Dejerine's reading area revisited with intracranial EEG
Selective responses to letter strings
Citation Manager Formats
Make Comment
See Comments

The visual word form area in the ventral occipitotemporal cortex develops with acquisition of reading skills. It is debated whether this region is specialized for reading1 or is rather a general-purpose area associating visual form (words, objects) with meaning. An outline of this debate can be found in appendix e-1 on the Neurology® Web site at www.neurology.org. We recorded intracranial EEG in 2 patients with epilepsy (figures 1, e-1, and e-2) and found neural populations responding almost exclusively to letter strings, over 500% of all other responses. With the exception of the fusiform face area, such specific responses have never been described before in the human visual system.2 Strong specialization in the human brain can thus be achieved also through cultural learning.
(A) Dejerine's drawing (1891)3 of the lesion in a patient “who suddenly observed that he could not read a single word, while he could write and speak quite well.” (B) Localization of the recording in patient P.M. (Talairach: −44x, −57y, −10z). (C) Mean broadband gamma response (50–150 Hz) to pronounceable pseudowords with a phonetic but no semantic dimension (e.g., “boutale”), unpronounceable consonant strings with no semantic or phonetic dimension (e.g., “qztvcw”), and other visual objects. We used pseudowords and consonant strings to minimize top-down lexical feedback that could arise for real words. (D) Trial-to-trial gamma power responses. Figure e-2 shows the T1 scan of one single patient's brain.
Footnotes
Supplemental data at www.neurology.org
Study funding: Supported by the Fondation pour la Recherche Medicale (FRM), BrainSync FP7 European Project (grant HEALTH-F2-2008-200728), and Agence Nationale de la Recherche OPENVIBE2 and MLA grants to J.R.V. and J.P.L. C.M.H. was supported by a Fyssen Fondation Postdoctoral Grant. M. Szwed was supported by a “Homing Plus” grant from the Foundation for Polish Science (2011-4/13) and a European Research Council Research grant (no. 230313).
Disclosure: The authors report no disclosures relevant to the manuscript. Go to Neurology.org for full disclosures.
- © 2013 American Academy of Neurology
References
Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence
REQUIREMENTS
If you are uploading a letter concerning an article:
You must have updated your disclosures within six months: http://submit.neurology.org
Your co-authors must send a completed Publishing Agreement Form to Neurology Staff (not necessary for the lead/corresponding author as the form below will suffice) before you upload your comment.
If you are responding to a comment that was written about an article you originally authored:
You (and co-authors) do not need to fill out forms or check disclosures as author forms are still valid
and apply to letter.
Submission specifications:
- Submissions must be < 200 words with < 5 references. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- Submissions should not have more than 5 authors. (Exception: original author replies can include all original authors of the article)
- Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.