Skip to main content
Advertisement
  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Education
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion (DEI)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Neurology Future Forecasting Series
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Topics A-Z
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit New Manuscript
    • Submit Revised Manuscript
    • Author Center

Advanced Search

Main menu

  • Neurology.org
  • Journals
    • Neurology
    • Clinical Practice
    • Education
    • Genetics
    • Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • Online Sections
    • Neurology Video Journal Club
    • Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion (DEI)
    • Innovations in Care Delivery
    • Practice Buzz
    • Practice Current
    • Residents & Fellows
    • Without Borders
  • Collections
    • COVID-19
    • Disputes & Debates
    • Health Disparities
    • Infographics
    • Neurology Future Forecasting Series
    • Null Hypothesis
    • Patient Pages
    • Topics A-Z
    • Translations
  • Podcast
  • CME
  • About
    • About the Journals
    • Contact Us
    • Editorial Board
  • Authors
    • Submit New Manuscript
    • Submit Revised Manuscript
    • Author Center
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Neurology Video Journal Club
  • Residents & Fellows

User menu

  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
Neurology
Home
The most widely read and highly cited peer-reviewed neurology journal
  • Subscribe
  • My Alerts
  • Log in
Site Logo
  • Home
  • Latest Articles
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Neurology Video Journal Club
  • Residents & Fellows

Share

January 01, 2013; 80 (1) Resident and Fellow Section

Emerging Subspecialties in Neurology: Clinical development

Jeffrey T. Guptill, Robert E. Dupuis, O’Neill D’Cruz
First published December 24, 2012, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e31827b1af6
Jeffrey T. Guptill
From Duke Clinical Research Institute (J.T.G.), Durham; Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics (R.E.D.), Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; and UCB Pharma Inc (O.D.), Raleigh, NC.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Robert E. Dupuis
From Duke Clinical Research Institute (J.T.G.), Durham; Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics (R.E.D.), Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; and UCB Pharma Inc (O.D.), Raleigh, NC.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
O’Neill D’Cruz
From Duke Clinical Research Institute (J.T.G.), Durham; Division of Pharmacotherapy and Experimental Therapeutics (R.E.D.), Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill; and UCB Pharma Inc (O.D.), Raleigh, NC.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Full PDF
Citation
Emerging Subspecialties in Neurology: Clinical development
Jeffrey T. Guptill, Robert E. Dupuis, O’Neill D’Cruz
Neurology Jan 2013, 80 (1) e4-e7; DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31827b1af6

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
Permissions

Make Comment

See Comments

Downloads
564

Share

  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Loading

Therapeutic development includes the activities necessary to bring a new medicinal compound (chemical or biologic) or medical device to market. Following drug discovery or development of a new device, successful preclinical studies result in an Investigational New Drug (IND) application (United States only; Clinical Trials Exemption Certificate in the United Kingdom). Once the IND is filed, a team-driven process begins that tests the efficacy and safety of a new therapeutic in humans. This process, known as clinical development, has traditionally been divided into 4 phases, with large-scale phase 3 pivotal trials in patients with a specific disease leading to registration and postmarketing studies.1

Recent advances in understanding the pathophysiology of neurologic diseases has led to the discovery of many new drug targets and candidate drugs. The largest funding agencies for research, represented by the NIH and the pharmaceutical industry,2 have substantially increased their budget allocation to neurosciences research3 and devoted more resources to clinical development programs.4 Thus, there is a significant and growing need for neurologists with experience and relevant training in clinical development.

Despite the growing need and potential rewards, recognition of therapeutic development careers among neurologists is generally poor. Furthermore, neurologists not directly involved with pharmaceutical medicine often have a poor understanding of the process, in part because it is largely ignored in US medical education. Here we review clinical development and training opportunities for interested neurologists.

Opportunities for neurologists

Clinical development opportunities for neurologists exist at pharmaceutical and device companies, contract research organizations, academic research organizations, regulatory agencies (e.g., US Food and Drug Administration, European Medicines Agency), and as an independent contractor. Increasingly, industry has partnered with academia to reduce rising research and development costs and take advantage of cutting-edge research at academic institutions. Industry sponsors potentially benefit from the specialized technology and expertise available in the academic environment. In this setting, academic neurologists work within their research area on innovative projects of interest to industry.

Roles

Clinical development activities of neurologists usually take advantage of their medical training and clinical experience. For example, in the early stages of a novel therapeutic's clinical development, neurologists must understand and communicate the potential clinical benefits of the new agent, disease populations to evaluate in clinical studies, and perceived safety risks that require monitoring.

