This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Background: A recent meta-analysis of randomized trials revealed that antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) as a class increase the risk of suicidal thoughts and behavior. We conducted an observational study with data from the United Kingdom General Practice Research Database to investigate if an increase in risk for different groups of AEDs is also evident in clinical practice.
Methods: This was a nested case-control study in a cohort of 44,300 patients with epilepsy who were treated with AEDs. Patients with self-harm or suicidal behavior were identified by predefined codes. We included 453 cases and 8,962 age-matched and sex-matched controls. AEDs were classified into 4 groups: barbiturates, conventional AEDs, and newer AEDs with low (lamotrigine, gabapentin, pregabalin, oxcarbazepine) or high (levetiracetam, tiagabine, topiramate, vigabatrin) potential of causing depression. Adjusted odds ratios (OR) were calculated using conditional logistic regression.
Results: Current use of newer AEDs with a high potential of causing depression was associated with a 3-fold increased risk of self-harm/suicidal behavior (OR = 3.08; 95% [CI] 1.22–7.77) as compared with no use of AEDs during the last year. Use of barbiturates (OR = 0.66; 95% CI 0.25–1.73), conventional AEDs (OR = 0.74; 95% CI 0.53–1.03), or low-risk newer AEDs (OR = 0.87; 95% CI 0.47–1.59) was not associated with an increased risk.
Conclusions: Newer AEDs with a rather high frequency of depressive symptoms in clinical trials may also increase the risk of self-harm or suicidal behavior in clinical practice. For the most commonly used other groups of AEDs, no increase in risk was observed.
Footnotes
-
Editorial, page 300
Supplemental data at www.neurology.org
Study funding: Database acquisition was funded by an unrestricted grant from Bayer Schering Pharma. The funding source had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, or interpretation of the data; or preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript.
Disclosure: Author disclosures are provided at the end of the article.
Received October 8, 2009. Accepted in final form March 19, 2010.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.