Clinical Reasoning: A 36-year-old man with vertical diplopia
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

In the Resident & Fellow Section article “Clinical Reasoning: A 36-year-old man with vertical diplopia” by S. Prasad et al. (Neurology 2009;72:e93–e99), section 3 (page e97), the abnormal muscles identified by the Parks-Bielschowsky test are given incorrectly. The correct explanation should read as follows (revisions in italics):
“According to the Parks-Bielschowsky three-step test, right hypertropia suggests weakness of the right superior oblique, right inferior rectus, left inferior oblique, or left superior rectus muscles. Next, increased right hypertropia in contralateral gaze narrows the possibilities to right superior oblique or left superior rectus weakness.” The authors regret the error.
Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence
NOTE: All authors' disclosures must be entered and current in our database before comments can be posted. Enter and update disclosures at http://submit.neurology.org. Exception: replies to comments concerning an article you originally authored do not require updated disclosures.
- Stay timely. Submit only on articles published within the last 8 weeks.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- 200 words maximum.
- 5 references maximum. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- 5 authors maximum. Exception: replies can include all original authors of the article.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
You May Also be Interested in
Related Articles
- No related articles found.