This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective: To investigate whether central facilitation of trigeminal pain processing is part of the pathophysiology of cluster headache (CH).
Methods: Sixty-six patients with CH (18 episodic CH inside bout, 28 episodic CH outside bout, 20 chronic CH) according to the International Classification of Headache Disorders–II classification, as well as 30 healthy controls, were investigated in a case-control study using simultaneous recordings of the nociceptive blink reflex (nBR) and pain-related evoked potentials (PREP) following nociceptive electrical stimulation on both sides of the forehead (V1).
Results: nBR latency ratio (headache side/nonheadache side) was decreased in all CH patients independent from CH subtype compared with healthy controls indicating central facilitation at brainstem level. Area under the curve ratio was increased in patients with episodic CH inside bout only. PREP showed decreased N2 latency ratio in patients with chronic CH indicating central facilitation at supraspinal (thalamic or cortical) level.
Conclusions: Asymmetric facilitation of trigeminal nociceptive processing predominantly on brainstem level was detected in patients with CH. This alteration is most pronounced in the acute pain phase of the disease, but appears to persist in remission periods. Only chronic CH patients show additional changes of PREP prompting to supraspinal changes of pain processing related to the chronic state of disease in regard to neuronal plasticity, which exceeds changes observed in episodic CH.
GLOSSARY
- ACC=
- anterior cingulate cortex;
- AUC=
- area under the curve;
- BR=
- blink reflex;
- CH=
- cluster headache;
- nBR=
- nociceptive blink reflex;
- PREP=
- pain-related evoked potentials;
- TSEP=
- trigeminal somatosensory evoked potentials;
- WDR=
- wide dynamic range
Footnotes
Study funding: Supported by the IFORES grant of the University Duisburg-Essen.
Supplemental data at www.neurology.org
- Received August 3, 2011.
- Accepted November 14, 2011.
- Copyright © 2012 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.