To evaluate the desired clinical benefits and minimize safety risks to research volunteers and patients, clinical development neurologists often offer their skills in multiple roles. These include activities such as developing clinical trial medical monitoring, and safety signal detection protocols; assisting with development of clinical trial reports, regulatory documents, and investigator brochures; directly monitoring the safety of trial participants; ensuring the medical accuracy of printed materials, such as product labels and publications; answering medical questions from investigators; and providing therapeutic training for internal staff, investigators, and contractors.

Functions

Neurologists can contribute to clinical development in several capacities; notably, as site investigator, clinical research physician on a clinical development team, or an external consultant. Neurologists with appropriate training may also support clinical development as a clinical pharmacologist.

Neurologists in industry

Within a pharmaceutical/device company or contract research organization, neurologists usually provide services as a medical affairs, clinical research, or safety physician. Due to the complexities of the therapeutic development process, neurologists often work in multidisciplinary teams with representatives from multiple functions (e.g., clinical operations, regulatory affairs, statistics). Importantly, the contributions of the neurologist will be interpreted in the context of input from these other functions that also play critical roles.

Pathways for entering industry

Neurologists may enter clinical development in an academic or industry environment directly after completing their clinical training. Most commonly, neurologists participate in clinical development as an investigator in pharmaceutical industry–sponsored clinical trials. Typically, their role starts as a subinvestigator in a clinical trial during training or as junior faculty, leading to a principal investigator role with increasing experience and participation in a variety of trials. Neurologists perceived as experts in their respective fields also sit on advisory boards to provide scientific advice on concepts and the development of clinical trial protocols. In some trials, external physicians serve on data monitoring committees that evaluate safety or efficacy data. After participating in clinical trials as an investigator or advisory board member, neurologists may decide to pursue clinical development as a career in the pharmaceutical industry.

Similarities and differences among clinical medicine, academic research, and clinical development

In contrast to clinical practice, where neurologists try to achieve a clinically meaningful change in disease status in the individual patient, clinical development of a therapeutic entity emphasizes the population response. In the industry setting, many team members share decision-making responsibilities and regulatory agencies (and increasingly payers) strongly direct clinical development activities. In translational or basic academic research, decisions are more centralized and often based on personal interests, skill sets, and funding opportunities. Clinical practice decisions may also be influenced differently by payers, legislation, and legal considerations. Additional challenges for a career in the pharmaceutical industry may include differences in terminology, organizational structure, and the highly regulated environment. Although seemingly straightforward, the distinctions between these environments and the necessary change in mindset can be difficult for neurologists who enter clinical development from a prolonged period in clinical practice or academic research. Despite these differences, communication, teamwork, and a strong desire to improve patient health are common elements in all these settings, while adherence to good clinical practice guidelines should be a feature of all clinical research.

For many neurologists, clinical development is a nontraditional career path. However, they may be attracted to the challenging work on the cutting edge of therapeutics, access to innovative technologies, and involvement in rapidly advancing clinical research without the stress of maintaining grant funding. Additional potential attractions include the often-employed multidisciplinary team approach and collaboration; a sense of accomplishment when a new medicine is delivered to the market for patients with unmet medical needs or a study is successfully completed; varied daily activities; and the need, during the development lifecycle of a therapeutic entity, to overcome ever-changing challenges. Neurologists may be enticed by the change in responsibilities, perceived lifestyle benefits, prior positive experiences interacting with industry personnel, and the global scope of clinical development.

Training opportunities

In several countries, pharmaceutical medicine is a recognized medical specialty with dedicated training programs and licensing.5 For instance, in the United Kingdom, the Pharmaceutical Medicine Specialty Training program is a multiyear modular training program, including a module on clinical development, that leads to registration with the General Medical Council as a specialist in pharmaceutical medicine.6 Particularly in Europe, advanced training opportunities in pharmaceutical medicine often confer a master's degree.5,7 Given the global nature of the pharmaceutical industry, the International Federation of Associations of Pharmaceutical Physicians harmonized these training programs to provide a balanced education and professional degrees that are recognized between countries. These structured pathways do not exist in the United States and training is often individualized to the needs of the neurologist and his or her organization.

When initiating a clinical development career in industry, the highly regulated environment and inadequate exposure of many neurologists results in a protracted “startup time” with substantial training costs to their organization and lower productivity that can be reduced by prior training. Consequently, for clinical development positions, neurologists with prior training or experience will be particularly attractive.

