Abstract
Objective: To determine the accuracy of stroke identification by the Emergency Medical Services (EMS) dispatch center as the first responder and to identify barriers to the accurate diagnosis.
Background The accuracy of stroke identification by dispatch units is an important determinant for directing appropriate level of EMS and response times.
Design/Methods: We used the 2009 National Emergency Medical Services Information System (NEMSIS) Research Dataset, which is representative of 26 states in the US. We compared the diagnosis for dispatch based on ascertainment by dispatch staff with the diagnosis made by EMS after arrival at scene for identification of stroke/cerebrovascular accident (CVA) and determined the reasons for false diagnosis. We also estimated the sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of dispatch diagnosis of stroke/CVA.
Results: Among the 58013 patients identified by the dispatch center as stroke/CVA, 35118(60.5%) were diagnosed as stroke/CVA by EMS after evaluation at scene. Among the patients with false dispatch diagnosis, the EMS diagnosis was as follows: 8401(14.5%) altered level of consciousness, 4107(7.1%), syncope/fainting, 2391(4.1%) diabetic symptoms-hypoglycemia, 917(1.6%) seizures and 7079(12.2%) other. Identification of stroke by dispatch unit showed a sensitivity of 57%, specificity of 99.03%, positive predictive value of 60.5%, negative predictive value of 98.8%, positive likelihood ratio of 59 (95% CI 58-60) and negative likelihood ratio of 0.43(95% CI 0.43-0.44).
Conclusions: The complaint of stroke/CVA reported by dispatch unit to EMS seems to have low sensitivity but high specificity. Efforts are required to increase the sensitivity of dispatch unit diagnosis of stroke to ensure appropriate level of EMS care is dispatched and reduce response times.
Disclosure: Dr. Jadhav has nothing to disclose. Dr. Pawar has nothing to disclose. Dr. Chaudhry has nothing to disclose. Dr. Hassan has nothing to disclose. Dr. Namasaka has nothing to disclose. Dr. Suri has nothing to disclose. Dr. Qureshi has nothing to disclose.
Tuesday, April 24 2012, 07:30 am-12:00 pm
- Copyright © 2011 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.
Letters: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.
