This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Hospitals and physicians' practices are rapidly implementing the electronic health record (EHR) because it offers many demonstrated advantages over paper records. Issues of misuse of the EHR previously identified include breaches in confidentiality and privacy and inappropriate record sharing. I describe a separate set of ethical and quality problems of the EHR that result from its otherwise beneficial timesaving features that inadvertently enable carelessness and harmful shortcuts. These problems include copying and pasting data obtained from other clinicians, authorship ambiguities, inadvertent inclusion of unobtained data in templated notes, misleading history and physical examinations, failure to review prepopulated data, inadequate discharge summaries, impairments to patient–physician communication, and the transformation of the purpose of the medical record to billing documentation. I offer a brief analysis and recommendations to mitigate these problems.
GLOSSARY
- EHR=
- electronic health record
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the author, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
- Received September 17, 2012.
- Accepted October 30, 2012.
- © 2013 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence
- Re:Electronic health records-physician's friend or foe?
- Electronic health records-physician's friend or foe?
NOTE: All authors' disclosures must be entered and current in our database before comments can be posted. Enter and update disclosures at http://submit.neurology.org. Exception: replies to comments concerning an article you originally authored do not require updated disclosures.
- Stay timely. Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- 200 words maximum.
- 5 references maximum. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- 5 authors maximum. Exception: replies can include all original authors of the article.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.