Several opportunities exist to develop skills in therapeutic development, either in preparation for a full-time position or to improve understanding and performance in clinical trials as an investigator (table). Several organizations provide short courses, Webinars, and online courses to acquire knowledge in specific areas of clinical development, as well as longer, usually site-based courses that offer a broad overview of the therapeutic development process.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
  • Download powerpoint
Table

Summary of available general and neurology-specific drug development educational programs

Neurology-specific structured training opportunities, such as fellowships, are limited. We know of 3 intensive programs that focus on drug development training in the neurosciences (UCB Pharma, Inc., in partnership with the University of North Carolina Eshelman School of Pharmacy, Duke Clinical Research Institute, and Hamner Institutes; University of California, San Diego; and University of Rochester).8,–,10 Further information on these programs is available on their respective Web sites (table).

Collectively, these programs train future leaders in neurology clinical development. In addition to the knowledge gained, they may also provide other benefits, such as added job opportunities for properly trained neurologists; networking and potential collaborations in clinical studies and other research projects; a larger pipeline of neurologists with drug development expertise that may encourage other trainees to consider training and working in therapeutic development; and a better understanding of the perspectives of the pharmaceutical industry and regulatory agencies.

DISCUSSION

Clinical development is a challenging and potentially rewarding field offering several opportunities for neurologists. As therapeutic development in neurologic diseases expands, the need for neurologists with clinical development expertise continues to grow. Interested neurologists will benefit from specialized training, either as part of a focused fellowship experience or through other educational opportunities as outlined in this article. Finally, the participation of neurologists familiar with the clinical spectrum of neurologic diseases will enhance the scientific validity and clinical relevance of neurotherapeutics in development.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Jeffrey T. Guptill: conception, manuscript drafting and revision. O’Neill D’Cruz: conception, manuscript drafting and revision. Robert E. Dupuis: manuscript drafting and revision.

STUDY FUNDING

Supported by a Fellowship in Neurology Clinical Drug Development sponsored by UCB, Inc. (Dr. Guptill).

DISCLOSURE

J. Guptill receives funding from the American Academy of Neurology Foundation, the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America, and a Fellowship in Neurology Clinical Drug Development sponsored by UCB Pharma, University of North Carolina School of Pharmacy, the Duke Clinical Research Institute, and the Hamner Institutes. R. Dupuis is a faculty member at the Eshelman School of Pharmacy and director of the UNC Fellowship Program. O. D’Cruz is a Medical Director, Global Projects and Development at UCB Pharma, Raleigh, NC. Go to Neurology.org for full disclosures.

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

The authors thank Daniel Benjamin, MD, and Paul Watkins, MD, for their critical review of the manuscript.

Footnotes

  • Go to Neurology.org for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.

  • © 2012 American Academy of Neurology

REFERENCES

  1. 1.↵
    Understanding clinical trials. In: ClinicalTrials.gov [online]. Available at: http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/info/understand. Accessed May 29, 2012.
  2. 2.↵
    1. Dorsey ER,
    2. De RJ,
    3. Thompson JP,
    4. et al
    . Funding of US biomedical research, 2003–2008. JAMA 2010;303:137–143.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  3. 3.↵
    1. Dorsey ER,
    2. Vitticore P,
    3. De RJ,
    4. et al
    . Financial anatomy of neuroscience research. Ann Neurol 2006;60:652–659.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  4. 4.↵
    1. Moses H III.,
    2. Dorsey ER,
    3. Matheson DH,
    4. Thier SO
    . Financial anatomy of biomedical research. JAMA 2005;294:1333–1342.
    OpenUrlCrossRefPubMed
  5. 5.↵
    1. Stonier P,
    2. Honorio S,
    3. Lahon H
    . Pharmaceutical medicine history, global status, evolution and development. Int J Pharm Med 2007;21:253–262.
    OpenUrl
  6. 6.↵
    1. Griffin J
    1. Bews S,
    2. Jones H
    . The development of pharmaceutical medicine as a specialty in the UK. In: Griffin J, ed. The Textbook of Pharmaceutical Medicine. Singapore: Wiley-Blackwell; 2009:xii–xv.
  7. 7.↵
    IFAPP accredited postgraduate courses in pharmaceutical medicine. In: ifapp.org [online]. Available at: http://www.ifapp.org/home/education/courses/ifapp-accredited. Accessed March 20, 2012.
  8. 8.↵
    UCB fellowship in neurology and clinical drug development. In: UNC School of Pharmacy [online]. Available at: http://www.pharmacy.unc.edu/programs/fellowships/ucb-fellowship-in-neurology-and-clinical-drug-development. Accessed March 20, 2012.
  9. 9.↵
    UC San Diego Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences fellowship programs. In: UC San Diego Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences [online]. Available at: http://pharmacy.ucsd.edu/faculty/research/fellowship-program.shtml. Accessed March 20, 2012.
  10. 10.↵
    University of Rochester Medical Center neurology experimental therapeutics fellowship. In: University of Rochester Medical Center [online]. Available at: http://www.urmc.rochester.edu/neurology/training/experimental-therapeutics.cfm. Accessed March 20, 2012.
View Abstract

Letters: Rapid online correspondence

No comments have been published for this article.
Comment

REQUIREMENTS

If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org

Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.

