al. Pathogenic potential of IgG binding to water channel extracellular domain in neuromyelitis optica. Neurology 2007;69:2221–2231.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
- Posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders
- Shoichi Ito, Department of Neurology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, 1-8-1 Inohana, Chuo-ku, Chiba, 260-8670, Japansito@faculty.chiba-u.jp
Submitted May 21, 2009 - Reply from the authors
- Brian G Weinshenker, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW Rochester MN 55905weinb@mayo.edu
- Setty M. Magana, Marcelo Matiello, Alejandro A. Rabinstein
Submitted May 21, 2009
REQUIREMENTS
You must ensure that your Disclosures have been updated within the previous six months. Please go to our Submission Site to add or update your Disclosure information.
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Dr. Babak Hooshmand and Dr. David Smith
► Watch
Topics Discussed
Alert Me
Recommended articles
-
Articles
A population-based study of neuromyelitis optica in CaucasiansN. Asgari, S.T. Lillevang, H.P.B. Skejoe et al.Neurology, May 02, 2011 -
Article
Distinction between MOG antibody-positive and AQP4 antibody-positive NMO spectrum disordersDouglas Kazutoshi Sato, Dagoberto Callegaro, Marco Aurelio Lana-Peixoto et al.Neurology, January 10, 2014 -
Articles
Neuromyelitis optica-IgG in childhood inflammatory demyelinating CNS disordersB. Banwell, S. Tenembaum, V. A. Lennon et al.Neurology, December 19, 2007 -
Article
Antibodies to myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein in bilateral and recurrent optic neuritisSudarshini Ramanathan, Stephen W. Reddel, Andrew Henderson et al.Neurology - Neuroimmunology Neuroinflammation, October 29, 2014