This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.
Abstract
Objective: To employ a novel stimulation paradigm in order to elicit multifocal electroretinography (mfERG)–induced optic nerve head component (ONHC) responses, believed to be contingent upon the transformation in electrical transmission properties of retinal ganglion cell axons from membrane to saltatory conduction mechanisms, as they traverse the lamina cribrosa and obtain oligodendrocyte myelin. We further sought to characterize abnormalities in ONHC responses in eyes from patients with multiple sclerosis (MS).
Methods: In 10 normal subjects and 7 patients with MS (including eyes with and without a history of acute optic neuritis), we utilized a novel mfERG stimulation paradigm that included interleaved global flashes in order to elicit the ONHC responses from 103 retinal patches of pattern-reversal stimulation.
Results: The number of abnormal or absent ONHC responses was significantly increased in MS patient eyes compared to normal subject eyes (p < 0.001, by general estimating equation modeling, and accounting for age and within-subject, intereye correlations).
Conclusion: Studying the relationship between ONHC abnormalities and alterations in validated structural and functional measures of the visual system may facilitate the ability to dissect and characterize the pathobiological mechanisms that contribute to tissue damage in MS, and may have utility to detect and monitor neuroprotective or restorative effects of novel therapies.
GLOSSARY
- AON=
- acute optic neuritis;
- ERG=
- electroretinography;
- GEE=
- generalized estimating equation;
- mfERG=
- multifocal electroretinography;
- mfVEP=
- multifocal visual evoked potential;
- MS=
- multiple sclerosis;
- ONHC=
- optic nerve head component;
- RGC=
- retinal ganglion cell
Footnotes
Go to Neurology.org for full disclosures. Funding information and disclosures deemed relevant by the authors, if any, are provided at the end of the article.
Editorial, page 518
- Received January 6, 2013.
- Accepted in final form April 4, 2013.
- © 2013 American Academy of Neurology
AAN Members
We have changed the login procedure to improve access between AAN.com and the Neurology journals. If you are experiencing issues, please log out of AAN.com and clear history and cookies. (For instructions by browser, please click the instruction pages below). After clearing, choose preferred Journal and select login for AAN Members. You will be redirected to a login page where you can log in with your AAN ID number and password. When you are returned to the Journal, your name should appear at the top right of the page.
AAN Non-Member Subscribers
Purchase access
Disputes & Debates: Rapid online correspondence
NOTE: All authors' disclosures must be entered and current in our database before comments can be posted. Enter and update disclosures at http://submit.neurology.org. Exception: replies to comments concerning an article you originally authored do not require updated disclosures.
- Stay timely. Submit only on articles published within 6 months of issue date.
- Do not be redundant. Read any comments already posted on the article prior to submission.
- 200 words maximum.
- 5 references maximum. Reference 1 must be the article on which you are commenting.
- 5 authors maximum. Exception: replies can include all original authors of the article.
- Submitted comments are subject to editing and editor review prior to posting.