If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.

Submission specifications:

  • Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
  • Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
  • Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
  • Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
  • Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.

More guidelines and information on Disputes & Debates

Compose Comment

More information about text formats

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Author Information
NOTE: The first author must also be the corresponding author of the comment.
First or given name, e.g. 'Peter'.
Your last, or family, name, e.g. 'MacMoody'.
Your email address, e.g. higgs-boson@gmail.com
Your role and/or occupation, e.g. 'Orthopedic Surgeon'.
Your organization or institution (if applicable), e.g. 'Royal Free Hospital'.
Publishing Agreement
NOTE: All authors, besides the first/corresponding author, must complete a separate Publishing Agreement Form and provide via email to the editorial office before comments can be posted.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.

Vertical Tabs

You May Also be Interested in

Back to top
  • Article
    • DISCUSSION
    • AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
    • STUDY FUNDING
    • DISCLOSURE
    • ACKNOWLEDGMENT
    • Footnotes
    • REFERENCES
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Disclosures
Advertisement

SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Safety in Guillain-Barré Syndrome, Chronic Inflammatory Demyelinating Polyneuropathy, and Multifocal Motor Neuropathy

Dr. Jeffrey Allen and Dr. Nicholas Purcell

► Watch

Related Articles

  • Warfarin treatment and thrombolysisHow to persuade procrastinators?
  • tPA and warfarinTime to move forward
  • Neighborhood socioeconomic status and stroke mortalityDisentangling individual and area effects
  • The border-land of epilepsy—Revisited
  • Diagnostic shifts in ALS?From clinical specter to imaging spectra
  • Biomarkers for PDHow can we approach complexity?
  • Whole-brain magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging measures are related to disability in ALS
  • Olfaction and imaging biomarkers in premotor LRRK2 G2019S-associated Parkinson disease

Topics Discussed

  • All Education
  • All Clinical trials
  • Other Education

Alert Me

  • Alert me when eletters are published

Recommended articles

  • Contemporary Issues
    Gene transfer for neurologic disease
    Agencies, policies, and process
    Jerry R. Mendell, Andra Miller et al.
    Neurology, December 28, 2004
  • Views & Reviews
    ALS drug development guidances and trial guidelines
    Consensus and opportunities for alignment
    Jinsy A. Andrews, Lucie I. Bruijn, Jeremy M. Shefner et al.
    Neurology, June 06, 2019
  • Article
    Considerations for development of therapies for cutaneous neurofibroma
    Sharad K. Verma, Vincent M. Riccardi, Scott R. Plotkin et al.
    Neurology, July 09, 2018
  • Views and Reviews
    The challenge of follow-on biologics for treatment of multiple sclerosis
    S. C. Reingold, J. P. Steiner, C. H. Polman et al.
    Neurology, August 17, 2009
Neurology: 100 (13)

Articles

  • Ahead of Print
  • Current Issue
  • Past Issues
  • Popular Articles
  • Translations

About

  • About the Journals
  • Ethics Policies
  • Editors & Editorial Board
  • Contact Us
  • Advertise

Submit

  • Author Center
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Information for Reviewers
  • AAN Guidelines
  • Permissions

Subscribers

  • Subscribe
  • Activate a Subscription
  • Sign up for eAlerts
  • RSS Feed
Site Logo
  • Visit neurology Template on Facebook
  • Follow neurology Template on Twitter
  • Visit Neurology on YouTube
  • Neurology
  • Neurology: Clinical Practice
  • Neurology: Education
  • Neurology: Genetics
  • Neurology: Neuroimmunology & Neuroinflammation
  • AAN.com
  • AANnews
  • Continuum
  • Brain & Life
  • Neurology Today

Wolters Kluwer Logo

Neurology | Print ISSN:0028-3878
Online ISSN:1526-632X

© 2023 American Academy of Neurology

  • Privacy Policy
  • Feedback
  • Advertise