This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective: Vasovagal syncope (VVS) is the most frequent type of syncope and a common differential diagnosis of epilepsy. The role of genetic factors in VVS is debated. We performed a twin-family study to clarify this question and to analyze the putative mode of inheritance.
Methods: Fifty-one same-sex twin pairs where at least 1 had syncope were ascertained. The twins were interviewed via telephone using a standardized questionnaire. Available medical records were obtained. Information on the affected status of first- and second-degree relatives was acquired.
Results: There was a trend toward higher casewise concordance in monozygous (MZ, 0.75) than dizygous (DZ, 0.50) twins for any syncope (p = 0.06). Significant and strong effects on concordance between MZ and DZ twins were found for fainting at least twice unrelated to external circumstances (0.71 vs 0.27, p = 0.018) and for syncope associated with typical vasovagal triggers (0.62 vs 0.00, p < 0.001). Twelve of 19 concordant MZ twin pairs reported sparse or no other affected family members whereas in the other 7 pairs multiple close relatives were affected.
Conclusions: The twin analysis provides strong evidence for the relevance of genetic factors in VVS. Analysis of the families suggests that complex inheritance (multiple genes ± environmental factors) is usual, with rarer families possibly segregating a major autosomal dominant gene.
GLOSSARY
- ATR=
- Australian Twin Registry;
- DZ=
- dizygous;
- MZ=
- monozygous;
- VVS=
- vasovagal syncope
Footnotes
Study funding: Supported by a project grant (ID 509135) and an enabling grant (ID 628911) of the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia. K.M.K. was supported by a research fellowship from the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (KL 2254/1-1) and a scholarship from The University of Melbourne.
Supplemental data at www.neurology.org
- Received January 19, 2012.
- Accepted March 19, 2012.
- Copyright © 2012 by AAN Enterprises, Inc.
Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence
NOTE: All authors' disclosures must be entered and current in our database before comments can be posted. Enter and update disclosures at http://submit.neurology.org. Exception: replies to comments concerning an article you originally authored do not require updated disclosures.
- Stay timely. Submit only on articles published within the last 8 weeks.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- 200 words maximum.
- 5 references maximum. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- 5 authors maximum. Exception: replies can include all original authors of the article.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.